| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 8 | |
| 1. |  | ANDRE, R. R. R.; NAVE, FARAH, F. T.; BUFO, L. V.; BENINI, R. de M. Levantamento floristico e elaboracao de trilhas nas fazendas Daterra - Patrocinio, MG. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE BOTANICA, 50., 1999, Blumenau. Programa e resumos... Blumenau: Sociedade Botanica do Brasil, 1999.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Cerrados. |
|   |
| 2. | | BENINI, R. de M.; LENTI, F. E. B.; TYMUS, J. R. C.; SILVA, A. P. M. da; ISERNHAGEN, I. Costs of ecological restoration in Brazil. In: WORLD CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION, 7.; CONGRESO IBEROAMERICANO Y DEL CARIBE DE RESTAURACIÓN ECOLÓGICA, 5.; CONFERÊNCIA BRASILEIRA DE RESTAURAÇÃO ECOLÓGICA, 1., 2017, Foz do Iguassu Linking science and practice for a better world: book of abstracts. Londrina: Sociedade Brasileira de Restauração Ecológica, 2017. p. 183. S78.01.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|  |
| 4. | | TYMUS, J. R. C.; LENTI, F. E. B.; BENINI, R. de M.; SILVA, A. P. M. da; ISERNHAGEN, I. Native ecological restoration techniques employed in Brazil. In: WORLD CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION, 7.; CONGRESO IBEROAMERICANO Y DEL CARIBE DE RESTAURACIÓN ECOLÓGICA, 5.; CONFERÊNCIA BRASILEIRA DE RESTAURAÇÃO ECOLÓGICA, 1., 2017, Foz do Iguassu Linking science and practice for a better world: book of abstracts. Londrina: Sociedade Brasileira de Restauração Ecológica, 2017. p. 338-339. T01-P05.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
| |
| 5. | | BRANCALION, P. H. S.; MELI, P.; TYMUS, J. R. C.; LENTI, F. E. B.; BENINI, R. M.; SILVA, A. P. M.; ISERNHAGEN, I.; HOLL, K. D. What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil. Biological Conservation, v. 240, 108274, 2019.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|  |
| 6. | | CROUZEILLES, R.; RODRIGUES, R. R.; STRASSBURG, B. B. N.; BRANCALION, P. H. S.; GARCIA, L. C.; CHAVES, R. B.; CALMON, M.; CAMPOS, M. M. de; MACEDO, M.; LUI, G. H.; SCARAMUZZA, C. A. de M.; RIBEIRO, S.; PUGLIESE, L.; JUNQUEIRA, R. G. P.; PIÑA-RODRIGUES, F.; JAKOVAC, C.; MORAES, L. F. D. de; VIEIRA, D. L. M.; SAMPAIO, A. B.; GANADE, G.; OVERBECK, G. E.; ADAMS, C.; MELO, F.; FERREIRA, J. N.; MAIER, T.; OLIVEIRA, M.; SPOSITO, T. C.; METZKER, T.; TEDESCO, A. M.; BALDERI, A. P.; BALDERI, F.; PRUDENTE, C. M.; WIENS, I. K.; OLIVEIRA, A.; GUIMARÃES, T. M. G.; MARTINS, N. de M.; SANTIAMI, E.; MEDINA, A.; GARCIA, E.; BENINI, R.; SCHIMITT, J.; VIEIRA, R. M.; FERRARINI, O. G.; TAVARES, R. N. Relatório temático sobre restauração de paisagens e ecossistemas. São Carlos, SP: Editora Cubo, 2019. 76 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
| |
| 7. | | CROUZEILLES, R.; RODRIGUES, R. R.; STRASSBURG, B. B. N.; BRANCALION, P. H. S.; GARCIA, L. C.; CHAVES, R. B.; CALMON, M.; CAMPOS, M. M. de; MACEDO, M.; LUI, G. H.; SCARAMUZZA, C. A. de M.; RIBEIRO, S.; PUGLIESE, L.; JUNQUEIRA, R. G. P.; PIÑA-RODRIGUES, F.; JAKOVAC, C.; MORAES, L. F. D. de; VIEIRA, D. L. M.; SAMPAIO, A. B.; GANADE, G.; OVERBECK, G. E.; ADAMS, C.; MELO, F.; FERREIRA, J. N.; MAIER, T.; OLIVEIRA, M.; SPOSITO, T. C.; METZKER, T.; TEDESCO, A. M.; BALDERI, A. P.; BALDERI, F.; PRUDENTE, C. M.; WIENS, I. K.; OLIVEIRA, A.; GUIMARÃES, T. M. G.; MARTINS, N. de M.; SANTIAMI, E.; MEDINA, A.; GARCIA, E.; BENINI, R.; SCHIMITT, J.; VIEIRA, R. M.; FERRARINI, O. G.; TAVARES, R. N. Relatório temático sobre restauração de paisagens e ecossistemas. São Carlos, SP: Editora Cubo, 2019. 76 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia. |
| |
