|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpmf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
Data corrente: |
03/11/2015 |
Data da última atualização: |
18/05/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
REIS, R. C.; VIANA, E. de S.; JESUS, J. L. de; LIMA, L. F.; NEVES, T. T. das; CONCEIÇÃO, E. A. da. |
Afiliação: |
RONIELLI CARDOSO REIS, CNPMF; ELISETH DE SOUZA VIANA, CNPMF; JACIENE LOPES DE JESUS, CNPMF; LEONARDO FRANKLIN LIMA, UFRB; TAIS TEIXEIRA DAS NEVES, UFRB; EMERSON ALMEIDA DA CONCEIÇÃO, FAMAM. |
Título: |
Compostos bioativos e atividade antioxidante de variedades melhoradas de mamão. |
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 45, n. 11, nov., 2015. |
ISSN: |
0103-8478 |
DOI: |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20140776 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
O objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar a concentração de carotenoides totais, vitamina C, polifenóis totais e a atividade antioxidante de variedades melhoradas de mamão. Foram avaliadas quatro variedades melhoradas pertencentes ao grupo Solo (L60, L47-05, L47-08 e H54.78), duas pertencentes ao grupo Formosa (L33 e H36.45) e as variedades comerciais Tainung no1 e Sunrise Solo. Dentre as variedades do grupo Solo, a linhagem L47-08 apresentou elevado teor de carotenoides totais e a variedade Sunrise Solo o maior conteúdo de vitamina C. Dentre as variedades do grupo Formosa, as variedades L33 e H36.45 apresentaram elevada atividade antioxidante, e maiores teores, respectivamente, de polifenóis totais e vitamina C do que a variedade comercial Tainung no1. Os polifenóis totais e a vitamina C apresentaram correlação signifi cativa com a atividade antioxidante dos mamões avaliados. |
Thesagro: |
Carica Papaya; Carotenoide; Mamão; Vitamina C. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Ascorbic acid; Carotenoids. |
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
Marc: |
LEADER 01681naa a2200277 a 4500 001 2027832 005 2023-05-18 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0103-8478 024 7 $a10.1590/0103-8478cr20140776$2DOI 100 1 $aREIS, R. C. 245 $aCompostos bioativos e atividade antioxidante de variedades melhoradas de mamão.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 520 $aO objetivo deste trabalho foi determinar a concentração de carotenoides totais, vitamina C, polifenóis totais e a atividade antioxidante de variedades melhoradas de mamão. Foram avaliadas quatro variedades melhoradas pertencentes ao grupo Solo (L60, L47-05, L47-08 e H54.78), duas pertencentes ao grupo Formosa (L33 e H36.45) e as variedades comerciais Tainung no1 e Sunrise Solo. Dentre as variedades do grupo Solo, a linhagem L47-08 apresentou elevado teor de carotenoides totais e a variedade Sunrise Solo o maior conteúdo de vitamina C. Dentre as variedades do grupo Formosa, as variedades L33 e H36.45 apresentaram elevada atividade antioxidante, e maiores teores, respectivamente, de polifenóis totais e vitamina C do que a variedade comercial Tainung no1. Os polifenóis totais e a vitamina C apresentaram correlação signifi cativa com a atividade antioxidante dos mamões avaliados. 650 $aAscorbic acid 650 $aCarotenoids 650 $aCarica Papaya 650 $aCarotenoide 650 $aMamão 650 $aVitamina C 700 1 $aVIANA, E. de S. 700 1 $aJESUS, J. L. de 700 1 $aLIMA, L. F. 700 1 $aNEVES, T. T. das 700 1 $aCONCEIÇÃO, E. A. da 773 $tCiência Rural, Santa Maria$gv. 45, n. 11, nov., 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura (CNPMF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
23/08/2020 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/09/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 4 |
Autoria: |
VASQUES, G. de M.; RODRIGUES, H. M.; COELHO, M. R.; BACA, J. F. M.; DART, R. de O.; OLIVEIRA, R. P. de; TEIXEIRA, W. G.; CEDDIA, M. B. |
Afiliação: |
GUSTAVO DE MATTOS VASQUES, CNPS; HUGO MACHADO RODRIGUES, UFRRJ; MAURICIO RIZZATO COELHO, CNPS; JESUS FERNANDO MANSILLA BACA, CNPS; RICARDO DE OLIVEIRA DART, CNPS; RONALDO PEREIRA DE OLIVEIRA, CNPS; WENCESLAU GERALDES TEIXEIRA, CNPS; MARCOS BACIS CEDDIA, UFRRJ. |
Título: |
Field proximal soil sensor fusion for improving high-resolution soil property maps. |
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Soil Systems, v. 4, n. 3, 52, 2020. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4030052 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Mapping soil properties, using geostatistical methods in support of precision agriculture and related activities, requires a large number of samples. To reduce soil sampling and measurement time and cost, a combination of field proximal soil sensors was used to predict and map laboratory-measured soil properties in a 3.4-ha pasture field in southeastern Brazil. Sensor soil properties were measured in situ on a 10 × 10-m dense grid (377 samples) using apparent electrical conductivity meters, apparent magnetic susceptibility meter, gamma-ray spectrometer, water content reflectometer, cone penetrometer, and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF). Soil samples were collected on a 20 × 20-m thin grid (105 samples) and analyzed in the laboratory for organic C, sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, clay content, soil volumetric moisture, and bulk density. Another 25 samples collected throughout the area were also analyzed for the same soil properties and used for independent validation of models and maps. To test whether the combination of sensors enhances soil property predictions, stepwise multiple linear regression (MLR) models of the laboratory soil properties were derived using individual sensor covariate data versus combined sensor data-except for the pXRF data, which were evaluated separately. Then, to test whether a denser grid sample boosted by sensor-based soil property predictions enhances soil property maps, ordinary kriging of the laboratory-measured soil properties from the thin grid was compared to ordinary kriging of the sensor-based predictions from the dense grid, and ordinary cokriging of the laboratory properties aided by sensor covariate data. The combination of multiple soil sensors improved the MLR predictions for all soil properties