Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Semiárido; Embrapa Uva e Vinho. |
|
Data corrente: |
09/01/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/01/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, J. B. de; EGIPTO, R.; LAUREANO, O.; DE CASTRO, R.; PEREIRA, G. E.; RICARDO-DA-SILVA, J. M. |
|
Afiliação: |
Juliane Barreto de Oliveira, LEAF- Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal; Ricardo Egipto, LEAF- Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal; Olga Laureano, LEAF- Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal; Rogério de Castro, LEAF- Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal; GIULIANO ELIAS PEREIRA, CNPUV; Jorge Manuel Ricardo da Silva, LEAF- Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food. Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017, Lisbon, Portugal. |
|
Título: |
Chemical composition and sensory profile of Syrah wines from semiaridtropical Brazil?Rootstock and harvest season effects. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
LWT. Food Science and Technology, v. 114, (e-108415), 2019. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108415 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
This study aims to characterise the chemical compositions and sensorial profiles of wines made with Syrahgrapes over two harvest seasons (first and second semester), over in different calendar years, from vines on twodifferent rootstocks (1103P and IAC 313). Wine chemical composition and sensory profile were influenced byboth rootstock and harvest season. Syrah wines on IAC 313 were favoured with higher concentrations of, pet-unidin 3-O-acetylglucoside (3.7 mg/L), malvidin 3-O-acetylglucoside (17.8 mg/L), malvidin 3-O-coumar-ylglucoside (4.4 mg/L), petunidin 3-O-coumarylglucoside (2.0 mg/L), peonidin 3-O-coumarylglucoside (1.4 mg/L), monomericflavanols (23.6 mg/L), oligomeric tannins (183.0 mg/L), total condensed tannins (1037.7 mg/L),dimer B1 (9.8 mg/L), B4 (5.0 mg/L), trimer C1 (3.1 mg/L) and calcium (80 mg/L). Syrah wines on 1103P hadhigher concentrations of total anthocyanins (375.6 mg/L, catechin (8.6 mg/L), epicatechin (12.6 mg/L), dimerB2 (21.0 mg/L), B1 3-O-gallate (1.8 mg/L), B2 3′-O-gallate (6.0 mg/L) and totalflavanols (53.4 mg/L). Thesensory profiles of the Syrah wines were influenced by rootstock followed by, mainly in relation to aromaticattributes. Syrah wines on IAC 313 were scored more highly by the tasters. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Região tropical; Sensory; Troical region; Vitis vinifera L. |
|
Thesagro: |
Composto Fenólico; Uva. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Phenolic compounds; Red wines. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
--
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/208403/1/1-s2.0-S0023643819307571-main.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02140naa a2200289 a 4500
001 2118423
005 2020-01-09
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108415$2DOI
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, J. B. de
245 $aChemical composition and sensory profile of Syrah wines from semiaridtropical Brazil?Rootstock and harvest season effects.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aThis study aims to characterise the chemical compositions and sensorial profiles of wines made with Syrahgrapes over two harvest seasons (first and second semester), over in different calendar years, from vines on twodifferent rootstocks (1103P and IAC 313). Wine chemical composition and sensory profile were influenced byboth rootstock and harvest season. Syrah wines on IAC 313 were favoured with higher concentrations of, pet-unidin 3-O-acetylglucoside (3.7 mg/L), malvidin 3-O-acetylglucoside (17.8 mg/L), malvidin 3-O-coumar-ylglucoside (4.4 mg/L), petunidin 3-O-coumarylglucoside (2.0 mg/L), peonidin 3-O-coumarylglucoside (1.4 mg/L), monomericflavanols (23.6 mg/L), oligomeric tannins (183.0 mg/L), total condensed tannins (1037.7 mg/L),dimer B1 (9.8 mg/L), B4 (5.0 mg/L), trimer C1 (3.1 mg/L) and calcium (80 mg/L). Syrah wines on 1103P hadhigher concentrations of total anthocyanins (375.6 mg/L, catechin (8.6 mg/L), epicatechin (12.6 mg/L), dimerB2 (21.0 mg/L), B1 3-O-gallate (1.8 mg/L), B2 3′-O-gallate (6.0 mg/L) and totalflavanols (53.4 mg/L). Thesensory profiles of the Syrah wines were influenced by rootstock followed by, mainly in relation to aromaticattributes. Syrah wines on IAC 313 were scored more highly by the tasters.
650 $aPhenolic compounds
650 $aRed wines
650 $aComposto Fenólico
650 $aUva
653 $aRegião tropical
653 $aSensory
653 $aTroical region
653 $aVitis vinifera L
700 1 $aEGIPTO, R.
700 1 $aLAUREANO, O.
700 1 $aDE CASTRO, R.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, G. E.
700 1 $aRICARDO-DA-SILVA, J. M.
773 $tLWT. Food Science and Technology$gv. 114, (e-108415), 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Uva e Vinho (CNPUV) |
|
