|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Corte. |
Data corrente: |
27/12/2018 |
Data da última atualização: |
27/12/2018 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
Autoria: |
SERRA, A. P.; MARCHETTI, M. E.; DUPAS, E.; ENSINAS, S. C.; LOURENTE, E. R. P.; SILVA, E. F. da; ALMEIDA, R. G. de; CARDUCCI, C. E.; ALOVISI, A. M. T. |
Afiliação: |
ADEMAR PEREIRA SERRA, CNPGC; Marlene Estevão Marchetti; Elisângela Dupas; Simone Candido Ensinas; Elaine Reis Pinheiro Lourente; Eulene Francisco da Silva; Roberto Giolo de Almeida; Carla Eloize Carducci; Alessandra Mayumi Tokura Alovisi. |
Título: |
Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Nitrogen Fertilizer in Forage Grasses. |
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: EDVAN, R. L. New Perspectives in Forage Crops. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen, 2018 |
Páginas: |
P. 243 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
There is a concern about the growing population and limitation in natural resources which are taking the population to direct its agricultural systems into a more productive and efficient activity, looking to avoid a negative impact on the surrounding environment. The industry energy expended to produce nitrogen (N)-fertilizer is considered an indirect consumption of energy in agriculture, which is higher with an increasing forage yield. Nitrogen is the key nutrient associated with high-yielding production in forage grass and grain crops. The aim of this chapter is to introduce the best management practices (BMPs) for N-fertilizer application in forage grasses to improve N-use efficiency, since the most economical way to feed livestock is forage plants where its potential biomass production is not well explored. The BMPs basically follow three management practices: (1) soil nutrient availability and forage requirement, (2) fertilizer application, and (3) decrease in nutrient losses from soil. In order to take a decision on applying N-fertilizer to accomplish forage grasses production with social, economic, and environmental benefits, the N-fertilizer use in forage grasses is going to follow the ?Right rate, Right source, Right place, and Right time (4R) nutrient stewardship.? The application of the 4R?s nutrients stewardship is directly associated with economic, social, and environmental impact. The capacity of the 4R?s implementation worldwide turns into a best guide to improve the striving of better N-use efficiency in forage grass. The 4R?s are interrelated; thus, the recommendation of N-fertilizer rates cannot be prescribed without the combination of the 4R?s where a whole system to be followed should be considered to decide about N-fertilizer in pasture. Consequently, any decision in one of the 4R?s is going to affect the expected N-fertilizer results and dry matter production. MenosThere is a concern about the growing population and limitation in natural resources which are taking the population to direct its agricultural systems into a more productive and efficient activity, looking to avoid a negative impact on the surrounding environment. The industry energy expended to produce nitrogen (N)-fertilizer is considered an indirect consumption of energy in agriculture, which is higher with an increasing forage yield. Nitrogen is the key nutrient associated with high-yielding production in forage grass and grain crops. The aim of this chapter is to introduce the best management practices (BMPs) for N-fertilizer application in forage grasses to improve N-use efficiency, since the most economical way to feed livestock is forage plants where its potential biomass production is not well explored. The BMPs basically follow three management practices: (1) soil nutrient availability and forage requirement, (2) fertilizer application, and (3) decrease in nutrient losses from soil. In order to take a decision on applying N-fertilizer to accomplish forage grasses production with social, economic, and environmental benefits, the N-fertilizer use in forage grasses is going to follow the ?Right rate, Right source, Right place, and Right time (4R) nutrient stewardship.? The application of the 4R?s nutrients stewardship is directly associated with economic, social, and environmental impact. The capacity of the 4R?s implementation worldwide turns into a best guide to imp... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
N-fertilizer recovery; N-use efficiency. |
Thesagro: |
Brachiaria sp; Panicum Maximum. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Soil fertility. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/189383/1/Best-management-practices-BMPs.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02771naa a2200289 a 4500 001 2102573 005 2018-12-27 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aSERRA, A. P. 245 $aBest Management Practices (BMPs) for Nitrogen Fertilizer in Forage Grasses.