| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Cerrados. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpac.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/06/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/06/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, A. F. de; MENEZES, G. L.; GONÇALVES, L. C.; ARAÚJO, V. E. de; RAMIREZ, M. A.; GUIMARAES JUNIOR, R.; JAYME, D. G.; LANA, A. M. Q. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALAN FIGUEIREDO DE OLIVEIRA; GUILHERME LOBATO MENEZES; LÚCIO CARLOS GONÇALVES; VANIA ELOISA DE ARAÚJO; MATHEUS ANCHIETA RAMIREZ; ROBERTO GUIMARAES JUNIOR, CPAC; DIOGO GONZAGA JAYME; ANGELA MARIA QUINTÃO LANA. |
|
Título: |
Pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems with Eucalyptus and Urochloa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Livestock Science, v. 262, 104973, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
15 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT This study evaluated pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems (SPSs) with Eucalyptus spp. and Urochloa spp. through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic searches of databases, scientific journals and references of selected articles found 2,639 articles, of which 29 (120 comparisons) were selected. Comparisons were classified according to the covariates of distance between tree rows, number of trees/ha, tree planting orientation, system age and forage type. Data were submitted to meta-regression followed by subgroup analysis for covariates with a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the response. Data were analyzed in random effects models using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05). Forage mass (FM) was greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha and lower for the other groups, compared to that for grass monoculture. Forage accumulation (FA) was also greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, but lower for SPSs with more than 300 trees/ha, compared to that for grass monoculture. FM was lower for SPSs of all spacings between tree rows and planting orientations, compared to that for grass monoculture, with the lowest being with smaller spacing and with northsouth planting orientation. FA was lower for SPSs with up to 28m between tree rows, compared to that for grass monoculture, while that for SPSs with more than 28m did not differ. Neutral detergent fiber concentration was lower and crude protein greater for SPSs compared to grass monoculture, while lignin was greater and in vitro dry matter digestibility did not differ, which indicated no significant improvement in nutritive value in SPSs. Average daily gain was greater in SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, and lower in those with more than 400 trees/ha, than in grass monoculture, with other subgroups not differing. Total weight gain per area (GHA) was lower in SPSs with less than 28m between tree rows or with more than 199 trees/ha, but greater in SPSs with more than 28m or with up to 99 trees/ha, compared to grass monoculture. GHA was lower in SPSs with a north-south orientation compared to grass monoculture, but those with an east-west orientation did not differ. The use of U. brizantha cv. Marandu and an east-west planting orientation are efficient strategies in maintaining FM, FA and GHA. GHA was greater in SPSs with more than 28m between tree rows and with up to 99 trees/ha, than in grass monoculture, which may facilitate the implementation of these SPSs in commercial farms. MenosABSTRACT This study evaluated pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems (SPSs) with Eucalyptus spp. and Urochloa spp. through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic searches of databases, scientific journals and references of selected articles found 2,639 articles, of which 29 (120 comparisons) were selected. Comparisons were classified according to the covariates of distance between tree rows, number of trees/ha, tree planting orientation, system age and forage type. Data were submitted to meta-regression followed by subgroup analysis for covariates with a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the response. Data were analyzed in random effects models using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05). Forage mass (FM) was greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha and lower for the other groups, compared to that for grass monoculture. Forage accumulation (FA) was also greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, but lower for SPSs with more than 300 trees/ha, compared to that for grass monoculture. FM was lower for SPSs of all spacings between tree rows and planting orientations, compared to that for grass monoculture, with the lowest being with smaller spacing and with northsouth planting orientation. FA was lower for SPSs with up to 28m between tree rows, compared to that for grass monoculture, while that for SPSs with more than 28m did not differ. Neutral detergent fiber concentration was lower and crude protein greater for SPSs compared to ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Bovinocultura; Brachiaria; Pastagem; Sistema de Cultivo; Sistema de Produção. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03371naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2143970
005 2022-06-13
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. F. de
245 $aPasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems with Eucalyptus and Urochloa$bSystematic review and meta-analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
300 $a15 p.
520 $aABSTRACT This study evaluated pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems (SPSs) with Eucalyptus spp. and Urochloa spp. through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic searches of databases, scientific journals and references of selected articles found 2,639 articles, of which 29 (120 comparisons) were selected. Comparisons were classified according to the covariates of distance between tree rows, number of trees/ha, tree planting orientation, system age and forage type. Data were submitted to meta-regression followed by subgroup analysis for covariates with a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the response. Data were analyzed in random effects models using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05). Forage mass (FM) was greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha and lower for the other groups, compared to that for grass monoculture. Forage accumulation (FA) was also greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, but lower for SPSs with more than 300 trees/ha, compared to that for grass monoculture. FM was lower for SPSs of all spacings between tree rows and planting orientations, compared to that for grass monoculture, with the lowest being with smaller spacing and with northsouth planting orientation. FA was lower for SPSs with up to 28m between tree rows, compared to that for grass monoculture, while that for SPSs with more than 28m did not differ. Neutral detergent fiber concentration was lower and crude protein greater for SPSs compared to grass monoculture, while lignin was greater and in vitro dry matter digestibility did not differ, which indicated no significant improvement in nutritive value in SPSs. Average daily gain was greater in SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, and lower in those with more than 400 trees/ha, than in grass monoculture, with other subgroups not differing. Total weight gain per area (GHA) was lower in SPSs with less than 28m between tree rows or with more than 199 trees/ha, but greater in SPSs with more than 28m or with up to 99 trees/ha, compared to grass monoculture. GHA was lower in SPSs with a north-south orientation compared to grass monoculture, but those with an east-west orientation did not differ. The use of U. brizantha cv. Marandu and an east-west planting orientation are efficient strategies in maintaining FM, FA and GHA. GHA was greater in SPSs with more than 28m between tree rows and with up to 99 trees/ha, than in grass monoculture, which may facilitate the implementation of these SPSs in commercial farms.
