| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 37 | |
| 25. |  | AVILA, A. F. D.; MAGALHÃES, M. C.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; IRIAS, L. J. M.; RODRIGUES, G. S. Impactos econômicos, sociais e ambientais dos investimentos na Embrapa. Revista de Política Agrícola, Brasília, DF, ano 14, n. 4, p. 86-101, out./dez. 2005.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|    |
| 26. | | VEDOVOTO, G. L.; MARQUES, D. V.; AVILA, A. F. D.; SOUZA, M. O. de; RIBEIRO, L. F. M. Avaliação de impactos sobre o conhecimento, capacitação e político-institucional da pesquisa gerada pela Embrapa. In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ECONOMIA, ADMINISTRAÇÃO E SOCIOLOGIA RURAL, 46., 2008, Rio Branco, AC. [Anais...]. Rio Branco, AC: SOBER, 2008.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|  |
| 27. | | VEDOVOTO, G. L.; MARQUES, D. V.; SOUZA, M. O. de; AVILA, A. F. D.; RIBEIRO, L. F. M. Avaliação multidimensional dos impactos de inovações tecnológicas: o caso da Embrapa. In: CONGRESSO ABIPTI: OS DESNÍVEIS REGIONAIS E A INOVAÇÃO NO BRASIL: os desafios para as instituições de pesquisa tecnológica, 2008, Campina Grande, PB. [Anais...] Campina Grande, PB, 2008.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 30. | | MANOS, M. G. L.; GALVAO, D. M. de O.; ALMEIDA, M. J. de O.; MORAIS, L. C. de; BARROSO NETO, J.; VEDOVOTO, G. L. Avaliação de aceitação do flocão de milho biofortificado em áreas de atuação da rede Biofort no Nordeste brasileiro. In: REUNIÃO DE BIOFORTIFICAÇÃO NO BRASIL, 5., 2015, São Paulo. Anais... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. p. 233-237.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 31. | | MANOS, M. G. L.; GALVAO, D. M. de O.; ALMEIDA, M. J. de O.; MORAIS, L. C. de; BARROSO NETO, J.; VEDOVOTO, G. L. Avaliação de aceitação do flocão de milho biofortificado em áreas de atuação da rede Biofort no Nordeste brasileiro. In: REUNIÃO DE BIOFORTIFICAÇÃO NO BRASIL, 5., 2015, São Paulo. Anais... Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. p. 233-237.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
| |
| 33. | | MAGALHÃES, M. C.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; IRIAS, L. J. M.; VIEIRA, R. de C. M. T.; ÁVILA, A. F. D. (ed.). Avaliação dos impactos da pesquisa da Embrapa: uma amostra de 12 tecnologias. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica: Embrapa. Secretaria de Gestão e Estratégia, 2006. 243 p. (Embrapa-Secretaria de Gestão e Estratégia. Documentos, 13). Autores: Ademir Francisco Girotto, Adriana Marlene Moreno Pires, Adriano Lincoln Albuquerque Mattos, Airton Manzano, Alcido Elenor Wander, Anna Cristina Lanna, Antonio Flavio Dias Ávila, Antonio Souza do Nascimento, Artur Chinelato de...| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Agroenergia; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Cocais; Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Gado de Corte; Embrapa Gado de Leite; Embrapa Hortaliças; Embrapa Instrumentação; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Pantanal; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Rondônia; Embrapa Roraima; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Solos; Embrapa Solos / UEP-Recife; Embrapa Suínos e Aves; Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros; Embrapa Unidades Centrais; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. MenosEmbrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Agroenergia; Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Algodão; Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Cerrados... Mostrar Todas |
| |
| 34. | | VEDOVOTO, G. L.; ALMEIDA, M. J. de O.; FREITAS NETO, M. de A.; GAZZOLA, R.; AVILA, A. F. D.; GERHARDT, I. V. Linha de base para avaliação de impactos de variedades biofortificadas: produção e autoconsumo de alimentos no Piauí. In: REUNIÃO DE BIOFORTIFICAÇÃO NO BRASIL, 5., 2015, São Paulo. [Anais...]. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. Organização Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. Editora técnica: Marília Regini Nutti| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 35. | | NUTTI, M. R.; CARVALHO, J. L. V. de; ALMEIDA, M. J. de O.; ABREU, G. B.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; GUIMARAES, P. E. de O. El progreso de las acciones de biofortificación en Brasil. In: REUNIÓN ANUAL PROGRAMA COOPERATIVO CENTROAMERICANO PARA EL MEJORAMIENTO DE CULTIVOS Y ANIMALES, 62., 2017, El Salvador. Trabajos. El Salvador: [s.n.], 2017. 1 p. PCCMCA.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 36. | | NUTTI, M. R.; CARVALHO, J. L. V. de; ALMEIDA, M. J. de O.; ABREU, G. B.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; GUIMARAES, P. E. de O. El progreso de las acciones de biofortificación en Brasil. In: REUNIÓN ANUAL PROGRAMA COOPERATIVO CENTROAMERICANO PARA EL MEJORAMIENTO DE CULTIVOS Y ANIMALES, 62., 2017, El Salvador. Trabajos. El Salvador: [s.n.], 2017. 1 p. PCCMCA.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos; Embrapa Meio-Norte. |
