|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
Data corrente: |
08/10/2001 |
Data da última atualização: |
12/07/2007 |
Autoria: |
FIALHO, F. B.; ZAZUETA, F. S.; BUCKLIN, R. A.; DANKEL III, D. D. |
Afiliação: |
Embrapa Suinos e Aves. |
Título: |
Interfacing an expert system with a swine growth simulation model. |
Ano de publicação: |
1998 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON AGRICULTURA ENGINEERING, 13., 1998, Rabat Morocco. Proceedings... Rabat: ICAE / ASAE, 1998. |
Volume: |
v.2 |
Páginas: |
p.399-403 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Palavras-Chave: |
Growth; Modelo; Simulation model. |
Thesagro: |
Crescimento; Simulação; Suíno. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
swine. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 00720naa a2200253 a 4500 001 1435061 005 2007-07-12 008 1998 bl --- 0-- u #d 100 1 $aFIALHO, F. B. 245 $aInterfacing an expert system with a swine growth simulation model. 260 $c1998 300 $ap.399-403 v.2 490 $vv.2 650 $aswine 650 $aCrescimento 650 $aSimulação 650 $aSuíno 653 $aGrowth 653 $aModelo 653 $aSimulation model 700 1 $aZAZUETA, F. S. 700 1 $aBUCKLIN, R. A. 700 1 $aDANKEL III, D. D. 773 $tIn: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON AGRICULTURA ENGINEERING, 13., 1998, Rabat Morocco. Proceedings... Rabat: ICAE / ASAE, 1998.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
Data corrente: |
18/02/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
18/02/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
Autoria: |
FIDELIS, A. dos S.; BRITO, J. I. M.; KIPERT, T. A.; ASSIS, H. de F.; PEREIRA, D. H.; PEDREIRA, B. C. e; PRADO, T. A.; BATISTA, E. D. |
Afiliação: |
ARIANNY DOS SANTOS FIDELIS, UFMT, SINOP, MT; JÉSSICA IAKESTEST MATHEUS BRITO, UFMT, SINOP, MT; THIAGO AUROS KIPERT, UFMT, SINOP, MT; HUGO DE FREITAS ASSIS, UFMT, SINOP, MT; DALTON HENRIQUE PEREIRA, UFMT, SINOP, MT; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT; THIAGO ALVES PRADO, FORTUNA NUTRICAO ANIMAL, NOVA CANAÃ DO NORTE, MT; ERICK DARLISSON BATISTA, UFMT, SINOP, MT. |
Título: |
Behaviour of grazing bulls during the dry season receiving high intake supplementation containing differents additives. |
Ano de publicação: |
2018 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 55.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ZOOTECNIA, 28., 2018, Goiânia. Construindo saberes, formando pessoas e transformando a produção animal: anais. Viçosa: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia; Brasília, DF: Associação Brasileira de Zootecnistas. |
Páginas: |
não paginado. |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The objective was to evaluate the effects of high intake supplementation containing different additives on behavior of Nelore bulls grazing during dry season. Four Nelore bulls (425 ± 79.3 kg body weight, BW) fitted with ruminal cannula were studied in a 4 × 4 balanced Latin square design. Animals were distributed in 0.2 ha paddocks of Brachiaria brizantha cv. BRS Piatã, where they received protein-energy supplementation (160 g kg-1 crude protein). Treatments included the additives: 1) virginiamycin at 70 mg kg-1 dry matter (DM); 2) ADV: Advantage 4.1 (Alltech) at 1.25 g kg-1 DM, a yeast-based additive as replacement of virginiamycin; 3) TAN14: ByPro® (Silvateam Brasil) at 1.4 g kg-1 DM, a quebracho tannin extract as replacement of virginiamycin; and 4) TAN21: ByPro® at 2.1 g kg-1 DM as replacement of virginiamycin. All supplements contained salinomycin at 2.5 mg kg-1. Supplementation was provided ad libitum every day at 8h00. Experimental periods lasted 20 days. The grazing behavior was evaluated on day 14 from 6h00 until 18h00, observing the animals in each five minutes (min). The evaluated parameters were: standing ruminating, lying ruminating, standing drinking water, standing grazing, standing eating supplement, and idle time. Statistical analyses were performed using a mixed procedure. Contrasts were used to compare control vs. others additives (ADV + TAN14 + TAN21); ADV vs. TAN (TAN14 + TAN21); and TAN14 vs. TAN21. There were no effects of treatments (P>0.05) on standing ruminating (5 ± 3.6 min), lying ruminating (60 ± 16.6 minutes), standing drinking water (11 ± 2.9 min), standing grazing (246 ± 43.5 min), and idle time (323 ± 37.6 min). Nevertheless, time expend eating supplement exhibited a tendency to be greater (P=0.07) in bulls receiving VIR (59 min) compared to bulls receiving ADV and TAN additives (averaging, 81 min). We conclude that grazing behavior of Nellore bulls during dry season receiving high intake supplementation containing Advantage 4.1 or ByPro additives does not differ of virginiamycin, except increase the time to eat supplement. MenosThe objective was to evaluate