650 $aBovino
650 $aBovinocultura
650 $aBrachiaria
650 $aPastagem
650 $aSistema de Cultivo
650 $aSistema de Produção
700 1 $aMENEZES, G. L.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, L. C.
700 1 $aARAÚJO, V. E. de
700 1 $aRAMIREZ, M. A.
700 1 $aGUIMARAES JUNIOR, R.
700 1 $aJAYME, D. G.
700 1 $aLANA, A. M. Q.
773 $tLivestock Science$gv. 262, 104973, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
05/12/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
LIMA, R. A. F. de; PHILLIPS, O. L.; DUQUE, A.; TELLO, J. S.; DAVIES, S. J.; OLIVEIRA, A. A. de; MULLER, S.; CORONADO, E. N. H.; VILANOVA, E.; CUNI-SANCHEZ, A.; BAKER, T. R.; RYAN, C. M.; MALIZIA, A.; LEWIS, S. L.; STEEGE, H. ter; FERREIRA, J. N.; MARIMON, B. S.; LUU, H. T.; IMANI, G.; ARROYO, L.; BLUNDO, C.; KENFACK, D.; SAINGE, M. N.; SONKÉ, B.; VÁDQUEZ, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
RENATO A. F. DE LIMA, USP; OLIVER L. PHILLIPS, University of Leeds; ALVARO DUQUE, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; J. SEBASTIAN TELLO, Missouri Botanical Garden; STUART J. DAVIES, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; ALEXANDRE ADALARDO DE OLIVEIRA, USP; SANDRA MULLER, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; EURIDICE N. HONORIO CORONADO, University of St Andrews; EMILIO VILANOVA, Universidad de los Andes; AIDA CUNI-SANCHEZ, Norwegian University of Life Sciences; TIMOTHY R. BAKER, University of Leeds; CASEY M. RYAN, University of Edinburgh; AGUSTINA MALIZIA, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; SIMON L. LEWIS, UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS / UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON; HANS TER STEEGE, Naturalis Biodiversity Center; JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; BEATRIZ SCHWANTES MARIMON, Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso; HONG TRUONG LUU, INSTITUTE OF APPLIED MATERIALS SCIENCE / VIETNAM ACADEMY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; GERARD IMANI, Universite Officielle de Bukavu; LUZMILA ARROYO, Museo de Historia Natural Noel Kempff Mercado / UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA GABRIEL RENÉ MORENO; CECILIA BLUNDO, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán; DAVID KENFACK, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute; MOSES N. SAINGE, University of Sierra Leone / Institute of International Education Scholar Rescue Fund / Cape Peninsula University of Technology; BONAVENTURE SONKÉ, University of Yaoundé I; RODOLFO VÁSQUEZ, JARDÍN BOTÁNICO DE MISSOURI. |
|
Título: |
Making forest data fair and open. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature Ecology & Evolution, v. 6, p. 656-658, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01738-7 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Data on tropical forests are in high demand. But ground forest measurements are hard to sustain and the people who make them are extremely disadvantaged compared to those who use them. We propose a new approach to forest data that focuses on the needs of data originators, and ensures users and funders contribute properly. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Dado; Ecologia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01504naa a2200457 a 4500
001 2159164
005 2023-12-05
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01738-7$2DOI
100 1 $aLIMA, R. A. F. de
245 $aMaking forest data fair and open.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aData on tropical forests are in high demand. But ground forest measurements are hard to sustain and the people who make them are extremely disadvantaged compared to those who use them. We propose a new approach to forest data that focuses on the needs of data originators, and ensures users and funders contribute properly.
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aDado
650 $aEcologia
700 1 $aPHILLIPS, O. L.
700 1 $aDUQUE, A.
700 1 $aTELLO, J. S.
700 1 $aDAVIES, S. J.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. A. de
700 1 $aMULLER, S.
700 1 $aCORONADO, E. N. H.
700 1 $aVILANOVA, E.
700 1 $aCUNI-SANCHEZ, A.
700 1 $aBAKER, T. R.
700 1 $aRYAN, C. M.
700 1 $aMALIZIA, A.
700 1 $aLEWIS, S. L.
700 1 $aSTEEGE, H. ter
700 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N.
700 1 $aMARIMON, B. S.
700 1 $aLUU, H. T.
700 1 $aIMANI, G.
700 1 $aARROYO, L.
700 1 $aBLUNDO, C.
700 1 $aKENFACK, D.
700 1 $aSAINGE, M. N.
700 1 $aSONKÉ, B.
700 1 $aVÁDQUEZ, R.
773 $tNature Ecology & Evolution$gv. 6, p. 656-658, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
