| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/11/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/04/2022 |
|
Autoria: |
ARAUJO FILHO, J. C. de; SANTOS, J. C. P. dos; BARROS, A. H. C.; AMARAL, A. J. do; MARQUES, F. A. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOSE COELHO DE ARAUJO FILHO, CNPS; JOSE CARLOS PEREIRA DOS SANTOS, CNPS; ALEXANDRE HUGO CEZAR BARROS, CNPS; ANDRE JULIO DO AMARAL, CNPS; FLAVIO ADRIANO MARQUES, CNPS. |
|
Título: |
Zoneamentos agroecológicos (ZAEs). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SOTTA, E. D.; SAMPAIO, F. G.; MARZALL, K.; SILVA, W. G. da (org.). Estratégias de adaptação às mudanças do clima dos sistemas agropecuários brasileiros. Brasília, DF: Mapa, 2021. p. 100-101. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Os Zoneamentos Agroecológicos (ZAEs) são instrumentos de planejamento multitemáticos cujo objetivo principal é o planejamento de uso das terras com critérios de sustentabilidade. Incluem informações de solos, uso e cobertura das terras, clima, potencial pedológico por cultura, aptidão climática por cultura, potencial pedoclimático por cultura, potencial de terras para irrigação, potencial agroecológico das terras, recursos hídricos, entre outros. O tema que merece destaque é levantamento de solos, pois constitui a "coluna dorsal" dos ZAEs. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Zoneamento agroecológico. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Zoning. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/227986/1/Zoneamentos-agroecologicos-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01252naa a2200193 a 4500
001 2136411
005 2022-04-27
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aARAUJO FILHO, J. C. de
245 $aZoneamentos agroecológicos (ZAEs).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aOs Zoneamentos Agroecológicos (ZAEs) são instrumentos de planejamento multitemáticos cujo objetivo principal é o planejamento de uso das terras com critérios de sustentabilidade. Incluem informações de solos, uso e cobertura das terras, clima, potencial pedológico por cultura, aptidão climática por cultura, potencial pedoclimático por cultura, potencial de terras para irrigação, potencial agroecológico das terras, recursos hídricos, entre outros. O tema que merece destaque é levantamento de solos, pois constitui a "coluna dorsal" dos ZAEs.
650 $aZoning
653 $aZoneamento agroecológico
700 1 $aSANTOS, J. C. P. dos
700 1 $aBARROS, A. H. C.
700 1 $aAMARAL, A. J. do
700 1 $aMARQUES, F. A.
773 $tIn: SOTTA, E. D.; SAMPAIO, F. G.; MARZALL, K.; SILVA, W. G. da (org.). Estratégias de adaptação às mudanças do clima dos sistemas agropecuários brasileiros. Brasília, DF: Mapa, 2021. p. 100-101.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/01/2019 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
27/04/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
DE NARDIN, J.; BUFFON, V.; REVERS, L. F.; ARAÚJO, A. M. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
Janaína De Nardin, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; VANESSA BUFFON, CNPUV; LUIS FERNANDO REVERS, CNPUV; Aldo Mellender de Araújo, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia, Departamento de Genética, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil. |
|
Título: |
Association between molecular markers and behavioral phenotypes in the immatures of a butterfly. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Genetics and Molecular Biology, v. 41, n. 1(suppl), p. 243-252, 2018. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Newly hatched caterpillars of the butterfly Heliconius erato phyllis routinely cannibalize eggs. In a manifestation of kin recognition they cannibalize sibling eggs less frequently than unrelated eggs. Previous work has estimated the heritability of kin recognition in H. erato phyllis to lie between 14 and 48%. It has furthermore been shown that the inheritance of kin recognition is compatible with a quantitative model with a threshold. Here we present the results of a preliminary study, in which we tested for associations between behavioral kin recognition phenotypes and AFLP and SSR markers. We implemented two experimental approaches: (1) a cannibalism test using sibling eggs only, which allowed for only two behavioral outcomes (cannibal and non-cannibal), and (2) a cannibalism test using two sibling eggs and one unrelated egg, which allowed four outcomes [cannibal who does not recognize siblings, cannibal who recognizes siblings, “super-cannibal” (cannibal of both eggs), and “super