| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
31/03/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/08/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
DUDAS, R. T.; DEMETRIO, W. C.; MAIA, L. S.; SÁTIRO, J. N. O.; SILVA, K. A.; NICOLA, V. B.; KILLE, P.; OLIVEIRA, C. M. R.; AFONSO, R. O.; RUSSELL, G.; FERREIRA, N. G. C.; CUNHA, L.; BROWN, G. G.; BARTZ, M. L. C. |
|
Afiliação: |
RAFAELA T. DUDAS, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; WILIAN C. DEMETRIO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; LILIANE S. MAIA, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; JOSÉ N. O. SÁTIRO, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARANA; KARLO A. SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; VITORIA B. NICOLA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; PETER KILLE, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; CINTÍA M. R. OLIVEIRA, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO; RITA O. AFONSO, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; GEORGINA RUSSELL, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; NUNO G. C. FERREIRA, UNIVERSIDADE DE CARDIFF; LUIS CUNHA, UNIVERSIDADE DE COIMBRA; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; MARIE L. C. BARTZ, UNIVERSIDADE POSITIVO. |
|
Título: |
Earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage systems and secondary forest fragments in Paraná, Southern Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Zootaxa, v. 5255, n. 1, p. 347-361, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5255.1.28 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and 67 in SF). The highest earthworm abundance was in Faxinal (123 individuals), with 76 individuals in NTS and 47 in SF. In Mauá da Serra the same pattern was observed (SF>NTS), while in Palmeira in overall, fewer individuals (38) were collected (24 in NTS and 14 in SF). The NTS at Faxinal and SF Mauá da Serra in 2019 had only/more exotic/cosmopolitan species, while at the other dates and sites >50% of the specimens sampled were native species. Overall, forests had more native species than exotics: in 2018, natives represented > 75% of all specimens, but in 2019 both Faxinal and Mauá da Serra had more exotic species (> 65%), while at Palmeira, they represented 50% of the individuals. Earthworm total biomass for forest sites was higher in Faxinal (3.2 g) and NTS in Mauá da Serra (1.7 g) in 2019. Overall, the total biomass was higher in SF sites than NTS. Using a classification available for earthworm populations in no-tillage systems, all three sites were considered to have poor quality in terms of abundance (ind m-2), while for species richness, they were considered to have moderate (Faxinal and Mauá da Serra) and good quality (Palmeira). MenosThe area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Conservation agriculture; Ecosystem engineer; Soil macrofauna. |
|
Thesagro: |
Conservação do Solo; Ecossistema; Fertilidade do Solo; Minhoca. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Earthworms; Oligochaeta. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03816naa a2200397 a 4500
001 2152915
005 2023-08-17
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5255.1.28$2DOI
100 1 $aDUDAS, R. T.
245 $aEarthworm communities in long-term no-tillage systems and secondary forest fragments in Paraná, Southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aThe area destined for agricultural production in Paraná state in Brazil is ~6 million hectares, of which 79% are under notillage systems (NTS) that can positively affect earthworm populations. Furthermore, earthworm abundance and richness can be valuable soil quality. This study assessed earthworm communities in long-term no-tillage sites (NTS) and nearby secondary Atlantic Forest (SF) fragments. Sampling was performed in June 2018 and May 2019 using the