|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste; Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
10/11/2014 |
Data da última atualização: |
06/03/2015 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
PIVA, J. T.; DIECKOW, J.; BAYER, C.; ZANATTA, J. A.; MORAES, A. de; TOMAZI, M.; PAULETTI, V.; BARTH, G.; PICCOLO, M. de C. |
Afiliação: |
JONATAS TIAGO PIVA, UFPR; JEFERSON DIECKOW, UFPR; CIMÉLIO BAYER, UFRGS; JOSILEIA ACORDI ZANATTA, CNPF; ANIBAL DE MORAES, UFPR; MICHELY TOMAZI, UFRGS; VOLNEI PAULETTI, UFPR; GABRIEL BARTH, Fundação ABC para Assistência Técnica Agropecuária; MARISA DE CASSIA PICCOLO, Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura/USP. |
Título: |
Soil gaseous N2O and CH4 emissions and carbon pool due to integrated crop-livestock in a subtropical Ferralsol. |
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v. 190, p. 87-93, 2014. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
We assessed the impact of integrated crop-livestock (CL), with silage maize (Zea mays L.) in summerand grazed annual-ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) in winter, and continuous crop (CC), with annual-ryegrass used only as cover-crop, on net greenhouse gas emission from soil (NetGHG-S) in a subtropicalFerralsol of a 3.5-year-old experiment in Brazil. Emissions from animal excreta in CL were estimated.Soil N2O fluxes after N application to maize were higher in CL (max. 181 g N2O-N m−2h−1) than in CC(max. 132 g N2O-N m−2h−1). The cumulative annual N2O emission from soil in CL surpassed that in CCby more than three-times (4.26 vs. 1.26 kg N2O-N ha−1, p < 0.01), possibly because of supplementary Napplication to grazed ryegrass in CL (N was not applied in cover-crop ryegrass of CC) and a certain degreeof soil compaction visually observed in the first few centimetres after grazing. The estimated annual N2Oemission from excreta in CL was 2.35 kg N2O-N ha−1. Cumulative annual CH4emission was not affectedsignificantly (1.65 in CL vs. 1.08 kg CH4-C ha−1in CC, p = 0.27). Soil organic carbon (OC) stocks were notaffected by soil use systems, neither in 0?20-cm (67.88 in CL vs. 67.20 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.62) or 0?100-cm (234.74 in CL vs. 234.61 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.97). The NetGHG-S was 0.652 Mg CO2-Ceqha−1year−1higher in CL than in CC. Crop-livestock emitted more N2O than CC and no soil OC sequestration occurredto offset that emission. Management of fertiliser- and excreta-N must be focused as a strategy to mitigate NO2 fluxes in CL. MenosWe assessed the impact of integrated crop-livestock (CL), with silage maize (Zea mays L.) in summerand grazed annual-ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) in winter, and continuous crop (CC), with annual-ryegrass used only as cover-crop, on net greenhouse gas emission from soil (NetGHG-S) in a subtropicalFerralsol of a 3.5-year-old experiment in Brazil. Emissions from animal excreta in CL were estimated.Soil N2O fluxes after N application to maize were higher in CL (max. 181 g N2O-N m−2h−1) than in CC(max. 132 g N2O-N m−2h−1). The cumulative annual N2O emission from soil in CL surpassed that in CCby more than three-times (4.26 vs. 1.26 kg N2O-N ha−1, p < 0.01), possibly because of supplementary Napplication to grazed ryegrass in CL (N was not applied in cover-crop ryegrass of CC) and a certain degreeof soil compaction visually observed in the first few centimetres after grazing. The estimated annual N2Oemission from excreta in CL was 2.35 kg N2O-N ha−1. Cumulative annual CH4emission was not affectedsignificantly (1.65 in CL vs. 1.08 kg CH4-C ha−1in CC, p = 0.27). Soil organic carbon (OC) stocks were notaffected by soil use systems, neither in 0?20-cm (67.88 in CL vs. 67.20 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.62) or 0?100-cm (234.74 in CL vs. 234.61 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.97). The NetGHG-S was 0.652 Mg CO2-Ceqha−1year−1higher in CL than in CC. Crop-livestock emitted more N2O than CC and no soil OC sequestration occurredto offset tha... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Aquecimento global; Dairy livestock; Fertilização; Global warming mitigation; Mitigação; Subtropical soil. |
Thesagro: |
Gado; Solo. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- A Sistemas de Cultivo |
Marc: |
