| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 6 | |
| 1. |  | BARTHOLDSON, Ö.; PORRO, R. Brokers - a weapon of the weak: the impact of bureaucracy and brokers on a community-based forest management project in the brazilian Amazon. Forum for Development Studies, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2019. Publicado também em: ANNUAL MEETING OF THE FLARE, 4., 2018, Frederiksberg. Abstracts... [Frederiksberg]: University of Copenhagen; [Ann Arbor: University of Michigan], 2018.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|    |
| 4. | | PORRO, R.; PORRO, N. M.; MENEZES, M.; BARTHOLDSON, Ö. Collective action for forest management: institutional challenges for enhanced social-ecological systems of the "environmental agrarian reform" in Anapu, Brazilian Transamazon. The International Forestry Review, v. 16, n. 5, p. 78-79, 2014. Edição dos abstracts do 24º IUFRO World Congress, 2014, Salt Lake City. Sustaining forests, sustaining people: the role of research.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 6 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
|
Data corrente: |
11/12/2014 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
18/10/2022 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
MARQUARDT, K.; BARTHOLDSON, Ö.; PAIN, A.; PORRO, R.; SALOMSSON, L. |
|
Afiliação: |
Kristina Marquardt, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Örjan Bartholdson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; Adam Pain, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; ROBERTO PORRO, CPATU; Lennart Salomsson, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. |
|
Título: |
The Clash between Global Master-plans and Local Contexts: conflicts and contradictions within initiatives for payment of ecosystem services in Brazil and Nepal. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2014 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 11., 2014, Berlin. Farming systems facing global challenges: Capacities and strategies: Proceedings. [Müncheberg]: ZALF; [Vienna]: IFSA, 2014. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 866-875. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Conteúdo: |
With the development of large-scale international agreements, such as REDD (United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries), it is becoming increasingly important to examine the synergy between global masterplans, national endeavors and local actions in relation to environmental services provision and to mitigation and adaption to climate change. This paper will draw on a comparative study of two countries?, Brazil and Nepal, strategies and practices to deal with carbon emissions, i.e. examining the tensions and contradictions between mitigation agendas and the roles, practices and interests of the actors in the programmes and projects related to REDD. The data has been collected from contrasting case studies within the two countries (REDD and nonREDD cases). Preliminary evidence suggests that while the lack of synergy between global plans and local practices might be seen as simply a matter of ?coordination?, it actually reflects competing interests and agendas, both at national and local levels. The REDD plans are guided by a generic template, but how these plans are interpreted and implemented at national and local levels varies greatly, both between and within participating countries. The complexity of the REDD schemes creates a demand for actors who can plan and broker the processes. This complexity and the lack of an overarching reflexivity create a number of problems linked to transparency, complexity, lack of accountability and room for exploitation by powerful economic and political actors. This paper argues that these aspects often transform the planned results into unintended outcomes, depending on the particular configuration of local contextual factors and processes. MenosWith the development of large-scale international agreements, such as REDD (United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries), it is becoming increasingly important to examine the synergy between global masterplans, national endeavors and local actions in relation to environmental services provision and to mitigation and adaption to climate change. This paper will draw on a comparative study of two countries?, Brazil and Nepal, strategies and practices to deal with carbon emissions, i.e. examining the tensions and contradictions between mitigation agendas and the roles, practices and interests of the actors in the programmes and projects related to REDD. The data has been collected from contrasting case studies within the two countries (REDD and nonREDD cases). Preliminary evidence suggests that while the lack of synergy between global plans and local practices might be seen as simply a matter of ?coordination?, it actually reflects competing interests and agendas, both at national and local levels. The REDD plans are guided by a generic template, but how these plans are interpreted and implemented at national and local levels varies greatly, both between and within participating countries. The complexity of the REDD schemes creates a demand for actors who can plan and broker the processes. This complexity and the lack of an overarching reflexivity create a number of problems linked to transparency... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Amazon; Himalaya; Manejo florestal; Paymentof ecosystem services; Smallholder agriculture. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura Familiar; Mudança Climática. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia; climate change; forest management. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/113574/1/WS-1-8-Marquardt.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02816nam a2200289 a 4500
001 2002325
005 2022-10-18
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aMARQUARDT, K.
245 $aThe Clash between Global Master-plans and Local Contexts$bconflicts and contradictions within initiatives for payment of ecosystem services in Brazil and Nepal.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 11., 2014, Berlin. Farming systems facing global challenges: Capacities and strategies: Proceedings. [Müncheberg]: ZALF; [Vienna]: IFSA$c2014
300 $ap. 866-875.
520 $aWith the development of large-scale international agreements, such as REDD (United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries), it is becoming increasingly important to examine the synergy between global masterplans, national endeavors and local actions in relation to environmental services provision and to mitigation and adaption to climate change. This paper will draw on a comparative study of two countries?, Brazil and Nepal, strategies and practices to deal with carbon emissions, i.e. examining the tensions and contradictions between mitigation agendas and the roles, practices and interests of the actors in the programmes and projects related to REDD. The data has been collected from contrasting case studies within the two countries (REDD and nonREDD cases). Preliminary evidence suggests that while the lack of synergy between global plans and local practices might be seen as simply a matter of ?coordination?, it actually reflects competing interests and agendas, both at national and local levels. The REDD plans are guided by a generic template, but how these plans are interpreted and implemented at national and local levels varies greatly, both between and within participating countries. The complexity of the REDD schemes creates a demand for actors who can plan and broker the processes. This complexity and the lack of an overarching reflexivity create a number of problems linked to transparency, complexity, lack of accountability and room for exploitation by powerful economic and political actors. This paper argues that these aspects often transform the planned results into unintended outcomes, depending on the particular configuration of local contextual factors and processes.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aclimate change
650 $aforest management
650 $aAgricultura Familiar
650 $aMudança Climática
653 $aAmazon
653 $aHimalaya
653 $aManejo florestal
653 $aPaymentof ecosystem services
653 $aSmallholder agriculture
700 1 $aBARTHOLDSON, Ö.
700 1 $aPAIN, A.
700 1 $aPORRO, R.
700 1 $aSALOMSSON, L.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
