| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 87 | |
| 14. |  | SILVA, B. C. F. da; SAMPAIO, D. P.; KAWAHARA, YU; TALAMINI, V.; INAMASU, R. Y. Desenvolvimento do projeto mecânico de uma haste para auxílio da colheita de coco verde. In: JORNADA CIENTÍFICA - EMBRAPA SÃO CARLOS, 10., 2018, São Carlos, SP. Anais... São Carlos: Embrapa Instrumentação: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, 2018. p. 82. Editores técnicos: Daniel Souza Corrêa, Elaine Cristina Paris, Maria Alice Martins, Paulino Ribeiro Villas Boas, Wilson Tadeu Lopes da Silva. (Embrapa Instrumentação. Documentos, 68). (Embrapa Instrumentação. Documentos, 68).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
|    |
| 15. | | SILVA, B. C. R.; BERNARDO, M. P.; MATTOSO, L. H. C. Propriedades térmicas de filamentos compósitos baseados em poli (ácido lático) e hidroxiapatita para prototipagem rápida. In: JORNADA CIENTÍFICA - EMBRAPA SÃO CARLOS, 12., 2020, São Carlos, SP. Anais... São Carlos: Embrapa Instrumentação: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, 2020. Editores técnicos: Cristiane Sanchez Farinas, Daniel Souza Corrêa, José Manoel Marconcini, Maria Fernanda Berlingieri Durigan, Paulo Sérgio de Paula Herrmann Junior. 41 Embrapa Instrumentação. Documentos, 71.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| |
| 16. | | SILVA, B. C. R.; BERNARDO, M. P.; MOREIRA, F. K. V.; MATTOSO, L. H. C. Avaliação de propriedades físico-químicas de compósitos bioativos baseados em poli (ácido lático) e hidroxiapatita para impressão 3D. In: SIMPÓSIO NACIONAL DE INSTRUMENTAÇÃO AGROPECUÁRIA, 4., 2019, São Carlos, SP. Ciência, inovação e mercado: anais. São Carlos, SP: Embrapa Instrumentação, 2019. Editores: Paulino Ribeiro Villas-Boas, Maria Alice Martins, Débora Marcondes Bastos Pereira Milori, Ladislau Martin Neto. SIAGRO 2019. 642-645| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| |
| 18. | | SILVA, B. C. R.; BERNARDO, M. P.; MATTOSO, L. H. C. Avaliação físico-química de [Mg-Al]-HDL carregado com naproxeno sódico pelo método de reconstrução estrutural. In: JORNADA CIENTÍFICA - EMBRAPA SÃO CARLOS, 11., 2019, São Carlos, SP. Anais... São Carlos: Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste: Embrapa Instrumentação, 2019. Editores técnicos: Alexandre Berndt, Ana Rita de Araujo Nogueira, Lea Chapaval, Marcelo Mattos Cavallari, Manuel Antonio Chagas Jacinto. 46 Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. Documentos, 134.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Instrumentação. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 87 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
12/08/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
12/08/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SGUIZZATO, A. L. L.; MARCONDES, M. I.; DIJKSTRA, J.; VALADARES FILHO, S. de C.; CAMPOS, M. M.; MACHADO, F. S.; SILVA, B. C.; ROTTA, P. P. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANNA LUIZA LACERDA SGUIZZATO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; MARCOS INÁCIO MARCONDES, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; JAN DIJKSTRAI, Wageningen University; SEBASTIÃO DE CAMPOS VALADARES FILHO, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; MARIANA MAGALHAES CAMPOS, CNPGL; FERNANDA SAMARINI MACHADO, CNPGL; BRENO CASTRO SILVA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa; POLYANA PIZZI ROTTA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa. |
|
Título: |
Energy requirements for pregnant dairy cows. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
PLoS One, v. 15, n. 7, e0235619, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0235619 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aimed to estimate energy requirements of pregnant Holstein × Gyr cows. Different planes of nutrition were established by two feeding regimens: ad libitum or maintenance. Sixty-two nonlactating cows with average body weight of 480 ± 10.1 kg and an age of 5 ± 0.5 years were used. Cows were divided into three groups: pregnant (n = 44), non-pregnant (n=12), and baseline reference (n = 6). The 56 pregnant and non-pregnant cows were randomly allocated into a feeding regimen: ad libitum or maintenance. To evaluate the effects of days of pregnancy, pregnant and non-pregnant animals were slaughtered at 140, 200, 240, and 270 days of pregnancy. Energy requirements for maintenance differed between pregnant and non-pregnant cows, thus two equations were developed. Net energy and metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance of non-pregnant cows were 82 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day and 132 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day, respectively. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance of non-pregnant cows was 62.4%. Net energy and metabolizable energy for maintenance of pregnant cows were 86 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day and 137 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day, respectively. Efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance of pregnant cows was 62.5%. