| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 139 | |
| 45. |  | PAULI, G.; LOPES, R. B.; ALVES, S. B.; DAMATTO JUNIOR, E. R.; MASCARIN, G. M. Falsa broca aumenta disseminação de Beauveria bassiana em populações de campo da broca-do-rizoma da bananeira. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 41, n. 11, p. 1867-1870, 2011.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|    |
| 51. | | MASCARIN, G. M.; DUARTE, V. da S.; BRANDÃO, M. M.; DELALIBERA JUNIOR, I. Natural occurrence of Zoophthora radicans (Entomophthorales: Entomophthoraceae) on Thaumastocoris peregrinus (Heteroptera: Thaumastocoridae), an invasive pest recently found in Brazil. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, New York, v. 110, n. 3, p. 401-404, Jul. 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|  |
| 52. | | MASCARIN, G. M.; KOBORI, N. N.; JACKSON, M. A.; DUNLAP, C. A.; DELALIBERA JUNIOR, I. Nitrogen sources affect productivity, desiccation tolerance and storage stability of Beauveria bassiana blastospores. Journal of Applied Microbiology, v. 124, n. 3, p. 810-820, 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 57. | | LOCATELLI, G. O.; FINKLER, C. L. L.; MASCARIN, G. M.; LOBO JUNIOR, M.; BUENO, L. A. Optimization of microesclerotia production by Trichoderma asperellum. In: SIMPÓSIO NACIONAL DE BIOPROCESSOS, 21.; SIMPÓSIO DE HIDRÓLISE ENZIMÁTICA DE BIOMASSA, 12., 2017, Aracajú, SE. [Anais ...]. São Paulo: Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química, 2017.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 139 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
26/05/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
06/09/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 4 |
|
Autoria: |
FARIA, M. R. de; MASCARIN, G. M.; BUTT, T.; LOPES, R. B. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCOS RODRIGUES DE FARIA, Cenargen; GABRIEL MOURA MASCARIN, CNPMA; TARIQ BUTT, Faculty of Science and Engineering, UK; ROGERIO BIAGGIONI LOPES, Cenargen. |
|
Título: |
On-farm production of microbial entomopathogens for use in agriculture: Brazil as a case study. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Neotropical Entomology, v. 52, p. 122-133, 2023. |
|
DOI: |
10.1007/s13744-023-01033-5. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Na publicação: Marcos Faria. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: In Brazil, the production of beneficial microorganisms by growers exclusively for their own use is a practice known as "on-farm production". Regarding on-farm bioinsecticides, they were initially deployed for pests of perennial and semi-perennial crops in the 1970s but, since 2013, their use has extended to pests of annual crops such as maize, cotton, and soybean. Millions of hectares are currently being treated with these on-farm preparations. Local production reduces costs, meets local needs, and reduces inputs of environmentally damaging chemical pesticides, facilitating establishment of more sustainable agroecosystems. Critics argue that without implementation of stringent quality control measures there is the risk that the on-farm preparations: (1) are contaminated with microbes which may include human pathogens or (2) contain very little active ingredient, impacting on field efficacy. The on-farm fermentation of bacterial insecticides predominates, especially that of Bacillus thuringiensis targeting lepidopteran pests. However, there has been a rapid growth in the past 5 years in the production of entomopathogenic fungi, mostly for the control of sap-sucking insects such as whitefly (Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)) and the corn leafhopper (Dalbulus maidis (DeLong and Wolcott)). In contrast, on-farm production of insect viruses has seen limited growth. Most of the ca. 5 million rural producers in Brazil own small or medium size properties and, although the vast majority still do not practice on-farm production of biopesticides, the topic has aroused interest among them. Many growers who adopt this practice usually use non-sterile containers as fermenters, resulting in poor-quality preparations, and cases of failure have been reported. On the other hand, some informal reports suggest on-farm preparations may be efficacious even when contaminated, what could be explained, at least partially, by the insecticidal secondary metabolites secreted by the pool of microorganisms in the liquid culture media. Indeed, there is insufficient information on efficacy and mode of action of these microbial biopesticides. It is usually the large farms, some with > 20,000 ha of continuous cultivated lands, that produce biopesticides with low levels of contamination, as many of them possess advanced production facilities and have access to specialized knowledge and trained staff. Uptake of on-farm biopesticides is expected to continue but the rate of adoption will depend on factors such as the selection of safe, virulent microbial strains and implementation of sound quality control measures (compliance with emerging Brazilian regulations and international standards). The challenges and opportunities of on-farm bioinsecticides are presented and discussed. MenosAbstract: In Brazil, the production of beneficial microorganisms by growers exclusively for their own use is a practice known as "on-farm production". Regarding on-farm bioinsecticides, they were initially deployed for pests of perennial and semi-perennial