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 300 $aP. 243 520 $aThere is a concern about the growing population and limitation in natural resources which are taking the population to direct its agricultural systems into a more productive and efficient activity, looking to avoid a negative impact on the surrounding environment. The industry energy expended to produce nitrogen (N)-fertilizer is considered an indirect consumption of energy in agriculture, which is higher with an increasing forage yield. Nitrogen is the key nutrient associated with high-yielding production in forage grass and grain crops. The aim of this chapter is to introduce the best management practices (BMPs) for N-fertilizer application in forage grasses to improve N-use efficiency, since the most economical way to feed livestock is forage plants where its potential biomass production is not well explored. The BMPs basically follow three management practices: (1) soil nutrient availability and forage requirement, (2) fertilizer application, and (3) decrease in nutrient losses from soil. In order to take a decision on applying N-fertilizer to accomplish forage grasses production with social, economic, and environmental benefits, the N-fertilizer use in forage grasses is going to follow the ?Right rate, Right source, Right place, and Right time (4R) nutrient stewardship.? The application of the 4R?s nutrients stewardship is directly associated with economic, social, and environmental impact. The capacity of the 4R?s implementation worldwide turns into a best guide to improve the striving of better N-use efficiency in forage grass. The 4R?s are interrelated; thus, the recommendation of N-fertilizer rates cannot be prescribed without the combination of the 4R?s where a whole system to be followed should be considered to decide about N-fertilizer in pasture. Consequently, any decision in one of the 4R?s is going to affect the expected N-fertilizer results and dry matter production. 650 $aSoil fertility 650 $aBrachiaria sp 650 $aPanicum Maximum 653 $aN-fertilizer recovery 653 $aN-use efficiency 700 1 $aMARCHETTI, M. E. 700 1 $aDUPAS, E. 700 1 $aENSINAS, S. C. 700 1 $aLOURENTE, E. R. P. 700 1 $aSILVA, E. F. da 700 1 $aALMEIDA, R. G. de 700 1 $aCARDUCCI, C. E. 700 1 $aALOVISI, A. M. T. 773 $tIn: EDVAN, R. L. New Perspectives in Forage Crops. London, United Kingdom: IntechOpen, 2018
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Corte (CNPGC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Soja; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
Data corrente: |
03/09/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
15/10/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
PEREIRA, L. F.; RIBEIRO JUNIOR, W. Q.; RAMOS, M. L. G.; SANTOS, N. Z. dos; SOARES, G. F.; CASARI, R. A. das C. N.; MULLER, O.; TAVARES, C. J.; MARTINS, E. de S.; RASCHER, U.; GUIMARÃES, C. A. de L.; PEREIRA, A. F.; MERTZ-HENNING, L. M.; SOUSA, C. A. F. de. |
Afiliação: |
LUCAS FELISBERTO PEREIRA, Instituto Federal Goiano; WALTER QUADROS RIBEIRO JUNIOR, CPAC; MARIA LUCRÉCIA GEROSA RAMOS, Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária; NICOLAS ZENDONADI DOS SANTOS, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany; GUILHERME FILGUEIRAS SOARES, Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária; RAPHAEL AUGUSTO DAS CHAGAS NOQUELI CASARI, Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária; ONNO MULLER, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany; CÁSSIO JARDIM TAVARES, Instituto Federal Goiano; EDER DE SOUZA MARTINS, CPAC; UWE RASCHER, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany; CRISTIANE ANDRÉA DE LIMA GUIMARÃES, Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária; ANDRE FERREIRA PEREIRA, CPAC; LILIANE MARCIA MERTZ HENNING, CNPSO; CARLOS ANTONIO FERREIRA DE SOUSA, CPAMN. |
Título: |
Physiological changes in soybean cultivated with soil remineralizer in the Cerrado under variable water regimes. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 56, e01455, 2021. |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1590/ S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.01455. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
Título em português: Alterações fisiológicas de soja cultivada com remineralizador de solo no Cerrado sob regimes hídricos variáveis. |
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT - The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of the soil remineralizer fine-graded mica schist (FMS) on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, yield, and grain quality under different water regimes (WRs) in the Brazilian Cerrado. The experiment was conducted under field conditions for two years, using four WRs and three treatments: mica schist, conventional
fertilization, and control. In 2017 and 2018, the following WRs were evaluated: WR1, WR2, WR3, and WR4, corresponding to a mean value of 100, 65, 44, and 28% of crop evapotranspiration replacement, respectively. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, internal CO2 concentration, effective quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv?/Fm?), quantum yield (PSII) (ᶲFSII),
and electron transport rate reduced as a function of the advanced phenological stage of soybean and the reduction in WR. Grain quality was only affected by the WR. The mica schist was statistically similar to conventional fertilization and the control in 2017 and 2018. Yield decreased due to the anticipation of soybean phenological age and WR, but there were no differences between the three treatments in 2017 and 2018. The reduction in soybean yield is attributed to stomatal closure, loss of photoprotective capacity, and damage to the photosynthetic machinery caused by drought.