| 8. | | CROUZEILLES, R.; RODRIGUES, R. R.; STRASSBURG, B. B. N.; BRANCALION, P. H. S.; GARCIA, L. C.; CHAVES, R. B.; CALMON, M.; CAMPOS, M. M. de; MACEDO, M.; LUI, G. H.; SCARAMUZZA, C. A. de M.; RIBEIRO, S.; PUGLIESE, L.; JUNQUEIRA, R. G. P.; PIÑA-RODRIGUES, F.; JAKOVAC, C.; MORAES, L. F. D. de; VIEIRA, D. L. M.; SAMPAIO, A. B.; GANADE, G.; OVERBECK, G. E.; ADAMS, C.; MELO, F.; FERREIRA, J. N.; MAIER, T.; OLIVEIRA, M.; SPOSITO, T. C.; METZKER, T.; TEDESCO, A. M.; BALDERI, A. P.; BALDERI, F.; PRUDENTE, C. M.; WIENS, I. K.; OLIVEIRA, A.; GUIMARÃES, T. M. G.; MARTINS, N. de M.; SANTIAMI, E.; MEDINA, A.; GARCIA, E.; BENINI, R.; SCHIMITT, J.; VIEIRA, R. M.; FERRARINI, O. G.; TAVARES, R. N. Relatório temático sobre restauração de paisagens e ecossistemas. São Carlos, SP: Editora Cubo, 2019. 76 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 8 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril. |
|
Data corrente: |
07/02/2018 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
07/02/2018 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
BENINI, R. de M.; LENTI, F. E. B.; TYMUS, J. R. C.; SILVA, A. P. M. da; ISERNHAGEN, I. |
|
Afiliação: |
RUBENS DE MIRANDA BENINI, THE NATURE CONSERVATION; FELIPE EDUARDO BRANDÃO LENTI, THE NATURE CONSERVATION; JULIO RICARDO CAETANO TYMUS, THE NATURE CONSERVATION; ANA PAULA MOREIRA DA SILVA, THE NATURE CONSERVATION; INGO ISERNHAGEN, CPAMT. |
|
Título: |
Costs of ecological restoration in Brazil. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2017 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: WORLD CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION, 7.; CONGRESO IBEROAMERICANO Y DEL CARIBE DE RESTAURACIÓN ECOLÓGICA, 5.; CONFERÊNCIA BRASILEIRA DE RESTAURAÇÃO ECOLÓGICA, 1., 2017, Foz do Iguassu Linking science and practice for a better world: book of abstracts. Londrina: Sociedade Brasileira de Restauração Ecológica, 2017. p. 183. S78.01. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
Aiming to subsidize actions and policies for the development of large-scale restoration in Brazil, the Institute for Applied EconomicResearch and The Nature Conservancy, started an important study to estimate the costs of implementing key ecologicalrestoration techniques in regions of Brazil. The project also has the support of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation(EMBRAPA), the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment (MMA) and the Deutsche Gessellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit(GIZ). Initially we identified widely used techniques by consulting executives from restoration projects, further characterizingeach in terms of required management activities, steps and inputs. Recognizing that initial site conditions play a role in restorationcosts, we define two hypothetical scenarios presuming two levels of intervention necessity: Favorable EnvironmentalConditions ? FEC and Unfavorable Environmental Conditions - UEC. Next, we estimated costs for acquisition of each input and executionof each management activity based on data collected from establishments in the restoration sector. The estimated averagecost of restoration (US$/hectare) for evaluated techniques considering both FEC and UEC scenarios is, respectively: densetree planting of several species through seedling: US$ 2,271 and US$ 6,081; dense tree planting of several species through seed:US$ 2,966 and US$6,727; density-improvement tree planting through seedling/enrichment planting through seedling: US$960and US$3,323; density-improvement tree planting through seeds/enrichment planting through seeds: US$172 and US$2,033; managementof advanced natural regeneration: US$301 and US$707. The great difficulty of collecting information (e.g. Pantanal andPampa biomes) highlights the necessity for discussions about ways to monitor restoration costs in Brazil. MenosAiming to subsidize actions and policies for the development of large-scale restoration in Brazil, the Institute for Applied EconomicResearch and The Nature Conservancy, started an important study to estimate the costs of implementing key ecologicalrestoration techniques in regions of Brazil. The project also has the support of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation(EMBRAPA), the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment (MMA) and the Deutsche Gessellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit(GIZ). Initially we identified widely used techniques