| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 133 | |
| 22. |  | OLIVEIRA, C. J. de; DOMINGUES, R.; GRANADA, R. L.; MINHO, A. P.; GASPAR, E. B. Ação antibacteriana in vitro de extratos vegetais de plantas do Bioma Pampa. In: SIMPÓSIO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA PECUÁRIA SUL, 6., 2016, Bagé. Resumos... Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 2016. p. 9. Claudia Cristina Gulias Gomes, editora técnica.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
|    |
| 27. | | SANTOS, L. A. L. DOS; FIGUEIREDO, A.; CHAGAS, A. C. de S.; MINHO, A. P. Avaliação de eficácia de acaricidas para desenvolvimento de métodos alternativos para controle de ectoparasitos de interesse veterinário. In: JORNADA CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA SÃO CARLOS, 12., 2020, São Carlos, SP. Anais... São Carlos, SP: Embrapa Instrumentação; Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste, 2020. p.21. (Embrapa Instrumentação. Documentos, 71).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
| |
| 29. | | GASPAR, E. B.; MINHO, A. P.; SUÑÉ, R. W.; DOMINGUES, R. Caracterização da mastite subclínica em animais das raças Holandesa e Jersey criados a pasto. In: CONGRESSO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA, 25.; CONGRESSO DE EXTENSÃO E CULTURA, 3.; CONGRESSO DE ENSINO DE GRADUAÇÃO, 2.; ENCONTRO DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO, 18., 2016, Pelotas. Conhecimento, sociedade e diversidade: anais. Pelotas: UFPEL, 2016. ENPOS.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
| |
| 30. | | SOARES, S. M.; GASPAR, E. B.; SUÑÉ, R. W.; VIEIRA, M. I. B.; MINHO, A. P. Correlação entre testes laboratoriais e a campo para detecção de mastite subclínica em rebanhos leiteiros. Anais do Salão Internacional de Ensino, Pesquisa e Extensão, Bagé, v. 8, n. 4, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
| |
| 34. | | SANTOS, P. A. dos; REIMANN, F. A.; SOLLERO, B. P.; MINHO, A. P.; CARDOSO, F. F. Identificação de genes candidatos relacionados ao carcinoma ocular bovino de acordo com a base de dados MESH (Medical Subject Headings). In: SIMPÓSIO DE INICIAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA DA EMBRAPA PECUÁRIA SUL, 7., 2017, Bagé. Resumos... Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 2017. p. 25. Claudia Cristina Gulias Gomes, editora técnica.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Pecuária Sul. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 133 | |
|
|
|
 | Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Agrobiologia. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpab.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agrobiologia. |
|
Data corrente: |
29/11/2022 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
29/11/2022 |
|
Autoria: |
LAVELLE, P.; MATHIEU, J.; SPAIN. A.; BROWN, G. G.; FRAGOSO, C.; LAPIED, E.; AQUINO, A. M. de; BAROIS, I.; BARRIOS, E.; BARROS, M. E.; BEDANO, J. C.; BLANCHART, E.; CAULFIELD, M.; CHAGUEZA, Y.; DAI, J.; DECAËNS, T.; DOMINGUEZ, A.; DOMINGUEZ, Y.; FEIJOO, A.; FOLGARAIT, P.; FONTE, S. J.; GOROSITO, N.; HUERTA, E.; JIMENEZ, J. J.; KELLY, C.; LORANGER, G.; MARCHAO, R. L.; MARICHAL, R.; PRAXEDES, C.; RODRIGUEZ, L.; ROUSSEAU, G.; ROUSSEAU, L.; RUIZ, N.; SANABRIA, C.; SUAREZ, J. C.; TONDOH, J. E.; VALENÇA, A. de; VANEK, S. J.; VASQUEZ, J.; VELASQUEZ, E.; WEBSTER, E.; ZHANG, C. |
|
Afiliação: |