quantitative Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility handsorting method (ISO-TSBF), complemented by qualitative sampling in three municipalities: Faxinal, Mauá da Serra and Palmeira, in NTS and SF. Eleven earthworm species, belonging to five families (Benhamiidae, Glossoscolecidae, Megascolecidae, Ocnerodrilidae, and Rhinodrilidae) were found along with seven native species (Glossoscolex sp.22, Glossoscolex sp.23, Fimoscolex sp.21, Fimoscolex sp.24, Fimoscolex sp.42, Andiorrhinus duseni and Urobenus brasiliensis) and four exotic or cosmopolitan species (Dichogaster gracilis, Amynthas gracilis, Metaphire californica and Pontoscolex corethrurus). The cosmopolitan P. corethrurus dominated Faxinal and Mauá da Serra, while in Palmeira Fimoscolex and Glossoscolex were the most abundant. Six species belonging to Glossoscolex and Fimoscolex were new to science and must be described. Overall, 239 individuals were found. In 2018 126 individuals were found (76 in NTS and 50 in SF) and in 2019, only 112 individuals were found (45 in NTS and 67 in SF). The highest earthworm abundance was in Faxinal (123 individuals), with 76 individuals in NTS and 47 in SF. In Mauá da Serra the same pattern was observed (SF>NTS), while in Palmeira in overall, fewer individuals (38) were collected (24 in NTS and 14 in SF). The NTS at Faxinal and SF Mauá da Serra in 2019 had only/more exotic/cosmopolitan species, while at the other dates and sites >50% of the specimens sampled were native species. Overall, forests had more native species than exotics: in 2018, natives represented > 75% of all specimens, but in 2019 both Faxinal and Mauá da Serra had more exotic species (> 65%), while at Palmeira, they represented 50% of the individuals. Earthworm total biomass for forest sites was higher in Faxinal (3.2 g) and NTS in Mauá da Serra (1.7 g) in 2019. Overall, the total biomass was higher in SF sites than NTS. Using a classification available for earthworm populations in no-tillage systems, all three sites were considered to have poor quality in terms of abundance (ind m-2), while for species richness, they were considered to have moderate (Faxinal and Mauá da Serra) and good quality (Palmeira).
650 $aEarthworms
650 $aOligochaeta
650 $aConservação do Solo
650 $aEcossistema
650 $aFertilidade do Solo
650 $aMinhoca
653 $aConservation agriculture
653 $aEcosystem engineer
653 $aSoil macrofauna
700 1 $aDEMETRIO, W. C.
700 1 $aMAIA, L. S.
700 1 $aSÁTIRO, J. N. O.
700 1 $aSILVA, K. A.
700 1 $aNICOLA, V. B.
700 1 $aKILLE, P.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, C. M. R.
700 1 $aAFONSO, R. O.
700 1 $aRUSSELL, G.
700 1 $aFERREIRA, N. G. C.
700 1 $aCUNHA, L.
700 1 $aBROWN, G. G.
700 1 $aBARTZ, M. L. C.
773 $tZootaxa$gv. 5255, n. 1, p. 347-361, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pantanal. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpap.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
|
Data corrente: |
27/11/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/11/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 4 |
|
Autoria: |
FERNANDES, G. W.; VALE, M. M.; OVERBECK, G. E.; BUSTAMANTE, M. M. C.; GRELLE, C. E. V.; BERGALLO, H. G.; MAGNUSSON, W. E.; AKAMA, A.; ALVES, S.; AMORIM, A.; ARAÚJO, J.; BARROS, C. F.; BRAVO, F.; CARIM, M. J. V.; CERQUEIRA, R.; COLLEVATTI, R. G.; COLLI, G. R.; CUNHA, C. N. da; D’ANDREA, P. S.; DIANESE, J. C.; DINIZ, S.; ESTRELA, P. C.; FERNANDES, M. R. M.; FONTANA, C. S.; GIACOMIN, L. L.; GUSMÃO, L. F. P.; JUNCÁ, F. A.; LINS-E-SILVA, A. C. B.; LOPES, C. R. A. S.; LORINI, M. L.; QUEIROZ, L. P. de; MALABARBA, L. R.; MARIMON, B. S.; MARIMON JUNIOR, B. H.; MARQUES, M. C. M.; MARTINELLI, B. M.; MARTINS, M. B.; MEDEIROS, H. F. de; MENIN, M.; MORAIS, P. B. de; MUNIZ, F. H.; NECKEL-OLIVEIRA, S.; OLIVEIRA, J. A. de; OLIVEIRA, R. P.; PEDRONI, F.; PENHA, J.; PODGAISKI, L. R.; RODRIGUES, D. J.; SCARIOT, A.; SILVEIRA, L. F.; SILVEIRA, M.; TOMAS, W. M.; VITAL, M. J. S.; PILLAR, V. D. |
