| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 218 | |
| 90. |  | YAZDANPANAH, M.; MOGHADAM, M. T.; ZOBEIDI, T.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; EUFEMIA, L.; SIEBER, S. What factors contribute to conversion to organic farming? Consideration of the Health Belief Model in relation to the uptake of organic farming by Iranian farmers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, v. 65, n. 5, p. 907-929, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
|    |
| 91. | | MACÁRIO, C. G. do N.; SCHULER, A. E.; PRADO, R. B.; FIDALGO, E. C. C.; TURETTA, A. P. D. PSA Hidrico Web: um sistema de apoio a programas de pagamento para serviços ambientais hídricos no Brasil. In: SIMPÓSIO DE GEOTECNOLOGIAS NO PANTANAL, 6., 2016, Cuiabá. Anais... São José dos Campos: INPE; Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2016. p. 501-511. 1 CD-ROM. GeoPantanal 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Solos. |
|  |
| 92. | | ARAUJO, J. B. C.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; ANDRADE, A. G. de; PIMENTEL, J. C. M.; ANDRADE, F. G. de. Adoção de tecnologia, agricultura familiar e agroecologia para o desenvolvimento sustentável da região do semi-árido, Caucaia-CE. In: CONGRESSO CEARENSE DE AGROECOLOGIA, 2., 2010, Juazeiro do Norte. Anais... Juazeiro do Norte: Universidade Federal do Ceará, 2010. CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroindústria Tropical. |
| |
| 98. | | MITSUYA, R. T.; SCHULER, A. E.; GONCALVES, A. O.; PRADO, R. B.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; DONAGEMMA, G. K. Dados de entrada e configuração do SWAT na microbacia do Córrego Pito Aceso, RJ. In: SEMINÁRIO DA REDE AGROHIDRO, 3.; WORKSHOP DO PROJETO OS IMPACTOS DA AGRICULTURA E DAS MUDANÇAS CLIMÁTICAS NOS RECURSOS HÍDRICOS, 1., 2015, Corumbá. Água na agricultura: desafios frente às mudanças climáticas e de uso da terra: resumos. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2015. p. 31.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 100. | | TURETTA, A. P. D.; PRADO, R. B.; FIDALGO, E. C. C.; SCHULER, A. E.; COUTINHO, H. L. da C. Seleção de indicadores para o monitoramento de PSA hídricos. In: FIDALGO, E. C. C.; PRADO, R. B.; TURETTA, A. P. D.; SCHULER, A. E. (Ed.). Manual para pagamento por serviços ambientais hídricos: seleção de áreas e monitoramento. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2017. cap. 3, p. 50-57.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 218 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Solos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnps.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/11/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
01/12/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
MELLONI; TURETTA, A. P. D.; LÖHR, K.; BONATTI, M.; SIEBER, S. |
|
Afiliação: |
GIACOMO MELLONI, UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT; ANA PAULA DIAS TURETTA, CNPS; KATHARINA LÖHR, LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH; MICHELLE BONATTI, LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH; STEFAN SIEBER, LEIBNIZ CENTRE FOR AGRICULTURAL LANDSCAPE RESEARCH. |
|
Título: |
A theoretical framework to address multi-level governance challenges of the water-energy-food nexus. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: BROUWER, F. (ed.). Handbook on the water-energy-food nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022. cap. 19, p. 346-363. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100550.00027 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
We create a framework of indicators following the structure of the ex ante sustainability impact assessment tool ScalA (Löhr and Sieber, 2020; Löhr et al., 2022) to highlight the gaps in the multi-level governance system, distinguishing (1) accountability gaps, (2) administra - tive gaps, (3) policy gaps, (4) capacity gaps and (5) data and information gaps. We suggest a list of 43 indicators to assist decision makers in assessing the set-up of a governance system to implement the nexus approach. The framework can help researchers to address ex ante nexus governance challenges by understanding the issues and actors involved, disentangle relations and power distribution in a specific context and ultimately work through existing arrangements to efficiently and effectively integrate issues and coordinate activities engaging with stakeholders and building trust (Stein et al., 2014). While acknowledging that the frame- work cannot be considered exhaustive or conclusive, given the magnitude and novelty of the topic, we believe that it can be useful for a future better understanding and development of a mechanism to address the challenges of nexus governance. Our study also puts forward