| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 31 | |
| 22. |  | MACIEL, A. M.; OTENIO, M. H.; PAULA, V. R. de; BENHAMI, V. M. L.; PIEKARSKI, C. M.; ROCHA, C. M. da; BARROS, N. O. Life cycle assessment of milk production system in Brazil: environmental impact reduction linked with anaerobic treatment of dairy manure. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, v. 54, 102883, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|    |
| 23. | | PAULA, V. R. de; CARVALHO, A. C. B. de; MATOS, A. N.; MOTTA, I. G. B. da; SILVA, G. H. da; SANTANA, L. A. R.; OTENIO, M. H. Solid waste management performance: a case study in a research institution. Brazilian Journal of Development, v. 8, n. 7, p. 51479-51497, jul. 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|  |
| 24. | | FEIJÓ, T.; DAVID, J. M.; BRAGA, R.; OTENIO, M. H.; PAULA, V. R. de; SANTOS, G. M.; CAMPOS, F.; STROELE, V. @grogest_Ambiental: a web-based decision support system for agribusiness. In: BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON MULTIMEDIA AND THE WEB, 27., 2021, Belo Horizonte. Proceedings... New York: Association for Computing Machinery, 2021. WebMedia 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 25. | | MOTTA, I. G. B. da; SANTANA, L. A. R.; PEREIRA, H. P.; PAULA, V. R. de; MARTINS, M. F.; CARNEIRO, J. da C.; OTENIO, M. H. Population dynamics of methanogenic archea in co-digestion systems operating different industrial residues for biogas production. Sustainability, v. 14, 11536, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 26. | | BARROS, M. V.; SALVADOR, R.; MACIEL, A. M.; FERREIRA, M. B.; PAULA, V. R. de; FRANCISCO, A. C. de; ROCHA, C. H. B.; PIEKARSKI, C. M. An analysis of Brazilian raw cow milk production systems and environmental product declarations of whole milk. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 367, 133067, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 27. | | NASCIMENTO, A. de M.; MACIEL, A. M.; SILVA, J. B. G.; MENDONÇA, H. V.; PAULA, V. R. de; OTENIO, M. H. Biofertilizer application on corn (Zea mays) increases the productivity and quality of the crop without causing environmental damage. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, v. 231, n. 8, article 414, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 28. | | BARUSELLI, P. S.; ABREU, L. A. de; PAULA, V. R. de; CARVALHO, B. C. de; GRICIO, E. A.; MORI, F. K.; REBEIS, L. M.; ALBERTINI, S.; SOUZA, A. H. de; D'OCCHIO. Applying assisted reproductive technology and reproductive management to reduce CO2-equivalent emission in dairy and beef cattle: a review. Animal Reproduction, v. 20, n. 2, e20230060, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 29. | | PAULA, V. R. de; MAIA, J. de M. R.; OTENIO, M. H.; OLIVEIRA, C. S.; BRIGHENTI, A. M.; PINTO, A. C. T.; CARVALHO, A. da C.; COSTA, F. J. N. Manual de boas práticas de segurança no GERECAMP. Juiz de Fora: Embrapa Gado de Leite, 2016. 24 p. (Embrapa Gado de Leite. Documentos, 195).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| 30. | | RIBEIRO, P. E. de A.; SILVA, M. S. L. da; COELHO, E. F.; BARROS, L. C. de; SIMOES, W. L.; MARMO, C. R.; GUILHERME, L. C.; CORREA, R. de O.; OTENIO, M. H.; TAVARES-DIAS, M.; PAULA, V. R. de; BERNARDES FILHO, R. Gestão da água e saneamento em comunidades rurais. In: SILVA, M. S. L. da; MATTHIENSEN, A.; BRITO, L. T. de L.; LIMA, J. E. F. W.; CARVALHO, C. J. R. de (Ed.). Água e saneamento: contribuições da Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2018. cap. 8, p. 125-147. (Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 6).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amapá; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Gado de Leite; Embrapa Instrumentação; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| 31. | | RIBEIRO, P. E. de A.; SILVA, M. S. L. da; COELHO, E. F.; BARROS, L. C. de; SIMOES, W. L.; MARMO, C. R.; GUILHERME, L. C.; CORREA, R. de O.; OTENIO, M. H.; TAVARES-DIAS, M.; PAULA, V. R. de; BERNARDES FILHO, R. Water management and sanitation in rural communities. In: SILVA, M. S. L. da; MATTHIENSEN, A.; BRITO, L. T. de L.; LIMA, J. E. F. W.; CARVALHO, C. J. R. de (ed.). Clean water and sanitation: contributions of Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2020. p. 81-94. (Sustainable Development Goal, 6).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura; Embrapa Meio-Norte; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Solos. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 31 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Gado de Leite. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpgl.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/11/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/11/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
|
Autoria: |
