| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/02/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/02/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
BROWN, G. G.; DEMETRIO, W.; GABRIAC, Q.; PASINI, A.; KORASAKI, V.; OLIVEIRA, L.; FRANCHINI, J. C.; TORRES, E.; GALERANI, P. R.; GAZZIERO, D. L. P.; BENITO, N. P.; NUNES, D. H.; SANTOS, A.; FERREIRA, T.; NADOLNY, H. S.; BARTZ, M.; MASCHIO, W.; DUDAS, R. T.; ZAGATTO, M.; NIVA, C. C.; CLASEN, L.; SAUTTER, K.; FROUFE, L. C. M.; SEOANE, C. E. S.; MORAES, A. de; JAMES, S.; ALBERTON, O.; JÚNIOR, O. B.; SARAIVA, O. F.; GARCIA, A.; OLIVEIRA, E.; CÉSAR, R.; CORREA-FERREIRA, B. S.; BRUZ, L. S. M.; SILVA, E. da; CARDOSO, G. B. X.; LAVELLE, P.; VELÁSQUEZ, E.; CREMONESI, M.; PARRON, L. M.; BAGGIO, A. J.; NEVES, E. J. M.; HUNGRIA, M.; CAMPOS, T. A.; SILVA, V. L. da; REISSMANN, C. B.; CONRADO, A. C.; BOUILLET, J. D.; GONÇALVES, J. L. M.; BRANDANI, C. B.; VIANI, R. A. G.; PAULA, R. R.; LACLAU, J.; PEÑA-VENEGAS, C. P.; PERES, C.; DECAËNS, T.; PEY, B.; EISENHAUER, N.; COOPER, M.; MATHIEU, J. |
|
Afiliação: |
GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; WILIAN DEMETRIO, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; QUENTIN GABRIAC; AMARILDO PASINI, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; VANESCA KORASAKI, UNIVERSIDADE DO ESTADO DE MINAS GERAIS; LENITA OLIVEIRA; JULIO CEZAR FRANCHINI DOS SANTOS, CNPSO; ELENO TORRES; PAULO ROBERTO GALERANI, ARIN; DIONISIO LUIZ PISA GAZZIERO, CNPSO; NORTON POLO BENITO, Cenargen; DAIANE H. NUNES, INSTITUTO FEDERAL CATARINENSE; ALESSANDRA SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; TALITA FERREIRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; HERLON S. NADOLNY, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; MARIE BARTZ, CARE-BIO; WAGNER MASCHIO; RAFAELA T. DUDAS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; MAURICIO ZAGATTO, DUNGTECH BIOFERTILIZANTES; CINTIA CARLA NIVA, CNPSA; LINA CLASEN, UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN; KLAUS SAUTTER; LUIS CLAUDIO MARANHAO FROUFE, CNPF; CARLOS EDUARDO SICOLI SEOANE, CNPF; ANÍBAL DE MORAES, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; SAMUEL JAMES, MAHARISCHI UNIVERSITY; ODAIR ALBERTON, UNIVERSIDADE PARANAENSE; OSVALDINO BRANDÃO JÚNIOR, FATEC; ODILON FERREIRA SARAIVA, CNPSO; ANTONIO GARCIA, CNPSO; ELMA OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; RAUL CÉSAR, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; BEATRIZ SPALDING CORREA FERREIRA, CNPSO; LILIANNE S. M. BRUZ, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; ELODIE DA SILVA; GILHERME B. X. CARDOSO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; PATRICK LAVELLE, UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE; ELENA VELÁSQUEZ, UNIVERSIDADE NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA; MARCUS CREMONESI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; LUCILIA MARIA PARRON VARGAS, CNPF; AMILTON JOAO BAGGIO, CNPF; EDINELSON JOSE MACIEL NEVES, CNPF; MARIANGELA HUNGRIA DA CUNHA, CNPSO; THIAGO A. CAMPOS, UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DE LONDRINA; VAGNER L. DA SILVA, UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA; CARLOS B. REISSMANN, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; ANA C. CONRADO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANÁ; JEAN-PIERRE D. BOUILLET, CIRAD; JOSÉ L. M. GONÇALVES, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; CAROLINA B. BRANDANI, TEXAS A&M AGRILIFE; RICARDO A. G. VIANI, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SÃO CARLOS; RANIERI R. PAULA, UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC; JEAN-PAUL LACLAU, CIRAD; CLARA P. PEÑA-VENEGAS, SINCHI; CARLOS PERES, UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA; THIBAUD DECAËNS, UNIV MONTPELLIER; BENJAMIN PEY, UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE; NICO EISENHAUER, GERMAN CENTRE FOR INTEGRATIVE BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH; MIGUEL COOPER, UNIVERSIDADE DE SÃO PAULO; JÉRÔME MATHIEU, SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ. |
|
Título: |