|  |
| 37. | | FERRE, M.; GOMEZ, M. M. R. G.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; CANTO, G. B.; CHOCANTA, B. E. A.; MARQUES, D. V.; RODRÍGUEZ-BORRAY, G.-A.; SOUZA, M. O. de; URRIAGO, A. R. V.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; SÁNCHEZ-LOZANO, J.-I.; ZAMBRANO-MORENO, G.-S.; ARIAS, M. A. L.; ZAPATA-TAMAYO, C.-A.; GOULET, F.; PROIETTI, C.; ROMÉMONT, A. de. Culture of impact in agricultural research organizations: what for and how? insights from a cross-analysis of Cirad, Embrapa, and Agrosavia institutes In: Eu-SPRI Annual Conference 2023: research with impact, 15th June 2023. p. 258-259.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 37 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
12/02/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
16/02/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
AVILA, A. F. D.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; PENTEADO FILHO, R. de C.; FONSECA JUNIOR, W. C. da. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANTONIO FLAVIO DIAS AVILA, SGE; GERALDO STACHETTI RODRIGUES, CNPMA; GRACIELA LUZIA VEDOVOTO, SGE; ROBERTO DE CAMARGO PENTEADO FILHO, SGE; WILSON CORREA DA FONSECA JUNIOR, SECOM. |
|
Título: |
EMBRAPA experience on impact of agricultural R&D: a yearly institutional system. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: IMPAR CONFERENCE, 2015, Paris. Impacts of agricultural research ? towards an approach of societal values: book of abstracts... Paris: INRA, 2015. |
|
Páginas: |
13 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation ? Embrapa has developed and has been using for 15 years an institutionalized impact assessment (IA) system based in a common multidimensional approach estimating economic, social, environmental, political and scientific impacts of its main technologies. Since 2001, Embrapa is monitoring and evaluating more than one hundred technologies and around 200 cultivars generated by its 41 research centers. This system is coordinated at national level, where an impact assessment team is responsible for the methodological support, analysis and consolidation of the main impacts. The multidimensional results of this process are been released through an annual official publication named ?Embrapa Social Report?. The impact studies include the estimation of economic surplus generated by Embrapa technologies based on field data collected by a national survey (cultivars) and for local/regional surveys in case of the other technologies. Internal rates of return (IRR) are estimated using benefits and costs data. To evaluate social and environmental impacts each research center interviews a sample of technology adopters to measure their perception on the impacts of Embrapa innovations. This method, named Ambitec-Agro, estimates multiple indices evaluating positive and negative impacts for a set of criteria and indicators. Other impact categories that recently are being measured include Embrapa contributions to the formulation of public policies and also its impact to scientific development, measured by the publication of articles on refereed journals, citations and establishment of R&D networks. It is important to stress that the development of econometric and other kinds of impact assessment studies continues to be a priority. Complementing this process, always that an external point of view is required, national and international consultants are mobilized to perform specific IA studies involving R&D areas, such as genetic breeding and climate change. Concerning new challenges, new areas of impact assessment are being examined such as ex-ante impacts of R&D projects, socioeconomic and environmental impacts of public policies supported by Embrapa, measurement of intangibles, balance of positive and negative externalities, impact on values of agricultural assets and, development of studies oriented to evaluate the impact of Embrapa Strategic Plan for 2015/34. This continuous system of impact assessment has been extremely important for Embrapa institutional sustainability, helping the institution to overcome several economic crises. Certainly, the strong support received by the corporation from Brazilian society is largely due to the credibility of this system, oriented to demonstrate and measure the adoption/introduction of new technologies and their impacts, not only the traditional annual R&D reports based on the description of agricultural research output. MenosThe Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation ? Embrapa has developed and has been using for 15 years an institutionalized impact assessment (IA) system based in a common multidimensional approach estimating economic, social, environmental, political and scientific impacts of its main technologies. Since 2001, Embrapa is monitoring and evaluating more than one hundred technologies and around 200 cultivars generated by its 41 research