crops in the 1970s but, since 2013, their use has extended to pests of annual crops such as maize, cotton, and soybean. Millions of hectares are currently being treated with these on-farm preparations. Local production reduces costs, meets local needs, and reduces inputs of environmentally damaging chemical pesticides, facilitating establishment of more sustainable agroecosystems. Critics argue that without implementation of stringent quality control measures there is the risk that the on-farm preparations: (1) are contaminated with microbes which may include human pathogens or (2) contain very little active ingredient, impacting on field efficacy. The on-farm fermentation of bacterial insecticides predominates, especially that of Bacillus thuringiensis targeting lepidopteran pests. However, there has been a rapid growth in the past 5 years in the production of entomopathogenic fungi, mostly for the control of sap-sucking insects such as whitefly (Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)) and the corn leafhopper (Dalbulus maidis (DeLong and Wolcott)). In contrast, on-farm production of insect viruses has seen limited growth. Most of the ca. 5 million rural producers in Brazil own small or medium size properties and, although the vast ma... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Bacillus; Baculoviruses; Biopesticidas; Microbial biopesticides. |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Fungo Para Controle Biológico; Produção. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Biological control; Biological control agents; Entomopathogenic fungi. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
S Ciências Biológicas |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/doc/1153996/1/s13744-023-01033-5.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03720naa a2200301 a 4500
001 2156453
005 2023-09-06
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s13744-023-01033-5.$2DOI
100 1 $aFARIA, M. R. de
245 $aOn-farm production of microbial entomopathogens for use in agriculture$bBrazil as a case study.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aNa publicação: Marcos Faria.
520 $aAbstract: In Brazil, the production of beneficial microorganisms by growers exclusively for their own use is a practice known as "on-farm production". Regarding on-farm bioinsecticides, they were initially deployed for pests of perennial and semi-perennial crops in the 1970s but, since 2013, their use has extended to pests of annual crops such as maize, cotton, and soybean. Millions of hectares are currently being treated with these on-farm preparations. Local production reduces costs, meets local needs, and reduces inputs of environmentally damaging chemical pesticides, facilitating establishment of more sustainable agroecosystems. Critics argue that without implementation of stringent quality control measures there is the risk that the on-farm preparations: (1) are contaminated with microbes which may include human pathogens or (2) contain very little active ingredient, impacting on field efficacy. The on-farm fermentation of bacterial insecticides predominates, especially that of Bacillus thuringiensis targeting lepidopteran pests. However, there has been a rapid growth in the past 5 years in the production of entomopathogenic fungi, mostly for the control of sap-sucking insects such as whitefly (Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)) and the corn leafhopper (Dalbulus maidis (DeLong and Wolcott)). In contrast, on-farm production of insect viruses has seen limited growth. Most of the ca. 5 million rural producers in Brazil own small or medium size properties and, although the vast majority still do not practice on-farm production of biopesticides, the topic has aroused interest among them. Many growers who adopt this practice usually use non-sterile containers as fermenters, resulting in poor-quality preparations, and cases of failure have been reported. On the other hand, some informal reports suggest on-farm preparations may be efficacious even when contaminated, what could be explained, at least partially, by the insecticidal secondary metabolites secreted by the pool of microorganisms in the liquid culture media. Indeed, there is insufficient information on efficacy and mode of action of these microbial biopesticides. It is usually the large farms, some with > 20,000 ha of continuous cultivated lands, that produce biopesticides with low levels of contamination, as many of them possess advanced production facilities and have access to specialized knowledge and trained staff. Uptake of on-farm biopesticides is expected to continue but the rate of adoption will depend on factors such as the selection of safe, virulent microbial strains and implementation of sound quality control measures (compliance with emerging Brazilian regulations and international standards). The challenges and opportunities of on-farm bioinsecticides are presented and discussed.
650 $aBiological control
650 $aBiological control agents
650 $aEntomopathogenic fungi
650 $aControle Biológico
650 $aFungo Para Controle Biológico
650 $aProdução
653 $aBacillus
653 $aBaculoviruses
653 $aBiopesticidas
653 $aMicrobial biopesticides
700 1 $aMASCARIN, G. M.
700 1 $aBUTT, T.
700 1 $aLOPES, R. B.
773 $tNeotropical Entomology$gv. 52, p. 122-133, 2023.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Meio Ambiente (CNPMA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
