| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 53 | |
| 10. |  | CUNHA, G. R.; HAAS, J. C.; BERLATO, M. A. (ed.). Applications of climate forecasting for better decision-making processes in agriculture. Passo Fundo: Embrapa Trigo, 2001. 327 p. The contribution from the 12th Regional Climate Outlook Forum for Southeastern South , America, held in Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil, April 24-25, 2001.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia; Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Florestas. |
|   |
| 13. | | CUNHA, G. R.; HAAS, J. C.; ASSAD, E. D. Zoneamento de riscos climáticos para a cultura de trigo no estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. In: REUNIÓN ARGENTINA DE AGROMETEOROLOGIA, 7, REUNIÓN LATINOAMERICANA DE AGROMETEOROLOGIA, 1, 1997, Buenos Aires. Actas [Buenos Aires]. Asociación Argentina de Agrometeorologia - Universidad de Buenos Aires. Faculdad de Agronomia, [1997], p. 79-80, 1997.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| 17. | | CUNHA, G. R. da; VENTIMIGLIA, L. A.; HAAS, J. C.; GARCIA, R.; MacMANEY, M. Composição do rendimento em genótipos de trigo argentino. Pesquisa Agropecuária Gaúcha, Porto Alegre, v. 2, n. 2, p. 155-162, 1996.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
|  |
| 19. | | STIVAL, A.; HAAS, J. C.; ARIAS, G.; FERREIRA, A.; GALON, G. Preliminary results on barley anther culture: comparison of 11 genotypes on two culture media. In: ENCONTRO BRASILEIRO DE BIOTECNOLOGIA VEGETAL, 1., 1993, Brasília, DF. Programas e resumos... [Brasília, DF: EMBRAPA-CENARGEN, 1993]. Não paginado.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Trigo. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 53 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com ctaa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos. |
|
Data corrente: |
08/12/2023 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
11/12/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ESPERANÇA, I. P. L. DE C.; CARVALHO, I. C.; LAUDANO, A. P. C. P.; SANTOS, G.; AYRES, E. M. M.; DELIZA, R. |
|
Afiliação: |
ISABELLE PAES LEME DE CASTRO ESPERANÇA, UFRJ; ISABELLA CHICON CARVALHO, UNIRIO; ANA PAULA CORRIA PORTUGAL LAUDANO, UNIRIO; GABRIELA SANTOS, UNIRIO; ELLEN M. MENEZES AYRES, UNIRIO; ROSIRES DELIZA, CTAA. |
|
Título: |
Using apple juice to replace sugar in grape nectar formulation associated with nutritional warning: the effects on the expected consumer liking. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2023 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIÊNCIA DE ALIMENTOS E NUTRIÇÃO, 15., 2023, Campinas. A revolução da ciência de alimentos e nutrição: alimentando o mundo de forma sustentável: caderno [eletrônico] de resumos. Campinas: Galoá, 2023. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Pôster 168522; SLACAN. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Nutritional warning helps promote healthy choices. In Brazil, the black magnifying glass is utilized when added sugars are ≥7.5% in beverages. To avoid this warning, the food industry uses apple juice to replace added sugar, informing consumers through package claims. However, the impact of this information on consumer product perception remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of product formulation, warning ("High in added sugar"), and claim (“With apple juice”) on consumers' expected liking and intention to purchase fruit nectars. Six packages were developed following an incomplete factorial design with three factors (levels): (i)Product (Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar; Grape nectar with sugar; Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar), (ii)Claim and (iii)Warning (Present/Absent). Consumers (n=100) looked at the packages and evaluated the expected liking (9-point hedonic scales) and purchase intention (5-point scales). Additionally, participants expressed their agreement (7-point Likert scale) on the ways for sweetening nectars: using sugar, apple juice, or sugar and apple juice. Product affected the expected liking. Lower averages were observed for “Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar”, without warning, with claim (6.7±1.5) or without (6.6±1.6); and “Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar”, with warning, and with claim (6.8±1.5) or without (6.7±1.4) compared to “Grape nectar with sugar”, with warning, with or without claim (7.6±1.3; 7.8±1.4). Purchase intention demonstrated similar results. The factor "Product" contributed to a greater expected acceptance, even in the presence of "Claim" and "Warning" (both didn’t affect acceptance). Participants gave a higher score to apple juice as a suitable way to sweeten nectars (average=5.1), as opposite to sugar or apple juice and sugar suggesting a dichotomy between the expected liking by looking at the nectar package and a question that was answered requiring rational thinking. Further studies are