| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
| 1. |  | MARTINS, W. B. R.; VENTURIERI, G. C.; CARVALHO, J. E. U. de. Fenologia e polinização do murucizeiro (Birsonima crassifolia) em Belém, PA, Brasil. In: SEMINÁRIO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA, 14., 2010, Belém, PA. Bolsista de iniciação científica: um aporte ao desenvolvimento da pesquisa agropecuária: anais. Belém, PA: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, 2010. 1 CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|    |
| 2. | | RODRIGUES, R. P.; GONÇALVES, D. de A.; SILVA, A. R.; MARTINS, W. B. R.; DIONISIO, L. F. S.; SCHWARTZ, G. Crescimento e mortalidade de Tachigali vulgaris L.G.Silva & H.C.Lima em diferentes espaçamentos de plantio para a produção de biomassa. Scientia Forestalis, v. 48, n. 128, e3269, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 3. | | OLIVEIRA, V. P. de; MARTINS, W. B. R.; RODRIGUES, J. I. de M.; SILVA, A. R.; LOPES, J. do C. A.; LIMA NETO, J. F. de; SCHWARTZ, G. Are liming and pit size determining for tree species establishment in degraded areas by kaolin mining? Ecological Engineering, v. 178, Article 106599, May 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|  |
| 4. | | MARTINS, W. B. R.; RODRIGUES, J. I. de M.; OLIVEIRA, V. P. de; RIBEIRO, S. S.; BARROS, W. dos S.; SCHWARTZ, G. Mining in the Amazon: Importance, impacts, and challenges to restore degraded ecosystems. Are we on the right way? Ecological Engineering, v. 174, 106468, Jan. 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 5. | | MARTINS, W. B. R.; PINTO, A. R. G.; COSTA, J. S. da; CARVALHO, J. O. P. de; CASTRO, T. da C.; RUSCHEL, A. R. Dinâmica da população de Lecythis idatimon Aubl. no período de trinta anos em uma floresta de terra firme manejada na Amazônia brasileira. Scientia Forestalis, v. 46, n. 120, p. 540-550, dez. 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 6. | | CAMPOS, M. V. A.; HOMMA, A. K. O.; MENEZES, A. J. E. A. de; FILGUEIRAS, G. C.; MARTINS, W. B. R. Dinâmica dos sistemas agroflorestais com as sinergias socioeconômicas e ambientais: caso dos cooperados nipo-paraenses da cooperativa agrícola mista de Tomé-Açu, Pará. Research, Society and Development, v. 11, n. 1, e22811121000, 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 8. | | MARTINS, W. B. R.; SCHWARTZ, G.; RIBEIRO, S. S.; FERREIRA, G. C.; BARBOSA, R. de S.; PAULA, M. T. de; BARBOSA, V. M.; OLIVEIRA, F. de A. Ecosystem restoration after bauxite mining: favorable indicators for Technosols construction and soil management using liming and subsoiling. New Forests, v. 52, p. 971-994, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 10. | | BARBOSA, R. de S.; VALE, R. S. do; SCHWARTZ, G.; MARTINS, W. B. R.; RIBEIRO, S. S.; RODRIGUES, J. I. de M.; FERREIRA, G. C.; BARBOSA, V. M. Restoration of degraded areas after bauxite mining in the eastern Amazon: Which method to apply? Ecological Engineering, v. 180, 106639, July 2022.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 11. | | DIONISIO, L. F. S.; LIMA, A. C. S.; FIDELIS, E. G.; FARIAS, P. R. S.; CORREIA, R. G.; MARTINS, W. B. R.; SANTOS, A. V. F. Spatial distribution of Rhynchophorus palmarum L. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in oil palm, Roraima State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias, v. 15, n. 1, e5683, 2020. 9 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
| |
| 12. | | RIBEIRO, S. S.; SCHWARTZ, G.; SILVA, A. R.; CRUZ, D. C. da; BRASIL NETO, A. B.; GAMA, M. A. P.; MARTINS, W. B. R.; BARBOSA, R. de S.; LOPES, J. do C. A. Soil properties under different supplementary organic fertilizers in a restoration site after kaolin mining in the Eastern Amazon. Ecological Engineering, v. 170, 106352, Nov. 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/05/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
19/05/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
MARTINS, W. B. R.; LIMA, M. D. R.; BARROS JUNIOR, U. O.; AMORIM, L. S. V.-B.; OLIVEIRA, F. de A.; SCHWARTZ, G. |
|
Afiliação: |
Walmer Bruno Rocha Martins, UFRA; Michael Douglas Roque Lima, UFRA; Udsonde Oliveira Barros Junior, UFRA; Larissa Sousa Villas-Boas Amorim, Management and Operational Center of the Amazonia Protection System; Francisco de Assis Oliveira, UFRA; GUSTAVO SCHWARTZ, CPATU. |
|
Título: |
Ecological methods and indicators for recovering and monitoring ecosystems after mining: A global literature review. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ecological Engineering, v. 145, 105707, Feb. 2020. