|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Clima Temperado. |
Data corrente: |
09/03/2022 |
Data da última atualização: |
10/08/2022 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
RIBEIRO, P. L.; BAMBERG, A. L.; PEREIRA, I. dos S.; MONTEIRO, A. B.; POTES, M. da L.; LIMA, C. L. R. de. |
Afiliação: |
PABLO LACERDA RIBEIRO; ADILSON LUIS BAMBERG, CPACT; IVAN DOS SANTOS PEREIRA; ALEX BECKER MONTEIRO; MARIANA DA LUZ POTES; CLÁUDIA LIANE RODRIGUES DE LIMA. |
Título: |
Liming and co-application of water treatment residuals with biosolids for conditioning sandy soils. |
Ano de publicação: |
2022 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Land Degradation and Development, v. 33, n. 7, p. 989-1001, 2022. |
DOI: |
10.1002/ldr.4202 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Notas: |
First published: 17 January 2022. |
Conteúdo: |
Application of water treatment residuals (WTR) and biosolids (BS) might ameliorate fragile soils. However, studies integrating impacts of waste preparation methods such as liming and grinding associated with co-application approaches for soil conditioning are lacking. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of agricultural use of WTR as well as their co-application with BS to ameliorate a sandy soil through assessing impacts on selected soil quality indicators and on nutrient and potentially toxic element concentration in plant tissue in addition to the biomass yield of annual crops. The following treatments were evaluated: non-amended soil (control); drying plus grinding and liming WTR; WTR co-application with BS at 3:1 ratio; and a soil amendment commercially available in Brazil. All treatments were soil incorporated in the 0.0?0.2 m layer at 30 Mg ha1 dose (dry mass). Selected soil physical, hydraulic, and chemical parameters were determined. Furthermore, nutrients and potentially toxic elements concentration in plant tissue as well as the agronomic performance of maize and ryegrass were measured. The co-application of WTR and BS increased the soil content of P, Zn, and Cu in the 0.0?0.1 m layer. The concentration of these nutrients also was greater in ryegrass tissue and promoted the biomass yield in 51%. WTR did not increase contaminants and did not decrease the P content in soil and in plant tissue, independently of drying plus grinding and liming. Considering the conditions investigated in our study, WTR/BS co-application was environmentally safe and effective in ameliorating soil quality. MenosApplication of water treatment residuals (WTR) and biosolids (BS) might ameliorate fragile soils. However, studies integrating impacts of waste preparation methods such as liming and grinding associated with co-application approaches for soil conditioning are lacking. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of agricultural use of WTR as well as their co-application with BS to ameliorate a sandy soil through assessing impacts on selected soil quality indicators and on nutrient and potentially toxic element concentration in plant tissue in addition to the biomass yield of annual crops. The following treatments were evaluated: non-amended soil (control); drying plus grinding and liming WTR; WTR co-application with BS at 3:1 ratio; and a soil amendment commercially available in Brazil. All treatments were soil incorporated in the 0.0?0.2 m layer at 30 Mg ha1 dose (dry mass). Selected soil physical, hydraulic, and chemical parameters were determined. Furthermore, nutrients and potentially toxic elements concentration in plant tissue as well as the agronomic performance of maize and ryegrass were measured. The co-application of WTR and BS increased the soil content of P, Zn, and Cu in the 0.0?0.1 m layer. The concentration of these nutrients also was greater in ryegrass tissue and promoted the biomass yield in 51%. WTR did not increase contaminants and did not decrease the P content in soil and in plant tissue, independently of drying plus grinding and liming. Consider... Mostrar Tudo |
Thesagro: |
