| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 28 | |
| 9. |  | COUTO, M. E. O.; CAMPOS, E. M. B.; NAVA, D. E.; MELO, M. Levantamento de pragas e doenças diagnosticados na Clinica Fitossanitária. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FITOPATOLOGIA, 40.; Maringá, 2007. [Resumos]. Brasília, DF: SBF, 2007. Fitopatologia Brasileira, Brasília, DF, v. 32, Supl., p.315, ago. 2007.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
|   |
| 10. | | HEIDEN, G.; BARBIERI, R. L.; COUTO, M. E. O.; MEDEIROS, A. R. M. de; SINIGAGLIA, C. Pimentas e pimentões do Sul do Brasil: variedades crioulas mantidas pela Embrapa clima temperado. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE AGROECOLOGIA, 2.; SEMINÁRIO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE AGROECOLOGIA, 5.; SEMINÁRIO ESTADUAL SOBRE AGROECOLOGIA, 6., 2004, Porto Alegre. Anais... Porto Alegre: EMATER/RS: ASCAR: Governo do Estado de Rio Grande do Sul: Embrapa, 2004. CD-ROM.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Hortaliças. |
| |
| 12. | | SOARES, V. N.; GOMES, C. B.; COUTO, M. E. O.; SOMAVILLA, L.; CAMPOS, E. M. B. Reação de funcho, avelós e alfazema a Meloidogyne incognita. In: CONGRESSO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA, 2.; ENCONTRO DE PÓS GRADUAÇÃO DA EMBRAPA CLIMA TEMPERADO, 2., 2008, Pelotas. anais... Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2008. p. 33 Volume 1.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 13. | | CAMPOS, E. M. B.; GOMES, C. B.; COUTO, M. E. O. Avaliação de resistência de genótipos de pimenta-vermelha (Capsicum spp.) a Meloidogyne incognita e M. javanica. In: CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE FITOPATOLOGIA, 41., 2008, Belo Horizonte. Fitopatologia: novos horizontes.Tropical Plant Pathology, Brasília, DF, v. 33, S263 , ago. 2008. Suplemento dos Resumos do 41 Congresso Brasileiro de Fitopatologia, Belo Horizonte, 2008.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| 15. | | CASTRO, L. A. S. de; COUTO, M. E. O.; CAMPOS, A. D.; MELO, M. Principais Problemas da Cultura. In: CASTRO, L. A. S. de; OLIVEIRA, R. P. de; OLIVEIRA, R. P. de; BECKER, A. (Ed.). Multiplicação de matrizes de batata-doce com alta sanidade. Pelotas: Embrapa Clima Temperado, 2017. 68 p. 2 Ed. (Embrapa Clima Temperado. Sistema de produção, 10). 14-22| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 28 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cpatu.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
04/06/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
04/06/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 1 |
|
Autoria: |
BELÉM, S. O.; GUIA, B. P.; CAMPBELL, A. J.; MAUES, M. M.; VIANA, J. H. |
|
Afiliação: |
Sávio O. Belém, UEPA; Brendo P. Guia, UEPA; Alistair J. Campbell, COLABORADOR CPATU; MARCIA MOTTA MAUES, CPATU; Jessica H. Viana, UEPA. |
|
Título: |
Effects of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on flying insect visitor behaviour and fruit production in açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea Mart.). |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Austral Entomology, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12458 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Early View. |
|
Conteúdo: |
Açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea ) production in the Amazon region has grown rapidly in recent decades to meet both domestic and international demand for the fruit. Understanding functional roles of different insects in açaí fruit production is essential for the development of sustainable management practices and the conservation of associated biodiversity in plantations. Ants play a variety of key roles in agroecosystems, particularly as predators, but may also influence crop pollination, either directly (as legitimate pollinators) or indirectly by altering behaviour/density of other flower visitors. Here, we compare flower visitor communities, behavioural interactions between ants and flying insects and fruit production in açaí inflorescences, under the experimental exclusion of ants. Flying insects differed in their response to experimental exclusion of ants, with bees and flies found in higher abundance on inflorescences where ants had been excluded. In contrast, beetles and wasps were unaffected by ant exclosure. Among bees, only medium?sized species, but not small?sized and large?sized species, were affected by the presence of ants. However, fruit production on inflorescences did not differ among ant exclosure treatments. We found clear evidence that ants interfere with flying insects visiting açaí inflorescences, but these changes do not affect açaí fruit production, likely due to the large diversity of flying insects that contribute to pollination services. Therefore, given their potential role as pest natural enemies, control of ant colonies in plantations is not recommended. MenosAçaí palm (Euterpe oleracea ) production in the Amazon region has grown rapidly in recent decades to meet both domestic and international demand for the fruit. Understanding functional roles of different insects in açaí fruit production is essential for the development of sustainable management practices and the conservation of associated biodiversity in plantations. Ants play a variety of key roles in agroecosystems, particularly as predators, but may also influence crop pollination, either directly (as legitimate pollinators) or indirectly by altering behaviour/density of other flower visitors. Here, we compare flower visitor communities, behavioural interactions between ants and flying insects and fruit production in açaí inflorescences, under the experimental exclusion of ants. Flying insects differed in their response to experimental exclusion of ants, with bees and flies found in higher abundance on inflorescences where ants had been excluded. In contrast, beetles and wasps were unaffected by ant exclosure. Among bees, only medium?sized species, but not small?sized and large?sized species, were affected by the presence of ants. However, fruit production on inflorescences did not differ among ant exclosure treatments. We found clear evidence that ants interfere with flying insects visiting açaí inflorescences, but these changes do not affect açaí fruit production, likely due to the large diversity of flying insects that contribute to pollination services. Therefore, giv... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesagro: |
Açaí; Euterpe Oleracea; Formiga. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
O Insetos e Entomologia |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02307naa a2200229 a 4500
001 2123004
005 2020-06-04
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12458$2DOI
100 1 $aBELÉM, S. O.
245 $aEffects of ants (Hymenoptera$bFormicidae) on flying insect visitor behaviour and fruit production in açaí palm (Euterpe oleracea Mart.).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aEarly View.
520 $aAçaí palm (Euterpe oleracea ) production in the Amazon region has grown rapidly in recent decades to meet both domestic and international demand for the fruit. Understanding functional roles of different insects in açaí fruit production is essential for the development of sustainable management practices and the conservation of associated biodiversity in plantations. Ants play a variety of key roles in agroecosystems, particularly as predators, but may also influence crop pollination, either directly (as legitimate pollinators) or indirectly by altering behaviour/density of other flower visitors. Here, we compare flower visitor communities, behavioural interactions between ants and flying insects and fruit production in açaí inflorescences, under the experimental exclusion of ants. Flying insects differed in their response to experimental exclusion of ants, with bees and flies found in higher abundance on inflorescences where ants had been excluded. In contrast, beetles and wasps were unaffected by ant exclosure. Among bees, only medium?sized species, but not small?sized and large?sized species, were affected by the presence of ants. However, fruit production on inflorescences did not differ among ant exclosure treatments. We found clear evidence that ants interfere with flying insects visiting açaí inflorescences, but these changes do not affect açaí fruit production, likely due to the large diversity of flying insects that contribute to pollination services. Therefore, given their potential role as pest natural enemies, control of ant colonies in plantations is not recommended.
650 $aAçaí
650 $aEuterpe Oleracea
650 $aFormiga
700 1 $aGUIA, B. P.
700 1 $aCAMPBELL, A. J.
700 1 $aMAUES, M. M.
700 1 $aVIANA, J. H.
773 $tAustral Entomology, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
