| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/11/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/02/2019 |
|
Autoria: |
GURSKI, B. C.; JERSZURKI, D.; SOUZA, J. L. M. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Bruno César Gurski, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR; Daniela Jerszurki, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research/Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; Jorge Luiz Moretti de Souza, Universidade Federal do Paraná - UFPR. |
|
Título: |
Alternative reference evapotranspiration methods for the main climate types of the state of Paraná, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 53, n. 9, p. 1003-1010, Sept. 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Título em português: Métodos alternativos de evapotranspiração de referência para os principais tipos climáticos do Paraná. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this work was to define the best alternative methods for estimating the reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in the main climatic types (Cfa and Cf b) of the state of Paraná, Brazil. The methods tested were Budyko, Camargo, Hargreaves-Samani, Linacre, and Thornthwaite, which were compared to the ETo calculated with the Penman-Monteith ASCE (EToPM) method, between 1986 and 2015, in eight meteorological stations. The performance of the alternative methods was obtained from the coefficient of determination (R2), index ?d? of agreement, index ?c? of performance, and root mean square error (RMSE). The Hargreaves-Samani method has a better performance in estimating the ETo for the main climatic types in the state of Paraná. The Camargo method allows smaller errors between the standard values of ETo, obtained with the Penman-Monteith method, and the estimated values. The methods of Thornthwaite, Linacre, and Budyko are not adequate to estimate the ETo in any climatic type of the state of Paraná, Brazil. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Climate variability; Dado climático faltante; Manejo da irrigação; Missing climate data; Modelo simplificado; Penman Monteith; Simplified models; Variabilidade climática. |
|
Thesagro: |
Balanço Hídrico. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Irrigation management; Water balance. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/185683/1/Alternative-reference-evapotranspiration.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02082naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2099066
005 2019-02-25
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aGURSKI, B. C.
245 $aAlternative reference evapotranspiration methods for the main climate types of the state of Paraná, Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aTítulo em português: Métodos alternativos de evapotranspiração de referência para os principais tipos climáticos do Paraná.
520 $aThe objective of this work was to define the best alternative methods for estimating the reference evapotranspiration (ETo) in the main climatic types (Cfa and Cf b) of the state of Paraná, Brazil. The methods tested were Budyko, Camargo, Hargreaves-Samani, Linacre, and Thornthwaite, which were compared to the ETo calculated with the Penman-Monteith ASCE (EToPM) method, between 1986 and 2015, in eight meteorological stations. The performance of the alternative methods was obtained from the coefficient of determination (R2), index ?d? of agreement, index ?c? of performance, and root mean square error (RMSE). The Hargreaves-Samani method has a better performance in estimating the ETo for the main climatic types in the state of Paraná. The Camargo method allows smaller errors between the standard values of ETo, obtained with the Penman-Monteith method, and the estimated values. The methods of Thornthwaite, Linacre, and Budyko are not adequate to estimate the ETo in any climatic type of the state of Paraná, Brazil.
650 $aIrrigation management
650 $aWater balance
650 $aBalanço Hídrico
653 $aClimate variability
653 $aDado climático faltante
653 $aManejo da irrigação
653 $aMissing climate data
653 $aModelo simplificado
653 $aPenman Monteith
653 $aSimplified models
653 $aVariabilidade climática
700 1 $aJERSZURKI, D.
700 1 $aSOUZA, J. L. M. de
773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF$gv. 53, n. 9, p. 1003-1010, Sept. 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 2.512 | |
| Registros recuperados : 2.512 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