Água; Solo Arenoso; Tratamento da Água. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/232279/1/Artigo-Liming-and-co8208application-of-water-treatment-residuals-with-biosolids-for-conditioning.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02386naa a2200241 a 4500 001 2140700 005 2022-08-10 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1002/ldr.4202$2DOI 100 1 $aRIBEIRO, P. L. 245 $aLiming and co-application of water treatment residuals with biosolids for conditioning sandy soils.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aFirst published: 17 January 2022. 520 $aApplication of water treatment residuals (WTR) and biosolids (BS) might ameliorate fragile soils. However, studies integrating impacts of waste preparation methods such as liming and grinding associated with co-application approaches for soil conditioning are lacking. The present study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of agricultural use of WTR as well as their co-application with BS to ameliorate a sandy soil through assessing impacts on selected soil quality indicators and on nutrient and potentially toxic element concentration in plant tissue in addition to the biomass yield of annual crops. The following treatments were evaluated: non-amended soil (control); drying plus grinding and liming WTR; WTR co-application with BS at 3:1 ratio; and a soil amendment commercially available in Brazil. All treatments were soil incorporated in the 0.0?0.2 m layer at 30 Mg ha1 dose (dry mass). Selected soil physical, hydraulic, and chemical parameters were determined. Furthermore, nutrients and potentially toxic elements concentration in plant tissue as well as the agronomic performance of maize and ryegrass were measured. The co-application of WTR and BS increased the soil content of P, Zn, and Cu in the 0.0?0.1 m layer. The concentration of these nutrients also was greater in ryegrass tissue and promoted the biomass yield in 51%. WTR did not increase contaminants and did not decrease the P content in soil and in plant tissue, independently of drying plus grinding and liming. Considering the conditions investigated in our study, WTR/BS co-application was environmentally safe and effective in ameliorating soil quality. 650 $aÁgua 650 $aSolo Arenoso 650 $aTratamento da Água 700 1 $aBAMBERG, A. L. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, I. dos S. 700 1 $aMONTEIRO, A. B. 700 1 $aPOTES, M. da L. 700 1 $aLIMA, C. L. R. de 773 $tLand Degradation and Development$gv. 33, n. 7, p. 989-1001, 2022.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Clima Temperado (CPACT) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão. |
Data corrente: |
06/05/2010 |
Data da última atualização: |
25/06/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Folder/Folheto/Cartilha |
Autoria: |
GUIMARÃES, C. M.; FAGERIA, N. K.; BARBOSA FILHO, M. P. |
Afiliação: |
CLEBER MORAIS GUIMARAES, CNPAF; NAND KUMAR FAGERIA, CNPAF; MOREL PEREIRA BARBOSA FILHO, CNPAF. |
Título: |
Como a planta de arroz se desenvolve. |
Ano de publicação: |
2002 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Informações Agronômicas, Piracicaba, n. 99, p. 1-12, set. 2002. |
Série: |
(POTAFOS. Arquivo do agrônomo, 13). |
Idioma: |
Português |
Notas: |
Encarte. |
Conteúdo: |
Planta. Raízes. Caule. Perfilhamento. Folha. Panícula. Espigueta. Flor. Grão. Germinação. Plântula. Fases de crescimento da planta de arroz. Produção de matéria seca. Produção. Características da planta relacionadas com a capacidade de produção. Exigências de radiação solar pela cultura do arroz. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Cultivo. |
Thesagro: |
Arroz; Características agronômicas; Oryza sativa. |
Categoria do assunto: |
F Plantas e Produtos de Origem Vegetal |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/100485/1/Encarte.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00897nam a2200205 a 4500 001 1749053 005 2020-06-25 008 2002 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aGUIMARÃES, C. M. 245 $aComo a planta de arroz se desenvolve. 260 $aInformações Agronômicas, Piracicaba, n. 99, p. 1-12, set. 2002.$c2002 490 $a(POTAFOS. Arquivo do agrônomo, 13). 500 $aEncarte. 520 $aPlanta. Raízes. Caule. Perfilhamento. Folha. Panícula. Espigueta. Flor. Grão. Germinação. Plântula. Fases de crescimento da planta de arroz. Produção de matéria seca. Produção. Características da planta relacionadas com a capacidade de produção. Exigências de radiação solar pela cultura do arroz. 650 $aArroz 650 $aCaracterísticas agronômicas 650 $aOryza sativa 653 $aCultivo 700 1 $aFAGERIA, N. K. 700 1 $aBARBOSA FILHO, M. P.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Arroz e Feijão (CNPAF) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|