RESUMO - O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a influência do remineralizador de solo finos de mica xisto (FMS) na fisiologia, na produtividade e na qualidade de grãos de soja (Glycine max) em diferentes regimes hídricos (RHs), no Cerrado brasileiro. O experimento foi conduzido em condições de campo durante dois anos, tendo-se utilizado quatro RHs e três tratamentos: mica xisto, adubação convencional e controle. Em 2017 e 2018, foram avaliados os seguintes RHs: RH1, RH2, RH3 e RH4, que correspondiam ao valor médio de 100, 65, 44 e 28% da reposição da evapotranspiração da cultura, respectivamente. A fotossíntese, a condutância estomática, a transpiração, a concentração interna de CO2, o rendimento quântico efetivo do fotossistema II (FSII) (Fv?/Fm?), o rendimento quântico (FSII) (ᶲFSII) e a taxa de transporte de elétrons reduziram em função do avanço da fase fenológica da soja e da redução do RH. A qualidade dos grãos foi afetada apenas pelo RH. O mica xisto foi estatisticamente semelhante à adubação convencional e ao controle em 2017 e 2018. A produtividade reduziu devido à antecipação da idade fenológica da soja e do RH, mas não houve diferenças entre os três tratamentos em 2017 e 2018. A redução da produtividade da soja é atribuída ao fechamento estomático, à perda da capacidade fotoprotetora e aos danos ao maquinário fotossintético causados pela seca. MenosABSTRACT - The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of the soil remineralizer fine-graded mica schist (FMS) on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, yield, and grain quality under different water regimes (WRs) in the Brazilian Cerrado. The experiment was conducted under field conditions for two years, using four WRs and three treatments: mica schist, conventional
fertilization, and control. In 2017 and 2018, the following WRs were evaluated: WR1, WR2, WR3, and WR4, corresponding to a mean value of 100, 65, 44, and 28% of crop evapotranspiration replacement, respectively. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, internal CO2 concentration, effective quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv?/Fm?), quantum yield (PSII) (ᶲFSII),
and electron transport rate reduced as a function of the advanced phenological stage of soybean and the reduction in WR. Grain quality was only affected by the WR. The mica schist was statistically similar to conventional fertilization and the control in 2017 and 2018. Yield decreased due to the anticipation of soybean phenological age and WR, but there were no differences between the three treatments in 2017 and 2018. The reduction in soybean yield is attributed to stomatal closure, loss of photoprotective capacity, and damage to the photosynthetic machinery caused by drought.
