|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpc.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos. |
Data corrente: |
26/05/2010 |
Data da última atualização: |
23/09/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
FONSECA, J. F. da; SOUZA, J. M. G.; BRUSCHI, J. H.; VIANA, J. H. M.; BRANDÃO, F. Z.; SILVA, W. J.; DENADAI, R.; MAIA, A. L. R. S.; FACO, O. |
Afiliação: |
JEFERSON FERREIRA DA FONSECA, CNPC; Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV), Viçosa, MG.; JOSE HENRIQUE BRUSCHI, CNPGL; JOAO HENRIQUE MOREIRA VIANA, CNPGL; Universidade Federal Fluminense, Riterói, RJ; UNESP, Botucatu, SP.; Universidade Federal Fluminense; OLIVARDO FACO, CNPC. |
Título: |
Induction of estrus in cyclic Alpine goats with short-term progestagen protocols with or without eCG administration. |
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Reproduction, Fertility and Development, v. 22, n. 1, p. 169, 2010. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
Edição dos Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Embryo Transfer Society, Córdoba, Argentina, 9?12 January 2010. |
Conteúdo: |
Depending on the season, estrus can be efficiently induced using male effect, melatonin implants, light controlled programs, prostaglandin, progestagens, and gonadotrophins. The eCG is the most used hormone employed in estrus induction protocols in goats. However, as eCG is a foreign protein, a humoral immune response (i.e. antibody formation) is displayed in goats, which tends to reduce the efficiency of eCG when successively administered. The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility of omitting the administration of eCG to induce estrus in Alpine goats during the breeding season in herds submitted to successive hormonal estrus induction. This study was done in April (local breeding season) of 2009 in Florestal/MG, Brazil. Nulliparous (n = 10) and pluriparous (n = 10) Alpine goats were equally assigned to receive (Day 0) MAP 60 mg intravaginal sponges (Progespon®, Schering Plough Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil) for 6 days and 50 ?g D-cloprostenol (Ciosin®, Schering Plough Animal Health) i.m. with (T1) or without (T2) 200 IU of eCG (Novormon 5000®, Schering Plough Animal Health) i.m. 24 h before sponge removal. Transrectal ultrasound (5 MHz probe, Aloka SSD 500®, Tokyo, Japan) was done at 12-h intervals until 72 h after sponge removal. All goats underwent timed AI 55 h after sponge removal according to expected ovulation (Menchaca et al. 2007 Anim. Reprod. Sci. 102, 76-87). Statistical analysis was performed using all tests at the 95% confidence interval (SAEG® program, Funarbe, Viçosa, Brasil). Data are reported as percentage or mean ± SD. The following results for T1 or T2 animals (respectively) were observed: estrus response (80 and 80%), goats ovulating (80 and 100%), interval from sponge removal to estrus onset (46.0 ± 17.0 and 53.5 ± 18.1 h) and to ovulation (58.8 ± 6.2 and 66.0 ± 9.8 h), interval from estrus onset to ovulation (26.0 ± 8.5 and 26.0 ± 0.7 h), diameter of ovulatory follicles (7.1 ± 0.6 and 7.4 ± 0.9 mm), number of ovulations (1.7 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.9 h), intervals from sponge removal to insemination (56.9 ± 2.3 and 58.2 ± 1.2 h) and from estrus onset to insemination (10.9 ± 14.5 and 4.6 ± 16.1h) and pregnancy rate (20 and 40%). Eight goats were inseminated at 17 to 23 h after estrus onset, which resulted in 50% pregnancy rate, and the other 2 pregnant goats were inseminated without being detected in estrus. In Brazil, dairy goats are inseminated with frozen-thawed semen 12 to 24 h after estrus onset or 42 to 55 h after sponge removal. Thus, for Alpine goats, this study suggests that earlier AI time should be avoided. However, under heat detection, AI at 18 to 24 h can be indicated. Ovarian ultrasonography of goats submitted to estrus induction gives great information of ovulation time relative to device removal and to estrus onset, which can optimize AI efficiency. In herds with successive estrus induction this kind of information could indicate an error in the common times currently used in AI programs in goats in Brazil. MenosDepending on the season, estrus can be efficiently induced using male effect, melatonin implants, light controlled programs, prostaglandin, progestagens, and