necessary to comprehend the consumer's perception/preference, sugar replacement, and warnings. MenosNutritional warning helps promote healthy choices. In Brazil, the black magnifying glass is utilized when added sugars are ≥7.5% in beverages. To avoid this warning, the food industry uses apple juice to replace added sugar, informing consumers through package claims. However, the impact of this information on consumer product perception remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of product formulation, warning ("High in added sugar"), and claim (“With apple juice”) on consumers' expected liking and intention to purchase fruit nectars. Six packages were developed following an incomplete factorial design with three factors (levels): (i)Product (Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar; Grape nectar with sugar; Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar), (ii)Claim and (iii)Warning (Present/Absent). Consumers (n=100) looked at the packages and evaluated the expected liking (9-point hedonic scales) and purchase intention (5-point scales). Additionally, participants expressed their agreement (7-point Likert scale) on the ways for sweetening nectars: using sugar, apple juice, or sugar and apple juice. Product affected the expected liking. Lower averages were observed for “Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar”, without warning, with claim (6.7±1.5) or without (6.6±1.6); and “Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar”, with warning, and with claim (6.8±1.5) or without (6.7±1.4) compared to “Grape nectar with sugar”, with warning, with or without claim (7.6±1.3; 7.8±1.4). Purchase in... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Fermented. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Goat milk; Lactic acid bacteria. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
Q Alimentos e Nutrição Humana |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03025nam a2200217 a 4500
001 2159377
005 2023-12-11
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aESPERANÇA, I. P. L. DE C.
245 $aUsing apple juice to replace sugar in grape nectar formulation associated with nutritional warning$bthe effects on the expected consumer liking.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: SIMPÓSIO LATINO AMERICANO DE CIÊNCIA DE ALIMENTOS E NUTRIÇÃO, 15., 2023, Campinas. A revolução da ciência de alimentos e nutrição: alimentando o mundo de forma sustentável: caderno [eletrônico] de resumos. Campinas: Galoá$c2023
500 $aPôster 168522; SLACAN.
520 $aNutritional warning helps promote healthy choices. In Brazil, the black magnifying glass is utilized when added sugars are ≥7.5% in beverages. To avoid this warning, the food industry uses apple juice to replace added sugar, informing consumers through package claims. However, the impact of this information on consumer product perception remains unclear. This study evaluated the effect of product formulation, warning ("High in added sugar"), and claim (“With apple juice”) on consumers' expected liking and intention to purchase fruit nectars. Six packages were developed following an incomplete factorial design with three factors (levels): (i)Product (Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar; Grape nectar with sugar; Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar), (ii)Claim and (iii)Warning (Present/Absent). Consumers (n=100) looked at the packages and evaluated the expected liking (9-point hedonic scales) and purchase intention (5-point scales). Additionally, participants expressed their agreement (7-point Likert scale) on the ways for sweetening nectars: using sugar, apple juice, or sugar and apple juice. Product affected the expected liking. Lower averages were observed for “Mixed grape and apple nectar no sugar”, without warning, with claim (6.7±1.5) or without (6.6±1.6); and “Mixed grape and apple nectar with sugar”, with warning, and with claim (6.8±1.5) or without (6.7±1.4) compared to “Grape nectar with sugar”, with warning, with or without claim (7.6±1.3; 7.8±1.4). Purchase intention demonstrated similar results. The factor "Product" contributed to a greater expected acceptance, even in the presence of "Claim" and "Warning" (both didn’t affect acceptance). Participants gave a higher score to apple juice as a suitable way to sweeten nectars (average=5.1), as opposite to sugar or apple juice and sugar suggesting a dichotomy between the expected liking by looking at the nectar package and a question that was answered requiring rational thinking. Further studies are necessary to comprehend the consumer's perception/preference, sugar replacement, and warnings.
650 $aGoat milk
650 $aLactic acid bacteria
653 $aFermented
700 1 $aCARVALHO, I. C.
700 1 $aLAUDANO, A. P. C. P.
700 1 $aSANTOS, G.
700 1 $aAYRES, E. M. M.
700 1 $aDELIZA, R.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroindústria de Alimentos (CTAA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
