| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 43 | |
| 16. |  | DEVENS, J.; CARVALHO, P. de; BOURSCHEIDT, M. L. B.; NASCIMENTO, H. L. B.; PEREIRA, D. H.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e. Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 54., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu. A new view of animal science: challenges and perspectives: Proceedings. Foz do Iguaçu: SBZ, 2017. p. 621.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|    |
| 17. | | MATSUMOTO, R. L. T.; MENDONCA, S.; NUNES, V. S.; BARTCHEWSKY JUNIOR, W.; RIBEIRO, M. L.; CARVALHO, P. de O. Effects of maté tea (Ilex paraguariensis) ingestion on mRNA expression of antioxidant enzymes, lipid peroxidation, and total atioxidant status in healthy young women. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, v. 57, n. 5, p. 1775-1780, 2009.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agroenergia. |
|  |
| 18. | | ARAGÃO, L. S.; TESK, C. R. M.; CARVALHO, P. de; CAVALLI, J.; PEREIRA, D. H.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e. Efeito de duas intensidades de pastejo na composição morfológica de Panicum Maximum cv. Quênia e Tamani no Bioma Amazônia. In: ENCONTRO DE CIÊNCIA E TECNOLOGIAS AGROSSUSTENTÁVEIS; JORNADA CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA AGROSSILVIPASTORIL, 6., 2017, Sinop, MT. Resumos... Sinop, MT: Embrapa Agrossilpastoril, 2017. p. 136-139.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 19. | | DEVENS, J.; CARVALHO, P. de; SILVA, D. S. M.; NASCIMENTO, H. B.; PEREIRA, D. H.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e. Seedlings development of Arachis pintoi cv Belmonte and Mandobi in consortium with Mombaça guineagrass. In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 54., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu. A new view of animal science: challenges and perspectives: Proceedings. Foz do Iguaçu: SBZ, 2017. p. 708.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 20. | | CARVALHO, P. de; DOMICIANO, L. F.; MOMBACH, M. A.; NASCIMENTO, H. L. B. do; CABRAL, L. da S.; SOLLENBERGER, L. E.; PEREIRA, D. H.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e. Forage and animal production on palisadegrass pastures growing in monoculture or as a component of integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems. Grass and forage science, v. 74, n. 4, p. 650-660, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 43 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpamt.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/01/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
28/09/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
CARVALHO, P. de; DOMICIANO, L. F.; MOMBACH, M. A.; NASCIMENTO, H. L. B. do; CABRAL, L. da S.; SOLLENBERGER, L. E.; PEREIRA, D. H.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e. |
|
Afiliação: |
PERIVALDO DE CARVALHO, UFMT, Cuiaba-MT; LEANDRO FERREIRA DOMICIANO, UFMT, Cuiaba-MT; MIRCÉIA ANGELE MOMBACH, UFMT, Cuiaba-MT; HEMYTHON LUIS BANDEIRA DO NASCIMENTO, IFMT, Guaranta do Norte-MT; LUCIANO DA SILVA CABRAL, UFMT, Cuiaba-MT; LYNN E. SOLLENBERGER, UNIVERSITY of FLORIDA, Gainsville, FL-USA; DALTON HENRIQUE PEREIRA, UFMT, Sinop-MT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT. |
|
Título: |
Forage and animal production on palisadegrass pastures growing in monoculture or as a component of integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Grass and forage science, v. 74, n. 4, p. 650-660, 2019. |
|
ISSN: |
0142-5242 |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12448 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
To meet the global demand for animal protein, sustainable intensification of existing livestock systems may be possible, especially through integration of livestock with crops or forestry. Thus, our objective was to compare forage production and animal performance in grass monoculture and integrated systems in the Brazilian Amazon biome. The four systems were (a) livestock (L) with Marandu palisadegrass {Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R. D. Webster} as monoculture, (b) palisadegrass pastures integrated with eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus urograndis; hybrid of Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden and Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake) arranged in three‐row groves with groves spaced 30 m apart (livestock?forestry; LF), (c) palisadegrass after two years of crops (crop?livestock; CL) and (d) palisadegrass after two years of crops with single rows of eucalyptus trees spaced 37 m apart (crop?livestock?forestry; CLF). From July 2016 to July 2017, all experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate. Greater herbage accumulation (HA) occurred in CL and CLF in comparison with L and LF (21,310, 24,050, 19,500 and 18,890 kg DM/ha respectively). The gain per hectare of L, LF