| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 16 | |
| 6. |  | RIZENTAL, M.; PAREDES-MONTERO, J. R.; ABREU, A. G. de; BROWN, J. K.; QUINTELA, E. D. Coleção entomológica de museu: a história da mosca-branca, Bemisia tabaci, no Brasil. In: SEMINÁRIO JOVENS TALENTOS, 14., 2020, Santo Antônio de Goiás. Resumos... Santo Antônio de Goiás: Embrapa Arroz e Feijão, 2021. p. 87.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|    |
| 12. | | FAUQUET, C. M.; FONDONG, V.; PITA, J.; TORES-JEREZ, I.; OTIM-NAPE, W. G.; OGWAL, S.; SANGARE, A.; REY, C.; BROWN, J. K.; BEACHY, R. N. Etiology of the cassava mosaic disease in Africa reveals increasing complexity and diversity. Revista Brasileira de Mandioca, Salvador, v. 17, p. 39, nov., 1998., Suplemento.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| 13. | | QUINTELA, E. D.; ABREU, A. G.; LIMA, J. F. dos S.; MASCARIN, G. M.; SANTOS, J. B. dos; BROWN, J. K. Reproduction of the whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) B biotype in maize fields (Zea mays L.) in Brazil. Pest Management Science, New Jersey, v. 72, n. 11, p. 2181-2187, Nov. 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
|  |
| 14. | | ROBERTS, A.; BOECKMAN, C. J.; MÜHL, M.; ROMEIS, J.; TEEM, J. L.; VALICENTE, F. H.; BROWN, J. K.; EDWARDS, M. G.; LEVINE, S. L.; MELNICK, R. L.; ROFRIGUES, T. B.; VÉLEZ, A. M.; ZHOU, X.; HELLMICH, R. L. Sublethal endpoints in non-target organism testing for insect-active GE crops. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, v. 8, article 556, 2020.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
| |
| 15. | | CHEN, W.; HASEGAWA, D. K.; KAUR, N.; KLIOT, A.; PINHEIRO, P. V.; LUAN, J.; STENSMYR, M. C.; ZHENG, Y.; LIU, W.; SUN, H.; XU, Y.; LUO, Y.; KRUSE, A.; YANG, X.; KONTSEDALOV, S.; LEBEDEV, G.; FISHER, T. W.; NELSON, D. R.; HUNTER, W. B.; BROWN, J. K.; JANDER, G.; CILIA, M.; DOUGLAS, A. E.; GHANIM, M.; SIMMONS, A. M.; WINTERMANTEL, W. M.; LING, K.-S.; FEI, Z. The draft genome of whitefly Bemisia tabaci MEAM1, a global crop pest, provides novel insights into virus transmission, host adaptation, and insecticide resistance. BMC Biology, v. 14, p. 1-15, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
| |
| 16. | | KUHN, J.; ADKINS, S.; AGWANDA, B. R.; KUBRUSLI, R. A.; ALKHOVSKY, S. V.; AMARASINGHE, G. K.; TATJANA, A.-Z.; AYLLÓN, M. A.; BAHL, J.; BALKEMA BUSCHMANN, A.; BALLINGER, M. J.; BASLER, C. F.; BAVARI, S.; BEER, M.; BEJERMAN, N.; BENNETT, A. J.; DBENTE, D. A.; BERGERON, É.; BIRD, B. H.; BLAIR, C. D.; BLASDELL, K. R.; BLYSTAD, D. R.; BOJKO, J.; BORTH, W. B.; BRADFUTE, S.; BREYTA, R.; BRIESE, T.; BROWN, P. A.; BROWN, J. K.; BUCHHOLZ, U. J.; BUCHMEIER, M. J.; ABUKREYEV, A.; BURT, F.; BÜTTNER, C.; CALISHER, C. H.; CAO, M.; CASAS, I.; CHANDRAN, K.; CHARREL, R. N.; CHENG, Q.; CHIAKI, Y.; CHIAPELLO, M.; CHOI, I. R.; CIUFO, M.; CLEGG, J. C. S.; CROZIER, I.; BÓ, E. D.; DE LA TORRE, J. C.; LAMBALLERIE, X. de; SWART, R. L. de; DEBAT, H.; DHEILLY, N. M.; DI CICCO, E.; DI PAOLA, N.; DI SERIO, F.; DIETZGEN, R. G.; DIGIARO, M.; DOLNIK, O.; DREBOT, M. A.; DREXLER, J. F.; DUNDON, W. G.; DUPREX, W. P.; DÜRRWALD, R.; DYE, J. M.; EASTON, A. J.; EBIHARA, H.; ELBEAINO, T.; ERGÜNAY, K.; FERGUSON, H. W.; FOOKS, A. R.; FORGIA, M.; FORMENTY, P. B. H.; FRÁNOVÁ, J.; ASTUA, J. de