| |
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpaf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/02/2024 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
22/02/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
MESSIAS, M.; FERREIRA, E. P. de B.; SILVA, O. F. da; WANDER, A. E. |
|
Afiliação: |
MATHEUS MESSIAS, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE GOIÁS; ENDERSON PETRONIO DE BRITO FERREIRA, CNPAF; OSMIRA FATIMA DA SILVA, CNPAF; ALCIDO ELENOR WANDER, CNPAF. |
|
Título: |
Economic assessment of Rhizobium tropici and Azospirillum brasilense co-inoculation in common bean. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2024 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Agricultural Research, 2024. |
|
ISSN: |
2249-720X |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-023-00692-5 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
The common bean cropping system has a high cost, mainly due to using nitrogen fertilisers. An alternative for a replacement to reduce production costs is the co-inoculation technique of Rhizobium tropici and Azospirillum brasilense. This study aimed to evaluate the economic viability of co-inoculation of common beans via sowing furrow. Data from five field experiments conducted in three locations in three seasons were used. The treatments consisted of absolute control (without inoculation and fertilisation), nitrogen fertilisation, simple inoculation with R. tropici and co-inoculation with R. tropici and different doses of A. brasilense applied in the sowing furrow. The economic analysis was carried out based on market prices and indexes, depending on the grain production of the different treatments. Treatment with nitrogen fertiliser (80 kg ha−1 of N) resulted in higher production costs, with an average value of USD 1,889 ha−1. Co-inoculation with two doses of R. tropici and four doses of A. brasilense provided the highest mean gross revenue values, net income and benefit-cost-ratio. Co-inoculation with two doses of R. tropici and four doses of A. brasilense resulted in a benefit-cost-ratio of 8 to 11% greater than simple inoculation with Rhizobium tropici, nitrogen treatment and commercial inoculant. Co-inoculation with R. tropici and A. brasilense, in addition to providing high yields, also provides high profitability, proving to be a technology that can contribute to the reduction/replacement of the use of nitrogen fertilisers and reduction of environmental impacts without compromising yield and profitability of common beans. MenosThe common bean cropping system has a high cost, mainly due to using nitrogen fertilisers. An alternative for a replacement to reduce production costs is the co-inoculation technique of Rhizobium tropici and Azospirillum brasilense. This study aimed to evaluate the economic viability of co-inoculation of common beans via sowing furrow. Data from five field experiments conducted in three locations in three seasons were used. The treatments consisted of absolute control (without inoculation and fertilisation), nitrogen fertilisation, simple inoculation with R. tropici and co-inoculation with R. tropici and different doses of A. brasilense applied in the sowing furrow. The economic analysis was carried out based on market prices and indexes, depending on the grain production of the different treatments. Treatment with nitrogen fertiliser (80 kg ha−1 of N) resulted in higher production costs, with an average value of USD 1,889 ha−1. Co-inoculation with two doses of R. tropici and four doses of A. brasilense provided the highest mean gross revenue values, net income and benefit-cost-ratio. Co-inoculation with two doses of R. tropici and four doses of A. brasilense resulted in a benefit-cost-ratio of 8 to 11% greater than simple inoculation with Rhizobium tropici, nitrogen treatment and commercial inoculant. Co-inoculation with R. tropici and A. brasilense, in addition to providing high yields, also provides high profitability, proving to be a technology that can contribute to the... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Co-inoculation. |
|
Thesagro: |
Análise de Custo-Benefício; Custo de Produção; Feijão; Fertilizante Nitrogenado; Phaseolus Vulgaris; Rhizobium. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Azospirillum brasilense; Beans; Bradyrhizobium; Cost benefit analysis; Production costs; Rhizobium tropici. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
E Economia e Indústria Agrícola |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02659naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2161806
005 2024-02-22
008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2249-720X
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-023-00692-5$2DOI
100 1 $aMESSIAS, M.
245 $aEconomic assessment of Rhizobium tropici and Azospirillum brasilense co-inoculation in common bean.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2024
520 $aThe common bean cropping system has a high cost, mainly due to using nitrogen fertilisers. An alternative for a replacement to reduce production costs is the co-inoculation technique of Rhizobium tropici and Azospirillum brasilense. This study aimed to evaluate the economic viability of co-inoculation of common beans via sowing furrow. Data from five field experiments conducted in three locations in three seasons were used. The treatments consisted of absolute control (without inoculation and fertilisation), nitrogen fertilisation, simple inoculation with R. tropici and co-inoculation with R. tropici and different doses of A. brasilense applied in the sowing furrow. The economic analysis was carried out based on market prices and indexes, depending on the grain production of the different treatments. Treatment with nitrogen fertiliser (80 kg ha−1 of N) resulted in higher production costs, with an average value of USD 1,889 ha−1. Co-inoculation with two doses of R. tropici and four doses of A. brasilense provided the highest mean gross revenue values, net income and benefit-cost-ratio. Co-inoculation with two doses of R. tropici and four doses of A. brasilense resulted in a benefit-cost-ratio of 8 to 11% greater than simple inoculation with Rhizobium tropici, nitrogen treatment and commercial inoculant. Co-inoculation with R. tropici and A. brasilense, in addition to providing high yields, also provides high profitability, proving to be a technology that can contribute to the reduction/replacement of the use of nitrogen fertilisers and reduction of environmental impacts without compromising yield and profitability of common beans.
