| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pantanal. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/02/1996 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
20/07/2012 |
|
Autoria: |
CARLO, I.; MENDOZA, R.; VELEZ, J. |
|
Título: |
Evaluation of different feeding systems in beef cattle production. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1972 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico, v.56, n.4, p.327-336, Oct. 1972. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Different feeding systems for beef cattle production were studied at the Corozal and Isabela Substations of the Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Puerto Rico. The data for each location were analyzed separately. Observations at Isabela indicate that Pangola-grass soilage is not suitable for rearing beef cattle. Ad libitum feeding of a bulky ration showed no comparative advantage over grazing alone in weight gains of the heifers. Similarly, a finishing period on ad libitum bulky feed was no better than grazing alone. The dressing percentage for the ad libitum bulky-fed group was 64.26 percent compared to 62.30 percent for the group on grazing alone and to 62.23 percent for the group o grazing plus a finishing period on ad libitum bulky feed. There was no significant difference between these two latter groups. The soilage group was not slaughtered. Data from the Corozal Substation indicate that corn supplementation was superior to the other treatment in regard to weight gains of the heifers. However, when economical aspects are considered, corn supplementation may prove unjustifiable. The molasses supplementation was no better than grazing alone. The dressing percentage of the corn supplemented heifers was significantly different from grazing alone (60.70 vs 59.03 percent) and from grazing plus concentrate supplementation when pastures were poor (60.70 vs. 59.10 percent). Dressing data for the molasses-fed group (60.40 percent) were not statistically analyzed becau-
se individual liveweights of heifers were not obtained for reference against the corresponding "hor carcass" weights. MenosDifferent feeding systems for beef cattle production were studied at the Corozal and Isabela Substations of the Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Puerto Rico. The data for each location were analyzed separately. Observations at Isabela indicate that Pangola-grass soilage is not suitable for rearing beef cattle. Ad libitum feeding of a bulky ration showed no comparative advantage over grazing alone in weight gains of the heifers. Similarly, a finishing period on ad libitum bulky feed was no better than grazing alone. The dressing percentage for the ad libitum bulky-fed group was 64.26 percent compared to 62.30 percent for the group on grazing alone and to 62.23 percent for the group o grazing plus a finishing period on ad libitum bulky feed. There was no significant difference between these two latter groups. The soilage group was not slaughtered. Data from the Corozal Substation indicate that corn supplementation was superior to the other treatment in regard to weight gains of the heifers. However, when economical aspects are considered, corn supplementation may prove unjustifiable. The molasses supplementation was no better than grazing alone. The dressing percentage of the corn supplemented heifers was significantly different from grazing alone (60.70 vs 59.03 percent) and from grazing plus concentrate supplementation when pastures were poor (60.70 vs. 59.10 percent). Dressing data for the molasses-fed group (60.40 percent) were not statistically analyzed be... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Feeding systems; Production. |
|
Thesagro: |
Gado de Corte; Produção; Sistema de Alimentação. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
beef cattle; Puerto Rico. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02263naa a2200229 a 4500
001 1787142
005 2012-07-20
008 1972 bl --- 0-- u #d
100 1 $aCARLO, I.
245 $aEvaluation of different feeding systems in beef cattle production.
260 $c1972
520 $aDifferent feeding systems for beef cattle production were studied at the Corozal and Isabela Substations of the Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Puerto Rico. The data for each location were analyzed separately. Observations at Isabela indicate that Pangola-grass soilage is not suitable for rearing beef cattle. Ad libitum feeding of a bulky ration showed no comparative advantage over grazing alone in weight gains of the heifers. Similarly, a finishing period on ad libitum bulky feed was no better than grazing alone. The dressing percentage for the ad libitum bulky-fed group was 64.26 percent compared to 62.30 percent for the group on grazing alone and to 62.23 percent for the group o grazing plus a finishing period on ad libitum bulky feed. There was no significant difference between these two latter groups. The soilage group was not slaughtered. Data from the Corozal Substation indicate that corn supplementation was superior to the other treatment in regard to weight gains of the heifers. However, when economical aspects are considered, corn supplementation may prove unjustifiable. The molasses supplementation was no better than grazing alone. The dressing percentage of the corn supplemented heifers was significantly different from grazing alone (60.70 vs 59.03 percent) and from grazing plus concentrate supplementation when pastures were poor (60.70 vs. 59.10 percent). Dressing data for the molasses-fed group (60.40 percent) were not statistically analyzed becau- se individual liveweights of heifers were not obtained for reference against the corresponding "hor carcass" weights.
