|
|
Registros recuperados : 29 | |
21. | | RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; GARRICK, D. J.; FERNANDO, R. L.; DAVIS, J. M.; JOKELA, E. J.; MARTIN, T. A.; PETER, G. F.; KIRST, M. Accuracy of genomic selection methods in a standard data set of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) Genetics, v. 190, p. 1503-1510, April 2012. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
22. | | ALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de A.; GUIMARÃES, J. F. R.; SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; MUÑOZ, P.; KIRST, M.; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R. de. Genomic prediction of additive and non-additive effects using genetic markers and pedigrees. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, v. 9, p. 2739-2748, Aug. 2019. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
23. | | OLIVEIRA, A. A. de; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R.; FERRÃO, L. F. V.; AMADEU, R. R.; GUIMARAES, L. J. M.; GUIMARÃES, C. T.; PASTINA, M. M.; MARGARIDO, G. R. A. Genomic prediction applied to multiple traits and environments in second season maize hybrids. Heredity, v. 125, n. 1/2, p. 60-72, 2020. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
24. | | MÜLLER, B. S. F.; NEVES, L. G.; ALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; MUÑOZ, P. R.; SANTOS, P. E. T. dos; PALUDZYSZYN FILHO, E.; KIRST, M.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Genomic prediction in contrast to a genome-wide association study in explaining heritable variation of complex growth traits in breeding populations of Eucalyptus. BMC Genomics, v. 18, article 524, 2017. 17 p. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
25. | | MUNOZ, P. R.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; HUBER, D. A.; QUESADA, T.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; NEALE, D. B.; WEGRZYN, J. L.; KIRST, M.; PETER, G. F. Genomic relationship matrix for correcting pedigree errors in breeding populations: impact on genetic parameters and genomic selection accuracy. Crop Science, v. 54, p. 115-1123, May/June 2014. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
26. | | GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; SANSALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; FARIA, D. A.; MISSIAGGIA, A. A.; TAKAHASHI, E. K.; ZAMPROGNO, K. C.; KILIAN, A.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de. Genomic selection in Eucalyptus: marker assisted selection coming to reality in forest trees. In: PLANT & ANIMAL GENOMES CONFERENCE, 18., 2010, San Diego. Resumos. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
27. | | GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; SANSALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; MISSIAGGIA, A. A.; TAKAHASHI, E. K.; ZAMPROGNO, K. C.; KILIAN, A. Breeding by genomic selection: capturing the missing heritability of complex traits in forest trees. In: NEW PHYTOLOGIST SYMPOSIUM, 26., 2011, Nancy. Bioenergy trees. [S.l.]: INRA, 2011. p. 9. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
28. | | GRATTAPAGLIA, D.; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; SANSALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; MISSIAGGIA, A. A.; TAKAHASHI, E. K.; ZAMPROGNO, K. C.; KILIAN, A. Breeding by genomic selection: capturing the missing heritability of complex traits in forest trees. In: NEW PHYTOLOGIST SYMPOSIUM, 26., 2011, Nancy. Bioenergy trees. [S.l.]: INRA, 2011. p. 9. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas. |
| |
29. | | RESENDE, M. D. V. de; RESENDE JUNIOR, M. F. R.; SANSALONI, C. P.; PETROLI, C. D.; MISSIAGGIA, A. A.; AGUIAR, A. M.; ABAD, J. M.; TAKAHASHI, E. K.; ROSADO, A. M.; FARIA, D. A.; PAPPAS JUNIOR, G. J.; KILIAN, A.; GRATTAPAGLIA, D. Genomic selection for growth and wood quality in Eucalyptus: capturing the missing heritability and accelerating breeding for complex traits in forest trees. New Phytologist, v. 194, p. 116-128, 2012. Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Florestas; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 29 | |
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
08/11/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/11/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
ALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de A.; GUIMARÃES, J. F. R.; SILVA, F. F. e; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; MUÑOZ, P.; KIRST, M.; RESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R. de. |
Afiliação: |
Janeo Eustáquio de Almeida Filho, Universidade Esatdual do Norte Fluminense e "Darcy Ribeiro"; João Filipi Rodrigues Guimarães, Futuragene Ltda; Fabyano Fonsceca e Silva, UFV; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; Patricio Muñoz, University of Florida; Matias Kirst, University of Florida; Marcio Fernando Ribeiro de Resende Júnior, University of Florida. |
Título: |
Genomic prediction of additive and non-additive effects using genetic markers and pedigrees. |
