|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
Data corrente: |
08/04/2016 |
Data da última atualização: |
08/04/2016 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
BRASILEIRO, B. P.; MENDES, T. O. de P.; PETERNELLI, L. A.; SILVEIRA, L. C. I. da; RESENDE, M. D. V. de; BARBOSA, M. H. P. |
Afiliação: |
Bruno Portela Brasileiro, UFV; Thiago Otávio de Paula Mendes, Centro de Tecnologia Canavieira; Luiz Alexandre Peternelli, UFV; Luís Cláudio Inácio da Silveira, UFV; MARCOS DEON VILELA DE RESENDE, CNPF; Márcio Henrique Pereira Barbosa, UFV. |
Título: |
Simulated individual best linear unbiased prediction versus mass selection in sugarcane families. |
Ano de publicação: |
2016 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Crop Science, v. 56, n. 2, p. 570-575, Mar./Apr. 2016. |
DOI: |
10.2135/cropsci2015.03.0199 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The purpose of this study was to compare the method BLUPIS (best linear unbiased prediction individual simulated) with mass selection in terms of efficiency in identifying the best genotypes in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) families. Mass selection was performed by two breeders with 25 yr of experience. The BLUPIS procedure selected families with higher means for tons of cane per hectare (TCH) than the overall mean. The number of plants selected per family was calculated by = (g? / g? ) k k j j n n, where ?gk indicates the genotypic value of the kth family; ?gj the genotypic value of the best family; and nj is equal to the number of plants selected in the best family, determined as nj = 45 in this study. Out of 20 best clones forwarded to the third test phase (T3), BLUPIS selected all in the first test phase (T1) and mass selection only two. Therefore, 100% of the clones in the second test phase (T2) had been selected by BLUPIS. The BLUPIS was most efficient in detecting the best genotypes, since all clones that were promoted up to phase T3 were descendants from the best families. The BLUPIS method should be applied in sugarcane breeding programs to ensure the selection of the best genotypes. |
Palavras-Chave: |
BLUP. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Sugarcane. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 01895naa a2200217 a 4500 001 2042976 005 2016-04-08 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.2135/cropsci2015.03.0199$2DOI 100 1 $aBRASILEIRO, B. P. 245 $aSimulated individual best linear unbiased prediction versus mass selection in sugarcane families.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 520 $aThe purpose of this study was to compare the method BLUPIS (best linear unbiased prediction individual simulated) with mass selection in terms of efficiency in identifying the best genotypes in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) families. Mass selection was performed by two breeders with 25 yr of experience. The BLUPIS procedure selected families with higher means for tons of cane per hectare (TCH) than the overall mean. The number of plants selected per family was calculated by = (g? / g? ) k k j j n n, where ?gk indicates the genotypic value of the kth family; ?gj the genotypic value of the best family; and nj is equal to the number of plants selected in the best family, determined as nj = 45 in this study. Out of 20 best clones forwarded to the third test phase (T3), BLUPIS selected all in the first test phase (T1) and mass selection only two. Therefore, 100% of the clones in the second test phase (T2) had been selected by BLUPIS. The BLUPIS was most efficient in detecting the best genotypes, since all clones that were promoted up to phase T3 were descendants from the best families. The BLUPIS method should be applied in sugarcane breeding programs to ensure the selection of the best genotypes. 650 $aSugarcane 653 $aBLUP 700 1 $aMENDES, T. O. de P. 700 1 $aPETERNELLI, L. A. 700 1 $aSILVEIRA, L. C. I. da 700 1 $aRESENDE, M. D. V. de 700 1 $aBARBOSA, M. H. P. 773 $tCrop Science$gv. 56, n. 2, p. 570-575, Mar./Apr. 2016.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Hortaliças. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnph.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Hortaliças. |
Data corrente: |
19/05/1999 |
Data da última atualização: |
19/05/1999 |
Autoria: |
CARLOS GOMES, G.; CASTOR, O. S.; QUINTERE JUNIOR, R. |
Afiliação: |
EMBRAPA-CNPH, Brasilia, DF. |
Título: |
Producao de hortalicas no DF. |
Ano de publicação: |
1988 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Horticultura Brasileira, Brasilia, v.6, n.1, p.49, maio 1988. |
Idioma: |
Português |
Notas: |
Resumo. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Brasilia; Distrito Federal; Production. |
Thesagro: |
Cerrado; Hortaliça; Produção. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Brazil; vegetables. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 00626naa a2200253 a 4500 001 1764196 005 1999-05-19 008 1988 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aCARLOS GOMES, G. 245 $aProducao de hortalicas no DF. 260 $c1988 500 $aResumo. 650 $aBrazil 650 $avegetables 650 $aCerrado 650 $aHortaliça 650 $aProdução 653 $aBrasil 653 $aBrasilia 653 $aDistrito Federal 653 $aProduction 700 1 $aCASTOR, O. S. 700 1 $aQUINTERE JUNIOR, R. 773 $tHorticultura Brasileira, Brasilia$gv.6, n.1, p.49, maio 1988.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Hortaliças (CNPH) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|