Soil macrofauna communities in Brazilian land-use systems. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2024 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Biodiversity Data Journal, v. 12, e115000, 2024. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e115000 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Soil animal communities include more than 40 higher-order taxa, representing over 23% of all described species. These animals have a wide range of feeding sources and contribute to several important soil functions and ecosystem services. Although many studies have assessed macroinvertebrate communities in Brazil, few of them have been published in journals and even fewer have made the data openly available for consultation and further use. As part of ongoing efforts to synthesise the global soil macrofauna communities and to increase the amount of openly-accessible data in GBIF and other repositories related to soil biodiversity, the present paper provides links to 29 soil macroinvertebrate datasets covering 42 soil fauna taxa, collected in various land-use systems in Brazil. A total of 83,085 georeferenced occurrences of these taxa are presented, based on quantitative estimates performed using a standardised sampling method commonly adopted worldwide to collect soil macrofauna populations, i.e. the TSBF (Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme) protocol. This consists of digging soil monoliths of 25 x 25 cm area, with handsorting of the macroinvertebrates visible to the naked eye from the surface litter and from within the soil, typically in the upper 0-20 cm layer (but sometimes shallower, i.e. top 0-10 cm or deeper to 0-40 cm, depending on the site). The land-use systems included anthropogenic sites managed with agricultural systems (e.g. pastures, annual and perennial crops, agroforestry), as well as planted forests and native vegetation located mostly in the southern Brazilian State of Paraná (96 sites), with a few additional sites in the neighbouring states of São Paulo (21 sites) and Santa Catarina (five sites). Important metadata on soil properties, particularly soil chemical parameters (mainly pH, C, P, Ca, K, Mg, Al contents, exchangeable acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, Base Saturation and, infrequently, total N), particle size distribution (mainly % sand, silt and clay) and, infrequently, soil moisture and bulk density, as well as on human management practices (land use and vegetation cover) are provided. These data will be particularly useful for those interested in estimating land-use change impacts on soil biodiversity and its implications for below-ground foodwebs, ecosystem functioning and ecosystem service delivery. MenosSoil animal communities include more than 40 higher-order taxa, representing over 23% of all described species. These animals have a wide range of feeding sources and contribute to several important soil functions and ecosystem services. Although many studies have assessed macroinvertebrate communities in Brazil, few of them have been published in journals and even fewer have made the data openly available for consultation and further use. As part of ongoing efforts to synthesise the global soil macrofauna communities and to increase the amount of openly-accessible data in GBIF and other repositories related to soil biodiversity, the present paper provides links to 29 soil macroinvertebrate datasets covering 42 soil fauna taxa, collected in various land-use systems in Brazil. A total of 83,085 georeferenced occurrences of these taxa are presented, based on quantitative estimates performed using a standardised sampling method commonly adopted worldwide to collect soil macrofauna populations, i.e. the TSBF (Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme) protocol. This consists of digging soil monoliths of 25 x 25 cm area, with handsorting of the macroinvertebrates visible to the naked eye from the surface litter and from within the soil, typically in the upper 0-20 cm layer (but sometimes shallower, i.e. top 0-10 cm or deeper to 0-40 cm, depending on the site). The land-use systems included anthropogenic sites managed with agricultural systems (e.g. pastures, annual and perenn... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Invertebrados; Macrofauna do solo; Serviços ecossistêmicos; Soil macrofauna. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biodiversidade; Ecossistema; Solo; Taxonomia Animal; Uso da Terra. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Biodiversity; ecology; Ecosystem services; Land use. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1161664/1/BiodiversDataJ-2024-Brown.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04955naa a2200997 a 4500
001 2161664
005 2024-02-06
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.12.e115000$2DOI
100 1 $aBROWN, G. G.
