|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
Data corrente: |
05/12/1996 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/07/2007 |
Autoria: |
MARQUES, D. |
Título: |
Manual do incubador. |
Ano de publicação: |
1986 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Sao Paulo: CASP, 1986. |
Páginas: |
214p. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
Pessoal do incubatorio; Do ovo ao pinto; Controle sanitario em incubacao; Fumigacao por formol; Renovacao de ar; Agua; Energia eletrica; Ar comprimido; Vapor e agua quente; Nutricao e seus efeitos na incubacao; A escolha de uma incubadora. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Ave; Controle sanitario; Egg; Incubation; Management; Sanitary control. |
Thesagro: |
Incubação; Manejo; Ovo. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
poultry. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 00760nam a2200241 a 4500 001 1431803 005 2007-07-09 008 1986 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d 100 1 $aMARQUES, D. 245 $aManual do incubador. 260 $aSao Paulo: CASP$c1986 300 $a214p. 520 $aPessoal do incubatorio; Do ovo ao pinto; Controle sanitario em incubacao; Fumigacao por formol; Renovacao de ar; Agua; Energia eletrica; Ar comprimido; Vapor e agua quente; Nutricao e seus efeitos na incubacao; A escolha de uma incubadora. 650 $apoultry 650 $aIncubação 650 $aManejo 650 $aOvo 653 $aAve 653 $aControle sanitario 653 $aEgg 653 $aIncubation 653 $aManagement 653 $aSanitary control
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cppse.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
Data corrente: |
17/07/2003 |
Data da última atualização: |
28/06/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
Internacional - A |
Autoria: |
BRITO, L. F. C.; SILVA, A. E. D. F.; BARBOSA, R. T.; UNANIAN, M. M.; KASTELIC, J. P. |
Afiliação: |
LEONARDO F. C. BRITO; ANTONIO EMIDIO DIAS FELICIANO SILVA, CPPSE, SÃO CARLOS, SP.; ROGERIO TAVEIRA BARBOSA, CPPSE; MARIA MARINA UNANIAN, CPPSE, SÃO CARLOS, SP.; JOHN P. KASTELIC. |
Título: |
Effects of scrotal insulation on sperm production semen quality and testicular echotexture in bos indicus and Bos indicus x Bos taurus bulls. |
Ano de publicação: |
2003 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Animal Reproduction Science, v. 79, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2003. |
DOI: |
10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00082-4 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the effects of scrotal insulation on sperm production, semen quality, and testicular echotexture in Bos indicus and Bos indicus × Bos taurus crossbred bulls. In one experiment, B. indicus bulls (n=12) were allocated to control and whole-scrotum insulation groups, while in a second experiment, crossbred bulls (n=21) were allocated into control, whole-scrotum, and scrotal-neck insulation groups. Insulation was applied for 4 days (start of insulation = Day 0) and semen collection and testicular ultrasonographic examinations were performed twice weekly until Day 35. Sperm concentration and total sperm output during the post-insulation period were greater in control groups, but significant differences were observed only in B. indicus bulls. Overall, sperm motility in scrotal-insulated B. indicus bulls was lower (P<0.05) than in the control group. After whole-scrotum insulation in crossbred bulls, sperm motility was lower (P<0.05) than pre-insulation levels between Days 21 and 31, and lower than control levels on Day 24. The proportion of normal sperm after whole-scrotum insulation was lower than pre-insulation and control values from Day 11 to the end of the experiment in B. indicus bulls (P<0.05 from Days 14 to 21 and on Day 27), and from Days 14 to 25 in crossbred bulls (P<0.05 on Days 14 and 18). Insulation of the scrotal neck in crossbred bulls did not significantly affect semen quality. Loose sperm heads (Day 11), midpiece defects (Days 11 and 14), and acrosome defects (Days 27 and 31) increased (P<0.05) in insulated B. indicus bulls, while proximal cytoplasmic droplets (Days 14, 18 and 27 in B. indicus; Days 24 and 27 in crossbred bulls) and sperm vacuoles (Days 18 and 21 in B. indicus; Day 18 in crossbred bulls) increased (P<0.05) in whole-scrotum insulation groups in both experiments. There was considerable variation among bulls in the incidence of specific sperm defects. The timing of appearance of sperm defects after insulation provided insights into the pathogenesis of specific abnormalities. Neither whole-scrotum nor scrotal-neck insulation affected testicular echotexture in either experiment. In conclusion, whole-scrotum insulation resulted in decreased sperm production and semen quality in B. indicus and B. indicus × B. taurus bulls, but those changes were not associated with changes