LEADER 02483naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1999593 005 2015-03-06 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPIVA, J. T. 245 $aSoil gaseous N2O and CH4 emissions and carbon pool due to integrated crop-livestock in a subtropical Ferralsol. 260 $c2014 520 $aWe assessed the impact of integrated crop-livestock (CL), with silage maize (Zea mays L.) in summerand grazed annual-ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) in winter, and continuous crop (CC), with annual-ryegrass used only as cover-crop, on net greenhouse gas emission from soil (NetGHG-S) in a subtropicalFerralsol of a 3.5-year-old experiment in Brazil. Emissions from animal excreta in CL were estimated.Soil N2O fluxes after N application to maize were higher in CL (max. 181 g N2O-N m−2h−1) than in CC(max. 132 g N2O-N m−2h−1). The cumulative annual N2O emission from soil in CL surpassed that in CCby more than three-times (4.26 vs. 1.26 kg N2O-N ha−1, p < 0.01), possibly because of supplementary Napplication to grazed ryegrass in CL (N was not applied in cover-crop ryegrass of CC) and a certain degreeof soil compaction visually observed in the first few centimetres after grazing. The estimated annual N2Oemission from excreta in CL was 2.35 kg N2O-N ha−1. Cumulative annual CH4emission was not affectedsignificantly (1.65 in CL vs. 1.08 kg CH4-C ha−1in CC, p = 0.27). Soil organic carbon (OC) stocks were notaffected by soil use systems, neither in 0?20-cm (67.88 in CL vs. 67.20 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.62) or 0?100-cm (234.74 in CL vs. 234.61 Mg ha−1in CC, p = 0.97). The NetGHG-S was 0.652 Mg CO2-Ceqha−1year−1higher in CL than in CC. Crop-livestock emitted more N2O than CC and no soil OC sequestration occurredto offset that emission. Management of fertiliser- and excreta-N must be focused as a strategy to mitigate NO2 fluxes in CL. 650 $aGado 650 $aSolo 653 $aAquecimento global 653 $aDairy livestock 653 $aFertilização 653 $aGlobal warming mitigation 653 $aMitigação 653 $aSubtropical soil 700 1 $aDIECKOW, J. 700 1 $aBAYER, C. 700 1 $aZANATTA, J. A. 700 1 $aMORAES, A. de 700 1 $aTOMAZI, M. 700 1 $aPAULETTI, V. 700 1 $aBARTH, G. 700 1 $aPICCOLO, M. de C. 773 $tAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment$gv. 190, p. 87-93, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Acre. |
Data corrente: |
12/01/2015 |
Data da última atualização: |
31/10/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Autoria: |
CHAGAS, E. A.; FLORES, P. S.; CHAGAS, P. C.; COUCEIRO, M. A.; PASQUAL, M.; PIO, R.; ARAÚJO, M. da C. da R.; SILVA, M. L. da. |
Afiliação: |
EDVAN ALVES CHAGAS, CPAF-RR; PATRICIA SILVA FLORES, CPAF-AC. |
Título: |
Frutíferas nativas da Amazônia. |
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: PASQUAL, M.; CHAGAS, E. A. (org.). Cultura de tecidos em espécies frutíferas Boa Vista: Editora da UFRR, 2014. |
Páginas: |
p. 89-109. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Conteúdo: |
1 Introdução; 2 Técnicas da cultura de tecidos em frutíferas nativas; 2.1 Estabelecimento in vitro e micropropagação; 2.2 Embriogênese somática; 2.3 Cultivo de embriões zigóticos in vitro; 2.4 Germinação in vitro de grãos de pólen; 3 Possibilidades de utilização da cultura de tecidos em frutíferas nativas da Amazônia; 4 Consideraçõesfinais; 5 Agradecimento. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Cultura de tecidos; Espécies amazônicas. |
Thesagro: |
Fruticultura. |
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/115265/1/25379.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01120naa a2200253 a 4500 001 2005162 005 2023-10-31 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCHAGAS, E. A. 245 $aFrutíferas nativas da Amazônia.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2014 300 $ap. 89-109. 520 $a1 Introdução; 2 Técnicas da cultura de tecidos em frutíferas nativas; 2.1 Estabelecimento in vitro e micropropagação; 2.2 Embriogênese somática; 2.3 Cultivo de embriões zigóticos in vitro; 2.4 Germinação in vitro de grãos de pólen; 3 Possibilidades de utilização da cultura de tecidos em frutíferas nativas da Amazônia; 4 Consideraçõesfinais; 5 Agradecimento. 650 $aFruticultura 653 $aCultura de tecidos 653 $aEspécies amazônicas 700 1 $aFLORES, P. S. 700 1 $aCHAGAS, P. C. 700 1 $aCOUCEIRO, M. A. 700 1 $aPASQUAL, M. 700 1 $aPIO, R. 700 1 $aARAÚJO, M. da C. da R. 700 1 $aSILVA, M. L. da 773 $tIn: PASQUAL, M.; CHAGAS, E. A. (org.). Cultura de tecidos em espécies frutíferas Boa Vista: Editora da UFRR, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Acre (CPAF-AC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|