| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 173 | |
| 5. |  | NUNES, D.; BROWN, G.; PASINI, A. Earthworms' biodiversity in agricultural systems of Jaguapitã, Paraná state, Brazil. In: ENCUENTRO LATINO-AMERICANO DE ECOLOGIA Y TAXONOMIA DE OLIGOQUETOS, 2., 2005, San Juan, Puerto Rico. [Resumenes]. San Juan, Puerto Rico: International Institute of Tropical Forestry: Fundación Puertorriqueña de Conservación, 2005. p. 25. Nome correto do segundo autor: BROWN, G.G.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|   |
| 7. | | KORASAKI, V.; BROWN, G. G.; PASINI, A.; LOPES, J. Abundância de engenheiros do solo em três fragmentos florestais com diferentes graus de pertubação na região de Londrina - PR. In: REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE FERTILIDADE DO SOLO E NUTRIÇÃO DE PLANTAS, 27.; REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA SOBRE MICORRIZAS, 11.; SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE MICROBIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 9.; REUNIÃO BRASILEIRA DE BIOLOGIA DO SOLO, 6., 2006, Bonito, MS. A busca das raízes: anais. Dourados: Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste, 2006. (Embrapa Agropecuária Oeste. Documentos, 82).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 8. | | SILVA, J. E. P.; PASINI, A.; ROGGIA, S. Ácaro predador afeta a distribuição vertical de ácaro fitófago em soja. In: CONGRESSO LATINOAMERICANO DE ACAROLOGIA, 3.; SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE ACAROLOGIA, 6., 2018, Pirenopólis. Acarologia para saúde pública. [Brasília, DF]: Embrapa: UNB; [Goiânia]: UFG, 2018. não paginado. CLAC/SIBAC, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|  |
| 9. | | BENITO, N. P.; ROESSING, M.; PASINI, A.; BROWN, G. G. Macrofauna invertebrada do solo em pastagens do norte do Estado do Paraná. In:WORKSHOP O USO DA MACROFAUNA EDÁFICA NA AGRICULTURA DO SÉCULO XXI: A IMPORTÂNCIA DOS ENGENHEIROS DO SOLO, 2003, Londrina. Anais... Londrina: Embrapa Soja: Instituto de Ecologia, A.C., 2003. p. 175-180. (Embrapa Soja. Documentos, 224). Organizado por George Gardner Brown, Carlos Fragoso, Lenita Jacob Oliveira.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 12. | | MARTINS, P. T.; NUNES, D.; PASINI, A.; BROWN, G. Comparison of three different sampling methods for earthworms in agricultural and natural ecosystems near Londrina, Brazil. In: ENCUENTRO LATINO-AMERICANO DE ECOLOGIA Y TAXONOMIA DE OLIGOQUETOS, 2., 2005, San Juan, Puerto Rico. [Resumenes]. San Juan, Puerto Rico: International Institute of Tropical Forestry: Fundación Puertorriqueña de Conservación, 2005. p. 37.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 13. | | MARTINS, P. T.; BROWN, G; PASINI, A.; NUNES, D. Comparação de três métodos de coleta de minhocas em ecossistema agrícola e natural próximo a Londrina, Brasil. In: MOSTRA ACADÊMICA DE TRABALHOS EM AGRONOMIA, 9., 2005; JORNADA DE ATUALIZAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS AGRÁRIAS, 1.; MOSTRA ACADÊMICA DE TRABALHOS EM AGRONOMIA, 8., 2004, Londrina. [Resumos expandidos...]. Londrina: UEL, 2005. p. 130-131. 1 CD-ROM. Seção: Preservação Dos Recursos Naturais da IX MATA. Nome correto do terceiro autor: BROWN, G. G.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 15. | | JUSTUS, C.; PASINI, A.; BUENO, A. de F. Aspectos biológicos de Spodoptera eridania e injúrias simuladas em vagens e flores de soja Bt: Bases para o manejo do nível de ação. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 28., 2022, Fortaleza. Biodiversidade: Conhecer, conservar e utilizar. anais. Fortaleza: Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, 2022. Edição Técnica: Nivia da Silva Dias Pini, Gerane Celly Dias Bezerra Silva, Márcio Alves Silva, Regiane Cristina Oliveira, José Wagner da Silva Melo, Flávia Rabelo Barbosa. resumo. p. 713.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
|  |
| 16. | | JUSTUS, C. M.; PASINI, A.; BUENO, A. de F. Aspectos biológicos de Spodoptera eridania (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) em diferentes estádios fenológicos de soja. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 27.; CONGRESSO LATINO-AMERICANO DE ENTOMOLOGIA, 10., 2018, Gramado, RS. Saúde, ambiente e agricultura: anais. Santo Antonio de Goiás: SEB: UFSM, 2018. v. 2. resumo. p. 132.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| 18. | | SILVA, J. E. P.; PASINI, A.; ROGGIA, S. Distribuição de ácaros em diferentes alturas da planta de soja. In: CONGRESSO LATINOAMERICANO DE ACAROLOGIA, 3.; SIMPÓSIO BRASILEIRO DE ACAROLOGIA, 6., 2018, Pirenopólis. Acarologia para saúde pública. [Brasília, DF]: Embrapa: UNB; [Goiânia]: UFG, 2018. não paginado. CLAC/SIBAC, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Soja. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 173 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Soja. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com valeria.cardoso@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Soja. |
|
Data corrente: |
06/12/2005 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/12/2005 |
|
Autoria: |
MARTINS, P. T.; NUNES, D.; PASINI, A.; BROWN, G. |
|
Título: |