the problematization of nexus governance by breaking it down in specific gaps, each of which may require the application of existing practices, benefitting therefore from further contribution of experts in different fields such as capacity building, stakeholder engagement, monitoring and more. We claim that the adoption of the framework can help researchers and policy makers to consider and address the issues of governance and ultimately break down siloes in natural resource management and prevent science-to-policy gaps in the nexus literature. MenosWe create a framework of indicators following the structure of the ex ante sustainability impact assessment tool ScalA (Löhr and Sieber, 2020; Löhr et al., 2022) to highlight the gaps in the multi-level governance system, distinguishing (1) accountability gaps, (2) administra - tive gaps, (3) policy gaps, (4) capacity gaps and (5) data and information gaps. We suggest a list of 43 indicators to assist decision makers in assessing the set-up of a governance system to implement the nexus approach. The framework can help researchers to address ex ante nexus governance challenges by understanding the issues and actors involved, disentangle relations and power distribution in a specific context and ultimately work through existing arrangements to efficiently and effectively integrate issues and coordinate activities engaging with stakeholders and building trust (Stein et al., 2014). While acknowledging that the frame- work cannot be considered exhaustive or conclusive, given the magnitude and novelty of the topic, we believe that it can be useful for a future better understanding and development of a mechanism to address the challenges of nexus governance. Our study also puts forward the problematization of nexus governance by breaking it down in specific gaps, each of which may require the application of existing practices, benefitting therefore from further contribution of experts in different fields such as capacity building, stakeholder engagement, monitoring and more. We cla... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Água; Alimento; Energia; Políticas Públicas. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Energy; Foods; Public policy; Water. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02603naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2148339
005 2022-12-01
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.4337/9781839100550.00027$2DOI
100 1 $aMELLONI
245 $aA theoretical framework to address multi-level governance challenges of the water-energy-food nexus.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aWe create a framework of indicators following the structure of the ex ante sustainability impact assessment tool ScalA (Löhr and Sieber, 2020; Löhr et al., 2022) to highlight the gaps in the multi-level governance system, distinguishing (1) accountability gaps, (2) administra - tive gaps, (3) policy gaps, (4) capacity gaps and (5) data and information gaps. We suggest a list of 43 indicators to assist decision makers in assessing the set-up of a governance system to implement the nexus approach. The framework can help researchers to address ex ante nexus governance challenges by understanding the issues and actors involved, disentangle relations and power distribution in a specific context and ultimately work through existing arrangements to efficiently and effectively integrate issues and coordinate activities engaging with stakeholders and building trust (Stein et al., 2014). While acknowledging that the frame- work cannot be considered exhaustive or conclusive, given the magnitude and novelty of the topic, we believe that it can be useful for a future better understanding and development of a mechanism to address the challenges of nexus governance. Our study also puts forward the problematization of nexus governance by breaking it down in specific gaps, each of which may require the application of existing practices, benefitting therefore from further contribution of experts in different fields such as capacity building, stakeholder engagement, monitoring and more. We claim that the adoption of the framework can help researchers and policy makers to consider and address the issues of governance and ultimately break down siloes in natural resource management and prevent science-to-policy gaps in the nexus literature.
650 $aEnergy
650 $aFoods
650 $aPublic policy
650 $aWater
650 $aÁgua
650 $aAlimento
650 $aEnergia
650 $aPolíticas Públicas
700 1 $aTURETTA, A. P. D.
700 1 $aLÖHR, K.
700 1 $aBONATTI, M.
700 1 $aSIEBER, S.
773 $tIn: BROUWER, F. (ed.). Handbook on the water-energy-food nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2022. cap. 19, p. 346-363.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