|
Afiliação: |
G. WILSON FERNANDES, UFMG; MARIANA M. VALE, UFRJ; GERHARD E. OVERBECK, UFRGS; MERCEDES M. C. BUSTAMANTE, UNB; CARLOS E. V. GRELLE, UFRJ; HELENA GODOY BERGALLO, UERJ; WILLIAM E. MAGNUSSON, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS DA AMAZÔNIA; ALBERTO AKAMA, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; SUELEN S. ALVES, UFSM; ANDRÉ AMORIM, UESC; JOAQUIM ARAÚJO, INSTITUTO BIOTRÓPICOS; CLAUDIA FRANCA BARROS, INSTITUTO DE PESQUISAS JARDIM BOTÂNICO DO RIO DE JANEIRO; FREDDY BRAVO, UEFS; MARCELO J. VEIGA CARIM, NÚCLEO DO PPBIO AMAPÁ; RUI CERQUEIRA, UFRJ; ROSANE GARCIA COLLEVATTI, UFG; GUARINO R. COLLI, UNB; CATIA NUNES DA CUNHA, UFMT; PAULO SERGIO D’ANDREA, INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ/FIOCRUZ; JOSÉ CARMINE DIANESE, UNB; SORAIA DINIZ, UFMT; PEDRO CORDEIRO ESTRELA, UFPB; MARILUCE R. M. FERNANDES, UNIR; CARLA SUERTEGARAY FONTANA, PUCRS, MUSEU DE CIÊNCIAS E TECNOLOGIA; LEANDRO L. GIACOMIN, UFOPA; LUIS FERNANDO P. GUSMÃO, UEFS; FLORA ACUÑA JUNCÁ, UEFS; ANA CAROLINA BORGES LINS-E-SILVA, UFRPE; CELIA R. A. S. LOPES, UNEMAT; MARIA LUCIA LORINI, UNIRIO; LUCIANO PAGANUCCI DE QUEIROZ, UEFS; LUIZ R. MALABARBA, UFRGS; BEATRIZ SCHWANTES MARIMON, UNEMAT; BEN HUR MARIMON JUNIOR, UNEMAT; MARCIA C. M. MARQUES, UFPR; BRUNO M. MARTINELLI, UNB; MARLUCIA BONIFACIO MARTINS, MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI; HERMES FONSECA DE MEDEIROS, UFPA; MARCELO MENIN, UFAM; PAULA BENEVIDES DE MORAIS, UFT; FRANCISCA HELENA MUNIZ, UEMA; SELVINO NECKEL-OLIVEIRA, UFSC; JOÃO ALVES DE OLIVEIRA, MUSEU NACIONAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO; REYJANE P. OLIVEIRA, UEFS; FERNANDO PEDRONI, UFMT; JERRY PENHA, UFMT; LUCIANA R. PODGAISKI, UFRGS; DOMINGOS J. RODRIGUES, UFMT; ALDICIR OSNI SCARIOT, Cenargen; LUÍS FÁBIO SILVEIRA, USP; MARCOS SILVEIRA, UFAC; WALFRIDO MORAES TOMAS, CPAP; MARCOS J. SALGADO VITAL, UFRR; VALÉRIO D. PILLAR, UFRGS. |
|
Título: |
Dismantling Brazil's science threatens global biodiversity heritage. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, v. 15, p. 239-243, 2017. |
|
DOI: |
10.1016/j.pecon.2017.07.004 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
In the middle of a political and fiscal crisis, the Brazilian government is applying successive budget cuts,including in science funding. Recent cuts radically affect research programs on biodiversity that arecrucial components for the design and monitoring of public policies for nature conservation and sustain-able development. We analyze the consequences of such cuts on the Research Program on Biodiversity(PPBio), the largest biodiversity research network in Brazil (626 researchers, nine networks in all Brazil-ian biomes). Brazil holds a substantial part of the world's biodiversity and of tropical forests that play asignificant role for regional and global climate stability. If underfunding is maintained, the dismantlingof the Brazilian PPBio will have consequences that go beyond biodiversity knowledge itself but affectsociety as a whole. Brazil will likely fail to reach the National Targets for Biodiversity 2011-2020, and itwill be difficult to fulfill the restoration target of the Brazilian NDC and to advance with the sustainabledevelopment goals. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Biodiversity research network; Global environmental commitments; Research Program on Biodiversity(PPBio). |
|
Thesagro: |
Depressão Econômica; Programa de Pesquisa. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Economic incentives; Research programs. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
D Governo, Leis e Regulamentações |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03438naa a2200853 a 4500
001 2080731
005 2017-11-27
008 2017 bl --- 0-- u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.pecon.2017.07.004$2DOI
100 1 $aFERNANDES, G. W.