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics, v. 9, p. 2739-2748, Aug. 2019. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The genetic merit of individuals can be estimated using models with dense markers and pedigree information. Early genomic models accounted only for additive effects. However, the prediction of non-additive effects is important for different forest breeding systems where the whole genotypic value can be captured through clonal propagation. In this study, we evaluated the integration of marker data with pedigree information, in models that included or ignored non-additive effects. We tested the models Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) and BayesA, with additive and additive-dominance frameworks. Model performance was assessed for the traits tree height, diameter at breast height and rust resistance, measured in 923 pine individuals from a structured population of 71 full-sib families. We have also simulated a population with similar genetic properties and evaluated the performance of models for six simulated traits with distinct genetic architectures. Different cross validation strategies were evaluated, and highest accuracies were achieved using within family cross validation. The inclusion of pedigree information in genomic prediction models did not yield higher accuracies. The different RKHS models resulted in similar predictions accuracies, and RKHS and BayesA generated substantially better predictions than pedigree-only models. The additive-BayesA resulted in higher accuracies than RKHS for rust incidence and in simulated additive-oligogenic traits. For DBH, HT and additive dominance polygenic traits, the RKHS- based models showed slightly higher accuracies than BayesA. Our results indicate that BayesA performs the best for traits with few genes with major effects, while RKHS based models can best predict genotypic effects for clonal selection of complex traits MenosThe genetic merit of individuals can be estimated using models with dense markers and pedigree information. Early genomic models accounted only for additive effects. However, the prediction of non-additive effects is important for different forest breeding systems where the whole genotypic value can be captured through clonal propagation. In this study, we evaluated the integration of marker data with pedigree information, in models that included or ignored non-additive effects. We tested the models Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) and BayesA, with additive and additive-dominance frameworks. Model performance was assessed for the traits tree height, diameter at breast height and rust resistance, measured in 923 pine individuals from a structured population of 71 full-sib families. We have also simulated a population with similar genetic properties and evaluated the performance of models for six simulated traits with distinct genetic architectures. Different cross validation strategies were evaluated, and highest accuracies were achieved using within family cross validation. The inclusion of pedigree information in genomic prediction models did not yield higher accuracies. The different RKHS models resulted in similar predictions accuracies, and RKHS and BayesA generated substantially better predictions than pedigree-only models. The additive-BayesA resulted in higher accuracies than RKHS for rust incidence and in simulated additive-oligogenic traits. For DBH, HT and ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
BayesA; Genomic Prediction; Genotypic Value; GenPred; Oligogenic; Polygenic; Predição genòmica; RKHS; Shared Data Resources. |
Thesagro: |
Genótipo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
G Melhoramento Genético |
Marc: |
LEADER 02704naa a2200313 a 4500 001 2114084 005 2019-11-08 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aALMEIDA FILHO, J. E. de A. 245 $aGenomic prediction of additive and non-additive effects using genetic markers and pedigrees.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 520 $aThe genetic merit of individuals can be estimated using models with dense markers and pedigree information. Early genomic models accounted only for additive effects. However, the prediction of non-additive effects is important for different forest breeding systems where the whole genotypic value can be captured through clonal propagation. In this study, we evaluated the integration of marker data with pedigree information, in models that included or ignored non-additive effects. We tested the models Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces (RKHS) and BayesA, with additive and additive-dominance frameworks. Model performance was assessed for the traits tree height, diameter at breast height and rust resistance, measured in 923 pine individuals from a structured population of 71 full-sib families. We have also simulated a population with similar genetic properties and evaluated the performance of models for six simulated traits with distinct genetic architectures. Different cross validation strategies were evaluated, and highest accuracies were achieved using within family cross validation. The inclusion of pedigree information in genomic prediction models did not yield higher accuracies. The different RKHS models resulted in similar predictions accuracies, and RKHS and BayesA generated substantially better predictions than pedigree-only models. The additive-BayesA resulted in higher accuracies than RKHS for rust incidence and in simulated additive-oligogenic traits. For DBH, HT and additive dominance polygenic traits, the RKHS- based models showed slightly higher accuracies than BayesA. Our results indicate that BayesA performs the best for traits with few genes with major effects, while RKHS based models can best predict genotypic effects for clonal selection of complex traits 650 $aGenótipo 653 $aBayesA 653 $aGenomic Prediction 653 $aGenotypic Value 653 $aGenPred 653 $aOligogenic 653 $aPolygenic 653 $aPredição genòmica 653 $aRKHS 653 $aShared Data Resources 700 1 $aGUIMARÃES, J. F. R. 700 1 $aSILVA, F. F. e 700 1 $aRESENDE, M. D. V. de 700 1 $aMUÑOZ, P. 700 1 $aKIRST, M. 700 1 $aRESENDE JÚNIOR, M. F. R. de 773 $tG3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics$gv. 9, p. 2739-2748, Aug. 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|