PATRICK LAVELLE, Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle; JÉRÔME MATHIEU, Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle; ALISTER SPAIN; GEORGE GARDNER BROWN, CNPF; CARLOS FRAGOSO, Red Biodiversidad y Sistemática, Instituto de Ecologia A.C., Xalapa; EMMANUEL LAPIED, Taxonomia Biodiversity Fund.; ADRIANA MARIA DE AQUINO, CNPAB; ISABELLE BAROIS, Red Ecología Funcional, Instituto de Ecologia A.C., Xalapa; EDMUNDO BARRIOS, FAO; MARIA ELEUSA BARROS, Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle; JOSÉ CAMILO BEDANO, Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto; ERIC BLANCHART, Eco& Sols, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAe, Institut Agro; MARK CAULFIELD, Eco& Sols, Université de Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, INRAe, Institut Agro; Wageningen University; YAMILETH CHAGUEZA, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; JUN DAI, South China Agricultural University; THIBAUD DECAËNS, Centre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive; ANAHI DOMINGUEZ, Universidad Nacional de Rio Cuarto; YAMILETH DOMINGUEZ, Universidad del Atlántico; ALEXANDER FEIJOO, Universidad Tecnológica de Pereira; PATRICIA FOLGARAIT, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; STEVEN J. FONTE, Colorado State University; NORMA GOROSITO, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes; ESPERANZA HUERTA, HUERTA; Wageningen University and Research; JUAN JOSE JIMENEZ, Pyrenean Institute of Ecology; COURTLAND KELLY, Colorado State University; GLADYS LORANGER, Université des Antilles; ROBELIO LEANDRO MARCHAO, CPAC; RAPHAEL MARICHAL, CIRAD; CATARINA PRAXEDES, Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi; LEONARDO RODRIGUEZ, Universidad de la Amazonia; GUILLAUME ROUSSEAU, Maranhão State University; LAURENT ROUSSEAU, Université Paris-Sorbonne Nouvelle; NURIA RUIZ, French National Research Agency; CATALINA SANABRIA, UNIVALLE; JUAN CARLOS SUAREZ, Universidad de la Amazonia; JERÔME EBAGNERIN TONDOH, Université Nagui Abrogoua; ANNE DE VALENÇA, Wageningen University; STEVEN J. VANEK, Colorado State University; JOEL VASQUEZ, Instituto de Investigaciones de la Amazonia Peruana; Universidad Nacional de la Amazonia Peruana; ELENA VELASQUEZ, Universidad Nacional de Colombia; EMILY WEBSTER, University of California; CHI ZHANG, South China Agricultural University. |
|
Título: |
Soil macroinvertebrate communities: a world-wide assessment. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Global Ecology and Biogeography, v. 31, n. 7, p. 1261-1276, 2022. |
|
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13492 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
AIM. Macroinvertebrates comprise a highly diverse set of taxa with great potential as indicators of soil quality. Communities were sampled at 3,694 sites distributed world-wide. We aimed to analyse the patterns of abundance, composition and network characteristics and their relationships to latitude, mean annual temperature and rainfall, land cover, soil texture and agricultural practices.
LOCATION. Sites are distributed in 41 countries, ranging from 55° S to 57° N latitude, from 0 to 4,000 m in elevation, with annual rainfall ranging from 500 to >3,000 mm and mean temperatures of 5?32°C.
TIME PERIOD. 1980-2018.
MAJOR TAXA STUDIED.
All soil macroinvertebrates: Haplotaxida; Coleoptera; Formicidae; Arachnida; Chilopoda; Diplopoda; Diptera; Isoptera; Isopoda; Homoptera; Hemiptera; Gastropoda; Blattaria; Orthoptera; Lepidoptera; Dermaptera; and ?others?.
METHODS.
Standard ISO 23611-5 sampling protocol was applied at all sites. Data treatment used a set of multivariate analyses, principal components analysis (PCA) on macrofauna data transformed by Hellinger?s method, multiple correspondence analysis for environmental data (latitude, elevation, temperature and average annual rainfall, type of vegetation cover) transformed into discrete classes, coinertia analysis to compare these two data sets, and bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap tests to evaluate the part of the variance of the macrofauna data attributable to each of the environmental factors. Network analysis was performed. Each pairwise association of taxonomic units was tested against a null model considering local and regional scales, in order to avoid spurious correlations.