the effects of high intake supplementation containing different additives on behavior of Nelore bulls grazing during dry season. Four Nelore bulls (425 ± 79.3 kg body weight, BW) fitted with ruminal cannula were studied in a 4 × 4 balanced Latin square design. Animals were distributed in 0.2 ha paddocks of Brachiaria brizantha cv. BRS Piatã, where they received protein-energy supplementation (160 g kg-1 crude protein). Treatments included the additives: 1) virginiamycin at 70 mg kg-1 dry matter (DM); 2) ADV: Advantage 4.1 (Alltech) at 1.25 g kg-1 DM, a yeast-based additive as replacement of virginiamycin; 3) TAN14: ByPro® (Silvateam Brasil) at 1.4 g kg-1 DM, a quebracho tannin extract as replacement of virginiamycin; and 4) TAN21: ByPro® at 2.1 g kg-1 DM as replacement of virginiamycin. All supplements contained salinomycin at 2.5 mg kg-1. Supplementation was provided ad libitum every day at 8h00. Experimental periods lasted 20 days. The grazing behavior was evaluated on day 14 from 6h00 until 18h00, observing the animals in each five minutes (min). The evaluated parameters were: standing ruminating, lying ruminating, standing drinking water, standing grazing, standing eating supplement, and idle time. Statistical analyses were performed using a mixed procedure. Contrasts were used to compare control vs. others additives (ADV + TAN14 + TAN21); ADV vs. TAN (TAN14 + TAN21); and TAN14 vs. TAN21. There were no effects of treatments (P>0.05) on stand... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Cattle; Dietary supplements; Virginiamycin; Yeasts. |
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/192957/1/2018-cpamt-bruno-pedreira-behaviour-grazing-supplementation-differents-addtives.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03122nam a2200253 a 4500 001 2106169 005 2019-02-18 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aFIDELIS, A. dos S. 245 $aBehaviour of grazing bulls during the dry season receiving high intake supplementation containing differents additives.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 55.; CONGRESSO BRASILEIRO DE ZOOTECNIA, 28., 2018, Goiânia. Construindo saberes, formando pessoas e transformando a produção animal: anais. Viçosa: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia; Brasília, DF: Associação Brasileira de Zootecnistas.$c2018 300 $anão paginado. 520 $aThe objective was to evaluate the effects of high intake supplementation containing different additives on behavior of Nelore bulls grazing during dry season. Four Nelore bulls (425 ± 79.3 kg body weight, BW) fitted with ruminal cannula were studied in a 4 × 4 balanced Latin square design. Animals were distributed in 0.2 ha paddocks of Brachiaria brizantha cv. BRS Piatã, where they received protein-energy supplementation (160 g kg-1 crude protein). Treatments included the additives: 1) virginiamycin at 70 mg kg-1 dry matter (DM); 2) ADV: Advantage 4.1 (Alltech) at 1.25 g kg-1 DM, a yeast-based additive as replacement of virginiamycin; 3) TAN14: ByPro® (Silvateam Brasil) at 1.4 g kg-1 DM, a quebracho tannin extract as replacement of virginiamycin; and 4) TAN21: ByPro® at 2.1 g kg-1 DM as replacement of virginiamycin. All supplements contained salinomycin at 2.5 mg kg-1. Supplementation was provided ad libitum every day at 8h00. Experimental periods lasted 20 days. The grazing behavior was evaluated on day 14 from 6h00 until 18h00, observing the animals in each five minutes (min). The evaluated parameters were: standing ruminating, lying ruminating, standing drinking water, standing grazing, standing eating supplement, and idle time. Statistical analyses were performed using a mixed procedure. Contrasts were used to compare control vs. others additives (ADV + TAN14 + TAN21); ADV vs. TAN (TAN14 + TAN21); and TAN14 vs. TAN21. There were no effects of treatments (P>0.05) on standing ruminating (5 ± 3.6 min), lying ruminating (60 ± 16.6 minutes), standing drinking water (11 ± 2.9 min), standing grazing (246 ± 43.5 min), and idle time (323 ± 37.6 min). Nevertheless, time expend eating supplement exhibited a tendency to be greater (P=0.07) in bulls receiving VIR (59 min) compared to bulls receiving ADV and TAN additives (averaging, 81 min). We conclude that grazing behavior of Nellore bulls during dry season receiving high intake supplementation containing Advantage 4.1 or ByPro additives does not differ of virginiamycin, except increase the time to eat supplement. 650 $aCattle 650 $aDietary supplements 650 $aVirginiamycin 650 $aYeasts 700 1 $aBRITO, J. I. M. 700 1 $aKIPERT, T. A. 700 1 $aASSIS, H. de F. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, D. H. 700 1 $aPEDREIRA, B. C. e 700 1 $aPRADO, T. A. 700 1 $aBATISTA, E. D.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|