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Mining contributes significantly to the world's economy. However, it brings strong environmental impacts, including the destruction of the original vegetation. In this way, the recovery of degraded areas by mining has been a mandatory procedure in many countries. With the objective to review this subject, a bibliometric analysis was carried out using scientific articles published in the period 1990?2018. A total of 700 articles in 171 journals were sampled. Ecological Engineering and Restoration Ecology were the journals with the largest number of articles. There was a significant increase of articles along time approaching the use of geotechnologies and arbuscular fungi. Recovered or recovering ecosystems were studied in 45 countries, mainly in Brazil, Australia, USA, China, and Spain. Coal and bauxite were the most common resources mined. The most frequent recovery methods were: seedling planting, direct seeding, natural regeneration, and hydroseeding, with techniques employed in some of them. In 35.71% of the articles, a small number of species (2?5) were used for the initial plant's establishment. The number of articles decreased as the number of both, plant species used in the initial recovery phase, and ecosystem's age increased. In monitoring, the most important indicators were classified as functional or functional plus structural. From the functional indicators, the Technosols or rebuilt soils were the most evaluated. Future perspectives on forests recovery includes methods tailored to peculiar features (soil and economic) of each ecosystem. For the forest recovery monitoring, the use of geotechnologies, mainly the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), as well as wildlife indicators tend to increase rapidly. MenosMining contributes significantly to the world's economy. However, it brings strong environmental impacts, including the destruction of the original vegetation. In this way, the recovery of degraded areas by mining has been a mandatory procedure in many countries. With the objective to review this subject, a bibliometric analysis was carried out using scientific articles published in the period 1990?2018. A total of 700 articles in 171 journals were sampled. Ecological Engineering and Restoration Ecology were the journals with the largest number of articles. There was a significant increase of articles along time approaching the use of geotechnologies and arbuscular fungi. Recovered or recovering ecosystems were studied in 45 countries, mainly in Brazil, Australia, USA, China, and Spain. Coal and bauxite were the most common resources mined. The most frequent recovery methods were: seedling planting, direct seeding, natural regeneration, and hydroseeding, with techniques employed in some of them. In 35.71% of the articles, a small number of species (2?5) were used for the initial plant's establishment. The number of articles decreased as the number of both, plant species used in the initial recovery phase, and ecosystem's age increased. In monitoring, the most important indicators were classified as functional or functional plus structural. From the functional indicators, the Technosols or rebuilt soils were the most evaluated. Future perspectives on forests recovery includes... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Análise bibliométrica; Área degradada; Indicador ecológico; Restauração ambiental. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/213077/1/EcologicalEngineering.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02475naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2122391
005 2020-05-19
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMARTINS, W. B. R.
245 $aEcological methods and indicators for recovering and monitoring ecosystems after mining$bA global literature review.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aMining contributes significantly to the world's economy. However, it brings strong environmental impacts, including the destruction of the original vegetation. In this way, the recovery of degraded areas by mining has been a mandatory procedure in many countries. With the objective to review this subject, a bibliometric analysis was carried out using scientific articles published in the period 1990?2018. A total of 700 articles in 171 journals were sampled. Ecological Engineering and Restoration Ecology were the journals with the largest number of articles. There was a significant increase of articles along time approaching the use of geotechnologies and arbuscular fungi. Recovered or recovering ecosystems were studied in 45 countries, mainly in Brazil, Australia, USA, China, and Spain. Coal and bauxite were the most common resources mined. The most frequent recovery methods were: seedling planting, direct seeding, natural regeneration, and hydroseeding, with techniques employed in some of them. In 35.71% of the articles, a small number of species (2?5) were used for the initial plant's establishment. The number of articles decreased as the number of both, plant species used in the initial recovery phase, and ecosystem's age increased. In monitoring, the most important indicators were classified as functional or functional plus structural. From the functional indicators, the Technosols or rebuilt soils were the most evaluated. Future perspectives on forests recovery includes methods tailored to peculiar features (soil and economic) of each ecosystem. For the forest recovery monitoring, the use of geotechnologies, mainly the Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), as well as wildlife indicators tend to increase rapidly.
653 $aAnálise bibliométrica
653 $aÁrea degradada
653 $aIndicador ecológico
653 $aRestauração ambiental
700 1 $aLIMA, M. D. R.
700 1 $aBARROS JUNIOR, U. O.
700 1 $aAMORIM, L. S. V.-B.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, F. de A.
700 1 $aSCHWARTZ, G.
773 $tEcological Engineering$gv. 145, 105707, Feb. 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
