| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 218 | |
| 18. |  | SCWANKE, A. M. L.; ANDRES, A.; NOLDIN, J. A.; CONCENÇO, G; PROCOPIO, S. de O. Avaliação de germinação e dormência de ecótipos de arroz-vermelho. Planta Daninha, Viçosa, MG, v. 26, n. 3, p. 497-505, 2008.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
|    |
| 19. | | PETTER, F. A.; PACHECO, L. P.; PROCOPIO, S. de O.; CARGNELUTTI FILHO, A.; VOLF, M. R. Seletividade de herbicidas à cultura do milho e ao capim-braquiária cultivadas no sistema de integração lavoura-pecuária. Semina. Ciências Agrárias, Londrina, v. 32, n. 3, p. 855-864, jul/set. 2011.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 218 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/09/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/09/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
CORADIN, J.; BRAZ, G. B. P.; SILVA, A. G. da; PROCOPIO, S. de O.; VIAN, G. S.; CHAVAGLIA, P. V. L. L.; GOULART, M. A. R.; SOUZA, M. de F. |
|
Afiliação: |
JHONATAN CORADIN, UNIVERSIDADE DE RIO VERDE; GUILHERME BRAGA PEREIRA BRAZ, UNIVERSIDADE DE RIO VERDE; ALESSANDRO GUERRA DA SILVA, UNIVERSIDADE DE RIO VERDE; SERGIO DE OLIVEIRA PROCOPIO, CNPMA; GUILHERME SALES VIAN, UNIVERSIDADE DE RIO VERDE; PAULO VICTOR LEÃO LIMA CHAVAGLIA, UNIVERSIDADE DE RIO VERDE; MARCO ANTONIO RODRIGUES GOULART, UNIVERSIDADE DE RIO VERDE; MATHEUS DE FREITAS SOUZA, UNIVERSIDADE DE RIO VERDE. |
|
Título: |
Selectivity of latifolicides associated with glyphosate applied in postemergence on soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, v. 55, n. 1, p. 86-97, 2023. |
|
ISSN: |
1853-8665 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: The genetic improvement of soybean cultivars over the years has focused on increasing the yield potential and tolerance to some abiotic and biotic factors. However, during the transfer of genes of interest, some genes responsible for a lower tolerance to herbicides can be integrated into the genome of the new cultivar. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicide associations applied in the postemergence period of three soybean cultivars. The experiment was conducted in a randomized completely block design, with four replications. The selected cultivars were M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO®, and Bônus IPRO®. The herbicides and the respective doses (g a.i. ha-1) used were glyphosate (1176), glyphosate + bentazon (1176 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (1176 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (1176 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (1176 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (1176 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (1176 + 39.5), and a control without herbicide application. The visual note of intoxication was evaluated for each treatment. The components of growth and yield evaluated were height, stand, weight of one hundred grains, and yield. The application of postherbicide herbicides did not alter the plant stands of soybean cultivars. Additionally, these herbicides did not reduce the yield of the M7110 IPRO® and Foco IPRO® cultivars. Glyphosate isolated and in association with lactofen or imazethapyr reduced the grain yield of the Bônus IPRO® cultivar. -- Resumen: El mejoramiento genético de los cultivares de soja a lo largo de los años se ha centrado en aumentar la capacidad productiva y la tolerancia a algunos factores abióticos y bióticos. Sin embargo, durante la transferencia de genes de interés, algunos genes responsables de una menor tolerancia a los herbicidas pueden integrarse en el genoma del nuevo cultivar. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la selectividad de las asociaciones de herbicidas aplicadas en la post-emergencia de tres cultivares de soja. El diseño experimental utilizado fue un bloque completamente al azar, con cuatro repeticiones. Los cultivares seleccionados fueron M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO® y Bônus IPRO®. Los herbicidas y las respectivas dosis (g a.i. ha-1) utilizados fueron: glyphosate (1176), glyphosate + bentazon (1176 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (1176 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (1176 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (1176 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (1176 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (1176 + 39,5), y un control sin aplicación de herbicida. Se hizo una nota visual de intoxicación para cada tratamiento. Los componentes de crecimiento y rendimiento evaluados fueron: altura, rodal, peso de cien granos y rendimiento. La aplicación de herbicidas en post-emergencia no alteró la masa vegetal de los cultivares de soja. Además, estos herbicidas no redujeron el rendimiento de los cultivares M7110 IPRO® y Foco IPRO®. Tanto el glifosato aislado como mezclado con lactofen o imazethapyr redujeron el rendimiento del cultivar Bônus IPRO®. MenosAbstract: The genetic improvement of soybean cultivars over the years has focused on increasing the yield potential and tolerance to some abiotic and biotic factors. However, during the transfer of genes of interest, some genes responsible for a lower tolerance to herbicides can be integrated into the genome of the new cultivar. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicide associations applied in the postemergence period of three soybean cultivars. The experiment was conducted in a randomized completely block design, with four replications. The selected cultivars were M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO®, and Bônus IPRO®. The herbicides and the respective doses (g a.i. ha-1) used were glyphosate (1176), glyphosate + bentazon (1176 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (1176 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (1176 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (1176 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (1176 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (1176 + 39.5), and a control without herbicide application. The visual note of intoxication was evaluated for each treatment. The components of growth and yield evaluated were height, stand, weight of one hundred grains, and yield. The application of postherbicide herbicides did not alter the plant stands of soybean cultivars. Additionally, these herbicides did not reduce the yield of the M7110 IPRO® and Foco IPRO® cultivars. Glyphosate isolated and in association with lactofen or imazethapyr reduced the grain yield of the Bônus IPRO® cultivar. -- ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Phytointoxication. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biomassa; Glycine Max; Herbicida; Produtividade; Soja. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Crop yield; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Soybeans. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
W Química e Física |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1156448/1/Procopio-Selectivity-latifolicides-2023.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04056naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2156448
005 2023-09-06
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1853-8665
100 1 $aCORADIN, J.
