| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 29 | |
| Registros recuperados : 29 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/06/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/02/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
RESENDE, J. A.; SILVA, V. L.; OLIVEIRA, T. L. R. de; FORTUNATO, S. de O.; CARNEIRO, J. da C.; OTENIO, M. H.; DINIZ, C. G. |
|
Afiliação: |
JULIANA ALVES RESENDE, UFJF; VÂNIA LÚCIA SILVA, UFJF; TAMARA LOPES ROCHA DE OLIVEIRA, UFJF; SAMUEL DE OLIVEIRA FORTUNATO, UFJF; JAILTON DA COSTA CARNEIRO, CNPGL; MARCELO HENRIQUE OTENIO, CNPGL; CLÁUDIO GALUPPO DINIZ, UFJF. |
|
Título: |
Prevalence and persistence of potentially pathogenic and antibiotic resistant bacteria during anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Bioresource Technology, n. 153, p. 284-291, 2014. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.007 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Anaerobic digestion figures as a sustainable alternative to avoid discharge of cattle manure in the environment, which results in biogas and biofertilizer. Persistence of potentially pathogenic and drug-resistant bacteria during anaerobic digestion of cattle manure was evaluated. Selective cultures were performed for enterobacteria (ENT), non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR) and Gram-positive cocci (GPC). Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined and a decay of all bacterial groups was observed after 60days. Multidrug-resistant bacteria were detected both the influent and effluent. GPC, the most prevalent group was highly resistant against penicillin and levofloxacin, whereas resistance to ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam and chloramphenicol was frequently observed in the ENT and NFR groups. The data point out the need of discussions to better address management of biodigesters and the implementation of sanitary and microbiological safe treatments of animal manures to avoid consequences to human, animal and environmental health. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Antimicrobial resistance; Biogas Biofertilizer; Dairy cattle manure; Pathogenic bacteria. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
anaerobic digestion. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/103487/1/Artigo-Otenio-e-Juliana-Bioresource-and-Technology-2013-2014.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01948naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1988214
005 2024-02-05
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.007$2DOI
100 1 $aRESENDE, J. A.
245 $aPrevalence and persistence of potentially pathogenic and antibiotic resistant bacteria during anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
520 $aAnaerobic digestion figures as a sustainable alternative to avoid discharge of cattle manure in the environment, which results in biogas and biofertilizer. Persistence of potentially pathogenic and drug-resistant bacteria during anaerobic digestion of cattle manure was evaluated. Selective cultures were performed for enterobacteria (ENT), non-fermenting Gram-negative rods (NFR) and Gram-positive cocci (GPC). Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns were determined and a decay of all bacterial groups was observed after 60days. Multidrug-resistant bacteria were detected both the influent and effluent. GPC, the most prevalent group was highly resistant against penicillin and levofloxacin, whereas resistance to ampicillin, ampicillin-sulbactam and chloramphenicol was frequently observed in the ENT and NFR groups. The data point out the need of discussions to better address management of biodigesters and the implementation of sanitary and microbiological safe treatments of animal manures to avoid consequences to human, animal and environmental health.
650 $aanaerobic digestion
653 $aAntimicrobial resistance
653 $aBiogas Biofertilizer
653 $aDairy cattle manure
653 $aPathogenic bacteria
700 1 $aSILVA, V. L.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, T. L. R. de
700 1 $aFORTUNATO, S. de O.
700 1 $aCARNEIRO, J. da C.
700 1 $aOTENIO, M. H.
700 1 $aDINIZ, C. G.
773 $tBioresource Technology$gn. 153, p. 284-291, 2014.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Gado de Leite (CNPGL) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