245 $aSoil macrofauna communities in Brazilian land-use systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2024
520 $aSoil animal communities include more than 40 higher-order taxa, representing over 23% of all described species. These animals have a wide range of feeding sources and contribute to several important soil functions and ecosystem services. Although many studies have assessed macroinvertebrate communities in Brazil, few of them have been published in journals and even fewer have made the data openly available for consultation and further use. As part of ongoing efforts to synthesise the global soil macrofauna communities and to increase the amount of openly-accessible data in GBIF and other repositories related to soil biodiversity, the present paper provides links to 29 soil macroinvertebrate datasets covering 42 soil fauna taxa, collected in various land-use systems in Brazil. A total of 83,085 georeferenced occurrences of these taxa are presented, based on quantitative estimates performed using a standardised sampling method commonly adopted worldwide to collect soil macrofauna populations, i.e. the TSBF (Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility Programme) protocol. This consists of digging soil monoliths of 25 x 25 cm area, with handsorting of the macroinvertebrates visible to the naked eye from the surface litter and from within the soil, typically in the upper 0-20 cm layer (but sometimes shallower, i.e. top 0-10 cm or deeper to 0-40 cm, depending on the site). The land-use systems included anthropogenic sites managed with agricultural systems (e.g. pastures, annual and perennial crops, agroforestry), as well as planted forests and native vegetation located mostly in the southern Brazilian State of Paraná (96 sites), with a few additional sites in the neighbouring states of São Paulo (21 sites) and Santa Catarina (five sites). Important metadata on soil properties, particularly soil chemical parameters (mainly pH, C, P, Ca, K, Mg, Al contents, exchangeable acidity, Cation Exchange Capacity, Base Saturation and, infrequently, total N), particle size distribution (mainly % sand, silt and clay) and, infrequently, soil moisture and bulk density, as well as on human management practices (land use and vegetation cover) are provided. These data will be particularly useful for those interested in estimating land-use change impacts on soil biodiversity and its implications for below-ground foodwebs, ecosystem functioning and ecosystem service delivery.
650 $aBiodiversity
650 $aecology
650 $aEcosystem services
650 $aLand use
650 $aBiodiversidade
650 $aEcossistema
650 $aSolo
650 $aTaxonomia Animal
650 $aUso da Terra
653 $aInvertebrados
653 $aMacrofauna do solo
653 $aServiços ecossistêmicos
653 $aSoil macrofauna
700 1 $aDEMETRIO, W.
700 1 $aGABRIAC, Q.
700 1 $aPASINI, A.
700 1 $aKORASAKI, V.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, L.
700 1 $aFRANCHINI, J. C.
700 1 $aTORRES, E.
700 1 $aGALERANI, P. R.
700 1 $aGAZZIERO, D. L. P.
700 1 $aBENITO, N. P.
700 1 $aNUNES, D. H.
700 1 $aSANTOS, A.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, T.
700 1 $aNADOLNY, H. S.
700 1 $aBARTZ, M.
700 1 $aMASCHIO, W.
700 1 $aDUDAS, R. T.
700 1 $aZAGATTO, M.
700 1 $aNIVA, C. C.
700 1 $aCLASEN, L.
700 1 $aSAUTTER, K.
700 1 $aFROUFE, L. C. M.
700 1 $aSEOANE, C. E. S.
700 1 $aMORAES, A. de
700 1 $aJAMES, S.
700 1 $aALBERTON, O.
700 1 $aJÚNIOR, O. B.
700 1 $aSARAIVA, O. F.
700 1 $aGARCIA, A.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, E.
700 1 $aCÉSAR, R.
700 1 $aCORREA-FERREIRA, B. S.
700 1 $aBRUZ, L. S. M.
700 1 $aSILVA, E. da
700 1 $aCARDOSO, G. B. X.
700 1 $aLAVELLE, P.
700 1 $aVELÁSQUEZ, E.
700 1 $aCREMONESI, M.
700 1 $aPARRON, L. M.
700 1 $aBAGGIO, A. J.
700 1 $aNEVES, E. J. M.
700 1 $aHUNGRIA, M.
700 1 $aCAMPOS, T. A.
700 1 $aSILVA, V. L. da
700 1 $aREISSMANN, C. B.
700 1 $aCONRADO, A. C.
700 1 $aBOUILLET, J. D.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, J. L. M.
700 1 $aBRANDANI, C. B.
