| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 22 | |
| 7. |  | AZEVEDO, S. G. de; PIRAUX, M.; ARAÚJO, C. R. de. O papel e os desafios do fórum no enfoque de desenvolvimento territorial: a experiência de Acauã. In: MENEZES, A. H. N.; ARAÚJO, C. R. de; SOUZA, C. M. de; OLIVEIRA, L. M. S. R. de; OLIVEIRA, L. S. de; PIRAUX, M.; RAMOS, P. R.; AZEVEDO, S. G. de. Formação de agentes de desenvolvimento sustentável: diálogos entre o fazer técnico e o saber humanista. Juazeiro, BA: Franciscana; Petrolina: Embrapa Semi-Árido: CIRAD: UNIVASF, 2007. cap. 1, p. 10-48.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
|    |
| 9. | | PIRAUX, M.; TONNEAU, J.-P; AZEVEDO, S. G. de; OLIVEIRA, L. M. S. R. de. Le développement territorial durable : le cas d'une expérience dans le Nordeste du Brésil. In: COLLOQUE DE L?ASRDLF, 43., 2007, Grenoble, Chambéry. Les dynamiques territoriales: débats et enjeux entre les différentes approches disciplinaires. Grenoble, Chambéry: Association de Science Régionale de Langue Française: Universités Joseph Fourier et Pierre Mendes France: Université de Savoie, 2007.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 13. | | TONNEAU, J.-P.; PIRAUX, M.; COUDEL, E.; SILVA, P. C. G. da; AZEVEDO, S. G. de; ARAÚJO, C. R. de. Dificeis inovações territóriais: uma experiência de articulação e construção de competências no Território do Alto Sertão do Piauí e de Pernambuco. In: NASCIMENTO, P. P.; SICOLI, A. H.; MARTINS, M. A. G.; BALSADI, O. V.; SILVA JÚNIOR, C. D. da. (Ed.). Inovações em desenvolvimento territorial: novos desafios para a Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica: Embrapa Departamento de Transferência de Tecnologia, 2011. p. 343-361.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 14. | | TONNEAU, J.-P.; SILVA, P. C. G. da; BARROS, E. da R.; PIRAUX, M.; AZEVEDO, S. G. de. Pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação para o desenvolvimento territorial e convivência com o Semiárido brasileiro: metodologia de pesquisa participativa. In: NASCIMENTO, P. P.; SICOLI, A. H.; MARTINS, M. A. G.; BALSADI, O. V.; SILVA JÚNIOR, C. D. da. (Ed.). Inovações em desenvolvimento territorial: novos desafios para a Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa Informação Tecnológica: Embrapa Departamento de Transferência de Tecnologia, 2011. cap. 3, p. 91-111. il.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 16. | | BIANCHINI, P. C.; TAKAGI, M.; PIRAUX, M.; TONNEAU, J.-P.; BIANCHINI, F.; FERREIRA, M. A. J. F.; SILVA, P. C. G. da. Agricultura familiar, territórios e políticas públicas: diretrizes para uma agenda de pesquisa Petrolina: Embrapa Semiárido, 2016. 25 p. il. (Embrapa Semiárido. Documentos, 275).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 17. | | RESQUE, A. G. L.; COUDEL, E.; PIKETTY, M.-G.; CIALDELLA, N.; SA, T. D. de A.; PIRAUX, M.; ASSIS, W.; LE PAGE, C. Agrobiodiversity and public food procurement programs in Brazil: influence of local stakeholders in configuring green mediated markets. Sustainability, v. 11, n. 5, 1425, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 18. | | BLANC, L.; FERREIRA, J. N.; PIKETTY, M.-G.; BOURGOIN, C.; GOND, V.; HÉRAULT, B.; KANASHIRO, M.; LAURENT, F.; PIRAUX, M.; RUTISHAUSER, E.; SIST, P. Gestão das florestas degradadas, uma nova prioridade na Amazônia brasileira. Perspective, n. 40, 2017. Disponível também em inglês e francês.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 19. | | PIKETTY, M.-G.; PIRAUX, M.; BLANC, L.; LAURENT, F.; CILDELLA, N.; FERREIRA, J. N.; COUDEL, E.; FREITAS, L. J. M. de; RESQUE, G. L.; LE PAGE, C.; NAUDIN, K.; CARVALHO, S.; GOMES, M. R. de O.; POCCARD-CHAPUIS, R. Municípios verdes: passer du zéro-déforestation à la gestion durable des ressources naturelles en Amazonie brésilienne. In: CARON, P.; VALETTE, E.; WASSENAAR, T.; COPPENS d'EECKENBRUGGE, G.; PAPAZIAN, V. (Ed.). Des territoires vivants pour transformer le monde. Versailles: Quae, 2017. p. 54-58.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|  |
| Registros recuperados : 22 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/12/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
14/12/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
BRANDÃO, F.; SCHONEVELD, G.; PACHECO, P.; VIEIRA, I.; PIRAUX, M.; MOTA, D. M. da. |
|
Afiliação: |
FREDERICO BRANDÃO, Utrecht University / CIFOR; George Schoneveld, CIFOR; Pablo Pacheco, WWF; IMA VIEIRA, MPEG; Marc Piraux, CIRAD; DALVA MARIA DA MOTA, CPATU. |
|
Título: |
The challenge of reconciling conservation and development in the tropics: Lessons from Brazil's oil palm governance model. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
World Development, v. 139, 105268, Mar. 2021. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105268 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Due to its controversies, oil palm cultivation has been targeted by regulatory innovations. Among these,transnational efforts?such as the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and corporate commit-ments to zero deforestation have been highly influential but often tend to overvalue environmental oversocio-economic outcomes. This article discusses to what extent domestic governance models of palm oilproducing countries can be better equipped to reconcile domestic demands such as economic develop-ment and poverty alleviation, and transnational concerns about forest conservation. We do so by lookinginto the Brazilian case, where the government intended to drive oil palm expansion in the Amazonthrough a program launched in 2010 that simultaneously only