Comparison of three different sampling methods for earthworms in agricultural and natural ecosystems near Londrina, Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2005 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: ENCUENTRO LATINO-AMERICANO DE ECOLOGIA Y TAXONOMIA DE OLIGOQUETOS, 2., 2005, San Juan, Puerto Rico. [Resumenes]. San Juan, Puerto Rico: International Institute of Tropical Forestry: Fundación Puertorriqueña de Conservación, 2005. p. 37. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sampling earthworms is generally a labor intensive and time consuming activity and means of reducing the time and effort necessary to sample earthworm populations are always welcome. With this in mind, we set out to compare the traditional hand-sorting method to two alternatives: electro-shocking and dilute formalin expulsion. The following collection methods were used in anative forest 9secondary vegetation) and the edge of a marsh (cattai), and two agroecosystems: after sorghum harvest and a > 10 yr old Cynodon spp. pasture grazed by horses. Electro-shocking (Thieleman octet method) was performed over an area of approximately 0.4 m2 for 20 min and immediately thereafter, earthworms were handsorted from 0.16 m2 soil monoliths, to a depth of 30 cm, under the electro-shocked area. Formalin (0.5%) was applied over a 1 m2 area, 5-m away, and the surfacing earthworms collected. Eight samples were taken in a 70-m transect in the forest and the marsh and 5 samples were taken in the agroecosystems. All earthworms were killed in dilute ethyl alcohol (30%) and then fixed in formalin. All individuals collected with each method were-counted (separately into age classes), weighed and identified to species level (when possible). At all sites, electro-shocking yielded the fewest earthworms. Amynthas gracilis and Urobenus brasiliensis predominated in the forest, and Pontoscolex corethrurus dominated in the marsh where formalin worked best of all. Dichogaster spp. dominated in the agroecosystems, where handsorting worked best, yielding the most earthworms. Electroshocking and formalin appear to be interesting methods to sample mostly large, surface-active earthworms, whereas handsorting appears to be better suited for smaller, mostly endogeic earthworm species. MenosSampling earthworms is generally a labor intensive and time consuming activity and means of reducing the time and effort necessary to sample earthworm populations are always welcome. With this in mind, we set out to compare the traditional hand-sorting method to two alternatives: electro-shocking and dilute formalin expulsion. The following collection methods were used in anative forest 9secondary vegetation) and the edge of a marsh (cattai), and two agroecosystems: after sorghum harvest and a > 10 yr old Cynodon spp. pasture grazed by horses. Electro-shocking (Thieleman octet method) was performed over an area of approximately 0.4 m2 for 20 min and immediately thereafter, earthworms were handsorted from 0.16 m2 soil monoliths, to a depth of 30 cm, under the electro-shocked area. Formalin (0.5%) was applied over a 1 m2 area, 5-m away, and the surfacing earthworms collected. Eight samples were taken in a 70-m transect in the forest and the marsh and 5 samples were taken in the agroecosystems. All earthworms were killed in dilute ethyl alcohol (30%) and then fixed in formalin. All individuals collected with each method were-counted (separately into age classes), weighed and identified to species level (when possible). At all sites, electro-shocking yielded the fewest earthworms. Amynthas gracilis and Urobenus brasiliensis predominated in the forest, and Pontoscolex corethrurus dominated in the marsh where formalin worked best of all. Dichogaster spp. dominated in the agroecosy... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02447naa a2200157 a 4500
001 1468624
005 2005-12-06
008 2005 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aMARTINS, P. T.
245 $aComparison of three different sampling methods for earthworms in agricultural and natural ecosystems near Londrina, Brazil.
260 $c2005
520 $aSampling earthworms is generally a labor intensive and time consuming activity and means of reducing the time and effort necessary to sample earthworm populations are always welcome. With this in mind, we set out to compare the traditional hand-sorting method to two alternatives: electro-shocking and dilute formalin expulsion. The following collection methods were used in anative forest 9secondary vegetation) and the edge of a marsh (cattai), and two agroecosystems: after sorghum harvest and a > 10 yr old Cynodon spp. pasture grazed by horses. Electro-shocking (Thieleman octet method) was performed over an area of approximately 0.4 m2 for 20 min and immediately thereafter, earthworms were handsorted from 0.16 m2 soil monoliths, to a depth of 30 cm, under the electro-shocked area. Formalin (0.5%) was applied over a 1 m2 area, 5-m away, and the surfacing earthworms collected. Eight samples were taken in a 70-m transect in the forest and the marsh and 5 samples were taken in the agroecosystems. All earthworms were killed in dilute ethyl alcohol (30%) and then fixed in formalin. All individuals collected with each method were-counted (separately into age classes), weighed and identified to species level (when possible). At all sites, electro-shocking yielded the fewest earthworms. Amynthas gracilis and Urobenus brasiliensis predominated in the forest, and Pontoscolex corethrurus dominated in the marsh where formalin worked best of all. Dichogaster spp. dominated in the agroecosystems, where handsorting worked best, yielding the most earthworms. Electroshocking and formalin appear to be interesting methods to sample mostly large, surface-active earthworms, whereas handsorting appears to be better suited for smaller, mostly endogeic earthworm species.
700 1 $aNUNES, D.
700 1 $aPASINI, A.
700 1 $aBROWN, G.
773 $tIn: ENCUENTRO LATINO-AMERICANO DE ECOLOGIA Y TAXONOMIA DE OLIGOQUETOS, 2., 2005, San Juan, Puerto Rico. [Resumenes]. San Juan, Puerto Rico: International Institute of Tropical Forestry: Fundación Puertorriqueña de Conservación, 2005. p. 37.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Soja (CNPSO) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
