Data/hora: 07/06/2024 00:56:34

Biblioteca(s): | Embrapa Acre.
Data corrente: | 17/02/2020
Data da última atualização: | 02/07/2021
Autoria: | MATUK, F. A.; BEHAGEL, J. H.; SIMAS, F. N. B.; AMARAL, E. F. do; HAVERROTH, M.; TURNHOUT, E.
Afiliação: | Fernanda Ayaviri Matuk, Wageningen University / Federal Institute of Minas Gerais; Jelle Hendrik Behagel, Wageningen University; Felipe Nogueira Bello Simas, Federal University of Viçosa; EUFRAN FERREIRA DO AMARAL, CPAF-AC; MOACIR HAVERROTH, CPAF-AC; Esther Turnhout, Wageningen University.
Título: | Including diverse knowledges and worldviews in environmental assessment and planning: the Brazilian Amazon Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land case.
Ano de publicação: | 2020
Fonte/Imprenta: | Ecosystems and People, v. 16, n. 1, p. 95-113, 2020.
ISSN: | 2639-5916
DOI: | 10.1080/26395916.2020.1722752
Idioma: | Inglês
Conteúdo: | The concepts of 'ecosystem services' (ES) and 'nature's contributions to people' (NCP) inform environmental frameworks that set out to include Indigenous and Local Knowledge systems (ILK) and worldviews in policy and planning processes. These frameworks aim to enhance biodiversity conservation and human well-being in a legitimate and effective way. In this article, we explore how the concept of People's Contributions to Nature (PCN) is complementary to NCP. We use it to investigate challenges that planners and locals face in realizing the legitimate inclusion of diverse knowledges and worldviwes that account for people and ecosystems in a relational way. We introduce a case study where planners drew on ES and NCP and used participatory methods to implement a REDD+ policy in the Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land (Acre-Brazil). We find that both Kaxinawás and planners emphasize both NCP and PCN in their discourses. Nevertheless, differences between knowledge systems and disciplines, uneven power relations between Kaxinawás and planners, and an underconsideration of PCN by global frameworks challenge the legitimate inclusion of the Kaxinawá knowlege and worldviews to craft assessment and planning. We conclude that by explicitly addressing these challenges, science-policy interfaces can further advance knowledge legitimacy and policy effectiveness.
Palavras-Chave: | Abordagem participativa; Acre; Amazonia Occidental; Amazônia Ocidental; Conhecimento tradicional; Conocimiento tradicional; Contribuições das pessoas para a natureza; Gestión participativa; People's contributions to nature (PCN); Povos indígenas; Pueblos indígenas; Servicios ecosistémicos; Serviços ecossistêmicos; Terra Indígena Kaxinawá de Nova Olinda (TIKNO); Western Amazon.
Thesaurus Nal: | Ecosystem services; Indigenous knowledge; Indigenous peoples; Participatory management.
Categoria do assunto: | P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra
URL: | http://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/210896/1/26972.pdf
Registro original: | Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC)
Exemplares: | CPAF-AC - (26972-1) - UPC - AP - DD -  -  -  - DIS