gonadotrophins. The eCG is the most used hormone employed in estrus induction protocols in goats. However, as eCG is a foreign protein, a humoral immune response (i.e. antibody formation) is displayed in goats, which tends to reduce the efficiency of eCG when successively administered. The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility of omitting the administration of eCG to induce estrus in Alpine goats during the breeding season in herds submitted to successive hormonal estrus induction. This study was done in April (local breeding season) of 2009 in Florestal/MG, Brazil. Nulliparous (n = 10) and pluriparous (n = 10) Alpine goats were equally assigned to receive (Day 0) MAP 60 mg intravaginal sponges (Progespon®, Schering Plough Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil) for 6 days and 50 ?g D-cloprostenol (Ciosin®, Schering Plough Animal Health) i.m. with (T1) or without (T2) 200 IU of eCG (Novormon 5000®, Schering Plough Animal Health) i.m. 24 h before sponge removal. Transrectal ultrasound (5 MHz probe, Aloka SSD 500®, Tokyo, Japan) was done at 12-h intervals until 72 h after sponge removal. All goats underwent timed AI 55 h after sponge removal according to expected ovulation (Menchaca et al. 2007 Anim. Reprod. Sci. 102, 76-87). Statistical analysis was performed using all tests at the 95% confidence interval (SA... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; CCG; Estro; Minas Gerais. |
Thesagro: |
Caprino; Ciclo estral; Hormônio animal; Inseminação artificial; Reprodução animal. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Animal reproduction; Artificial insemination; Brazil; Equine chorionic gonadotropin; Goats. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
Marc: |
LEADER 04266nam a2200385 a 4500 001 1853901 005 2019-09-23 008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aFONSECA, J. F. da 245 $aInduction of estrus in cyclic Alpine goats with short-term progestagen protocols with or without eCG administration.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aReproduction, Fertility and Development, v. 22, n. 1, p. 169$c2010 500 $aEdição dos Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Embryo Transfer Society, Córdoba, Argentina, 9?12 January 2010. 520 $aDepending on the season, estrus can be efficiently induced using male effect, melatonin implants, light controlled programs, prostaglandin, progestagens, and gonadotrophins. The eCG is the most used hormone employed in estrus induction protocols in goats. However, as eCG is a foreign protein, a humoral immune response (i.e. antibody formation) is displayed in goats, which tends to reduce the efficiency of eCG when successively administered. The objective of this study was to evaluate the possibility of omitting the administration of eCG to induce estrus in Alpine goats during the breeding season in herds submitted to successive hormonal estrus induction. This study was done in April (local breeding season) of 2009 in Florestal/MG, Brazil. Nulliparous (n = 10) and pluriparous (n = 10) Alpine goats were equally assigned to receive (Day 0) MAP 60 mg intravaginal sponges (Progespon®, Schering Plough Animal Health, São Paulo, Brazil) for 6 days and 50 ?g D-cloprostenol (Ciosin®, Schering Plough Animal Health) i.m. with (T1) or without (T2) 200 IU of eCG (Novormon 5000®, Schering Plough Animal Health) i.m. 24 h before sponge removal. Transrectal ultrasound (5 MHz probe, Aloka SSD 500®, Tokyo, Japan) was done at 12-h intervals until 72 h after sponge removal. All goats underwent timed AI 55 h after sponge removal according to expected ovulation (Menchaca et al. 2007 Anim. Reprod. Sci. 102, 76-87). Statistical analysis was performed using all tests at the 95% confidence interval (SAEG® program, Funarbe, Viçosa, Brasil). Data are reported as percentage or mean ± SD. The following results for T1 or T2 animals (respectively) were observed: estrus response (80 and 80%), goats ovulating (80 and 100%), interval from sponge removal to estrus onset (46.0 ± 17.0 and 53.5 ± 18.1 h) and to ovulation (58.8 ± 6.2 and 66.0 ± 9.8 h), interval from estrus onset to ovulation (26.0 ± 8.5 and 26.0 ± 0.7 h), diameter of ovulatory follicles (7.1 ± 0.6 and 7.4 ± 0.9 mm), number of ovulations (1.7 ± 0.8 and 1.8 ± 0.9 h), intervals from sponge removal to