RESULTS
Communities were separated into five clusters reflecting their densities and taxonomic richness. They were significantly influenced by climatic conditions, soil texture and vegetation cover. Abundance and diversity, highest in tropical forests (1,895 ± 234 individuals/m2) and savannahs (1,796 ± 72 individuals/m2), progressively decreased in tropical cropping systems (tree-associated crops, 1,358 ± 120 individuals/m2; pastures, 1,178 ± 154 individuals/m2; and annual crops, 867 ± 62 individuals/m2), temperate grasslands (529 ± 60 individuals/m2), forests (232 ± 20 individuals/m2) and annual crops (231 ± 24 individuals/m2) and temperate dry forests and shrubs (195 ± 11 individuals/m2). Agricultural management decreased overall abundance by ≤54% in tropical areas and 64% in temperate areas. Connectivity varied with taxa, with dominant positive connections in litter transformers and negative connections with ecosystem engineers and Arachnida. Connectivity and modularity were higher in communities with low abundance and taxonomic richness.
MAIN CONCLUSIONS.
Soil macroinvertebrate communities respond to climatic, soil and land-cover conditions. All taxa, except termites, are found everywhere, and communities from the five clusters cover a wide range of geographical and environmental conditions. Agricultural practices significantly decrease abundance, although the presence of tree components alleviates this effect. MenosAIM. Macroinvertebrates comprise a highly diverse set of taxa with great potential as indicators of soil quality. Communities were sampled at 3,694 sites distributed world-wide. We aimed to analyse the patterns of abundance, composition and network characteristics and their relationships to latitude, mean annual temperature and rainfall, land cover, soil texture and agricultural practices.
LOCATION. Sites are distributed in 41 countries, ranging from 55° S to 57° N latitude, from 0 to 4,000 m in elevation, with annual rainfall ranging from 500 to >3,000 mm and mean temperatures of 5?32°C.
TIME PERIOD. 1980-2018.
MAJOR TAXA STUDIED.
All soil macroinvertebrates: Haplotaxida; Coleoptera; Formicidae; Arachnida; Chilopoda; Diplopoda; Diptera; Isoptera; Isopoda; Homoptera; Hemiptera; Gastropoda; Blattaria; Orthoptera; Lepidoptera; Dermaptera; and ?others?.
METHODS.
Standard ISO 23611-5 sampling protocol was applied at all sites. Data treatment used a set of multivariate analyses, principal components analysis (PCA) on macrofauna data transformed by Hellinger?s method, multiple correspondence analysis for environmental data (latitude, elevation, temperature and average annual rainfall, type of vegetation cover) transformed into discrete classes, coinertia analysis to compare these two data sets, and bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap tests to evaluate the part of the variance of the macrofauna data attributable to each of the environmental factors. Network analysis was perf... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Banco de dados; Cobertura da terra; Communities; Ecologia do solo; Macrofauna; Macrofauna database; Macroinvertebrados; Network analysis; Soil macroinvertebrates. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Land cover; Soil ecology. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
Marc: |
LEADER 05080naa a2200757 a 4500
001 2148911
005 2022-11-29
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13492$2DOI
100 1 $aLAVELLE, P.