245 $aSelectivity of latifolicides associated with glyphosate applied in postemergence on soybean (Glycine max) cultivars.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
520 $aAbstract: The genetic improvement of soybean cultivars over the years has focused on increasing the yield potential and tolerance to some abiotic and biotic factors. However, during the transfer of genes of interest, some genes responsible for a lower tolerance to herbicides can be integrated into the genome of the new cultivar. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the selectivity of herbicide associations applied in the postemergence period of three soybean cultivars. The experiment was conducted in a randomized completely block design, with four replications. The selected cultivars were M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO®, and Bônus IPRO®. The herbicides and the respective doses (g a.i. ha-1) used were glyphosate (1176), glyphosate + bentazon (1176 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (1176 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (1176 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (1176 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (1176 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (1176 + 39.5), and a control without herbicide application. The visual note of intoxication was evaluated for each treatment. The components of growth and yield evaluated were height, stand, weight of one hundred grains, and yield. The application of postherbicide herbicides did not alter the plant stands of soybean cultivars. Additionally, these herbicides did not reduce the yield of the M7110 IPRO® and Foco IPRO® cultivars. Glyphosate isolated and in association with lactofen or imazethapyr reduced the grain yield of the Bônus IPRO® cultivar. -- Resumen: El mejoramiento genético de los cultivares de soja a lo largo de los años se ha centrado en aumentar la capacidad productiva y la tolerancia a algunos factores abióticos y bióticos. Sin embargo, durante la transferencia de genes de interés, algunos genes responsables de una menor tolerancia a los herbicidas pueden integrarse en el genoma del nuevo cultivar. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar la selectividad de las asociaciones de herbicidas aplicadas en la post-emergencia de tres cultivares de soja. El diseño experimental utilizado fue un bloque completamente al azar, con cuatro repeticiones. Los cultivares seleccionados fueron M7110 IPRO®, Foco IPRO® y Bônus IPRO®. Los herbicidas y las respectivas dosis (g a.i. ha-1) utilizados fueron: glyphosate (1176), glyphosate + bentazon (1176 + 600), glyphosate + fomesafen (1176 + 175), glyphosate + lactofen (1176 + 120), glyphosate + imazethapyr (1176 + 100), glyphosate + chlorimuron (1176 + 10), glyphosate + cloransulam (1176 + 39,5), y un control sin aplicación de herbicida. Se hizo una nota visual de intoxicación para cada tratamiento. Los componentes de crecimiento y rendimiento evaluados fueron: altura, rodal, peso de cien granos y rendimiento. La aplicación de herbicidas en post-emergencia no alteró la masa vegetal de los cultivares de soja. Además, estos herbicidas no redujeron el rendimiento de los cultivares M7110 IPRO® y Foco IPRO®. Tanto el glifosato aislado como mezclado con lactofen o imazethapyr redujeron el rendimiento del cultivar Bônus IPRO®.
650 $aCrop yield
650 $aGlyphosate
650 $aHerbicides
650 $aSoybeans
650 $aBiomassa
650 $aGlycine Max
650 $aHerbicida
650 $aProdutividade
650 $aSoja
653 $aPhytointoxication
700 1 $aBRAZ, G. B. P.
700 1 $aSILVA, A. G. da
700 1 $aPROCOPIO, S. de O.
700 1 $aVIAN, G. S.
700 1 $aCHAVAGLIA, P. V. L. L.
700 1 $aGOULART, M. A. R.
700 1 $aSOUZA, M. de F.
773 $tRevista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo$gv. 55, n. 1, p. 86-97, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