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for gain was 41.9%. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for pregnancy was 14.1%. Furthermore, net energy requirement for pregnancy was different from zero from day 70 of pregnancy onwards. In conclusion, net energy and metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance of non-pregnant cows are different from pregnant cows. Furthermore, we believe that the proposed non-linear equations to estimate net energy requirements for pregnancy are more adequate than current NRC equation, and should be recommended for Holstein × Gyr cows. MenosThis study aimed to estimate energy requirements of pregnant Holstein × Gyr cows. Different planes of nutrition were established by two feeding regimens: ad libitum or maintenance. Sixty-two nonlactating cows with average body weight of 480 ± 10.1 kg and an age of 5 ± 0.5 years were used. Cows were divided into three groups: pregnant (n = 44), non-pregnant (n=12), and baseline reference (n = 6). The 56 pregnant and non-pregnant cows were randomly allocated into a feeding regimen: ad libitum or maintenance. To evaluate the effects of days of pregnancy, pregnant and non-pregnant animals were slaughtered at 140, 200, 240, and 270 days of pregnancy. Energy requirements for maintenance differed between pregnant and non-pregnant cows, thus two equations were developed. Net energy and metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance of non-pregnant cows were 82 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day and 132 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day, respectively. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance of non-pregnant cows was 62.4%. Net energy and metabolizable energy for maintenance of pregnant cows were 86 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day and 137 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day, respectively. Efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance of pregnant cows was 62.5%. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for gain was 41.9%. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for pregnancy was 14.1%. Furthermore, net energy requirement for pregnancy was d... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado Leiteiro. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/225095/1/Energy-requirements.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02554naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2133488
005 2021-08-12
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0235619$2DOI
100 1 $aSGUIZZATO, A. L. L.
245 $aEnergy requirements for pregnant dairy cows.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aThis study aimed to estimate energy requirements of pregnant Holstein × Gyr cows. Different planes of nutrition were established by two feeding regimens: ad libitum or maintenance. Sixty-two nonlactating cows with average body weight of 480 ± 10.1 kg and an age of 5 ± 0.5 years were used. Cows were divided into three groups: pregnant (n = 44), non-pregnant (n=12), and baseline reference (n = 6). The 56 pregnant and non-pregnant cows were randomly allocated into a feeding regimen: ad libitum or maintenance. To evaluate the effects of days of pregnancy, pregnant and non-pregnant animals were slaughtered at 140, 200, 240, and 270 days of pregnancy. Energy requirements for maintenance differed between pregnant and non-pregnant cows, thus two equations were developed. Net energy and metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance of non-pregnant cows were 82 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day and 132 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day, respectively. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance of non-pregnant cows was 62.4%. Net energy and metabolizable energy for maintenance of pregnant cows were 86 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day and 137 kcal/kg empty body weight0.75/day, respectively. Efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for maintenance of pregnant cows was 62.5%. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for gain was 41.9%. The efficiency of use of metabolizable energy for pregnancy was 14.1%. Furthermore, net energy requirement for pregnancy was different from zero from day 70 of pregnancy onwards. In conclusion, net energy and metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance of non-pregnant cows are different from pregnant cows. Furthermore, we believe that the proposed non-linear equations to estimate net energy requirements for pregnancy are more adequate than current NRC equation, and should be recommended for Holstein × Gyr cows.
650 $aGado Leiteiro
700 1 $aMARCONDES, M. I.
700 1 $aDIJKSTRA, J.
700 1 $aVALADARES FILHO, S. de C.
700 1 $aCAMPOS, M. M.
700 1 $aMACHADO, F. S.
700 1 $aSILVA, B. C.
700 1 $aROTTA, P. P.
773 $tPLoS One$gv. 15, n. 7, e0235619, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