245 $aSoil macroinvertebrate communities$ba world-wide assessment.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
520 $aAIM. Macroinvertebrates comprise a highly diverse set of taxa with great potential as indicators of soil quality. Communities were sampled at 3,694 sites distributed world-wide. We aimed to analyse the patterns of abundance, composition and network characteristics and their relationships to latitude, mean annual temperature and rainfall, land cover, soil texture and agricultural practices. LOCATION. Sites are distributed in 41 countries, ranging from 55° S to 57° N latitude, from 0 to 4,000 m in elevation, with annual rainfall ranging from 500 to >3,000 mm and mean temperatures of 5?32°C. TIME PERIOD. 1980-2018. MAJOR TAXA STUDIED. All soil macroinvertebrates: Haplotaxida; Coleoptera; Formicidae; Arachnida; Chilopoda; Diplopoda; Diptera; Isoptera; Isopoda; Homoptera; Hemiptera; Gastropoda; Blattaria; Orthoptera; Lepidoptera; Dermaptera; and ?others?. METHODS. Standard ISO 23611-5 sampling protocol was applied at all sites. Data treatment used a set of multivariate analyses, principal components analysis (PCA) on macrofauna data transformed by Hellinger?s method, multiple correspondence analysis for environmental data (latitude, elevation, temperature and average annual rainfall, type of vegetation cover) transformed into discrete classes, coinertia analysis to compare these two data sets, and bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap tests to evaluate the part of the variance of the macrofauna data attributable to each of the environmental factors. Network analysis was performed. Each pairwise association of taxonomic units was tested against a null model considering local and regional scales, in order to avoid spurious correlations. RESULTS Communities were separated into five clusters reflecting their densities and taxonomic richness. They were significantly influenced by climatic conditions, soil texture and vegetation cover. Abundance and diversity, highest in tropical forests (1,895 ± 234 individuals/m2) and savannahs (1,796 ± 72 individuals/m2), progressively decreased in tropical cropping systems (tree-associated crops, 1,358 ± 120 individuals/m2; pastures, 1,178 ± 154 individuals/m2; and annual crops, 867 ± 62 individuals/m2), temperate grasslands (529 ± 60 individuals/m2), forests (232 ± 20 individuals/m2) and annual crops (231 ± 24 individuals/m2) and temperate dry forests and shrubs (195 ± 11 individuals/m2). Agricultural management decreased overall abundance by ≤54% in tropical areas and 64% in temperate areas. Connectivity varied with taxa, with dominant positive connections in litter transformers and negative connections with ecosystem engineers and Arachnida. Connectivity and modularity were higher in communities with low abundance and taxonomic richness. MAIN CONCLUSIONS. Soil macroinvertebrate communities respond to climatic, soil and land-cover conditions. All taxa, except termites, are found everywhere, and communities from the five clusters cover a wide range of geographical and environmental conditions. Agricultural practices significantly decrease abundance, although the presence of tree components alleviates this effect.
650 $aLand cover
650 $aSoil ecology
653 $aBanco de dados
653 $aCobertura da terra
653 $aCommunities
653 $aEcologia do solo
653 $aMacrofauna
653 $aMacrofauna database
653 $aMacroinvertebrados
653 $aNetwork analysis
653 $aSoil macroinvertebrates
700 1 $aMATHIEU, J.
700 1 $aSPAIN. A.
700 1 $aBROWN, G. G.
700 1 $aFRAGOSO, C.
700 1 $aLAPIED, E.
700 1 $aAQUINO, A. M. de
700 1 $aBAROIS, I.
700 1 $aBARRIOS, E.
700 1 $aBARROS, M. E.
700 1 $aBEDANO, J. C.
700 1 $aBLANCHART, E.
700 1 $aCAULFIELD, M.
700 1 $aCHAGUEZA, Y.
700 1 $aDAI, J.
700 1 $aDECAËNS, T.
700 1 $aDOMINGUEZ, A.
700 1 $aDOMINGUEZ, Y.
700 1 $aFEIJOO, A.
700 1 $aFOLGARAIT, P.
700 1 $aFONTE, S. J.
700 1 $aGOROSITO, N.
700 1 $aHUERTA, E.
700 1 $aJIMENEZ, J. J.
700 1 $aKELLY, C.
700 1 $aLORANGER, G.
700 1 $aMARCHAO, R. L.
700 1 $aMARICHAL, R.
700 1 $aPRAXEDES, C.
700 1 $aRODRIGUEZ, L.
700 1 $aROUSSEAU, G.
700 1 $aROUSSEAU, L.
700 1 $aRUIZ, N.
700 1 $aSANABRIA, C.
700 1 $aSUAREZ, J. C.
700 1 $aTONDOH, J. E.
700 1 $aVALENÇA, A. de
700 1 $aVANEK, S. J.
700 1 $aVASQUEZ, J.
700 1 $aVELASQUEZ, E.
700 1 $aWEBSTER, E.
700 1 $aZHANG, C.
773 $tGlobal Ecology and Biogeography$gv. 31, n. 7, p. 1261-1276, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agrobiologia (CNPAB) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