650 $aAzospirillum brasilense
650 $aBeans
650 $aBradyrhizobium
650 $aCost benefit analysis
650 $aProduction costs
650 $aRhizobium tropici
650 $aAnálise de Custo-Benefício
650 $aCusto de Produção
650 $aFeijão
650 $aFertilizante Nitrogenado
650 $aPhaseolus Vulgaris
650 $aRhizobium
653 $aCo-inoculation
700 1 $aFERREIRA, E. P. de B.
700 1 $aSILVA, O. F. da
700 1 $aWANDER, A. E.
773 $tAgricultural Research, 2024.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 10 | |
| 7. |  | MESSIAS, M.; SOUZA, K. M. de O. L. de; SOARES, L. H. de B.; FERREIRA, E. P. de B.; REIS, V. M.; ZILLI, J. E. Desenvolvimento de inoculante líquido contendo Rhizobium tropici e bactérias promotoras de crescimento para a cultura do feijoeiro comum In: SEMANA CIENTÍFICA JOHANNA DÖBEREINER, 22., 2022, Seropédica. Bicentenário da Independência: 200 anos de ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil: caderno de resumos... Seropédica: Embrapa Agrobiologia, 2022.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|    |
| 8. | | ALMEIDA, J. C. de; PACHECO, R. S.; FERREIRA, N. dos S.; MORAES, C.; MESSIAS, M.; JANTALIA, C. P.; ZILLI, J. E. Desempenho produtivo de quatro cultivares de grão-de-bico nas condições edafoclimáticas do Rio de Janeiro. In: SEMANA CIENTÍFICA JOHANNA DÖBEREINER, 22., 2022, Seropédica. Bicentenário da Independência: 200 anos de ciência, tecnologia e inovação no Brasil: caderno de resumos... Seropédica: Embrapa Agrobiologia, 2022.| Tipo: Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| 9. | | ARAÚJO, M. S.; MESSIAS, M. R.; FIGUEIRO, M. R.; GIL, L. H. S.; PROBST, C. M.; VIDAL, N. M.; KATSURAGAWA, T. H.; KRIEGER, M. A.; SILVA, L. H. P. da; OZAKI, L. S. Natural Plasmodium infection in monkeys in the state of Rondônia (Brazilian Western Amazon). Malaria Journal, v. 12, article 180, 2013.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 10. | | ROSA C.; BACCARO, F.; CRONEMBERGER, C.; HIPÓLITO, J.; BARROS, C. F.; RODRIGUES, D. de J.; NECKEL-OLIVEIRA, S.; OVERBECK, G. E.; DRECHSLER-SANTOS, E. R.; ANJOS, M. R. dos; FERREGUETTI, A. C.; AKAMA, A.; MARTINS, M. B.; TOMAS, W. M.; SANTOS, S. A.; FERREIRA, V. L.; CUNHA, C. N. da; PENHA, J.; PINHO, J. B. de; SALIS, S. M.; DORIA, C. R. da C.; PILLAR, V. D.; PODGAISKI, L. R.; MENIN, M.; BÍGIO, N, C.; ARAGÓN, S.; MANZATTO, A. G.; VÉLEZ-MARTIN, E.; SILVA, A. C. B. L. e; IZZO, T. J.; MORTATI, A. F.; GIACOMIN, L. L.; ALMEIDA, T. E.; ANDRÉ, T.; SILVEIRA, M. A. P. de A.; SILVEIRA, A. L. P. da; MESSIAS, M. R.; MARQUES, M. C. M.; PADIAL, A. A.; MARQUES, R.; BITAR, Y. O. C.; SILVEIRA, M.; MORATO, E. F.; PAGOTTO, R. de C.; STRUSSMANN, C.; MACHADO, R. B.; AGUIAR, L. M. de S.; FERNANDES, G. W.; OKI, Y.; NOVAIS, S.; FERREIRA, G. B.; BARBOSA, F. R.; OCHOA, A. C.; MANGIONE, A. M.; GATICA, A.; CARRIZO, M. C.; RETTA, L. M.; JOFRÉ, L. E.; CASTILLO, L. L.; NEME, A. M.; RUEDA, C.; TOLEDO, J. J. de; GRELLE, C. E. V.; VALE, M. M.; VIEIRA, M. V.; CERQUEIRA, R.; HIGASHIKAWA, E. M.; MENDONÇA, F. P. de; GUERREIRO, Q. L de M.; BANHOS, A.; HERO, JEAN-MARC; KOBLITZ, R.; COLLEVATTI, R. G.; SILVEIRA, L. F.; VASCONCELOS, H. L.; VIEIRA, C. R.; COLLI, G. R.; CECHIN, S. Z.; SANTOS, T. G. dos; FONTANA, C. S.; JARENKOW, J. A.; MALABARBA, L. R.; RUEDA, M. P. R.; ARAUJO, P. A.; PALOMO, L.; ITURRE, M. C.; BERGALLO, H. G.; MAGNUSSON, W. E. The program for biodiversity research in Brazil: The role of regional networks for biodiversity knowledge, dissemination, and conservation. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, v. 93, n. 2, e20201604, 2021.| Tipo: Artigo em Periódico Indexado | Circulação/Nível: A - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pantanal. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 10 | |
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