non-cannibal” (does not cannibalize eggs at all)]. Single-marker analyses were performed using 2 tests and logistic regression with null markers as covariates. Results of the 2 tests identified 72 associations for experimental design 1 and 73 associations for design 2. Logistic regression analysis of the markers found to be significant in the 2 test resulted in 20 associations for design 1 and 11 associations for design 2. Experiment 2 identified markers that were more frequently present or absent in cannibals who recognize siblings and super non-cannibals; i.e. in both phenotypes capable of k MenosNewly hatched caterpillars of the butterfly Heliconius erato phyllis routinely cannibalize eggs. In a manifestation of kin recognition they cannibalize sibling eggs less frequently than unrelated eggs. Previous work has estimated the heritability of kin recognition in H. erato phyllis to lie between 14 and 48%. It has furthermore been shown that the inheritance of kin recognition is compatible with a quantitative model with a threshold. Here we present the results of a preliminary study, in which we tested for associations between behavioral kin recognition phenotypes and AFLP and SSR markers. We implemented two experimental approaches: (1) a cannibalism test using sibling eggs only, which allowed for only two behavioral outcomes (cannibal and non-cannibal), and (2) a cannibalism test using two sibling eggs and one unrelated egg, which allowed four outcomes [cannibal who does not recognize siblings, cannibal who recognizes siblings, “super-cannibal” (cannibal of both eggs), and “super non-cannibal” (does not cannibalize eggs at all)]. Single-marker analyses were performed using 2 tests and logistic regression with null markers as covariates. Results of the 2 tests identified 72 associations for experimental design 1 and 73 associations for design 2. Logistic regression analysis of the markers found to be significant in the 2 test resulted in 20 associations for design 1 and 11 associations for design 2. Experiment 2 identified markers that were more frequently present or abs... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
AFLP; Caterpillar-egg cannibalism; Kin discrimination. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Heliconius; Lepidoptera. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/190394/1/De-Nardin-et-al.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02266naa a2200217 a 4500
001 2103881
005 2019-04-27
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aDE NARDIN, J.
245 $aAssociation between molecular markers and behavioral phenotypes in the immatures of a butterfly.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
520 $aNewly hatched caterpillars of the butterfly Heliconius erato phyllis routinely cannibalize eggs. In a manifestation of kin recognition they cannibalize sibling eggs less frequently than unrelated eggs. Previous work has estimated the heritability of kin recognition in H. erato phyllis to lie between 14 and 48%. It has furthermore been shown that the inheritance of kin recognition is compatible with a quantitative model with a threshold. Here we present the results of a preliminary study, in which we tested for associations between behavioral kin recognition phenotypes and AFLP and SSR markers. We implemented two experimental approaches: (1) a cannibalism test using sibling eggs only, which allowed for only two behavioral outcomes (cannibal and non-cannibal), and (2) a cannibalism test using two sibling eggs and one unrelated egg, which allowed four outcomes [cannibal who does not recognize siblings, cannibal who recognizes siblings, “super-cannibal” (cannibal of both eggs), and “super non-cannibal” (does not cannibalize eggs at all)]. Single-marker analyses were performed using 2 tests and logistic regression with null markers as covariates. Results of the 2 tests identified 72 associations for experimental design 1 and 73 associations for design 2. Logistic regression analysis of the markers found to be significant in the 2 test resulted in 20 associations for design 1 and 11 associations for design 2. Experiment 2 identified markers that were more frequently present or absent in cannibals who recognize siblings and super non-cannibals; i.e. in both phenotypes capable of k
650 $aHeliconius
650 $aLepidoptera
653 $aAFLP
653 $aCaterpillar-egg cannibalism
653 $aKin discrimination
700 1 $aBUFFON, V.
700 1 $aREVERS, L. F.
700 1 $aARAÚJO, A. M. de
773 $tGenetics and Molecular Biology$gv. 41, n. 1(suppl), p. 243-252, 2018.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
