|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Agroenergia. |
Data corrente: |
20/12/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
20/04/2020 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento |
Autoria: |
LAVIOLA, B. G.; SANTOS, A. dos; GOMES, E. S.; ROCHA, L. de s.; BORGES, M.; MENDONÇA, S.; GOUVÊA, J. A. de; RODRIGUES, E. V. |
Afiliação: |
BRUNO GALVEAS LAVIOLA, CNPAE; Adriano dos Santos, Engenheiro??agrônomo, doutor em Genética e Melhoramento de Plantas, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, UENF, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ.; Eloisa Silva Gomes, Graduanda em Ciências Naturais, Universidade de Brasília, UnB, Brasília, DF.; Leonardo de Sousa Rocha, Graduando em Gestão ambiental, Universidade de Brasília, UnB, Brasília, DF.; Marina Borges, Mestranda em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade de Brasília, UnB, Brasília, DF.; Simone Mendonça, Farmacêutica, doutora em Saúde Pública, pesquisadora da Embrapa Agroenergia, Brasília, DF.; Jorge Alberto de Gouvêa, Engenheiro??agrônomo, doutor em Biologia Vegetal, pesquisador da Embrapa Trigo, Passo Fundo, RS.; Erina Vitório Rodrigues, Engenheira??agrônoma, doutora em Genética e Melhoramento de Plantas, professora da UnB. Brasília, DF. |
Título: |
Performance de genótipos de canola nas condições de Cerrado, Brasília, DF. |
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Brasília, DF: Embrapa Agroenergia, 2019. |
Páginas: |
27 |
Série: |
((Boletim de pesquisa e desenvolvimento / Embrapa Agroenergia, 20) |
Idioma: |
Português |
Thesagro: |
Cerrado; Seleção Genética. |
Thesaurus Nal: |
Canola. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/207655/1/BRUNO-BP20.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00729nam a2200241 a 4500 001 2117451 005 2020-04-20 008 2019 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aLAVIOLA, B. G. 245 $aPerformance de genótipos de canola nas condições de Cerrado, Brasília, DF.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aBrasília, DF: Embrapa Agroenergia$c2019 300 $a27 490 $a((Boletim de pesquisa e desenvolvimento / Embrapa Agroenergia, 20) 650 $aCanola 650 $aCerrado 650 $aSeleção Genética 700 1 $aSANTOS, A. dos 700 1 $aGOMES, E. S. 700 1 $aROCHA, L. de s. 700 1 $aBORGES, M. 700 1 $aMENDONÇA, S. 700 1 $aGOUVÊA, J. A. de 700 1 $aRODRIGUES, E. V.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Agroenergia (CNPAE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
| Acesso ao texto completo restrito à biblioteca da Embrapa Suínos e Aves. Para informações adicionais entre em contato com cnpsa.biblioteca@embrapa.br. |
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
Data corrente: |
01/11/2019 |
Data da última atualização: |
01/11/2019 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Circulação/Nível: |
A - 2 |
Autoria: |
AROEIRA, C. N.; FEDDERN, V.; GRESSLER, V.; MOLOGNONI, L.; DAGUER, H.; DALLA COSTA, O. A.; LIMA, G. J. M. M. de; CONTRERAS-CASTILL0, C. J. |
Afiliação: |
CAROLINA N. AROEIRA, ESALQ; VIVIAN FEDDERN, CNPSA; VANESSA GRESSLER, CNPSA; LUCIANO MOLOGNONI, MAPA; HEITOR DAGUER, MAPA; OSMAR ANTONIO DALLA COSTA, CNPSA; GUSTAVO JULIO MELLO M. DE LIMA, CNPSA; CARMEN J. CONTRERAS-CASTILL0, ESALQ. |
Título: |
Determination of ractopamine residue in tissues and urine from swine fed meat and bone meal. |
Ano de publicação: |
2019 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, v. 36, n. 3, p. 424-433, 2019. |
DOI: |
10.1080/19440049.2019.1567942 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
Abstract: In many countries, ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) is allowed to be used in animal production as a βagonist, which is an energy repartitioning agent able to offer economic benefits such as increased muscle and decreased fat deposition, feed conversion improvement and an increase in average daily weight gain. However, some countries have banned its use and established strict traceability programmes because of pharmacological implications of β-agonist residues in meat products. In Brazil, commercial RAC is controlled (5?20 mg kg−1) and only added to pig diet during the last 28 days before slaughter. However, the control is more difficult when co-products, like meat and bone meal (MBM), which can be produced from RAC treated animals, are part of the feed composition. Therefore, a study was undertaken to evaluate the presence of RAC residue concentrations in urine and tissues of gilts (n = 40) in four dietary groups: 0%, 7%, 14% and 21% (w/w) of MBM-containing RAC (53.5 µg kg−1). The concentration of RAC residues in MBM, pig tissues and urine was determined by LC?MS. Low RAC concentrations