| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros. |
|
Data corrente: |
17/10/2017 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
17/10/2017 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
SCHULTZ, N.; PEREIRA, W.; SILVA, P. de A.; BALDANI, J. I.; BODDEY, R. M.; ALVES, B. J. R.; URQUIAGA, S.; REIS, V. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
NIVALDO SCHULTZ; WILLIAN PEREIRA; PAULO DE ALBUQUERQUE SILVA, CPATC; JOSE IVO BALDANI, CNPAB; ROBERT MICHAEL BODDEY, CNPAB; BRUNO JOSE RODRIGUES ALVES, CNPAB; SEGUNDO SACRAMENTO U CABALLERO, CNPAB; VERONICA MASSENA REIS, CNPAB. |
|
Título: |
Yield of sugarcane varieties and their sugar quality grown in different soil types and inoculated with a diazotrophic bacteria consortium. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Plant Production Science, out. 2017. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Sugarcane is a crop of great economic, social, and environmental relevance in Brazil. The country is the largest sugar producer and the second largest bioethanol producer in the world. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of a sugarcane inoculant composed of five diazotrophic bacterial strains, as well as nitrogen fertilization of two sugarcane varieties. Two experiments were carried out on two varieties using an experimental design composed of complete randomized blocks in a factorial of two varieties and three treatments with four replicates. The treatments can be described as: inoculation with the consortium of five diazotrophic strains, or N fertilization with 120 kg ha?1, and one control treatment. The following parameters were then evaluated: stem yield, accumulation of total dry matter, nitrogen content, quality of the sugarcane juice, and 15N natural abundance on flag-leaves. Inoculation and N fertilization on the Sapucaia plantation promoted increases of stem yield equivalent to 22.3 and 26.5 Mg ha?1 in the RB867515 variety, in comparison to the control, respectively. Inoculation and N fertilizer used for the Coruripe plantation increased stem yield of 38.0 and 42.4 Mg ha?1, respectively, with the RB867515 variety, while RB72454 showed increases of 16.7 and 37.5 Mg ha?1, both compared to the control. Biological nitrogen fixation was not affected by the treatments, however, both treatments increased the total recoverable sugar yield. Benefits from inoculation appeared to promote plant growth due to the plant–bacteria interaction. MenosSugarcane is a crop of great economic, social, and environmental relevance in Brazil. The country is the largest sugar producer and the second largest bioethanol producer in the world. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of a sugarcane inoculant composed of five diazotrophic bacterial strains, as well as nitrogen fertilization of two sugarcane varieties. Two experiments were carried out on two varieties using an experimental design composed of complete randomized blocks in a factorial of two varieties and three treatments with four replicates. The treatments can be described as: inoculation with the consortium of five diazotrophic strains, or N fertilization with 120 kg ha?1, and one control treatment. The following parameters were then evaluated: stem yield, accumulation of total dry matter, nitrogen content, quality of the sugarcane juice, and 15N natural abundance on flag-leaves. Inoculation and N fertilization on the Sapucaia plantation promoted increases of stem yield equivalent to 22.3 and 26.5 Mg ha?1 in the RB867515 variety, in comparison to the control, respectively. Inoculation and N fertilizer used for the Coruripe plantation increased stem yield of 38.0 and 42.4 Mg ha?1, respectively, with the RB867515 variety, while RB72454 showed increases of 16.7 and 37.5 Mg ha?1, both compared to the control. Biological nitrogen fixation was not affected by the treatments, however, both treatments increased the total recoverable sugar yield. Benefits from in... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
15N natural abundance; Bactérias; Biological nitrogen fixation; Plant growth promotion; Saccharum spp; Sugar. |
|
Thesagro: |
Acúcar; Cana de açúcar; Solo. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
Nitrogen; soil; sugarcane. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/165184/1/Yield-of-sugarcane.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02562naa a2200349 a 4500
001 2077519
005 2017-10-17
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aSCHULTZ, N.
245 $aYield of sugarcane varieties and their sugar quality grown in different soil types and inoculated with a diazotrophic bacteria consortium.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
520 $aSugarcane is a crop of great economic, social, and environmental relevance in Brazil. The country is the largest sugar producer and the second largest bioethanol producer in the world. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of a sugarcane inoculant composed of five diazotrophic bacterial strains, as well as nitrogen fertilization of two sugarcane varieties. Two experiments were carried out on two varieties using an experimental design composed of complete randomized blocks in a factorial of two varieties and three treatments with four replicates. The treatments can be described as: inoculation with the consortium of five diazotrophic strains, or N fertilization with 120 kg ha?1, and one control treatment. The following parameters were then evaluated: stem yield, accumulation of total dry matter, nitrogen content, quality of the sugarcane juice, and 15N natural abundance on flag-leaves. Inoculation and N fertilization on the Sapucaia plantation promoted increases of stem yield equivalent to 22.3 and 26.5 Mg ha?1 in the RB867515 variety, in comparison to the control, respectively. Inoculation and N fertilizer used for the Coruripe plantation increased stem yield of 38.0 and 42.4 Mg ha?1, respectively, with the RB867515 variety, while RB72454 showed increases of 16.7 and 37.5 Mg ha?1, both compared to the control. Biological nitrogen fixation was not affected by the treatments, however, both treatments increased the total recoverable sugar yield. Benefits from inoculation appeared to promote plant growth due to the plant–bacteria interaction.
