| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Unidades Centrais; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/01/2004 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/01/2018 |
|
Autoria: |
CAMARGO, U. A.; NACHTIGAL, J. C.; MAIA, J. D. G.; OLIVEIRA, P. R. D. de; PROTAS, J. F. da S. |
|
Afiliação: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Título: |
BRS Morena: nova cultivar de uva preta de mesa sem semente. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2003 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Bento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho, 2003. |
|
Páginas: |
4 p. |
|
Descrição Física: |
il. |
|
Série: |
(Embrapa Uva e Vinho. Comunicado Técnico, 47). |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Notas: |
ISSN 1516-8093. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Origem; Características ampelográficas: broto, flor, folha adulta, cacho, baga; Características agronômicas e comerciais; Particularidades de manejo; Formação da planta; Manejo do cacho; Recomendações de uso; Disponibilidade de material propagativo. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
BRS Morena; Característica; Cultivar; Origem; Uva de mesa; Uva preta; Uva sem semente; Uvas do Brasil; Videira. |
|
Thesagro: |
Ampelografia; Manejo; Uva; Viticultura. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CNPUV/5276/1/cot047.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01171nam a2200349 a 4500
001 1539108
005 2018-01-23
008 2003 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aCAMARGO, U. A.
245 $aBRS Morena$bnova cultivar de uva preta de mesa sem semente.
260 $aBento Gonçalves: Embrapa Uva e Vinho$c2003
300 $a4 p.$cil.
490 $a(Embrapa Uva e Vinho. Comunicado Técnico, 47).
500 $aISSN 1516-8093.
520 $aOrigem; Características ampelográficas: broto, flor, folha adulta, cacho, baga; Características agronômicas e comerciais; Particularidades de manejo; Formação da planta; Manejo do cacho; Recomendações de uso; Disponibilidade de material propagativo.
650 $aAmpelografia
650 $aManejo
650 $aUva
650 $aViticultura
653 $aBRS Morena
653 $aCaracterística
653 $aCultivar
653 $aOrigem
653 $aUva de mesa
653 $aUva preta
653 $aUva sem semente
653 $aUvas do Brasil
653 $aVideira
700 1 $aNACHTIGAL, J. C.
700 1 $aMAIA, J. D. G.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, P. R. D. de
700 1 $aPROTAS, J. F. da S.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Cerrados. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/12/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/12/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
DIAS, M. B. de C.; COSTA, K. A. de P.; SEVERIANO, E. da C.; BILEGO, U. O.; FURTINI NETO, A. E.; ALMEIDA, D. P.; BRAND, S. P.; VILELA, L. |
|
Afiliação: |
LOURIVAL VILELA, CPAC. |
|
Título: |
Brachiaria and Panicum maximum in an integrated crop?livestock system and a second-crop maize system in succession with soybean. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Journal of Agricultural Science, v. 158, n. 3, 2020. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 206-217 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Owing to its contribution to the maintenance of carbon stocks, soil nitrogen and nutrient cycling for subsequent crops, the integrated systems become increasingly important for agricultural conservation. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production of and total nutrient in Brachiaria spp. and Panicum maximum forage grasses used as mulch and soybean yields in an integrated crop?livestock system and second-crop maize succession system. The treatments consisted of the following cropping systems: Xaraes palisadegrass intercropped with soybean, Congo grass intercropped with soybean, Mombaça guinea grass intercropped with soybean, Tamani guinea grass intercropped with soybean and a soybean/ maize succession system. The forage grasses were established during the soybean R6?R7 stage. Compared with Congo grass, Xaraes palisadegrass, Mombaça guinea grass and Tamani guinea grass produced more biomass and equivalent amounts of fertilizer returned to the soil and resulted in greater nutrient cycling, indicating the benefits of these grasses for use as mulch in integrated production systems. Maize had a greater C/N ratio, but the forage grasses also exhibited high potential by protecting the soil until the end of the soybean development cycle. The use of an integrated crop?livestock system combined with a forage cropping system provided greater soil nutrient cycling than the maize cropping system did, which resulted in increased soybean yields, thus contributing to the sustainability of agricultural systems. MenosOwing to its contribution to the maintenance of carbon stocks, soil nitrogen and nutrient cycling for subsequent crops, the integrated systems become increasingly important for agricultural conservation. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production of and total nutrient in Brachiaria spp. and Panicum maximum forage grasses used as mulch and soybean yields in an integrated crop?livestock system and second-crop maize succession system. The treatments consisted of the following cropping systems: Xaraes palisadegrass intercropped with soybean, Congo grass intercropped with soybean, Mombaça guinea grass intercropped with soybean, Tamani guinea grass intercropped with soybean and a soybean/ maize succession system. The forage grasses were established during the soybean R6?R7 stage. Compared with Congo grass, Xaraes palisadegrass, Mombaça guinea grass and Tamani guinea grass produced more biomass and equivalent amounts of fertilizer returned to the soil and resulted in greater nutrient cycling, indicating the benefits of these grasses for use as mulch in integrated production systems. Maize had a greater C/N ratio, but the forage grasses also exhibited high potential by protecting the soil until the end of the soybean development cycle. The use of an integrated crop?livestock system combined with a forage cropping system provided greater soil nutrient cycling than the maize cropping system did, which resulted in increased soybean yields, thus contributin... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Sistema de integração; Sustentabilidade. |
|
Thesagro: |
Biomassa; Nutriente; Planta Forrageira. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/219001/1/LOURIVAL-VILELA-Brachiaria-e-Panicum.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02389naa a2200277 a 4500
001 2127898
005 2020-12-09
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aDIAS, M. B. de C.
245 $aBrachiaria and Panicum maximum in an integrated crop?livestock system and a second-crop maize system in succession with soybean.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $ap. 206-217
520 $aOwing to its contribution to the maintenance of carbon stocks, soil nitrogen and nutrient cycling for subsequent crops, the integrated systems become increasingly important for agricultural conservation. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the biomass production of and total nutrient in Brachiaria spp. and Panicum maximum forage grasses used as mulch and soybean yields in an integrated crop?livestock system and second-crop maize succession system. The treatments consisted of the following cropping systems: Xaraes palisadegrass intercropped with soybean, Congo grass intercropped with soybean, Mombaça guinea grass intercropped with soybean, Tamani guinea grass intercropped with soybean and a soybean/ maize succession system. The forage grasses were established during the soybean R6?R7 stage. Compared with Congo grass, Xaraes palisadegrass, Mombaça guinea grass and Tamani guinea grass produced more biomass and equivalent amounts of fertilizer returned to the soil and resulted in greater nutrient cycling, indicating the benefits of these grasses for use as mulch in integrated production systems. Maize had a greater C/N ratio, but the forage grasses also exhibited high potential by protecting the soil until the end of the soybean development cycle. The use of an integrated crop?livestock system combined with a forage cropping system provided greater soil nutrient cycling than the maize cropping system did, which resulted in increased soybean yields, thus contributing to the sustainability of agricultural systems.
650 $aBiomassa
650 $aNutriente
650 $aPlanta Forrageira
653 $aSistema de integração
653 $aSustentabilidade
700 1 $aCOSTA, K. A. de P.
700 1 $aSEVERIANO, E. da C.
700 1 $aBILEGO, U. O.
700 1 $aFURTINI NETO, A. E.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, D. P.
700 1 $aBRAND, S. P.
700 1 $aVILELA, L.
773 $tJournal of Agricultural Science$gv. 158, n. 3, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Cerrados (CPAC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