were detected in muscle, kidney, liver and lungs (limit of detection = 0.15, 0.5, 0.5 and 1.0 µg kg−1, respectively); however, no RAC residues were quantified above the limit of quantification (0.5, 2.5, 2.5 and 2.5 µg kg−1, respectively). In urine, the RAC concentration remained below 1.35 µg L−1. These data suggest that MBM (containing 53.5 µg kg−1 RAC) added to diet up to 21% (w/w) could hamper the trade where RAC is restricted or has zero-tolerance policy MenosAbstract: In many countries, ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) is allowed to be used in animal production as a βagonist, which is an energy repartitioning agent able to offer economic benefits such as increased muscle and decreased fat deposition, feed conversion improvement and an increase in average daily weight gain. However, some countries have banned its use and established strict traceability programmes because of pharmacological implications of β-agonist residues in meat products. In Brazil, commercial RAC is controlled (5?20 mg kg−1) and only added to pig diet during the last 28 days before slaughter. However, the control is more difficult when co-products, like meat and bone meal (MBM), which can be produced from RAC treated animals, are part of the feed composition. Therefore, a study was undertaken to evaluate the presence of RAC residue concentrations in urine and tissues of gilts (n = 40) in four dietary groups: 0%, 7%, 14% and 21% (w/w) of MBM-containing RAC (53.5 µg kg−1). The concentration of RAC residues in MBM, pig tissues and urine was determined by LC?MS. Low RAC concentrations were detected in muscle, kidney, liver and lungs (limit of detection = 0.15, 0.5, 0.5 and 1.0 µg kg−1, respectively); however, no RAC residues were quantified above the limit of quantification (0.5, 2.5, 2.5 and 2.5 µg kg−1, respectively). In urine, the RAC concentration remained below 1.35 µg L−1. These data suggest that MBM (containing 53.5 µ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Carne de porco; Pig fed meat; Pork production. |
Thesagro: |
Carne; Farinha de Osso; Suíno. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Analytical methods; Feed additives; Food safety. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
Marc: |
LEADER 02578naa a2200325 a 4500 001 2113744 005 2019-11-01 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1080/19440049.2019.1567942$2DOI 100 1 $aAROEIRA, C. N. 245 $aDetermination of ractopamine residue in tissues and urine from swine fed meat and bone meal.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 520 $aAbstract: In many countries, ractopamine hydrochloride (RAC) is allowed to be used in animal production as a βagonist, which is an energy repartitioning agent able to offer economic benefits such as increased muscle and decreased fat deposition, feed conversion improvement and an increase in average daily weight gain. However, some countries have banned its use and established strict traceability programmes because of pharmacological implications of β-agonist residues in meat products. In Brazil, commercial RAC is controlled (5?20 mg kg−1) and only added to pig diet during the last 28 days before slaughter. However, the control is more difficult when co-products, like meat and bone meal (MBM), which can be produced from RAC treated animals, are part of the feed composition. Therefore, a study was undertaken to evaluate the presence of RAC residue concentrations in urine and tissues of gilts (n = 40) in four dietary groups: 0%, 7%, 14% and 21% (w/w) of MBM-containing RAC (53.5 µg kg−1). The concentration of RAC residues in MBM, pig tissues and urine was determined by LC?MS. Low RAC concentrations were detected in muscle, kidney, liver and lungs (limit of detection = 0.15, 0.5, 0.5 and 1.0 µg kg−1, respectively); however, no RAC residues were quantified above the limit of quantification (0.5, 2.5, 2.5 and 2.5 µg kg−1, respectively). In urine, the RAC concentration remained below 1.35 µg L−1. These data suggest that MBM (containing 53.5 µg kg−1 RAC) added to diet up to 21% (w/w) could hamper the trade where RAC is restricted or has zero-tolerance policy 650 $aAnalytical methods 650 $aFeed additives 650 $aFood safety 650 $aCarne 650 $aFarinha de Osso 650 $aSuíno 653 $aCarne de porco 653 $aPig fed meat 653 $aPork production 700 1 $aFEDDERN, V. 700 1 $aGRESSLER, V. 700 1 $aMOLOGNONI, L. 700 1 $aDAGUER, H. 700 1 $aDALLA COSTA, O. A. 700 1 $aLIMA, G. J. M. M. de 700 1 $aCONTRERAS-CASTILL0, C. J. 773 $tFood Additives & Contaminants: Part A$gv. 36, n. 3, p. 424-433, 2019.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Expressão de busca inválida. Verifique!!! |
|
|