relative to single sensors. The pXRF data produced the best MLR predictions for organic C content, clay content, and bulk density, standing out as the best single sensor for soil property prediction, whereas the other sensors combined outperformed the pXRF sensor for the sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, and soil volumetric moisture, based on independent validation. Ordinary kriging of sensor-based predictions outperformed the other interpolation approaches for all soil properties, except organic C content, based on validation results. Thus, combining soil sensors, and using sensor-based soil property predictions to increase the sample size and spatial coverage, leads to more detailed and accurate soil property maps. MenosMapping soil properties, using geostatistical methods in support of precision agriculture and related activities, requires a large number of samples. To reduce soil sampling and measurement time and cost, a combination of field proximal soil sensors was used to predict and map laboratory-measured soil properties in a 3.4-ha pasture field in southeastern Brazil. Sensor soil properties were measured in situ on a 10 × 10-m dense grid (377 samples) using apparent electrical conductivity meters, apparent magnetic susceptibility meter, gamma-ray spectrometer, water content reflectometer, cone penetrometer, and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF). Soil samples were collected on a 20 × 20-m thin grid (105 samples) and analyzed in the laboratory for organic C, sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, clay content, soil volumetric moisture, and bulk density. Another 25 samples collected throughout the area were also analyzed for the same soil properties and used for independent validation of models and maps. To test whether the combination of sensors enhances soil property predictions, stepwise multiple linear regression (MLR) models of the laboratory soil properties were derived using individual sensor covariate data versus combined sensor data-except for the pXRF data, which were evaluated separately. Then, to test whether a denser grid sample boosted by sensor-based soil property predictions enhances soil property maps, ordinary kriging of the laboratory-measured soil pr... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Fluorescência de raios X; Fusão de sensor proximal; Geoestatística; Radiometria gama; Susceptibilidade magnética. |
Thesagro: |
Condutividade Eletrica; Sensoriamento Remoto. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Electrical conductivity; Geostatistics; Remote sensing. |
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/215532/1/Field-proximal-soil-sensor-fusion-for-improving-high-resolution-soil-property-maps-2020.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03550naa a2200337 a 4500 001 2124518 005 2020-09-08 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3390/soilsystems4030052$2DOI 100 1 $aVASQUES, G. de M. 245 $aField proximal soil sensor fusion for improving high-resolution soil property maps.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 520 $aMapping soil properties, using geostatistical methods in support of precision agriculture and related activities, requires a large number of samples. To reduce soil sampling and measurement time and cost, a combination of field proximal soil sensors was used to predict and map laboratory-measured soil properties in a 3.4-ha pasture field in southeastern Brazil. Sensor soil properties were measured in situ on a 10 × 10-m dense grid (377 samples) using apparent electrical conductivity meters, apparent magnetic susceptibility meter, gamma-ray spectrometer, water content reflectometer, cone penetrometer, and portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (pXRF). Soil samples were collected on a 20 × 20-m thin grid (105 samples) and analyzed in the laboratory for organic C, sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, clay content, soil volumetric moisture, and bulk density. Another 25 samples collected throughout the area were also analyzed for the same soil properties and used for independent validation of models and maps. To test whether the combination of sensors enhances soil property predictions, stepwise multiple linear regression (MLR) models of the laboratory soil properties were derived using individual sensor covariate data versus combined sensor data-except for the pXRF data, which were evaluated separately. Then, to test whether a denser grid sample boosted by sensor-based soil property predictions enhances soil property maps, ordinary kriging of the laboratory-measured soil properties from the thin grid was compared to ordinary kriging of the sensor-based predictions from the dense grid, and ordinary cokriging of the laboratory properties aided by sensor covariate data. The combination of multiple soil sensors improved the MLR predictions for all soil properties relative to single sensors. The pXRF data produced the best MLR predictions for organic C content, clay content, and bulk density, standing out as the best single sensor for soil property prediction, whereas the other sensors combined outperformed the pXRF sensor for the sum of bases, cation exchange capacity, and soil volumetric moisture, based on independent validation. Ordinary kriging of sensor-based predictions outperformed the other interpolation approaches for all soil properties, except organic C content, based on validation results. Thus, combining soil sensors, and using sensor-based soil property predictions to increase the sample size and spatial coverage, leads to more detailed and accurate soil property maps. 650 $aElectrical conductivity 650 $aGeostatistics 650 $aRemote sensing 650 $aCondutividade Eletrica 650 $aSensoriamento Remoto 653 $aFluorescência de raios X 653 $aFusão de sensor proximal 653 $aGeoestatística 653 $aRadiometria gama 653 $aSusceptibilidade magnética 700 1 $aRODRIGUES, H. M. 700 1 $aCOELHO, M. R. 700 1 $aBACA, J. F. M. 700 1 $aDART, R. de O. 700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, R. P. de 700 1 $aTEIXEIRA, W. G. 700 1 $aCEDDIA, M. B. 773 $tSoil Systems$gv. 4, n. 3, 52, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|