| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados; Embrapa Unidades Centrais. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/09/1994 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/05/2014 |
|
Autoria: |
BURLE, M. L.; SUHET, A. R.; RESCK, D. V. S.; PERES, J. R. R.; BOWEN, W. T.; PEREIRA, J. |
|
Título: |
Liberacao de nitrogenio apos a incorporacao de adubos verdes cultivados durante o periodo da seca nos cerrados. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
1990 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Planaltina: EMBRAPA-CPAC, 1990. |
|
Páginas: |
3p. |
|
Série: |
(EMBRAPA-CPAC. Pesquisa em Andamento, 49). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Liberação de nitrogênio após a incorporação de adubos verdes cultivados durante o período da seca nos cerrados. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Canavalia brasiliensis; CPAC 1230; Cultivar; Cultivation; Cultivo; Época seca; Feijão bravo do Ceará; Mucuna aterrima; Sorgo BR 300. |
|
Thesagro: |
Adubação Verde; Cajanus Cajan; Cerrado; Guandu; Leguminosa; Mucuna Preta; Nitrogênio; Reciclagem; Sorghum Bicolor; Stylosanthes Guianensis. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
dry season; green manures; legumes; nitrogen; recycling; Tephrosia candida; varieties. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/102944/1/pesq-49.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01446nam a2200505 a 4500
001 1549388
005 2014-05-30
008 1990 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aBURLE, M. L.
245 $aLiberacao de nitrogenio apos a incorporacao de adubos verdes cultivados durante o periodo da seca nos cerrados.
260 $aPlanaltina: EMBRAPA-CPAC$c1990
300 $a3p.
490 $a(EMBRAPA-CPAC. Pesquisa em Andamento, 49).
520 $aLiberação de nitrogênio após a incorporação de adubos verdes cultivados durante o período da seca nos cerrados.
650 $adry season
650 $agreen manures
650 $alegumes
650 $anitrogen
650 $arecycling
650 $aTephrosia candida
650 $avarieties
650 $aAdubação Verde
650 $aCajanus Cajan
650 $aCerrado
650 $aGuandu
650 $aLeguminosa
650 $aMucuna Preta
650 $aNitrogênio
650 $aReciclagem
650 $aSorghum Bicolor
650 $aStylosanthes Guianensis
653 $aCanavalia brasiliensis
653 $aCPAC 1230
653 $aCultivar
653 $aCultivation
653 $aCultivo
653 $aÉpoca seca
653 $aFeijão bravo do Ceará
653 $aMucuna aterrima
653 $aSorgo BR 300
700 1 $aSUHET, A. R.
700 1 $aRESCK, D. V. S.
700 1 $aPERES, J. R. R.
700 1 $aBOWEN, W. T.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, J.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agricultura Digital. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnptia.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital; Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|
Data corrente: |
19/01/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
24/02/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
SILVA, R. de O.; BARIONI, L. G.; HALL, J. A. J.; MATSUURA, M. F.; ALBERTINI, T. Z.; FERNANDES, F. A.; MORAN, D. |
|
Afiliação: |
R. DE OLIVEIRA SILVA, University of Edinburgh; LUIS GUSTAVO BARIONI, CNPTIA; J. A. J. HALL, University of Edinburgh; MARILIA IEDA DA S F MATSUURA, CNPMA; TIAGO ZANETT ALBERTINI, USP/ESALQ; FERNANDO ANTONIO FERNANDES, CPAP; D. MORAN, Research Division, SRUC. |
|
Título: |
Increasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Nature Climate Change, v. 6, n. 5, p. 493-497, May 2016. |
|
DOI: |
10.1038/NCLIMATE2916 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Recent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly diferent emission estimates. MenosRecent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly d... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Beef production; Emissões de gases. |
|
Thesagro: |
Efeito Estufa. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Gas emissions; Greenhouse gas emissions. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02333naa a2200265 a 4500
001 2034370
005 2017-02-24
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1038/NCLIMATE2916$2DOI
100 1 $aSILVA, R. de O.
245 $aIncreasing beef production could lower greenhouse gas emissions in Brazil if decoupled from deforestation.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
520 $aRecent debate about agricultural greenhouse gas emissions mitigation highlights trade-os inherent in thewaywe produce and consume food, with increasing scrutiny on emissionsintensive livestock products1-3. Although most research has focused on mitigation through improved productivity4,5, systemic interactions resulting from reduced beef production at the regional level are still unexplored. A detailed optimization model of beef production encompassing pasture degradation and recovery processes, animal and deforestation emissions, soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and upstream life-cycle inventory was developed and parameterized for the Brazilian Cerrado. Economic return was maximized considering two alternative scenarios: decoupled livestock-deforestation (DLD), assuming baseline deforestation rates controlled by eective policy; and coupled livestock-deforestation (CLD), where shifting beef demand alters deforestation rates. In DLD, reduced consumption actually leads to less productive beef systems, associated with higher emissions intensities and total emissions, whereas increased production leads to more eficient systems with boosted SOC stocks, reducing both per kilogram and total emissions. Under CLD, increased production leads to 60% higher emissions than in DLD. The results indicate the extent to which deforestation control contributes to sustainable intensification in Cerrado beef systems, and how alternative life-cycle analytical approaches result in significantly diferent emission estimates.
650 $aGas emissions
650 $aGreenhouse gas emissions
650 $aEfeito Estufa
653 $aBeef production
653 $aEmissões de gases
700 1 $aBARIONI, L. G.
700 1 $aHALL, J. A. J.
700 1 $aMATSUURA, M. F.
700 1 $aALBERTINI, T. Z.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, F. A.
700 1 $aMORAN, D.
773 $tNature Climate Change$gv. 6, n. 5, p. 493-497, May 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