MACIEL, A. M.; OTENIO, M. H.; PAULA, V. R. de; BENHAMI, V. M. L.; PIEKARSKI, C. M.; ROCHA, C. M. da; BARROS, N. O. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALYNE MARTINS MACIEL, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora; MARCELO HENRIQUE OTENIO, CNPGL; VANESSA ROMARIO DE PAULA, CNPGL; VIRGÍNIA MENDONÇA LOURENÇO BENHAMI, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora; CASSIANO MORO PIEKARSKI, Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná; CAMILA MARÇAL DA ROCHA, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; NATHAN OLIVEIRA BARROS, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora. |
|
Título: |
Life cycle assessment of milk production system in Brazil: environmental impact reduction linked with anaerobic treatment of dairy manure. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, v. 54, 102883, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102883 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Earlier Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) analyses have shown that dairy manure treatment by anaerobic digestion reduces the environmental impacts; however, the magnitude of this reduction is currently unknown in Brazil. This paper aims to assess the environmental impacts of milk production farms (with and without anaerobic digester) in Brazil with LCA. Additionally, quantify the reduction of environmental impacts associated with the treatment of dairy manure through anaerobic digestion in three different product systems: (1) the Embrapa farm with anaerobic digestion (AD), (2) the Embrapa farm without anaerobic digestion (NAD1), and (3) the Colinas farm without anaerobic digestion (NAD2). The analysis was performed using software OpenLCA© , assuming 1 kg of fat and protein-corrected milk as a functional unit. Our results show that anaerobic digestion (AD scenario) promotes biogas and digestate production, which besides providing clean energy and organic fertilizer productions, can help reduce on average 25 % and 38 % of the impacts on acidification, eutrophication, climate change, energy use, photochemical oxidation, and ozone depletion, compared to NAD1 and NAD2, respectively. Then, if Brazil applied anaerobic digester to treat animal manure and encourages biogas production, besides the extra clean energy production, a part of the actions to mitigate CO2 emission could be achieved. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Digestão anaeróbica; Gestão de resíduos. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biogás; Bovino. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Anaerobic digestion; Cattle; Waste management. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02323naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2148678
005 2022-11-24
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102883$2DOI
100 1 $aMACIEL, A. M.
245 $aLife cycle assessment of milk production system in Brazil$benvironmental impact reduction linked with anaerobic treatment of dairy manure.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aEarlier Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) analyses have shown that dairy manure treatment by anaerobic digestion reduces the environmental impacts; however, the magnitude of this reduction is currently unknown in Brazil. This paper aims to assess the environmental impacts of milk production farms (with and without anaerobic digester) in Brazil with LCA. Additionally, quantify the reduction of environmental impacts associated with the treatment of dairy manure through anaerobic digestion in three different product systems: (1) the Embrapa farm with anaerobic digestion (AD), (2) the Embrapa farm without anaerobic digestion (NAD1), and (3) the Colinas farm without anaerobic digestion (NAD2). The analysis was performed using software OpenLCA© , assuming 1 kg of fat and protein-corrected milk as a functional unit. Our results show that anaerobic digestion (AD scenario) promotes biogas and digestate production, which besides providing clean energy and organic fertilizer productions, can help reduce on average 25 % and 38 % of the impacts on acidification, eutrophication, climate change, energy use, photochemical oxidation, and ozone depletion, compared to NAD1 and NAD2, respectively. Then, if Brazil applied anaerobic digester to treat animal manure and encourages biogas production, besides the extra clean energy production, a part of the actions to mitigate CO2 emission could be achieved.
650 $aAnaerobic digestion
650 $aCattle
650 $aWaste management
650 $aBiogás
650 $aBovino
653 $aDigestão anaeróbica
653 $aGestão de resíduos
700 1 $aOTENIO, M. H.
700 1 $aPAULA, V. R. de
700 1 $aBENHAMI, V. M. L.
700 1 $aPIEKARSKI, C. M.
700 1 $aROCHA, C. M. da
700 1 $aBARROS, N. O.
773 $tSustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments$gv. 54, 102883, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
