| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|
Data corrente: |
15/03/2011 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
15/03/2011 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo de Divulgação na Mídia |
|
Autoria: |
OLIVEIRA, M. G. de C.; OLIVEIRA, L. F. C. de. |
|
Afiliação: |
MARCIA GONZAGA DE CASTRO OLIVEIRA, CNPAF; LUCIENE FROES CAMARANO DE OLIVEIRA, CNPAF. |
|
Título: |
A utilização de Unidades Demonstrativas para a transferência de tecnologia. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
ClicNews 2010. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 22 nov. 2010. |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
A demonstração das tecnologias agrícolas é uma das formas de transferência adotadas pela Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária ? Embrapa. Essa demonstração é feita para aproximar o agricultor dos benefícios gerados pela pesquisa. Nesse contexto, se insere o conceito de Unidade Demonstrativa (UD), mas o que vem a ser uma UD? |
|
Thesagro: |
Transferência de tecnologia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
B Sociologia Rural |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/29508/1/adocao.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00863nam a2200133 a 4500
001 1880808
005 2011-03-15
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aOLIVEIRA, M. G. de C.
245 $aA utilização de Unidades Demonstrativas para a transferência de tecnologia.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aClicNews 2010. Disponível em: <http://www.clicnews.com.br/agropecuaria/view.htm?id=117997>. Acesso em: 22 nov. 2010.$c2010
520 $aA demonstração das tecnologias agrícolas é uma das formas de transferência adotadas pela Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária ? Embrapa. Essa demonstração é feita para aproximar o agricultor dos benefícios gerados pela pesquisa. Nesse contexto, se insere o conceito de Unidade Demonstrativa (UD), mas o que vem a ser uma UD?
650 $aTransferência de tecnologia
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, L. F. C. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Florestas. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpf.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Florestas. |
|
Data corrente: |
23/09/2008 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
23/09/2008 |
|
Autoria: |
CALLAHAM JUNIOR, M. A.; ROSTKOWSKI, S. C.; GARDINER, E. S.; STANTURF, J. A.; SNYDER, B. A. |
|
Título: |
Litter-dwelling arthropods in a bottomland hardwood restoration experiment in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
To determine the influence of different restoration methods on litter-dwelling arthropod fauna,
we used pitfall traps to sample in long-term plots subjected to experimental restoration methods
in bottomland hardwood habitat in Sharkey County, MS, USA. For the first 15 yr of the experiment,
treatments included 1) Native ?natural? regeneration (NR); 2) Oak acorns (Quercus nuttallii) directly
seeded (SEED); 3) Oak seedlings planted (PLN); and 4) Oak seedlings interplanted between
the rows of a cottonwood (Populus deltoides) plantation (CW), in a randomized complete block
design. The blocking factor in the experiment reflected differences in elevation which are related
to susceptibility of the different blocks to flooding. After 15 yr (in 2006), the CW plots were
divided into split plots with four additional experimental treatments applied: 1) cottonwoods
clearcut and allowed to resprout to coppice, 2) cottonwoods clearcut and sprouts treated with
herbicide, 3) cottonwoods thinned 50%, and 4) control (cottonwoods left unharvested). Findings
from quarterly (seasonal) sampling one year prior to cottonwood harvest suggested the
collembolan family Sminthuridae was affected by block, but these effects depended upon the
season of sampling. In winter, this group was significantly more abundant in blocks with higher
elevation, whereas in summer the lower-lying block had greater abundance. Other groups
exhibited significant responses to the blocking factor during Summer, including Formicidae,
Entomobryidae, Acari, and Carabidae. In general, these groups were more abundant in the
lower-lying block, possibly indicating moisture dependence in these organisms. The sminthurid
collembolans also had variable responses to the restoration treatments. They were more
abundant in CW plots than in NR plots during the summer sampling, but the opposite pattern
was observed in winter. Other organisms showing restoration treatment effects included three
(Sphecidae, Hemiptera, and Hypogastruridae) significantly more abundant in the CW, and one
(Orthoptera) more abundant in the NR treatment. These results suggest that CW treatments
may foster forest litter-dwelling organisms (and possibly jump-start their associated functions)
in hardwood restorations on the Mississippi Delta. Data from two dates following the