and CL (average of 932 kg ha?1) was less than CLF (1,190 kg ha?1). Average daily gain was similar among systems (0.69 kg/day). We conclude that integrated systems can support similar (LF or CL) or greater (CLF) levels of animal production than palisadegrass monocultures while increasing diversity of outputs, thereby providing a greater range of viable systems for livestock production in the Brazilian Amazon biome. MenosTo meet the global demand for animal protein, sustainable intensification of existing livestock systems may be possible, especially through integration of livestock with crops or forestry. Thus, our objective was to compare forage production and animal performance in grass monoculture and integrated systems in the Brazilian Amazon biome. The four systems were (a) livestock (L) with Marandu palisadegrass {Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R. D. Webster} as monoculture, (b) palisadegrass pastures integrated with eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus urograndis; hybrid of Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden and Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake) arranged in three‐row groves with groves spaced 30 m apart (livestock?forestry; LF), (c) palisadegrass after two years of crops (crop?livestock; CL) and (d) palisadegrass after two years of crops with single rows of eucalyptus trees spaced 37 m apart (crop?livestock?forestry; CLF). From July 2016 to July 2017, all experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate. Greater herbage accumulation (HA) occurred in CL and CLF in comparison with L and LF (21,310, 24,050, 19,500 and 18,890 kg DM/ha respectively). The gain per hectare of L, LF and CL (average of 932 kg ha?1) was less than CLF (1,190 kg ha?1). Average daily gain was similar among systems (0.69 kg/day). We conclude that integrated systems can support similar (LF or CL) or greater (CLF) levels of animal production than palisadegrass monocultures whil... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Eucalyptus urograndis; Marandu; Systems CL; Systems LF. |
|
Thesagro: |
Brachiaria Brizantha. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Agroforestry; Beef cattle; Eucalyptus; Grazing management. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02679naa a2200337 a 4500
001 2119609
005 2020-09-28
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0142-5242
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12448$2DOI
100 1 $aCARVALHO, P. de
245 $aForage and animal production on palisadegrass pastures growing in monoculture or as a component of integrated crop-livestock-forestry systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
520 $aTo meet the global demand for animal protein, sustainable intensification of existing livestock systems may be possible, especially through integration of livestock with crops or forestry. Thus, our objective was to compare forage production and animal performance in grass monoculture and integrated systems in the Brazilian Amazon biome. The four systems were (a) livestock (L) with Marandu palisadegrass {Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) R. D. Webster} as monoculture, (b) palisadegrass pastures integrated with eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus urograndis; hybrid of Eucalyptus grandis W. Hill ex Maiden and Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake) arranged in three‐row groves with groves spaced 30 m apart (livestock?forestry; LF), (c) palisadegrass after two years of crops (crop?livestock; CL) and (d) palisadegrass after two years of crops with single rows of eucalyptus trees spaced 37 m apart (crop?livestock?forestry; CLF). From July 2016 to July 2017, all experimental units were continuously stocked using a variable stocking rate. Greater herbage accumulation (HA) occurred in CL and CLF in comparison with L and LF (21,310, 24,050, 19,500 and 18,890 kg DM/ha respectively). The gain per hectare of L, LF and CL (average of 932 kg ha?1) was less than CLF (1,190 kg ha?1). Average daily gain was similar among systems (0.69 kg/day). We conclude that integrated systems can support similar (LF or CL) or greater (CLF) levels of animal production than palisadegrass monocultures while increasing diversity of outputs, thereby providing a greater range of viable systems for livestock production in the Brazilian Amazon biome.
650 $aAgroforestry
650 $aBeef cattle
650 $aEucalyptus
650 $aGrazing management
650 $aBrachiaria Brizantha
653 $aEucalyptus urograndis
653 $aMarandu
653 $aSystems CL
653 $aSystems LF
700 1 $aDOMICIANO, L. F.
700 1 $aMOMBACH, M. A.
700 1 $aNASCIMENTO, H. L. B. do
700 1 $aCABRAL, L. da S.
700 1 $aSOLLENBERGER, L. E.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, D. H.
700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e
773 $tGrass and forage science$gv. 74, n. 4, p. 650-660, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
