Data/hora: 04/06/2024 14:17:27

Biblioteca(s): | Embrapa Solos.
Data corrente: | 23/08/2016
Data da última atualização: | 09/11/2021
Autoria: | CLEMENT, C. R.; DENEVAN, W. M.; HECKENBERGER, M. J.; JUNQUEIRA, A. B.; NEVES, E. G.; TEIXEIRA, W. G.; WOODS, W. I.
Afiliação: | CHARLES R. CLEMENT, INPA; WILLIAM M. DENEVAN, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN; MICHAEL J. HECKENBERGER, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; ANDRÉ BRAGA JUNQUEIRA, INPA; EDUARDO G. NEVES, USP; WENCESLAU GERALDES TEIXEIRA, CNPS; WILLIAM I. WOODS, UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS.
Título: | Response to comment by McMichael, Piperno and Bush.
Ano de publicação: | 2015
Fonte/Imprenta: | Proceedings of the Royal Society B: biological sciences, v. 282, n. 1821, 20152459, Dez. 2015.
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2459
Idioma: | Inglês
Conteúdo: | We thank McMichael et al. for commenting on our recent review [1]. They focus on: our misinterpretation of their published data; use of data that is not pre-Conquest; and the extrapolative nature of our review. As they point out, we agree with them about heterogeneous landscape domestication across Amazonia, but we dis- agree with their conclusions about the extent to which forests were altered in western Amazonia and elsewhere [2,3]. As western Amazonia covers approxi- mately 2 000 000 km2, they are making a major statement. We consider their claim to be of an excessively 'extrapolative nature' given their data.
Palavras-Chave: | Fitólito.
Thesagro: | Carvão Vegetal.
Thesaurus Nal: | Amazonia.
Categoria do assunto: | P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra
Registro original: | Embrapa Solos (CNPS)
Exemplares: | CNPS - (19320-1) - UPC - AP - DD -  -  - 2016.00217 - DIS