implementation of the cottonwood harvest treatments will also be presented and discussed. MenosTo determine the influence of different restoration methods on litter-dwelling arthropod fauna,
we used pitfall traps to sample in long-term plots subjected to experimental restoration methods
in bottomland hardwood habitat in Sharkey County, MS, USA. For the first 15 yr of the experiment,
treatments included 1) Native ?natural? regeneration (NR); 2) Oak acorns (Quercus nuttallii) directly
seeded (SEED); 3) Oak seedlings planted (PLN); and 4) Oak seedlings interplanted between
the rows of a cottonwood (Populus deltoides) plantation (CW), in a randomized complete block
design. The blocking factor in the experiment reflected differences in elevation which are related
to susceptibility of the different blocks to flooding. After 15 yr (in 2006), the CW plots were
divided into split plots with four additional experimental treatments applied: 1) cottonwoods
clearcut and allowed to resprout to coppice, 2) cottonwoods clearcut and sprouts treated with
herbicide, 3) cottonwoods thinned 50%, and 4) control (cottonwoods left unharvested). Findings
from quarterly (seasonal) sampling one year prior to cottonwood harvest suggested the
collembolan family Sminthuridae was affected by block, but these effects depended upon the
season of sampling. In winter, this group was significantly more abundant in blocks with higher
elevation, whereas in summer the lower-lying block had greater abundance. Other groups
exhibited significant responses to the blocking factor during Summer, including Formic... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03207naa a2200169 a 4500
001 1314856
005 2008-09-23
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aCALLAHAM JUNIOR, M. A.
245 $aLitter-dwelling arthropods in a bottomland hardwood restoration experiment in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley, USA.
260 $c2008
520 $aTo determine the influence of different restoration methods on litter-dwelling arthropod fauna, we used pitfall traps to sample in long-term plots subjected to experimental restoration methods in bottomland hardwood habitat in Sharkey County, MS, USA. For the first 15 yr of the experiment, treatments included 1) Native ?natural? regeneration (NR); 2) Oak acorns (Quercus nuttallii) directly seeded (SEED); 3) Oak seedlings planted (PLN); and 4) Oak seedlings interplanted between the rows of a cottonwood (Populus deltoides) plantation (CW), in a randomized complete block design. The blocking factor in the experiment reflected differences in elevation which are related to susceptibility of the different blocks to flooding. After 15 yr (in 2006), the CW plots were divided into split plots with four additional experimental treatments applied: 1) cottonwoods clearcut and allowed to resprout to coppice, 2) cottonwoods clearcut and sprouts treated with herbicide, 3) cottonwoods thinned 50%, and 4) control (cottonwoods left unharvested). Findings from quarterly (seasonal) sampling one year prior to cottonwood harvest suggested the collembolan family Sminthuridae was affected by block, but these effects depended upon the season of sampling. In winter, this group was significantly more abundant in blocks with higher elevation, whereas in summer the lower-lying block had greater abundance. Other groups exhibited significant responses to the blocking factor during Summer, including Formicidae, Entomobryidae, Acari, and Carabidae. In general, these groups were more abundant in the lower-lying block, possibly indicating moisture dependence in these organisms. The sminthurid collembolans also had variable responses to the restoration treatments. They were more abundant in CW plots than in NR plots during the summer sampling, but the opposite pattern was observed in winter. Other organisms showing restoration treatment effects included three (Sphecidae, Hemiptera, and Hypogastruridae) significantly more abundant in the CW, and one (Orthoptera) more abundant in the NR treatment. These results suggest that CW treatments may foster forest litter-dwelling organisms (and possibly jump-start their associated functions) in hardwood restorations on the Mississippi Delta. Data from two dates following the implementation of the cottonwood harvest treatments will also be presented and discussed.
700 1 $aROSTKOWSKI, S. C.
700 1 $aGARDINER, E. S.
700 1 $aSTANTURF, J. A.
700 1 $aSNYDER, B. A.
773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON SOIL ZOOLOGY, 15; INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM ON APTERYGOTA, 12., 2008, Curitiba. Biodiversity, conservation and sustainabele management of soil animal: abstracts. Colombo: Embrapa Florestas. Editors: George Gardner Brown; Klaus Dieter Sautter; Renato Marques; Amarildo Pasini. 1 CD-ROM.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Florestas (CNPF) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|
