| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
| 1. |  | GUIMARAES JUNIOR, R.; OLIVEIRA, A. F. de; FERREIRA, I. C.; PEREIRA, L. G. R.; TOMICH, T. R.; MENEZES, G. L.; VILELA, L.; LANA, A. M. Q. Methane emissions and milk yields from zebu cows under integrated systems. Livestock Science, v. 263, 105038, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
|    |
| 2. | | TEIXEIRA, N. P.; OLIVEIRA, A. F. DE; MENEZES, G. L.; ALVARENGA, R. C.; CAMPANHA, M. M.; ALVES, B. J. R.; LANA, A. M. Q. Nitrous oxide emission from excreta of different beef cattle breeds finished in feedlot. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 58, e03312, 2023. Título em português: Emissão de óxido nitroso de excretas de diferentes raças de gado de corte terminados em confinamento.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Milho e Sorgo; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|  |
| 3. | | OLIVEIRA, A. F. de; MENEZES, G. L.; GONÇALVES, L. C.; ARAÚJO, V. E. de; RAMIREZ, M. A.; GUIMARAES JUNIOR, R.; JAYME, D. G.; LANA, A. M. Q. Pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems with Eucalyptus and Urochloa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Livestock Science, v. 262, 104973, 2022. 15 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
| 4. | | MENEZES, G. L.; GONÇALVES, L. C.; SOUSA, P. G. de; MICHEL, P. H. F.; OLIVEIRA, R. B. P. de; OLIVEIRA, A. F. de; MELO, D. F. de O.; PIRES, F. P. A. de A; JAYME, D. G. Corn silage quality under delayed sealing and microbial inoculant use. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 57, e02831, 2022. Título em português: Qualidade da silagem de milho submetida a atraso na vedação e uso de inoculantes microbianos.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
| |
| 5. | | PIRES, F. P. A. de A.; TOMICH, T. R.; PEREIRA, L. G. R.; MACHADO, F. S.; CAMPOS, M. M.; OLIVEIRA, A. F. de; MENEZES, G. L.; MENEZES, R. A. de; SOUSA, P. G. de; JAYME, D. G.; GONÇALVES, L. C. Effect of the Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Lentilactobacillus buchneri on corn and sorghum silage quality and sheep energy partition under tropical conditions. Grass and Forage Science, v. 78, p. 224-235, 2023.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Gado de Leite. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 5 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Cerrados. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpac.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
13/06/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
13/06/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, A. F. de; MENEZES, G. L.; GONÇALVES, L. C.; ARAÚJO, V. E. de; RAMIREZ, M. A.; GUIMARAES JUNIOR, R.; JAYME, D. G.; LANA, A. M. Q. |
|
Afiliação: |
ALAN FIGUEIREDO DE OLIVEIRA; GUILHERME LOBATO MENEZES; LÚCIO CARLOS GONÇALVES; VANIA ELOISA DE ARAÚJO; MATHEUS ANCHIETA RAMIREZ; ROBERTO GUIMARAES JUNIOR, CPAC; DIOGO GONZAGA JAYME; ANGELA MARIA QUINTÃO LANA. |
|
Título: |
Pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems with Eucalyptus and Urochloa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Livestock Science, v. 262, 104973, 2022. |
|
Páginas: |
15 p. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
ABSTRACT This study evaluated pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems (SPSs) with Eucalyptus spp. and Urochloa spp. through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic searches of databases, scientific journals and references of selected articles found 2,639 articles, of which 29 (120 comparisons) were selected. Comparisons were classified according to the covariates of distance between tree rows, number of trees/ha, tree planting orientation, system age and forage type. Data were submitted to meta-regression followed by subgroup analysis for covariates with a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the response. Data were analyzed in random effects models using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05). Forage mass (FM) was greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha and lower for the other groups, compared to that for grass monoculture. Forage accumulation (FA) was also greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, but lower for SPSs with more than 300 trees/ha, compared to that for grass monoculture. FM was lower for SPSs of all spacings between tree rows and planting orientations, compared to that for grass monoculture, with the lowest being with smaller spacing and with northsouth planting orientation. FA was lower for SPSs with up to 28m between tree rows, compared to that for grass monoculture, while that for SPSs with more than 28m did not differ. Neutral detergent fiber concentration was lower and crude protein greater for SPSs compared to grass monoculture, while lignin was greater and in vitro dry matter digestibility did not differ, which indicated no significant improvement in nutritive value in SPSs. Average daily gain was greater in SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, and lower in those with more than 400 trees/ha, than in grass monoculture, with other subgroups not differing. Total weight gain per area (GHA) was lower in SPSs with less than 28m between tree rows or with more than 199 trees/ha, but greater in SPSs with more than 28m or with up to 99 trees/ha, compared to grass monoculture. GHA was lower in SPSs with a north-south orientation