| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 33 | |
| 16. |  | VILELA, L.; SPAIN, J. M.; SOARES, W. V.; PENALOZA, A. del P. S.; GOMIDE, C. C. C. Adaptação de gramíneas e leguminosas forrageiras a níveis de acidez e fósforo em um solo de cerrado: segunda coleção. In: REUNION SABANAS, 1., 1992, Brasília, DF. Red Internacional de Evaluacion de Pastos Tropicales - RIEPT. Brasília, DF: EMBRAPA-CPAC; [Cali]: CIAT, 1992. p. 439-449.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
|   |
| 17. | | MACHADO, A. C. C.; VALLS, J. F. M.; PEÑALOZA, A. del P. de S.; SANTOS, S, dos. Novos biótipos pentaplóides do grupo Dilatata de paspalum L. (Gramineae) no Sul do Brasil. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 35, n. 1, p. 56-61, 2005.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 33 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/05/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/05/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
CAMARA, G.; SIMÕES, R.; RUIVO, H. M.; ANDRADE, P. R.; SOTERRONI, A. C.; RAMOS, F. M.; RAMOS, R. G.; SCARABELLO, M.; ALMEIDA, C.; SANCHES, I.; MAURANO, L.; COUTINHO, A. C.; ESQUERDO, J. C. D. M.; ANTUNES, J. F. G.; VENTURIERI, A.; ADAMI, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
GILBERTO CAMARA, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ROLF SIMOES, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; HELOISA M. RUIVO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; PEDRO R. ANDRADE, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ALINE C. SOTERRONI, UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD; FERNANDO M. RAMOS, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; RAFAEL G. RAMOS, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; MARLUCE SCARABELLO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; CLAUDIO ALMEIDA, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; IEDA SANCHES, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; LUIS MAURANO, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS; ALEXANDRE CAMARGO COUTINHO, CNPTIA; JULIO CESAR DALLA MORA ESQUERDO, CNPTIA; JOAO FRANCISCO GONCALVES ANTUNES, CNPTIA; ADRIANO VENTURIERI, CPATU; MARCOS ADAMI, INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS. |
|
Título: |
Impact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Environmental Research Letters, v. 18, n. 6, 065005, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd20a |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Na publicação: Alexandre Coutinho, Julio Esquerdo, João Antunes. |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study examines how land tenure constrains Brazil's ability to meet its deforestation control and forest restoration goals in its Amazonia biome. Our findings are based on an updated assessment of land tenure and land use in the region. Between 2019 and 2021, 44% of deforestation in Amazonia occurred in private lands, while forest removal in settlements ranged from 31% to 27% of the total. Deforestation in undesignated public lands increased from 11% in 2008 to 18% in 2021. Deforestation is highly concentrated, with 1% of properties accounting for 82.5% of forest cuts in 2021. In Amazonia, there is considerable non-compliance with the legal reserve provisions set by Brazil's Forest Code. Legal reserve deficits in private lands sum up to 18.17?Mha (million hectares), compared with 12.49?Mha of legal reserve surpluses. Even if all forest surpluses are offered in the forest credits market set in the Forest Code, farmers still need to restore 5.67?Mha to comply with the law. Large-scale cattle ranchers have a legal reserve deficit of 10.35?Mha (34% of their area). Most crop farming occurs in medium and large properties (4.63?Mha) with a large proportion of legal reserve deficits (45%). Given the political power and financial resources of large ranchers and crop producers, Brazil faces major challenges in inducing these farmers to meet their legal obligations. Therefore, Brazil needs to combine robust command-and-control strategies with market-based policies to achieve its deforestation and forest restoration goals. The government should tailor forest protection and restoration policies to the needs of different landowners, considering their land use practices, technical capacity, and financial resources. MenosThis study examines how land tenure constrains Brazil's ability to meet its deforestation control and forest restoration goals in its Amazonia biome. Our findings are based on an updated assessment of land tenure and land use in the region. Between 2019 and 2021, 44% of deforestation in Amazonia occurred in private lands, while forest removal in settlements ranged from 31% to 27% of the