allowed expansion into already deforestedareas and offered companies incentives to engage smallholder farmers in their supply chains. Our find-ings, drawn from primary research activities and existing literature, indicate that Brazil has managedto avoid deforestation typically associated with oil palm expansion elsewhere. Oil palm establishmentinvolved the conversion of 0.8% and 1.3% of primary forests for corporate and smallholder plantations,respectively. However, the Brazilian government did not manage to optimally enhance smallholder par-ticipation in the sector, as significant differences in performance were observed between farmers, rangingfrom very successful (17%) to highly unsuccessful (12%); and failed to achieve sectoral development andcompetitiveness targets. While some failings can be attributed to external factors such as context,broader domestic governance frameworks and alignments, and private supply chain initiatives, the pro-gram itself did not manage to reconcile social, environmental and economic objectives into a singlecoherent sectoral governance model. Yet, this case study suggests that domestic governance strategiescan enable commodity production in a way that is more coherent with national priorities, at the sametime as preventing deforestation and minimizing social risks more effectively. MenosDue to its controversies, oil palm cultivation has been targeted by regulatory innovations. Among these,transnational efforts?such as the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and corporate commit-ments to zero deforestation have been highly influential but often tend to overvalue environmental oversocio-economic outcomes. This article discusses to what extent domestic governance models of palm oilproducing countries can be better equipped to reconcile domestic demands such as economic develop-ment and poverty alleviation, and transnational concerns about forest conservation. We do so by lookinginto the Brazilian case, where the government intended to drive oil palm expansion in the Amazonthrough a program launched in 2010 that simultaneously only allowed expansion into already deforestedareas and offered companies incentives to engage smallholder farmers in their supply chains. Our find-ings, drawn from primary research activities and existing literature, indicate that Brazil has managedto avoid deforestation typically associated with oil palm expansion elsewhere. Oil palm establishmentinvolved the conversion of 0.8% and 1.3% of primary forests for corporate and smallholder plantations,respectively. However, the Brazilian government did not manage to optimally enhance smallholder par-ticipation in the sector, as significant differences in performance were observed between farmers, rangingfrom very successful (17%) to highly unsuccessful (12%); and failed to achieve sect... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Palm oils. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02748naa a2200205 a 4500
001 2128082
005 2020-12-14
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105268$2DOI
100 1 $aBRANDÃO, F.
245 $aThe challenge of reconciling conservation and development in the tropics$bLessons from Brazil's oil palm governance model.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aDue to its controversies, oil palm cultivation has been targeted by regulatory innovations. Among these,transnational efforts?such as the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) and corporate commit-ments to zero deforestation have been highly influential but often tend to overvalue environmental oversocio-economic outcomes. This article discusses to what extent domestic governance models of palm oilproducing countries can be better equipped to reconcile domestic demands such as economic develop-ment and poverty alleviation, and transnational concerns about forest conservation. We do so by lookinginto the Brazilian case, where the government intended to drive oil palm expansion in the Amazonthrough a program launched in 2010 that simultaneously only allowed expansion into already deforestedareas and offered companies incentives to engage smallholder farmers in their supply chains. Our find-ings, drawn from primary research activities and existing literature, indicate that Brazil has managedto avoid deforestation typically associated with oil palm expansion elsewhere. Oil palm establishmentinvolved the conversion of 0.8% and 1.3% of primary forests for corporate and smallholder plantations,respectively. However, the Brazilian government did not manage to optimally enhance smallholder par-ticipation in the sector, as significant differences in performance were observed between farmers, rangingfrom very successful (17%) to highly unsuccessful (12%); and failed to achieve sectoral development andcompetitiveness targets. While some failings can be attributed to external factors such as context,broader domestic governance frameworks and alignments, and private supply chain initiatives, the pro-gram itself did not manage to reconcile social, environmental and economic objectives into a singlecoherent sectoral governance model. Yet, this case study suggests that domestic governance strategiescan enable commodity production in a way that is more coherent with national priorities, at the sametime as preventing deforestation and minimizing social risks more effectively.
650 $aPalm oils
700 1 $aSCHONEVELD, G.
700 1 $aPACHECO, P.
700 1 $aVIEIRA, I.
700 1 $aPIRAUX, M.
700 1 $aMOTA, D. M. da
773 $tWorld Development$gv. 139, 105268, Mar. 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
