| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 52 | |
| Registros recuperados : 52 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/09/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/03/2016 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
VENTURINI, M. T.; SANTOS, L. R. dos; OLIVEIRA, E. J. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCELA TONINI VENTURINI, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia; LEANDRO RIBEIRO DOS SANTOS, Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia; EDER JORGE DE OLIVEIRA, CNPMF. |
|
Título: |
Development of a diagrammatic scale for the evaluation of postharvest physiological deterioration in cassava roots. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF., v.50, n.8, p.658-668, ago. 2015. |
|
ISSN: |
0100-204X |
|
DOI: |
10.1590/S0100-204X2015000800004 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this work was to develop a scale to assess the severity of postharvest physiological deterioration (PPD) of cassava roots, and to validate this scale for accuracy and reproducibility estimates. A diagrammatic scale (0 to 100%) for the damaged roots was analyzed according to precision, accuracy, and reproducibility. Seven evaluators (four with experience and three without it) quantified the PPD severity, with or without the scale, considering 150 roots with different levels of PPD. Without and with the use of the scale, respectively, the inexperienced evaluators obtained coefficients of determination (R2) from 0.76 to 0.86 and 0.87 to 0.92, and the experienced evaluators obtained R2 from 0.90 to 0.96 and 0.96 to 0.97. The values of the intercept (a) obtained by both the experienced and inexperienced evaluators who did not use the scale were all significant, while after using the scale, only two evaluators got values that were not significantly different from one. Evaluation reproducibility between the evaluators ranged from 0.61 to 0.91 for the inexperienced ones and from 0.83 to 0.95 for the experienced ones. The proposed diagrammatic scale was considered appropriate to estimate the severity of PPD in cassava roots, and can be used to identify sources of tolerance to postharvest deterioration. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Maninhot esculenta; Physiological processes; Subsistence crop; Tolerance. |
|
Thesagro: |
Mandioca. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Cassava; Shelf life. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/131860/1/Development-of-a-diagrammatic-scale-for-the-evaluation-of-postharvest-physiological-deterioration-in-cassava-roots.pdf
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/129148/1/Development-of-a-diagrammatic.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02114naa a2200253 a 4500
001 2027332
005 2016-03-09
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0100-204X
024 7 $a10.1590/S0100-204X2015000800004$2DOI
100 1 $aVENTURINI, M. T.
245 $aDevelopment of a diagrammatic scale for the evaluation of postharvest physiological deterioration in cassava roots.
260 $c2015
520 $aThe objective of this work was to develop a scale to assess the severity of postharvest physiological deterioration (PPD) of cassava roots, and to validate this scale for accuracy and reproducibility estimates. A diagrammatic scale (0 to 100%) for the damaged roots was analyzed according to precision, accuracy, and reproducibility. Seven evaluators (four with experience and three without it) quantified the PPD severity, with or without the scale, considering 150 roots with different levels of PPD. Without and with the use of the scale, respectively, the inexperienced evaluators obtained coefficients of determination (R2) from 0.76 to 0.86 and 0.87 to 0.92, and the experienced evaluators obtained R2 from 0.90 to 0.96 and 0.96 to 0.97. The values of the intercept (a) obtained by both the experienced and inexperienced evaluators who did not use the scale were all significant, while after using the scale, only two evaluators got values that were not significantly different from one. Evaluation reproducibility between the evaluators ranged from 0.61 to 0.91 for the inexperienced ones and from 0.83 to 0.95 for the experienced ones. The proposed diagrammatic scale was considered appropriate to estimate the severity of PPD in cassava roots, and can be used to identify sources of tolerance to postharvest deterioration.
650 $aCassava
650 $aShelf life
650 $aMandioca
653 $aManinhot esculenta
653 $aPhysiological processes
653 $aSubsistence crop
653 $aTolerance
700 1 $aSANTOS, L. R. dos
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, E. J. de
773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, Brasília, DF.$gv.50, n.8, p.658-668, ago. 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