total. Deforestation in undesignated public lands increased from 11% in 2008 to 18% in 2021. Deforestation is highly concentrated, with 1% of properties accounting for 82.5% of forest cuts in 2021. In Amazonia, there is considerable non-compliance with the legal reserve provisions set by Brazil's Forest Code. Legal reserve deficits in private lands sum up to 18.17?Mha (million hectares), compared with 12.49?Mha of legal reserve surpluses. Even if all forest surpluses are offered in the forest credits market set in the Forest Code, farmers still need to restore 5.67?Mha to comply with the law. Large-scale cattle ranchers have a legal reserve deficit of 10.35?Mha (34% of their area). Most crop farming occurs in medium and large properties (4.63?Mha) with a large proportion of legal reserve deficits (45%). Given the political power and financial resources of large ranchers and crop producers, Brazil faces major challenges in inducing these farmers to meet their legal obligations. Therefore, Brazil needs to combine robust command-and-control strategies with market-based policies to achieve its de... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Brazilian Amazonia; Brazil´s Forest Code; Brazil´s NDC; Cadastro Ambiental Rural; CAR; Código florestal brasileiro; Land use policy in Brazil; Política de uso da terra no Brasil; Recuperação florestal. |
|
Thesagro: |
Desmatamento; Impacto Ambiental; Posse de Terra. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Deforestation; Environmental impact; Forest restoration; Land ownership; Land tenure; Land use; Logging. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1153847/1/AP-Impact-land-tenure-2023.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03375naa a2200553 a 4500
001 2153847
005 2023-05-22
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acd20a$2DOI
100 1 $aCAMARA, G.
245 $aImpact of land tenure on deforestation control and forest restoration in Brazilian Amazonia.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aNa publicação: Alexandre Coutinho, Julio Esquerdo, João Antunes.
520 $aThis study examines how land tenure constrains Brazil's ability to meet its deforestation control and forest restoration goals in its Amazonia biome. Our findings are based on an updated assessment of land tenure and land use in the region. Between 2019 and 2021, 44% of deforestation in Amazonia occurred in private lands, while forest removal in settlements ranged from 31% to 27% of the total. Deforestation in undesignated public lands increased from 11% in 2008 to 18% in 2021. Deforestation is highly concentrated, with 1% of properties accounting for 82.5% of forest cuts in 2021. In Amazonia, there is considerable non-compliance with the legal reserve provisions set by Brazil's Forest Code. Legal reserve deficits in private lands sum up to 18.17?Mha (million hectares), compared with 12.49?Mha of legal reserve surpluses. Even if all forest surpluses are offered in the forest credits market set in the Forest Code, farmers still need to restore 5.67?Mha to comply with the law. Large-scale cattle ranchers have a legal reserve deficit of 10.35?Mha (34% of their area). Most crop farming occurs in medium and large properties (4.63?Mha) with a large proportion of legal reserve deficits (45%). Given the political power and financial resources of large ranchers and crop producers, Brazil faces major challenges in inducing these farmers to meet their legal obligations. Therefore, Brazil needs to combine robust command-and-control strategies with market-based policies to achieve its deforestation and forest restoration goals. The government should tailor forest protection and restoration policies to the needs of different landowners, considering their land use practices, technical capacity, and financial resources.
650 $aDeforestation
650 $aEnvironmental impact
650 $aForest restoration
650 $aLand ownership
650 $aLand tenure
650 $aLand use
650 $aLogging
650 $aDesmatamento
650 $aImpacto Ambiental
650 $aPosse de Terra
653 $aBrazilian Amazonia
653 $aBrazil´s Forest Code
653 $aBrazil´s NDC
653 $aCadastro Ambiental Rural
653 $aCAR
653 $aCódigo florestal brasileiro
653 $aLand use policy in Brazil
653 $aPolítica de uso da terra no Brasil
653 $aRecuperação florestal
700 1 $aSIMÕES, R.
700 1 $aRUIVO, H. M.
700 1 $aANDRADE, P. R.
700 1 $aSOTERRONI, A. C.
700 1 $aRAMOS, F. M.
700 1 $aRAMOS, R. G.
700 1 $aSCARABELLO, M.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, C.
700 1 $aSANCHES, I.
700 1 $aMAURANO, L.
700 1 $aCOUTINHO, A. C.
700 1 $aESQUERDO, J. C. D. M.
700 1 $aANTUNES, J. F. G.
700 1 $aVENTURIERI, A.
700 1 $aADAMI, M.
773 $tEnvironmental Research Letters$gv. 18, n. 6, 065005, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