by consulting executives from restoration projects, further characterizingeach in terms of required management activities, steps and inputs. Recognizing that initial site conditions play a role in restorationcosts, we define two hypothetical scenarios presuming two levels of intervention necessity: Favorable EnvironmentalConditions ? FEC and Unfavorable Environmental Conditions - UEC. Next, we estimated costs for acquisition of each input and executionof each management activity based on data collected from establishments in the restoration sector. The estimated averagecost of restoration (US$/hectare) for evaluated techniques considering both FEC and UEC scenarios is, respectively: densetree planting of several species through seedling: US$ 2,271 and US$ 6,081; dense tree planting of several species through seed:US$ 2,966 and US$6,727; density-improvement tree planting through seedling/enrichment planting through seedling: US$960a... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Ecological restoration; Variable costs. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
K Ciência Florestal e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/172292/1/2017-cpamt-ingo-isernhagen-costs-ecological-restoration-brazil.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02675nam a2200181 a 4500
001 2087298
005 2018-02-07
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aBENINI, R. de M.
245 $aCosts of ecological restoration in Brazil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: WORLD CONFERENCE ON ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION, 7.; CONGRESO IBEROAMERICANO Y DEL CARIBE DE RESTAURACIÓN ECOLÓGICA, 5.; CONFERÊNCIA BRASILEIRA DE RESTAURAÇÃO ECOLÓGICA, 1., 2017, Foz do Iguassu Linking science and practice for a better world: book of abstracts. Londrina: Sociedade Brasileira de Restauração Ecológica, 2017. p. 183. S78.01.$c2017
520 $aAiming to subsidize actions and policies for the development of large-scale restoration in Brazil, the Institute for Applied EconomicResearch and The Nature Conservancy, started an important study to estimate the costs of implementing key ecologicalrestoration techniques in regions of Brazil. The project also has the support of the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation(EMBRAPA), the Brazilian Ministry of the Environment (MMA) and the Deutsche Gessellschaft fur Internationale Zusammenarbeit(GIZ). Initially we identified widely used techniques by consulting executives from restoration projects, further characterizingeach in terms of required management activities, steps and inputs. Recognizing that initial site conditions play a role in restorationcosts, we define two hypothetical scenarios presuming two levels of intervention necessity: Favorable EnvironmentalConditions ? FEC and Unfavorable Environmental Conditions - UEC. Next, we estimated costs for acquisition of each input and executionof each management activity based on data collected from establishments in the restoration sector. The estimated averagecost of restoration (US$/hectare) for evaluated techniques considering both FEC and UEC scenarios is, respectively: densetree planting of several species through seedling: US$ 2,271 and US$ 6,081; dense tree planting of several species through seed:US$ 2,966 and US$6,727; density-improvement tree planting through seedling/enrichment planting through seedling: US$960and US$3,323; density-improvement tree planting through seeds/enrichment planting through seeds: US$172 and US$2,033; managementof advanced natural regeneration: US$301 and US$707. The great difficulty of collecting information (e.g. Pantanal andPampa biomes) highlights the necessity for discussions about ways to monitor restoration costs in Brazil.
650 $aEcological restoration
650 $aVariable costs
700 1 $aLENTI, F. E. B.
700 1 $aTYMUS, J. R. C.
700 1 $aSILVA, A. P. M. da
700 1 $aISERNHAGEN, I.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrossilvipastoril (CPAMT) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