245 $aDismantling Brazil's science threatens global biodiversity heritage.
260 $c2017
520 $aIn the middle of a political and fiscal crisis, the Brazilian government is applying successive budget cuts,including in science funding. Recent cuts radically affect research programs on biodiversity that arecrucial components for the design and monitoring of public policies for nature conservation and sustain-able development. We analyze the consequences of such cuts on the Research Program on Biodiversity(PPBio), the largest biodiversity research network in Brazil (626 researchers, nine networks in all Brazil-ian biomes). Brazil holds a substantial part of the world's biodiversity and of tropical forests that play asignificant role for regional and global climate stability. If underfunding is maintained, the dismantlingof the Brazilian PPBio will have consequences that go beyond biodiversity knowledge itself but affectsociety as a whole. Brazil will likely fail to reach the National Targets for Biodiversity 2011-2020, and itwill be difficult to fulfill the restoration target of the Brazilian NDC and to advance with the sustainabledevelopment goals.
650 $aEconomic incentives
650 $aResearch programs
650 $aDepressão Econômica
650 $aPrograma de Pesquisa
653 $aBiodiversity research network
653 $aGlobal environmental commitments
653 $aResearch Program on Biodiversity(PPBio)
700 1 $aVALE, M. M.
700 1 $aOVERBECK, G. E.
700 1 $aBUSTAMANTE, M. M. C.
700 1 $aGRELLE, C. E. V.
700 1 $aBERGALLO, H. G.
700 1 $aMAGNUSSON, W. E.
700 1 $aAKAMA, A.
700 1 $aALVES, S.
700 1 $aAMORIM, A.
700 1 $aARAÚJO, J.
700 1 $aBARROS, C. F.
700 1 $aBRAVO, F.
700 1 $aCARIM, M. J. V.
700 1 $aCERQUEIRA, R.
700 1 $aCOLLEVATTI, R. G.
700 1 $aCOLLI, G. R.
700 1 $aCUNHA, C. N. da
700 1 $aD’ANDREA, P. S.
700 1 $aDIANESE, J. C.
700 1 $aDINIZ, S.
700 1 $aESTRELA, P. C.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, M. R. M.
700 1 $aFONTANA, C. S.
700 1 $aGIACOMIN, L. L.
700 1 $aGUSMÃO, L. F. P.
700 1 $aJUNCÁ, F. A.
700 1 $aLINS-E-SILVA, A. C. B.
700 1 $aLOPES, C. R. A. S.
700 1 $aLORINI, M. L.
700 1 $aQUEIROZ, L. P. de
700 1 $aMALABARBA, L. R.
700 1 $aMARIMON, B. S.
700 1 $aMARIMON JUNIOR, B. H.
700 1 $aMARQUES, M. C. M.
700 1 $aMARTINELLI, B. M.
700 1 $aMARTINS, M. B.
700 1 $aMEDEIROS, H. F. de
700 1 $aMENIN, M.
700 1 $aMORAIS, P. B. de
700 1 $aMUNIZ, F. H.
700 1 $aNECKEL-OLIVEIRA, S.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, J. A. de
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, R. P.
700 1 $aPEDRONI, F.
700 1 $aPENHA, J.
700 1 $aPODGAISKI, L. R.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, D. J.
700 1 $aSCARIOT, A.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, L. F.
700 1 $aSILVEIRA, M.
700 1 $aTOMAS, W. M.
700 1 $aVITAL, M. J. S.
700 1 $aPILLAR, V. D.
773 $tPerspectives in Ecology and Conservation$gv. 15, p. 239-243, 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