in testicular echotexture. MenosThe objectives of the present study were to evaluate the effects of scrotal insulation on sperm production, semen quality, and testicular echotexture in Bos indicus and Bos indicus × Bos taurus crossbred bulls. In one experiment, B. indicus bulls (n=12) were allocated to control and whole-scrotum insulation groups, while in a second experiment, crossbred bulls (n=21) were allocated into control, whole-scrotum, and scrotal-neck insulation groups. Insulation was applied for 4 days (start of insulation = Day 0) and semen collection and testicular ultrasonographic examinations were performed twice weekly until Day 35. Sperm concentration and total sperm output during the post-insulation period were greater in control groups, but significant differences were observed only in B. indicus bulls. Overall, sperm motility in scrotal-insulated B. indicus bulls was lower (P<0.05) than in the control group. After whole-scrotum insulation in crossbred bulls, sperm motility was lower (P<0.05) than pre-insulation levels between Days 21 and 31, and lower than control levels on Day 24. The proportion of normal sperm after whole-scrotum insulation was lower than pre-insulation and control values from Day 11 to the end of the experiment in B. indicus bulls (P<0.05 from Days 14 to 21 and on Day 27), and from Days 14 to 25 in crossbred bulls (P<0.05 on Days 14 and 18). Insulation of the scrotal neck in crossbred bulls did not significantly affect semen quality. Loose sperm heads (Day 11), midpiece... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Bull; Scrotal insulation; Sperm; Ultrasound. |
Thesagro: |
Sêmen. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
Marc: |
LEADER 03181naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1046442 005 2023-06-28 008 2003 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/S0378-4320(03)00082-4$2DOI 100 1 $aBRITO, L. F. C. 245 $aEffects of scrotal insulation on sperm production semen quality and testicular echotexture in bos indicus and Bos indicus x Bos taurus bulls.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2003 520 $aThe objectives of the present study were to evaluate the effects of scrotal insulation on sperm production, semen quality, and testicular echotexture in Bos indicus and Bos indicus × Bos taurus crossbred bulls. In one experiment, B. indicus bulls (n=12) were allocated to control and whole-scrotum insulation groups, while in a second experiment, crossbred bulls (n=21) were allocated into control, whole-scrotum, and scrotal-neck insulation groups. Insulation was applied for 4 days (start of insulation = Day 0) and semen collection and testicular ultrasonographic examinations were performed twice weekly until Day 35. Sperm concentration and total sperm output during the post-insulation period were greater in control groups, but significant differences were observed only in B. indicus bulls. Overall, sperm motility in scrotal-insulated B. indicus bulls was lower (P<0.05) than in the control group. After whole-scrotum insulation in crossbred bulls, sperm motility was lower (P<0.05) than pre-insulation levels between Days 21 and 31, and lower than control levels on Day 24. The proportion of normal sperm after whole-scrotum insulation was lower than pre-insulation and control values from Day 11 to the end of the experiment in B. indicus bulls (P<0.05 from Days 14 to 21 and on Day 27), and from Days 14 to 25 in crossbred bulls (P<0.05 on Days 14 and 18). Insulation of the scrotal neck in crossbred bulls did not significantly affect semen quality. Loose sperm heads (Day 11), midpiece defects (Days 11 and 14), and acrosome defects (Days 27 and 31) increased (P<0.05) in insulated B. indicus bulls, while proximal cytoplasmic droplets (Days 14, 18 and 27 in B. indicus; Days 24 and 27 in crossbred bulls) and sperm vacuoles (Days 18 and 21 in B. indicus; Day 18 in crossbred bulls) increased (P<0.05) in whole-scrotum insulation groups in both experiments. There was considerable variation among bulls in the incidence of specific sperm defects. The timing of appearance of sperm defects after insulation provided insights into the pathogenesis of specific abnormalities. Neither whole-scrotum nor scrotal-neck insulation affected testicular echotexture in either experiment. In conclusion, whole-scrotum insulation resulted in decreased sperm production and semen quality in B. indicus and B. indicus × B. taurus bulls, but those changes were not associated with changes in testicular echotexture. 650 $aSêmen 653 $aBull 653 $aScrotal insulation 653 $aSperm 653 $aUltrasound 700 1 $aSILVA, A. E. D. F. 700 1 $aBARBOSA, R. T. 700 1 $aUNANIAN, M. M. 700 1 $aKASTELIC, J. P. 773 $tAnimal Reproduction Science$gv. 79, n. 1, p. 1-15, 2003.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|