650 $abeef cattle
650 $aPuerto Rico
650 $aGado de Corte
650 $aProdução
650 $aSistema de Alimentação
653 $aFeeding systems
653 $aProduction
700 1 $aMENDOZA, R.
700 1 $aVELEZ, J.
773 $tJournal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico$gv.56, n.4, p.327-336, Oct. 1972.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pantanal (CPAP) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/12/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/08/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Circular Técnica |
|
Autoria: |
PEREIRA, M. C. N.; GASPAROTTO, L.; PEREIRA, J. C. R.; LOPES, C. M. d'A. |
|
Afiliação: |
MIRZA CARLA NORMANDO PEREIRA, CPAA; LUADIR GASPAROTTO, CPAA; JOSÉ CLÉRIO REZENDE PEREIRA, IN MEMORIAM; CONSUELO MARIA D'ÁVILA LOPES, MAPA. |
|
Título: |
Manejo da cultura da bananeira no Estado do Amazonas. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Manaus: Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental, 2020. |
|
Páginas: |
53 p. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. Circular técnica, 10). |
|
ISSN: |
1517-2449 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Instalação de um bananal. Escolha da cultivar. Thap maeo. Caipira. Fhia 18. Prata Ken. Pelipita. BRS Conquista. BRS Caprichosa. BRS Garantida. BRS Japira. Escolha da área. Condições climáticas. Preparo do solo. Coleta de solo para análise e recomendação de adubação. Época de plantio. Espaçamento e densidade populacional. Coveamento e sulcamento. Seleção de preparo das mudas. Adubação. Adubação de cova. Adubação de plantio. Adubação de cobertura. Adubação a partir do 2º ciclo. Irrigação. Práticas culturais. Capina. Desbaste. Desfolha. Escoramento. Eliminação do coração (mangará) e pencas. Colheita. Quando colher. Pós-colheita. Doenças da bananeira. Sigatoka-negra. Moko. Mal do panamá. Mosaico da bananeira. Estrias da bananeira. Pragas da bananeira. Broca-do-rizoma. Broca-do-pseudocaule. Abelha-arapuá. Tripes. Tripes-da-ferrugem-dos-frutos. Ácaros-de-teia. Índices técnicos. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Cultivo. |
|
Thesagro: |
Banana. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/224612/1/Circ-Tec-10-segunda-edicao.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01513nam a2200205 a 4500
001 2128801
005 2021-08-02
008 2020 bl uuuu 00u1 u #d
022 $a1517-2449
100 1 $aPEREIRA, M. C. N.
245 $aManejo da cultura da bananeira no Estado do Amazonas.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aManaus: Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental$c2020
300 $a53 p.
490 $a(Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental. Circular técnica, 10).
520 $aInstalação de um bananal. Escolha da cultivar. Thap maeo. Caipira. Fhia 18. Prata Ken. Pelipita. BRS Conquista. BRS Caprichosa. BRS Garantida. BRS Japira. Escolha da área. Condições climáticas. Preparo do solo. Coleta de solo para análise e recomendação de adubação. Época de plantio. Espaçamento e densidade populacional. Coveamento e sulcamento. Seleção de preparo das mudas. Adubação. Adubação de cova. Adubação de plantio. Adubação de cobertura. Adubação a partir do 2º ciclo. Irrigação. Práticas culturais. Capina. Desbaste. Desfolha. Escoramento. Eliminação do coração (mangará) e pencas. Colheita. Quando colher. Pós-colheita. Doenças da bananeira. Sigatoka-negra. Moko. Mal do panamá. Mosaico da bananeira. Estrias da bananeira. Pragas da bananeira. Broca-do-rizoma. Broca-do-pseudocaule. Abelha-arapuá. Tripes. Tripes-da-ferrugem-dos-frutos. Ácaros-de-teia. Índices técnicos.
650 $aBanana
653 $aCultivo
700 1 $aGASPAROTTO, L.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, J. C. R.
700 1 $aLOPES, C. M. d'A.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental (CPAA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