700 1 $aVIANI, R. A. G.
700 1 $aPAULA, R. R.
700 1 $aLACLAU, J.
700 1 $aPEÑA-VENEGAS, C. P.
700 1 $aPERES, C.
700 1 $aDECAËNS, T.
700 1 $aPEY, B.
700 1 $aEISENHAUER, N.
700 1 $aCOOPER, M.
700 1 $aMATHIEU, J.
773 $tBiodiversity Data Journal$gv. 12, e115000, 2024.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/11/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
26/11/2010 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
STUCHI, E. S.; SILVA, S. R.; CANTUARIAS-AVILÉS, T. E.; GIRARDI, E. A.; REIFF, E. T. |
|
Afiliação: |
EDUARDO SANCHES STUCHI, CNPMF; Simone Rodrigues da Silva, ESALQ; Tatiana E. Cantuarias-Avilés, ESALQ; Eduardo Augusto Girardi, ESALQ; Eduardo Toller Reiff, EECB. |
|
Título: |
Production and Citrus Variegated Chlorosis (CVC) tolerance of portuguese midseason sweet orange selections (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, 28., 2010, Lisboa. Science and horticulture for people: programme & book of abstracts. Lisboa: ISHS, 2010. v. 1, p. 148. 1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
T02.225, pdf. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Production and CVC tolerance of 14 Portuguese midseason sweet orange selections (‘Tua 145’, ‘Tua Graúda’, ‘Tua Ponte’, ‘Tua Sr. Mamede’, ‘Tua 149’, ‘Tua 160’, ‘Tua 176’, ‘Convento’, ‘Grada’, ‘Jaffa’, ‘Ovale’, ‘Setúbal 174’, ‘Setúbal 180’ and ‘Pera de Vidigueira Sr. Antunes’) were evaluated in the period 2005-2008. Trees were budded onto Sunki mandarin and planted in 2001 at 7 × 5 m in Bebedouro, SP, Brazil. Experimental design was randomized blocks, with three replications and two trees in the unit. Data was submitted to ANOVA with means compared by the Scott- Knott Test (P < 0.05). ‘Tua 145’, ‘Tua Ponte’, ‘Jaffa’ and ‘Ovale’ were included in a low-production selections group (61.0-78.7 kg/tree or 17.4-22.5 t·ha-1). All other selections yielded 130.2 to 170.0 kg/tree or 37.2 to 48.5 t·ha-1 in 2005-2008. Production in the first two harvests ranged from 22% to 33% of the total yield. ‘Setúbal 174’ showed a more pronounced alternate bearing index (0.74) than ‘Tua 145’ (0.46). In all years, fruits were harvested in September, confirming the midseason maturing behavior. Juice content varied from 40 to 51%, and ‘Tua Ponte’ was not indicated as a suitable selection for juice extraction because of its low yield and juiciness. The Portuguese sweet orange selections were grouped in three classes of ratio: > 19 (‘Jaffa’); 15-18 (‘Ovale’ and ‘Tua Graúda’) and < 14 (all other varieties). Fruit ripening was directly influenced by the juice acid concentrations. Highest total soluble solids (2.33-2.46 kg/box) were accumulated by ‘Tua Ponte’, ‘Convento’ and ‘Setúbal 180’. CVC did not affect ‘Jaffa’ sweet orange until 2008 and this may be a tolerant variety. Symptomatic plants were observed in all other selections, prominently in ‘Tua Sr. Mamede’, ‘Grada’ and ‘Pera Vidigueira Sr. Antunes’ (mean of 56.6% and 0.81 for CVC incidence and severity score, respectively). MenosProduction and CVC tolerance of 14 Portuguese midseason sweet orange selections (‘Tua 145’, ‘Tua Graúda’, ‘Tua Ponte’, ‘Tua Sr. Mamede’, ‘Tua 149’, ‘Tua 160’, ‘Tua 176’, ‘Convento’, ‘Grada’, ‘Jaffa’, ‘Ovale’, ‘Setúbal 174’, ‘Setúbal 180’ and ‘Pera de Vidigueira Sr. Antunes’) were evaluated in the period 2005-2008. Trees were budded onto Sunki mandarin and planted in 2001 at 7 × 5 m in Bebedouro, SP, Brazil. Experimental design was randomized blocks, with three replications and two trees in the unit. Data was submitted to ANOVA with means compared by the Scott- Knott Test (P < 0.05). ‘Tua 145’, ‘Tua Ponte’, ‘Jaffa’ and ‘Ovale’ were included in a low-production selections group (61.0-78.7 kg/tree or 17.4-22.5 t·ha-1). All other selections yielded 130.2 to 170.0 kg/tree or 37.2 to 48.5 t·ha-1 in 2005-2008. Production in the first two harvests ranged from 22% to 33% of the total yield. ‘Setúbal 174’ showed a more pronounced alternate bearing index (0.74) than ‘Tua 145’ (0.46). In all years, fruits were harvested in September, confirming the midseason maturing behavior. Juice content varied from 40 to 51%, and ‘Tua Ponte’ was not indicated as a suitable selection for juice extraction because of its low yield and juiciness. The Portuguese sweet orange selections were grouped in three classes of ratio: > 19 (‘Jaffa’); 15-18 (‘Ovale’ and ‘Tua Graúda’) and < 14 (all other varieties). Fruit ripening was directly influenced by the juice acid concentrations. Highest total soluble solids... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Orange; Plant diseases. |
|
Thesagro: |
Clorose; Doença de Planta; Fruta Cítrica. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02855naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1867704
005 2010-11-26
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSTUCHI, E. S.