centers. This system is coordinated at national level, where an impact assessment team is responsible for the methodological support, analysis and consolidation of the main impacts. The multidimensional results of this process are been released through an annual official publication named ?Embrapa Social Report?. The impact studies include the estimation of economic surplus generated by Embrapa technologies based on field data collected by a national survey (cultivars) and for local/regional surveys in case of the other technologies. Internal rates of return (IRR) are estimated using benefits and costs data. To evaluate social and environmental impacts each research center interviews a sample of technology adopters to measure their perception on the impacts of Embrapa innovations. This method, named Ambitec-Agro, estimates multiple indices evaluating positive and negative impacts for a set of criteria and indicators. Other impact categories that recently are being measured include Embrapa contributions to the formulation of public policies and... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Avaliação de impacto; Pesquisa agropecuária. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
B Sociologia Rural |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/139073/1/2015RA-077.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03637nam a2200193 a 4500
001 2036765
005 2016-02-16
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aAVILA, A. F. D.
245 $aEMBRAPA experience on impact of agricultural R&D$ba yearly institutional system.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: IMPAR CONFERENCE, 2015, Paris. Impacts of agricultural research ? towards an approach of societal values: book of abstracts... Paris: INRA$c2015
300 $a13
520 $aThe Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation ? Embrapa has developed and has been using for 15 years an institutionalized impact assessment (IA) system based in a common multidimensional approach estimating economic, social, environmental, political and scientific impacts of its main technologies. Since 2001, Embrapa is monitoring and evaluating more than one hundred technologies and around 200 cultivars generated by its 41 research centers. This system is coordinated at national level, where an impact assessment team is responsible for the methodological support, analysis and consolidation of the main impacts. The multidimensional results of this process are been released through an annual official publication named ?Embrapa Social Report?. The impact studies include the estimation of economic surplus generated by Embrapa technologies based on field data collected by a national survey (cultivars) and for local/regional surveys in case of the other technologies. Internal rates of return (IRR) are estimated using benefits and costs data. To evaluate social and environmental impacts each research center interviews a sample of technology adopters to measure their perception on the impacts of Embrapa innovations. This method, named Ambitec-Agro, estimates multiple indices evaluating positive and negative impacts for a set of criteria and indicators. Other impact categories that recently are being measured include Embrapa contributions to the formulation of public policies and also its impact to scientific development, measured by the publication of articles on refereed journals, citations and establishment of R&D networks. It is important to stress that the development of econometric and other kinds of impact assessment studies continues to be a priority. Complementing this process, always that an external point of view is required, national and international consultants are mobilized to perform specific IA studies involving R&D areas, such as genetic breeding and climate change. Concerning new challenges, new areas of impact assessment are being examined such as ex-ante impacts of R&D projects, socioeconomic and environmental impacts of public policies supported by Embrapa, measurement of intangibles, balance of positive and negative externalities, impact on values of agricultural assets and, development of studies oriented to evaluate the impact of Embrapa Strategic Plan for 2015/34. This continuous system of impact assessment has been extremely important for Embrapa institutional sustainability, helping the institution to overcome several economic crises. Certainly, the strong support received by the corporation from Brazilian society is largely due to the credibility of this system, oriented to demonstrate and measure the adoption/introduction of new technologies and their impacts, not only the traditional annual R&D reports based on the description of agricultural research output.
653 $aAvaliação de impacto
653 $aPesquisa agropecuária
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, G. S.
700 1 $aVEDOVOTO, G. L.
700 1 $aPENTEADO FILHO, R. de C.
700 1 $aFONSECA JUNIOR, W. C. da
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