650 $aNitrogen
650 $asoil
650 $asugarcane
650 $aAcúcar
650 $aCana de açúcar
650 $aSolo
653 $a15N natural abundance
653 $aBactérias
653 $aBiological nitrogen fixation
653 $aPlant growth promotion
653 $aSaccharum spp
653 $aSugar
700 1 $aPEREIRA, W.
700 1 $aSILVA, P. de A.
700 1 $aBALDANI, J. I.
700 1 $aBODDEY, R. M.
700 1 $aALVES, B. J. R.
700 1 $aURQUIAGA, S.
700 1 $aREIS, V. M.
773 $tPlant Production Science, out. 2017.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Tabuleiros Costeiros (CPATC) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital. |
|
Data corrente: |
24/05/2021 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
25/05/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Capítulo em Livro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autoria: |
LOPES FILHO, J. H.; SILVA, V. C. H. da; SANTOS, J. C. dos; DANTE, R. A.; GERHARDT, I. R.; YASSITEPE, J. E. de C. T.; FERNANDES, F. R. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOSÉ HERNANDES LOPES FILHO, COLABORADOR CNPTIA; VIVIANE CRISTINA HEINZEN DA SILVA, UNICAMP, GCCRC; JOSENILDA CARLOS DOS SANTOS, Bolsista CNPMS; RICARDO AUGUSTO DANTE, CNPTIA; ISABEL RODRIGUES GERHARDT, CNPTIA; JULIANA ERIKA DE C T YASSITEPE, CNPTIA; FERNANDA RAUSCH FERNANDES, CNPTIA. |
|
Título: |
Introduction to genome editing in plants. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: MOLINARI, H. B. C.; VIEIRA, L. R.; SILVA, N. V. e; PRADO, G. S.; LOPES FILHO, J. F. (Ed.). CRISPR technology in plant genome editing: biotechnology applied to agriculture. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2021. chap. 1, p. 11-46. |
|
ISBN: |
978-65-87380-10-0 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Present and future challenges of modern agriculture. Gene editing tools for precision crop breeding. Genome editing methodologies. Origin of the CRISPR/Cas technology. Overview of mechanisms and enzymes. Application of CRISPR in agriculture. Productivity increase. Quality improvement. Resistance to biotic factors. Resistance to abiotic factors. Accelerated and de novo domestication of wild species. Perspectives and conclusions. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR associated protein; Edição genômica; Genômica; Repetições palindrômicas agrupadas e regularmente espaçadas; Sistema CRISPR/Cas; Técnicas de edição de genomas; Transcription Activator-Like Effector Nuclease; Zinc Finger Nucleases. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Biologia Molecular; Melhoramento Genético Vegetal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agriculture; Genetic improvement; Genomics. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/223422/1/PL-Introduction-genome-editing-cap1-2021.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01813naa a2200373 a 4500
001 2131965
005 2021-05-25
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-65-87380-10-0
100 1 $aLOPES FILHO, J. H.
245 $aIntroduction to genome editing in plants.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
520 $aPresent and future challenges of modern agriculture. Gene editing tools for precision crop breeding. Genome editing methodologies. Origin of the CRISPR/Cas technology. Overview of mechanisms and enzymes. Application of CRISPR in agriculture. Productivity increase. Quality improvement. Resistance to biotic factors. Resistance to abiotic factors. Accelerated and de novo domestication of wild species. Perspectives and conclusions.
650 $aAgriculture
650 $aGenetic improvement
650 $aGenomics
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aBiologia Molecular
650 $aMelhoramento Genético Vegetal
653 $aClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR associated protein
653 $aEdição genômica
653 $aGenômica
653 $aRepetições palindrômicas agrupadas e regularmente espaçadas
653 $aSistema CRISPR/Cas
653 $aTécnicas de edição de genomas
653 $aTranscription Activator-Like Effector Nuclease
653 $aZinc Finger Nucleases
700 1 $aSILVA, V. C. H. da
700 1 $aSANTOS, J. C. dos
700 1 $aDANTE, R. A.
700 1 $aGERHARDT, I. R.
700 1 $aYASSITEPE, J. E. de C. T.
700 1 $aFERNANDES, F. R.
773 $tIn: MOLINARI, H. B. C.; VIEIRA, L. R.; SILVA, N. V. e; PRADO, G. S.; LOPES FILHO, J. F. (Ed.). CRISPR technology in plant genome editing: biotechnology applied to agriculture. Brasília, DF : Embrapa, 2021. chap. 1, p. 11-46.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agricultura Digital (CNPTIA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