245 $aProduction and Citrus Variegated Chlorosis (CVC) tolerance of portuguese midseason sweet orange selections (Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck).
260 $c2010
500 $aT02.225, pdf.
520 $aProduction and CVC tolerance of 14 Portuguese midseason sweet orange selections (‘Tua 145’, ‘Tua Graúda’, ‘Tua Ponte’, ‘Tua Sr. Mamede’, ‘Tua 149’, ‘Tua 160’, ‘Tua 176’, ‘Convento’, ‘Grada’, ‘Jaffa’, ‘Ovale’, ‘Setúbal 174’, ‘Setúbal 180’ and ‘Pera de Vidigueira Sr. Antunes’) were evaluated in the period 2005-2008. Trees were budded onto Sunki mandarin and planted in 2001 at 7 × 5 m in Bebedouro, SP, Brazil. Experimental design was randomized blocks, with three replications and two trees in the unit. Data was submitted to ANOVA with means compared by the Scott- Knott Test (P < 0.05). ‘Tua 145’, ‘Tua Ponte’, ‘Jaffa’ and ‘Ovale’ were included in a low-production selections group (61.0-78.7 kg/tree or 17.4-22.5 t·ha-1). All other selections yielded 130.2 to 170.0 kg/tree or 37.2 to 48.5 t·ha-1 in 2005-2008. Production in the first two harvests ranged from 22% to 33% of the total yield. ‘Setúbal 174’ showed a more pronounced alternate bearing index (0.74) than ‘Tua 145’ (0.46). In all years, fruits were harvested in September, confirming the midseason maturing behavior. Juice content varied from 40 to 51%, and ‘Tua Ponte’ was not indicated as a suitable selection for juice extraction because of its low yield and juiciness. The Portuguese sweet orange selections were grouped in three classes of ratio: > 19 (‘Jaffa’); 15-18 (‘Ovale’ and ‘Tua Graúda’) and < 14 (all other varieties). Fruit ripening was directly influenced by the juice acid concentrations. Highest total soluble solids (2.33-2.46 kg/box) were accumulated by ‘Tua Ponte’, ‘Convento’ and ‘Setúbal 180’. CVC did not affect ‘Jaffa’ sweet orange until 2008 and this may be a tolerant variety. Symptomatic plants were observed in all other selections, prominently in ‘Tua Sr. Mamede’, ‘Grada’ and ‘Pera Vidigueira Sr. Antunes’ (mean of 56.6% and 0.81 for CVC incidence and severity score, respectively).
650 $aClorose
650 $aDoença de Planta
650 $aFruta Cítrica
653 $aOrange
653 $aPlant diseases
700 1 $aSILVA, S. R.
700 1 $aCANTUARIAS-AVILÉS, T. E.
700 1 $aGIRARDI, E. A.
700 1 $aREIFF, E. T.
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL HORTICULTURAL CONGRESS, 28., 2010, Lisboa. Science and horticulture for people: programme & book of abstracts. Lisboa: ISHS, 2010.$gv. 1, p. 148. 1 CD-ROM.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
