| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
| Registros recuperados : 1 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Pantanal. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpap.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
|
Data corrente: |
22/08/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/02/2013 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Nota Técnica/Nota Científica |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA-SANTOS, L. G. R.; DORAZIO, R. M.; TOMAS, W. M.; MOURAO, G. de M.; FERNANDEZ, F. A. S. |
|
Afiliação: |
LUIZ G. R. OLIVEIRA-SANTOS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO; ROBERT M. DORAZIO, SOUTHEAST ECOLOGICAL SCIENCE CENTER; WALFRIDO MORAES TOMAS, CPAP; GUILHERME DE MIRANDA MOURAO, CPAP; FERNANDO A. S. FERNANDEZ, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO DE JANEIRO. |
|
Título: |
No evidence of interference competition among the invasive feral pig and two native peccary species in a Neotropical wetland. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2011 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Tropical Ecology, v. 27, p. 557-561, 2011. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
SHORT COMMUNICATION. |
|
Conteúdo: |
The feral pig has been considered a threat to peccary conservation in the Pantanal, often reaching high abundance (?5 ind. km?2) (Desbiez et al. 2010, Oliveira-Santos 2009). However, the failure to demonstrate a negative association between feral pig and the two peccary species, in this study, suggests that interference competitionwas absent at this temporal and spatial scale, even during a period of severe scarcity of water and food. Although the invasive pig is widespread on the landscape, the two peccary species maintain densities as high (4?6 ind. km?2) as those recorded in Amazonian areas free of hunting and feral pig (Desbiez et al. 2010, Oliveira-Santos 2009), corroborating our findings that the presence of pigs does not appear to have a negative impact on the two peccary species. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Pig. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01398naa a2200193 a 4500
001 1898495
005 2013-02-19
008 2011 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA-SANTOS, L. G. R.
245 $aNo evidence of interference competition among the invasive feral pig and two native peccary species in a Neotropical wetland.
260 $c2011
500 $aSHORT COMMUNICATION.
520 $aThe feral pig has been considered a threat to peccary conservation in the Pantanal, often reaching high abundance (?5 ind. km?2) (Desbiez et al. 2010, Oliveira-Santos 2009). However, the failure to demonstrate a negative association between feral pig and the two peccary species, in this study, suggests that interference competitionwas absent at this temporal and spatial scale, even during a period of severe scarcity of water and food. Although the invasive pig is widespread on the landscape, the two peccary species maintain densities as high (4?6 ind. km?2) as those recorded in Amazonian areas free of hunting and feral pig (Desbiez et al. 2010, Oliveira-Santos 2009), corroborating our findings that the presence of pigs does not appear to have a negative impact on the two peccary species.
653 $aPig
700 1 $aDORAZIO, R. M.
700 1 $aTOMAS, W. M.
700 1 $aMOURAO, G. de M.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, F. A. S.
773 $tJournal of Tropical Ecology$gv. 27, p. 557-561, 2011.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
