| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 321 | |
| 201. |  | RAMOS FILHO, L. O.; RODRIGUES, I.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CAMPAGNOLLA, C.; BROMBAL, J. C. Aplicação do sistema APOIA-Novo Rural para avaliação do desempenho ambiental do agroturismo. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, Brasília, DF, v. 21, n. 3, p. 409-423, set./dez. 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|    |
| 202. | | RAMOS FILHO, L. O.; RODRIGUES, I.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CAMPANHOLA, C.; BROMBAL, J. C. Aplicação do sistema "Apoia-Novorural" para avaliação do desempenho ambiental do agroturismo. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, Brasília, v.21, n.3, p. 409-423, set./dez.2004 págs. 409-423| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 203. | | RODRIGUES, G. S.; STUCHI, E. S.; ALBUQUERQUE, A. F. A. de; BARIZON, R. R. M.; GIRARDI, E. A. Analysis of environmental impact indicators, best management practices and technology adoption for HLB control: the view of horchard technical managers. In: INTERNATIONAL CITRUS CONGRESS, 13., 2016, Foz do Iguaçu. Sustainable citriculture: the role of applied knowledge: abstract book. Campinas: IAC; Londrina: IAPAR, 2016. Resumo S6-254. p. 84-85.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 207. | | PEREIRA, J. M.; LINO, J. S.; BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; BARROS, I. de; RODRIGUES, G. S. Integrated farm environmental management and biodiversity conservation: a case study en the Caratinga Biological Station (Minas Gerais State, Brazil). Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical, Goiânia, v. 40, n. 4, p. 401-413, 2010.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 208. | | RODRIGUES, G. S.; KITAMURA, P. C.; MEYER, L. F. F.; DENICH, M.; SÁ, T. D. de A. Integration of information on fallow systems towards supporting public policies. In: GERMAN-BRAZILIAN WORKSHOP ON NEOTROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS - ARCHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH, 2000, Hamburg. Proceedings. Geesthacht: GKSS, 2002. 1 CD-ROM. Editado por Reinhard Lieberei, Helmut Bianchi, Vera Boehm, Christoph Reisdorff.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 209. | | RODRIGUES, G. S.; KITAMURA, P. C.; MEYER, L. F. F.; DENICH, M.; SÁ, T. D. de A. Integration of information on fallow systems toward supporting public policies. In: GERMAN-BRAZILIAN ON WORKSHOP ON NEOTROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS - ARCHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH, 2000, Hamburg. Proceedings. Geesthacht: GHSS, 2002. p. 777-782. Editado por Reinhard Lieberei, Helmut Bianchi, Vera Boehm, Christoph Reisdorff.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 210. | | RODRIGUES, G. S.; KITAMURA, P. C.; MEYER, L. F. F.; DENICH, M.; SÁ, T. D. de A. Integration of information on fallow systems toward supporting public policies. In: GERMAN-BRAZILIAN WORKSHOP ON NEOTROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS - ARCHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH, 2000, Hamburg. Proceedings. Geesthacht: GHSS, 2002. p. 224. Editado por Reinhard Lieberei, Helmut Bianchi, Vera Boehm, Christoph Reisdorff. Anexo 1 CD-ROM nº 0084, completo. Publicado também em GERMAN-BRAZILIAN WORKSHOP ON NEOTROPICAL ECOSYSTEMS: ARCHIEMENTS AND PROPECTS OF COOPERATIVE RESEARCH,...| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 214. | | RODRIGUES, G. S.; VALARINI, P. J.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; CAMPANHOLA, C.; RAMOS FILHO, L. O.; RODRIGUES, I. Avaliação de impacto ambiental de alternativas de manejo na horticultura. Revista Científica Rural, Bagé, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2006.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 215. | | RODRIGUES, G. S.; VARALINI, P. J.; FRIGHETTO, R. T. S.; CAMPANHOLA, C.; RAMOS FILHO, L. O.; RODRIGUES, I. Avaliação de impacto ambiental de alternativas de manejo no horticultura. Revista Cientifica Rural, Bagé, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2006.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Hortaliças. |
| |
| 216. | | IRIAS, L. J. M.; GEBLER, L.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; ROSA, M. de F.; RODRIGUES, G. S. Avaliação de impacto ambiental de inovação tecnológica agropecuária, aplicação do Sistema Ambitec. Agricultura em São Paulo, São Paulo, v. 51, n. 1, p.23-39, jan./jun. 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 217. | | IRIAS, L. J. M.; GEBLER, L.; PALHARES, J. C. P.; ROSA, M. de F.; RODRIGUES, G. S. Avaliação de impacto ambiental de inovação tecnológica agropecuária, aplicação do Sistema Ambitec. Agricultura em São Paulo, São Paulo, v. 51, n. 1, p. 23-39, jan./jun. 2004.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 218. | | BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; PIRES, A. M. M.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; LIGO, M. A. V.; RAMOS, N. P. Avaliação de impactos sociais, ecológicos e de conhecimento das cadeias produtivas de soja, girassol, canola, mamona e dendê na obtenção de biocombustíveis. In: FÓRUM DE APRESENTAÇÃO DE RESULTADOS DE PESQUISA: AVANÇOS E OPORTUNIDADES, 1., 2014, Campinas. Anais... Jaguariúna: Embrapa Meio Ambiente, 2014. RE003. 5 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 220. | | SILVA, M. da S.; ESPINDOLA, J. A. A.; ASSIS, R. L. de; RODRIGUES, G. S.; RODRIGUES, I. A. Avaliação da sustentabilidade de sistemas de produção agrícola de base ecológica no município de Nova Friburgo, RJ In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE SISTEMAS DE PRODUÇÃO, 11., 2016, Pelotas. Anais... [Florianópolis]: Sociedade Brasileira de Sistemas de Produção, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 321 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/02/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/02/2016 |