compared to grass monoculture, but those with an east-west orientation did not differ. The use of U. brizantha cv. Marandu and an east-west planting orientation are efficient strategies in maintaining FM, FA and GHA. GHA was greater in SPSs with more than 28m between tree rows and with up to 99 trees/ha, than in grass monoculture, which may facilitate the implementation of these SPSs in commercial farms. MenosABSTRACT This study evaluated pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems (SPSs) with Eucalyptus spp. and Urochloa spp. through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic searches of databases, scientific journals and references of selected articles found 2,639 articles, of which 29 (120 comparisons) were selected. Comparisons were classified according to the covariates of distance between tree rows, number of trees/ha, tree planting orientation, system age and forage type. Data were submitted to meta-regression followed by subgroup analysis for covariates with a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the response. Data were analyzed in random effects models using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05). Forage mass (FM) was greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha and lower for the other groups, compared to that for grass monoculture. Forage accumulation (FA) was also greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, but lower for SPSs with more than 300 trees/ha, compared to that for grass monoculture. FM was lower for SPSs of all spacings between tree rows and planting orientations, compared to that for grass monoculture, with the lowest being with smaller spacing and with northsouth planting orientation. FA was lower for SPSs with up to 28m between tree rows, compared to that for grass monoculture, while that for SPSs with more than 28m did not differ. Neutral detergent fiber concentration was lower and crude protein greater for SPSs compared to ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Bovino; Bovinocultura; Brachiaria; Pastagem; Sistema de Cultivo; Sistema de Produção. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03371naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2143970
005 2022-06-13
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, A. F. de
245 $aPasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems with Eucalyptus and Urochloa$bSystematic review and meta-analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
300 $a15 p.
520 $aABSTRACT This study evaluated pasture traits and cattle performance in silvopastoral systems (SPSs) with Eucalyptus spp. and Urochloa spp. through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic searches of databases, scientific journals and references of selected articles found 2,639 articles, of which 29 (120 comparisons) were selected. Comparisons were classified according to the covariates of distance between tree rows, number of trees/ha, tree planting orientation, system age and forage type. Data were submitted to meta-regression followed by subgroup analysis for covariates with a significant effect (P < 0.05) on the response. Data were analyzed in random effects models using mean difference and 95% confidence interval (P < 0.05). Forage mass (FM) was greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha and lower for the other groups, compared to that for grass monoculture. Forage accumulation (FA) was also greater for SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, but lower for SPSs with more than 300 trees/ha, compared to that for grass monoculture. FM was lower for SPSs of all spacings between tree rows and planting orientations, compared to that for grass monoculture, with the lowest being with smaller spacing and with northsouth planting orientation. FA was lower for SPSs with up to 28m between tree rows, compared to that for grass monoculture, while that for SPSs with more than 28m did not differ. Neutral detergent fiber concentration was lower and crude protein greater for SPSs compared to grass monoculture, while lignin was greater and in vitro dry matter digestibility did not differ, which indicated no significant improvement in nutritive value in SPSs. Average daily gain was greater in SPSs with up to 99 trees/ha, and lower in those with more than 400 trees/ha, than in grass monoculture, with other subgroups not differing. Total weight gain per area (GHA) was lower in SPSs with less than 28m between tree rows or with more than 199 trees/ha, but greater in SPSs with more than 28m or with up to 99 trees/ha, compared to grass monoculture. GHA was lower in SPSs with a north-south orientation compared to grass monoculture, but those with an east-west orientation did not differ. The use of U. brizantha cv. Marandu and an east-west planting orientation are efficient strategies in maintaining FM, FA and GHA. GHA was greater in SPSs with more than 28m between tree rows and with up to 99 trees/ha, than in grass monoculture, which may facilitate the implementation of these SPSs in commercial farms.
650 $aBovino
650 $aBovinocultura
650 $aBrachiaria
650 $aPastagem
650 $aSistema de Cultivo
650 $aSistema de Produção
700 1 $aMENEZES, G. L.
700 1 $aGONÇALVES, L. C.
700 1 $aARAÚJO, V. E. de
700 1 $aRAMIREZ, M. A.
700 1 $aGUIMARAES JUNIOR, R.
700 1 $aJAYME, D. G.
700 1 $aLANA, A. M. Q.
773 $tLivestock Science$gv. 262, 104973, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