RESUMO - O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a influência do remineralizador de solo finos de mica xisto (FMS) na fisiologia, na produtividade e... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Adubação; Evapotranspiração; Fenologia; Fotossíntese; Glycine Max; Soja; Solo. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Cerrado soils; Mica; Photosynthesis; Soybeans; Water stress. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/225691/1/Physiological-changes-soybean-2021.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04194naa a2200445 a 4500 001 2135363 005 2021-10-15 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1590/ S1678-3921.pab2021.v56.01455.$2DOI 100 1 $aPEREIRA, L. F. 245 $aPhysiological changes in soybean cultivated with soil remineralizer in the Cerrado under variable water regimes.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aTítulo em português: Alterações fisiológicas de soja cultivada com remineralizador de solo no Cerrado sob regimes hídricos variáveis. 520 $aABSTRACT - The objective of this work was to evaluate the influence of the soil remineralizer fine-graded mica schist (FMS) on soybean (Glycine max) physiology, yield, and grain quality under different water regimes (WRs) in the Brazilian Cerrado. The experiment was conducted under field conditions for two years, using four WRs and three treatments: mica schist, conventional fertilization, and control. In 2017 and 2018, the following WRs were evaluated: WR1, WR2, WR3, and WR4, corresponding to a mean value of 100, 65, 44, and 28% of crop evapotranspiration replacement, respectively. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, transpiration, internal CO2 concentration, effective quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv?/Fm?), quantum yield (PSII) (ᶲFSII), and electron transport rate reduced as a function of the advanced phenological stage of soybean and the reduction in WR. Grain quality was only affected by the WR. The mica schist was statistically similar to conventional fertilization and the control in 2017 and 2018. Yield decreased due to the anticipation of soybean phenological age and WR, but there were no differences between the three treatments in 2017 and 2018. The reduction in soybean yield is attributed to stomatal closure, loss of photoprotective capacity, and damage to the photosynthetic machinery caused by drought. RESUMO - O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar a influência do remineralizador de solo finos de mica xisto (FMS) na fisiologia, na produtividade e na qualidade de grãos de soja (Glycine max) em diferentes regimes hídricos (RHs), no Cerrado brasileiro. O experimento foi conduzido em condições de campo durante dois anos, tendo-se utilizado quatro RHs e três tratamentos: mica xisto, adubação convencional e controle. Em 2017 e 2018, foram avaliados os seguintes RHs: RH1, RH2, RH3 e RH4, que correspondiam ao valor médio de 100, 65, 44 e 28% da reposição da evapotranspiração da cultura, respectivamente. A fotossíntese, a condutância estomática, a transpiração, a concentração interna de CO2, o rendimento quântico efetivo do fotossistema II (FSII) (Fv?/Fm?), o rendimento quântico (FSII) (ᶲFSII) e a taxa de transporte de elétrons reduziram em função do avanço da fase fenológica da soja e da redução do RH. A qualidade dos grãos foi afetada apenas pelo RH. O mica xisto foi estatisticamente semelhante à adubação convencional e ao controle em 2017 e 2018. A produtividade reduziu devido à antecipação da idade fenológica da soja e do RH, mas não houve diferenças entre os três tratamentos em 2017 e 2018. A redução da produtividade da soja é atribuída ao fechamento estomático, à perda da capacidade fotoprotetora e aos danos ao maquinário fotossintético causados pela seca. 650 $aCerrado soils 650 $aMica 650 $aPhotosynthesis 650 $aSoybeans 650 $aWater stress 650 $aAdubação 650 $aEvapotranspiração 650 $aFenologia 650 $aFotossíntese 650 $aGlycine Max 650 $aSoja 650 $aSolo 700 1 $aRIBEIRO JUNIOR, W. Q. 700 1 $aRAMOS, M. L. G. 700 1 $aSANTOS, N. Z. dos 700 1 $aSOARES, G. F. 700 1 $aCASARI, R. A. das C. N. 700 1 $aMULLER, O. 700 1 $aTAVARES, C. J. 700 1 $aMARTINS, E. de S. 700 1 $aRASCHER, U. 700 1 $aGUIMARÃES, C. A. de L. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, A. F. 700 1 $aMERTZ-HENNING, L. M. 700 1 $aSOUSA, C. A. F. de 773 $tPesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira$gv. 56, e01455, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|