|
Autoria: |
AVILA, A. F. D.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; VEDOVOTO, G. L.; PENTEADO FILHO, R. de C.; FONSECA JUNIOR, W. C. da. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANTONIO FLAVIO DIAS AVILA, SGE; GERALDO STACHETTI RODRIGUES, CNPMA; GRACIELA LUZIA VEDOVOTO, SGE; ROBERTO DE CAMARGO PENTEADO FILHO, SGE; WILSON CORREA DA FONSECA JUNIOR, SECOM. |
|
Título: |
Embrapa experience on the impact assessment of agricultural R&D: 15 years using a multidimensional approach. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: IMPAR CONFERENCE, 2015, Paris. Impacts of agricultural research: towards an approach of societal values: [proceedings...]. Paris: INRA, 2015. 25 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
After decades doing sporadic studies on impact assessment and using diversified approaches focused on economic effects, Embrapa is now completing 15 years of an institutionalized system based in a common multidimensional approach measuring economic, social, environmental, political and scientific impacts of its main technologies. Since 2001, Embrapa is monitoring and evaluating more than one hundred technologies and around 200 cultivars originated from its 42 research centers. An impact assessment team, located at the Embrapa Headquarters, by the Secretariat for Management and Institutional Development (SGI), coordinates the system. This central unit is responsible for the analysis and consolidation of the results, and to give feedback to local teams, as to continually improve their analysis. This process is completed with an official and annual publication reporting on the multidimensional impacts, named Embrapa?s Social Report (http://bs.sede.embrapa.br/). The impact studies include the estimation of economic surpluses generated by Embrapa technologies based on field data collected through a private national survey (for cultivars) and by local/regional research teams for surveys regarding the other technologies. Internal rates of return are estimated using benefits and costs data series. To evaluate social and environmental impacts research teams in each center interviews a sample of technology adopters to measure their perception on the innovations? impacts, comparatively to the former technologies or practices replaced. A reference multicriteria method, named Ambitec-Agro, is applied to estimate multiple indices evaluating positive and negative impacts in a set of socioenvironmental indicators. More recently, new impacts are being measured including the contribution of Embrapa to the formulation of public policies and its scientific impact to the advancement of science, measured by the publication of articles on refereed journals, citations and establishment of R&D networks. It is important to note that the development of econometric and other more sophisticated impact assessment analyses continue to be developed at Embrapa?s consultants have developed aggregate impact studies, or specific R&D assessments for especial research areas, such as genetic breeding. This continuous impact system has been extremely important to Embrapa?s institutional sustainability. Certainly, the strong support received by the corporation from Brazilian society is due in large part to this institutionalized consultants have developed aggregate impact studies, or specific R&D assessments for especial research areas, such as genetic breeding. This continuous impact system has been extremely important to Embrapa?s institutional sustainability. Certainly, the strong support received by the corporation from Brazilian society is due in large part to this institutionalized system that shows not only results (outputs), but also their use and application impacts. MenosAfter decades doing sporadic studies on impact assessment and using diversified approaches focused on economic effects, Embrapa is now completing 15 years of an institutionalized system based in a common multidimensional approach measuring economic, social, environmental, political and scientific impacts of its main technologies. Since 2001, Embrapa is monitoring and evaluating more than one hundred technologies and around 200 cultivars originated from its 42 research centers. An impact assessment team, located at the Embrapa Headquarters, by the Secretariat for Management and Institutional Development (SGI), coordinates the system. This central unit is responsible for the analysis and consolidation of the results, and to give feedback to local teams, as to continually improve their analysis. This process is completed with an official and annual publication reporting on the multidimensional impacts, named Embrapa?s Social Report (http://bs.sede.embrapa.br/). The impact studies include the estimation of economic surpluses generated by Embrapa technologies based on field data collected through a private national survey (for cultivars) and by local/regional research teams for surveys regarding the other technologies. Internal rates of return are estimated using benefits and costs data series. To evaluate social and environmental impacts research teams in each center interviews a sample of technology adopters to measure their perception on the innovations? impacts, comparatively... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Avaliação de impacto; Impact assessment; Multidimensional approach; Public research centers. |
|
Thesagro: |
Impacto ambiental; Impacto econômico; Impacto social; Pesquisa agrícola. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
agricultural research; economic impact; environmental impact; social impact. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/138651/1/Embrapa-Experience-on-the-impact.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04056nam a2200301 a 4500
001 2036444
005 2016-02-10
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aAVILA, A. F. D.
245 $aEmbrapa experience on the impact assessment of agricultural R&D$b15 years using a multidimensional approach.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: IMPAR CONFERENCE, 2015, Paris. Impacts of agricultural research: towards an approach of societal values: [proceedings...]. Paris: INRA, 2015. 25 p.$c2015
520 $aAfter decades doing sporadic studies on impact assessment and using diversified approaches focused on economic effects, Embrapa is now completing 15 years of an institutionalized system based in a common multidimensional approach measuring economic, social, environmental, political and scientific impacts of its main technologies. Since 2001, Embrapa is monitoring and evaluating more than one hundred technologies and around 200 cultivars originated from its 42 research centers. An impact assessment team, located at the Embrapa Headquarters, by the Secretariat for Management and Institutional Development (SGI), coordinates the system. This central unit is responsible for the analysis and consolidation of the results, and to give feedback to local teams, as to continually improve their analysis. This process is completed with an official and annual publication reporting on the multidimensional impacts, named Embrapa?s Social Report (http://bs.sede.embrapa.br/). The impact studies include the estimation of economic surpluses generated by Embrapa technologies based on field data collected through a private national survey (for cultivars) and by local/regional research teams for surveys regarding the other technologies. Internal rates of return are estimated using benefits and costs data series. To evaluate social and environmental impacts research teams in each center interviews a sample of technology adopters to measure their perception on the innovations? impacts, comparatively to the former technologies or practices replaced. A reference multicriteria method, named Ambitec-Agro, is applied to estimate multiple indices evaluating positive and negative impacts in a set of socioenvironmental indicators. More recently, new impacts are being measured including the contribution of Embrapa to the formulation of public policies and its scientific impact to the advancement of science, measured by the publication of articles on refereed journals, citations and establishment of R&D networks. It is important to note that the development of econometric and other more sophisticated impact assessment analyses continue to be developed at Embrapa?s consultants have developed aggregate impact studies, or specific R&D assessments for especial research areas, such as genetic breeding. This continuous impact system has been extremely important to Embrapa?s institutional sustainability. Certainly, the strong support received by the corporation from Brazilian society is due in large part to this institutionalized consultants have developed aggregate impact studies, or specific R&D assessments for especial research areas, such as genetic breeding. This continuous impact system has been extremely important to Embrapa?s institutional sustainability. Certainly, the strong support received by the corporation from Brazilian society is due in large part to this institutionalized system that shows not only results (outputs), but also their use and application impacts.
650 $aagricultural research
650 $aeconomic impact
650 $aenvironmental impact
650 $asocial impact
650 $aImpacto ambiental
650 $aImpacto econômico
650 $aImpacto social
650 $aPesquisa agrícola
653 $aAvaliação de impacto
653 $aImpact assessment
653 $aMultidimensional approach
653 $aPublic research centers
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, G. S.
700 1 $aVEDOVOTO, G. L.
700 1 $aPENTEADO FILHO, R. de C.
700 1 $aFONSECA JUNIOR, W. C. da
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Unidades Centrais (AI-SEDE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
