| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 79 | |
| 9. |  | OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C.; KELLER, M.; CRILL, P. M. Fluxes of nitrous oxide and methane in commercial soybean, rice, and maize crops on the Santarem-Belterra Plateau, Para State. In: SCIENCE TEAM MEETING, 11., 2007, Salvador. Book of Abstracts... Manaus: LBA-ECO, 2007. Abstract ID: 11. Publicado também on-line.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|    |
| 15. | | HAREN, J. van; SALESKA, S.; HUETE, A.; KELLER, M.; OLIVEIRA, R. C. Amazon forest tree species composition influences soil fluxes of CO2 and N2O. In: SCIENCE TEAM MEETING, 10., 2006, Brasília, DF. Book of Abstracts... Manaus: LBA-ECO, 2006. p. 19.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 16. | | SAMPAIO, I. C. G.; OLIVEIRA JUNIOR, R. C. de; KELLER, M.; PEREIRA, C.; OLIVEIRA, K. Análise do fluxo de metano de uma plantação de arroz e soja em comparação com floresta tropical na Amazônia. Espaço Científico, Santarém, v. 13, n. 1/2, p. 47-60, 2012. Revista editada e publicada em 2013.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 79 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Territorial. |
|
Data corrente: |
02/04/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
02/04/2015 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SCHIMEL, D.; KELLER, M. |
|
Afiliação: |
DAVID SCHIMEL, CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY; MICHAEL KELLER, USDA/EMBRAPA MONITORAMENTO POR SATÉLITE. |
|
Título: |
Big questions, big science: meeting the challenges of global ecology. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Oecologia, v. 177, n. 4, 2015. |
|
Páginas: |
p 925-934. |
|
DOI: |
10.1007/s00442-015-3236-3 |
|
Idioma: |
Italiano |
|
Conteúdo: |
Ecologists are increasingly tackling questions that require significant infrastucture, large experiments, networks of observations, and complex data and computation. Key hypotheses in ecology increasingly require more investment, and larger data sets to be tested than can be collected by a single investigator?s or s group of investigator?s labs, sustained for longer than a typical grant. Large-scale projects are expensive, so their scientific return on the investment has to justify the opportunity cost-the science foregone because resources were expended on a large project rather than supporting a number of individual projects. In addition, their management must be accountable and efficient in the use of significant resources, requiring the use of formal systems engineering and project management to mitigate risk of failure. Mapping the scientific method into formal project management requires both scientists able to work in the context, and a project implementation team sensitive to the unique requirements of ecology. Sponsoring agencies, under pressure from external and internal forces, experience many pressures that push them towards counterproductive project management but a scientific community aware and experienced in large project science can mitigate these tendencies. For big ecology to result in great science, ecologists must become informed, aware and engaged in the advocacy and governance of large ecological projects. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
National Ecological Observatory Network; Project management. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Systems engineering. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/121785/1/4429.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02001naa a2200193 a 4500
001 2012696
005 2015-04-02
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s00442-015-3236-3$2DOI
100 1 $aSCHIMEL, D.
245 $aBig questions, big science$bmeeting the challenges of global ecology.
260 $c2015
300 $ap 925-934.
520 $aEcologists are increasingly tackling questions that require significant infrastucture, large experiments, networks of observations, and complex data and computation. Key hypotheses in ecology increasingly require more investment, and larger data sets to be tested than can be collected by a single investigator?s or s group of investigator?s labs, sustained for longer than a typical grant. Large-scale projects are expensive, so their scientific return on the investment has to justify the opportunity cost-the science foregone because resources were expended on a large project rather than supporting a number of individual projects. In addition, their management must be accountable and efficient in the use of significant resources, requiring the use of formal systems engineering and project management to mitigate risk of failure. Mapping the scientific method into formal project management requires both scientists able to work in the context, and a project implementation team sensitive to the unique requirements of ecology. Sponsoring agencies, under pressure from external and internal forces, experience many pressures that push them towards counterproductive project management but a scientific community aware and experienced in large project science can mitigate these tendencies. For big ecology to result in great science, ecologists must become informed, aware and engaged in the advocacy and governance of large ecological projects.
650 $aSystems engineering
653 $aNational Ecological Observatory Network
653 $aProject management
700 1 $aKELLER, M.
773 $tOecologia$gv. 177, n. 4, 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Territorial (CNPM) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