F.; FU, J.; FÜRL, S.; ZACHERT, S. G.; GĀO, G. F.; GARCÍA, M. L.; SASTRE, A. G.; GARRISON, A. R.; GASKIN, T.; GONZALE, J. P. J.; GRIFTHS, A.; GOLDBERG, T. L.; GROSCHUP, M. H.; GÜNTHER, S.; HALL, R. A.; HAMMOND, J.; HAN, O.; HEPOJOKI, J.; HEWSON, R.; HONG, J.; HONG, N.; HORIE, M.; HU, J. S.; HU, T.; HUGHES, H. R.; HÜTTNER, F.; HYNDMAN, T. H.; ILYAS, M.; JALKANEN, R.; JIĀNG, D.; JONSON, G. J.; JUNGLEN, S.; KADONO, F.; KAUKINEN, K. H.; KAWATE, M.; KLEMPA, B.; KLINGSTRÖM, J.; KOBINGER, G.; KOLONIUK, I.; KONDŌ, H.; KOONIN, V.; KRUPOVIC, M.; KUBOTA, K.; KURATH, G.; LAENEN, L.; LAMBERT, A. J.; LANGEVIN, S. L.; LEE, B.; LEFKOWITZ, E. J.; LI, L.; LEROY, E. M.; LI, S.; LÍ, J.; LIU, H.; LUKASHEVICH, I. S.; MAES, P.; SOUZA, W. M. de; MARKLEWITZ, M.; MARSHALL, S. H.; MARZANO, S. L.; MASSART, S.; MCCAULEY, J. W.; MELZER, M.; MILLER, K. M.; MING, T. J.; MIRAZIMI, A.; MORDECAI, G. J.; MÜHLBACH, H. P.; MÜHLBERGER, E.; NAIDU, R.; NATSUAKI, T.; NAVARRO, J. A.; NETESOV, S. Y V.; NEUMANN, G.; NOWOTNY, N.; NUNES, M. R. T.; VELARDE, A. O.; PALACIOS, G.; PALLÁS, V.; PÁLYI, B.; PAPA, A.; PARASKEVOPOULOU, S.; PARK, A. C.; PARRISH, C. R.; PATTERSON, D. A.; CORRÊA, A. P.; PAWESKA, J. T.; PAYNE, S.; PERACCHIO, C.; PÉREZ, D. R.; POSTLER, T. S.; QI, L.; RADOSHITZKY, S. R.; RESENDE, R. O.; REYES, C. A.; RIMA, B. K.; LUNA, G. R.; ROMANOWSKI, V.; ROTA, P.; RUBBENSTROTH, D.; RUBINO, L.; RUNSTADLER, J. A.; SABANADZOVIC, S.; SALL, A. A.; SALVATO, M. S.; SANG, R.; SASAYA, T.; SCHULZE, A. D.; SCHWEMMLE, M.; SHI, M.; SHÍ, X.; SHIMOMOTO, Y.; SHIRAKO, Y.; SIDDELL, S. G.; SIMMONDS, P.; SIRONI, M.; SMAGGHE, G.; SMITHER, S.; SONG, J. W.; SPANN, K.; SPENGLER, J. R.; STENGLEIN, M. D.; STONE, D. M.; SUGANO, J.; TABATA, A.; TAKADA, A.; TAKEUCHI, S.; TCHOUASSI, D. P.; TEFER, A.; TESH, R. B.; THORNBURG, N. J.; TOMITAKA, Y.; TOMONAGA, K.; TORDO, N.; TORTO, B.; TOWNER, J. S.; TSUDA, S.; TU, C.; TURINA, M.; TZANETAKIS, I. E.; UCHIDA, J.; USUGI, T.; VAIRA, A. M.; VALLINO, M.; VAN DEN HOOGEN, B.; VARSANI, A.; VASILAKIS, N.; VERBEEK, M.; BARGEN, S. V.; WADA, J.; WAHL, V.; WALKER, P. J.; WANG, L. F.; WANG, G.; WANG, Y.; WANG, Y.; WAQAS, M.; WÈI, T.; WEN, S.; WHITFELD, A. E.; WILLIAMS, J. V.; WOLF, Y. I.; WU, J.; XU, L.; YANAGISAWA, H.; YANG, C.; YANG, Z.; ZERBINI, F. M.; ZHAI, L.; ZHANG, Y. Z.; ZHANG, O.; ZHANG, J.; ZHANG, Z.; ZHOU, X. 2021 Taxonomic update of phylum Negarnaviricota (Riboviria: Orthornavirae), including the large orders Bunyavirales and Mononegavirale. Archives of Virology, August, 2021.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Mandioca e Fruticultura. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 16 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo. |
|
Data corrente: |
30/06/2020 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/06/2020 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Circulação/Nível: |
B - 3 |
|
Autoria: |
ROBERTS, A.; BOECKMAN, C. J.; MÜHL, M.; ROMEIS, J.; TEEM, J. L.; VALICENTE, F. H.; BROWN, J. K.; EDWARDS, M. G.; LEVINE, S. L.; MELNICK, R. L.; ROFRIGUES, T. B.; VÉLEZ, A. M.; ZHOU, X.; HELLMICH, R. L. |
|
Afiliação: |
Andrew Roberts, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; Chad J. Boeckman, Corteva Agriscience; Marina Mühl, Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Pesca, Dirección de Biotecnología, Buenos Aires; Jörg Romeis, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Agroscope, Zurich; John L. Teem, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; FERNANDO HERCOS VALICENTE, CNPMS; Judith K. Brown, School of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson; Martin G. Edwards, School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne; Steven L. Levine, Bayer Crop Science, Chesterfield, MO; Rachel L. Melnick, Agriculture and Food Systems Institute, Washington, DC; Thais B. Rodrigues, Greenlight Biosciences, Inc., Medford, MA; Ana M. Vélez, Department of Entomology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln; Xuguo Zhou, Department of Entomology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY; Richard L. Hellmich, USDA, Corn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Ames. |
