| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 142 | |
| Registros recuperados : 142 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Solos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnps.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/08/2016 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
09/11/2021 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
CLEMENT, C. R.; DENEVAN, W. M.; HECKENBERGER, M. J.; JUNQUEIRA, A. B.; NEVES, E. G.; TEIXEIRA, W. G.; WOODS, W. I. |
|
Afiliação: |
CHARLES R. CLEMENT, INPA; WILLIAM M. DENEVAN, UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN; MICHAEL J. HECKENBERGER, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA; ANDRÉ BRAGA JUNQUEIRA, INPA; EDUARDO G. NEVES, USP; WENCESLAU GERALDES TEIXEIRA, CNPS; WILLIAM I. WOODS, UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS. |
|
Título: |
Response to comment by McMichael, Piperno and Bush. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2015 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: biological sciences, v. 282, n. 1821, 20152459, Dez. 2015. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2459 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
We thank McMichael et al. for commenting on our recent review [1]. They focus on: our misinterpretation of their published data; use of data that is not pre-Conquest; and the extrapolative nature of our review. As they point out, we agree with them about heterogeneous landscape domestication across Amazonia, but we dis- agree with their conclusions about the extent to which forests were altered in western Amazonia and elsewhere [2,3]. As western Amazonia covers approxi- mately 2 000 000 km2, they are making a major statement. We consider their claim to be of an excessively 'extrapolative nature' given their data. |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fitólito. |
|
Thesagro: |
Carvão Vegetal. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 01346naa a2200241 a 4500
001 2051519
005 2021-11-09
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2015.2459$2DOI
100 1 $aCLEMENT, C. R.
245 $aResponse to comment by McMichael, Piperno and Bush.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
520 $aWe thank McMichael et al. for commenting on our recent review [1]. They focus on: our misinterpretation of their published data; use of data that is not pre-Conquest; and the extrapolative nature of our review. As they point out, we agree with them about heterogeneous landscape domestication across Amazonia, but we dis- agree with their conclusions about the extent to which forests were altered in western Amazonia and elsewhere [2,3]. As western Amazonia covers approxi- mately 2 000 000 km2, they are making a major statement. We consider their claim to be of an excessively 'extrapolative nature' given their data.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aCarvão Vegetal
653 $aFitólito
700 1 $aDENEVAN, W. M.
700 1 $aHECKENBERGER, M. J.
700 1 $aJUNQUEIRA, A. B.
700 1 $aNEVES, E. G.
700 1 $aTEIXEIRA, W. G.
700 1 $aWOODS, W. I.
773 $tProceedings of the Royal Society B: biological sciences$gv. 282, n. 1821, 20152459, Dez. 2015.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