insemination (56.9 ± 2.3 and 58.2 ± 1.2 h) and from estrus onset to insemination (10.9 ± 14.5 and 4.6 ± 16.1h) and pregnancy rate (20 and 40%). Eight goats were inseminated at 17 to 23 h after estrus onset, which resulted in 50% pregnancy rate, and the other 2 pregnant goats were inseminated without being detected in estrus. In Brazil, dairy goats are inseminated with frozen-thawed semen 12 to 24 h after estrus onset or 42 to 55 h after sponge removal. Thus, for Alpine goats, this study suggests that earlier AI time should be avoided. However, under heat detection, AI at 18 to 24 h can be indicated. Ovarian ultrasonography of goats submitted to estrus induction gives great information of ovulation time relative to device removal and to estrus onset, which can optimize AI efficiency. In herds with successive estrus induction this kind of information could indicate an error in the common times currently used in AI programs in goats in Brazil. 650 $aAnimal reproduction 650 $aArtificial insemination 650 $aBrazil 650 $aEquine chorionic gonadotropin 650 $aGoats 650 $aCaprino 650 $aCiclo estral 650 $aHormônio animal 650 $aInseminação artificial 650 $aReprodução animal 653 $aBrasil 653 $aCCG 653 $aEstro 653 $aMinas Gerais 700 1 $aSOUZA, J. M. G. 700 1 $aBRUSCHI, J. H. 700 1 $aVIANA, J. H. M. 700 1 $aBRANDÃO, F. Z. 700 1 $aSILVA, W. J. 700 1 $aDENADAI, R. 700 1 $aMAIA, A. L. R. S. 700 1 $aFACO, O.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Caprinos e Ovinos (CNPC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
Data corrente: |
31/08/2005 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/02/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
REIS, F. G.; CERQUEIRA, E. B.; SARTORATO, A.; COSTA, J. G. C. da; RAVA, C. A.; SIBOV, S. T.; CARNEIRO, M. S. |
Afiliação: |
FABIANA G. REIS, UFG; EDUARDO B. CERQUEIRA, UFG; ALOISIO SARTORATO, CNPAF; JOAQUIM GERALDO CAPRIO DA COSTA, CNPAF; CARLOS AGUSTIN RAVA SEIJAS, CNPAF; SÉRGIOT. SIBOV, UFG; MONALLSAS. CARNEIRO, UFG. |
Título: |
Identificação de novas fontes de resistência a mancha angular do feijoeiro comum. |
Ano de publicação: |
2004 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Fitopatologia Brasileira, v. 29, p. S173, ago. 2004. Suplemento, ref. 547. Edição de Resumos do XXXVII Congresso Brasileiro de Fitopatologia, Gramado, RS, ago. 2004. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar 23 genótipos pertencentes ao Banco Ativo de Germoplasma e ao programa de melhoramento genético da Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (Aruã, Carioca Rubi, Diamante Negro, Magnífico, Pérola, Piatã, Soberano, Uirapuru, Valente, Mar 2, Corne1l49-242, AND 277, Ouro Negro, CNFC 7806, CNFC 7813, CNFC 9504, CNFC 10276, CNFC 10281, CNFP 7776, CNFP 10120, CNFP 10125, CNFP 10138 e CNFP 10150) quanto à resistência aos patótipos 63.19 e 63.23 do fungo P. griseola. |
Thesagro: |
Doença de Planta; Feijão; Identificação; Mancha Angular; Phaseolus Vulgaris. |
Categoria do assunto: |
H Saúde e Patologia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/213646/1/fb-2004-p173.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01292nam a2200241 a 4500 001 1213646 005 2023-02-09 008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aREIS, F. G. 245 $aIdentificação de novas fontes de resistência a mancha angular do feijoeiro comum. 260 $aFitopatologia Brasileira, v. 29, p. S173, ago. 2004. Suplemento, ref. 547. Edição de Resumos do XXXVII Congresso Brasileiro de Fitopatologia, Gramado, RS, ago. 2004.$c2004 520 $aO objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar 23 genótipos pertencentes ao Banco Ativo de Germoplasma e ao programa de melhoramento genético da Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (Aruã, Carioca Rubi, Diamante Negro, Magnífico, Pérola, Piatã, Soberano, Uirapuru, Valente, Mar 2, Corne1l49-242, AND 277, Ouro Negro, CNFC 7806, CNFC 7813, CNFC 9504, CNFC 10276, CNFC 10281, CNFP 7776, CNFP 10120, CNFP 10125, CNFP 10138 e CNFP 10150) quanto à resistência aos patótipos 63.19 e 63.23 do fungo P. griseola. 650 $aDoença de Planta 650 $aFeijão 650 $aIdentificação 650 $aMancha Angular 650 $aPhaseolus Vulgaris 700 1 $aCERQUEIRA, E. B. 700 1 $aSARTORATO, A. 700 1 $aCOSTA, J. G. C. da 700 1 $aRAVA, C. A. 700 1 $aSIBOV, S. T. 700 1 $aCARNEIRO, M. S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|