|
Título: |
Sublethal endpoints in non-target organism testing for insect-active GE crops. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2020 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, v. 8, article 556, 2020. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00556 |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Historically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and status of sublethal endpoint testing in non-target organisms. MenosHistorically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and ... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Organismos não-alvo; Parâmetros subletais; Planta geneticamente modificada. |
|
Thesagro: |
Controle Biológico; Inseto; Melhoramento Genético Vegetal; Planta Transgênica. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/214276/1/Sublethal-endpoints.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02669naa a2200373 a 4500
001 2123519
005 2020-06-30
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00556$2DOI
100 1 $aROBERTS, A.
245 $aSublethal endpoints in non-target organism testing for insect-active GE crops.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
520 $aHistorically, genetically engineered (GE) plants that have incorporated genes conferring insect protection have primarily used Cry proteins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) to achieve their insecticidal phenotype. As a result, regulators have developed a level of familiarity and confidence in reviewing plants incorporating these insecticidal proteins. However, new technologies have been developed that produce GE plants that incorporate pest protection by triggering an RNA interference (RNAi) response or proteins other than Bt Cry proteins. These technologies have new modes of action. Although the overall assessment paradigm for GE plants is robust, there are ongoing discussions about the appropriate tests and measurement endpoints needed to inform non-target arthropod assessment for technologies that have a different mode of action than the Bt Cry proteins. As a result, increasing attention is being paid to the use of sublethal endpoints and their value for environmental risk assessment (ERA). This review focuses on the current status and history of sublethal endpoint use in insect-active GE crops, and evaluates the future use of sublethal endpoints for new and emerging technologies. It builds upon presentations made at the Workshop on Sublethal Endpoints for Non-target Organism Testing for Non-Bt GE Crops (Washington DC, USA, 4â??5 March 2019), and the discussions of government, academic and industry scientists convened for the purpose of reviewing the progress and status of sublethal endpoint testing in non-target organisms.
650 $aControle Biológico
650 $aInseto
650 $aMelhoramento Genético Vegetal
650 $aPlanta Transgênica
653 $aOrganismos não-alvo
653 $aParâmetros subletais
653 $aPlanta geneticamente modificada
700 1 $aBOECKMAN, C. J.
700 1 $aMÜHL, M.
700 1 $aROMEIS, J.
700 1 $aTEEM, J. L.
700 1 $aVALICENTE, F. H.
700 1 $aBROWN, J. K.
700 1 $aEDWARDS, M. G.
700 1 $aLEVINE, S. L.
700 1 $aMELNICK, R. L.
700 1 $aROFRIGUES, T. B.
700 1 $aVÉLEZ, A. M.
700 1 $aZHOU, X.
700 1 $aHELLMICH, R. L.
773 $tFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology$gv. 8, article 556, 2020.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (CNPMS) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
