| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 155 | |
| 141. |  | ABREU, L. S. de; BELLON, S.; BRANDENBURG, A.; OLLIVIER, G.; LAMINE, C.; DAROLT, M. R.; AVENTURIER, P. Controvérsias e relações entre agricultura orgânica e agroecologia. In: BRANDENBURG, A.; BILLAUD, J.; LAMINE, C. (Org.). Redes de agroecologias: experiências no Brasil e na França. Curitiba: Kairós Edições, 2015. p. 171-198.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|    |
| 142. | | ABREU, L. S. de; LAMINE, C.; BELLON, S.; BRANDENBURG, A.; ALENCAR, M. de C. F.; BILLAUD, J. P. Trajetória e dinâmica comparada da agroecologia no Brasil e na França. In: ULHÔA, J. L. R. (Ed.). Biodiversidade, Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Piracanjuba, GO: Editora Conhecimento Livre, 2020. vol. 2. p. 586-611.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 143. | | ABREU, L. S. de; BELLON, S.; BRANDENBURG, A.; OLLIVIER, G.; LAMINE, C.; DAROLT, M. R.; AVENTURIER, P. Relações entre agricultura orgânica e agroecologia: desafios atuais em torno dos princípios da agroecologia. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Curitiba, v. 26, p. 143-160, 2012.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 144. | | OELOFSE, M.; HOGH-JENSEN, H.; ABREU, L. S. de; ALMEIDA, G. F.; EL-ARABY, A.; HUI, Q. Y.; SULTAN, T.; NEERGAARD, A. de. Organic farm conventionalisation and farmer practices in China, Brazil and Egypt. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, Paris, v. 31, n. 4, p. 589-698, 2011.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 145. | | OELOFSE, M.; HOGH-JENSEN, H.; ABREU, L. S. de; ALMEIDA, G. F.; EL-ARABY, A.; HUI, Q. Y.; NEERGAARD, A. de. A comparative study of farm nutrient budgets and nutrient flows of certified organic and non-organic farms in China, Brazil and Egypt. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, v. 87, n. 3, p. 455-470, 2010. 16 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
|  |
| 146. | | WANDELLI, E. V.; ABREU, L. S. de; TAVARES, E. D.; BIANCHINI, F.; SILVA, A. P. da; BELTRAO, S. L. L.; FERREIRA, M. do S. G. Contributions of Embrapa to poverty eradication. In: COSTA, P. da; COSTA, J. R. da; WANDELLI, E. V.; BIANCHINI, F.; TAVARES, E. D. (Ed.). No poverty: contributions of Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2020. p. 27-37. (Sustainable Development Goals, 1).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura; Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 147. | | WANDELLI, E. V.; ABREU, L. S. de; TAVARES, E. D.; BIANCHINI, F.; SILVA, A. P. da; BELTRAO, S. L. L.; FERREIRA, M. do S. G. Contribuições da Embrapa para a erradicação da pobreza. In: COSTA, P. da; COSTA, J. R. da; WANDELLI, E. V.; BIANCHINI, F.; TAVARES, E. D. (Ed.). Erradicação da pobreza: contribuições da Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2018. Cap. 3. E-book. (Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 1).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Ocidental; Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Pesca e Aquicultura; Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 149. | | VALARINI, P. J.; ABREU, L. S. de; LIMA, M. A. de; NEVES, M. C.; CHAIM, A.; FILIZOLA, H. F.; TOLEDO, L. G. de; SILVA, A. S. Monitoramento e avaliação de impacto ambiental de agrotóxicos em agricultura irrigada: estudo de caso. In: CONGRESSO NACIONAL DE IRRIGAÇÃO E DRENAGEM, 11., Fortaleza. Anais... Fortaleza: ABID, 2001. p. 218-224. p. 218-224| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 150. | | FERREIRA, J.; BRIENZA JUNIOR, S.; BATISTELLA, M.; ABREU, L. S. de; CELESTINO, P.; MATTOS, L. M. de; XAUD, M. R.; SILVA, M. R. da; BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; PINTO, E. de P.; MOUTINHO, P.; STACHETTI, G. R. Agroambiente network: ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon. In: SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL ADAPTACIÓN AL CAMBIO CLIMÁTICO: EL ROL DE LOS SERVICIOS ECOSISTÉMICOS, 2008, Turrialba. Resúmenes... Turrialba: CATIE; Belém, PA: CIFOR, 2008. p. 94. Título do evento em Inglês: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP "ADAPTATION FOR CLIMATE CHANGE: THE ROLE OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2008, Turrialba".| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental. |
| |
| 151. | | FERREIRA, J. N.; BRIENZA JUNIOR, S.; BATISTELLA, M.; ABREU, L. S. de; CELESTINO FILHO, P.; MATTOS, L. M. de; XAUD, M. R.; SILVA, M. R. da; BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; PINTO, E. de P.; MOUTINHO, P.; STACHETTI, G. Agroambiente network: ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon. In: ACES: A CONFERENCE ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2 USING SCIENCE FOR DECISION MAKING IN DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, Naples, FL. Abstract book... Gainesville: University of Florida, 2008. p. 46.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Territorial. |
| |
| 152. | | CORRALES, F. M.; CANUTO. J. C.; FERRAZ, J. M. G.; ABREU, L. S. de; RAMOS FILHO, L. O.; NEVES, M. C.; RAMOS, M. S. T. A. dos S.; MORICONI, W. Transferência de conhecimentos e de tecnologias de base agroecológica a partir da rede de unidades de referência na região leste do Estado de São Paulo. In: FÓRUM DE APRESENTAÇÃO DE RESULTADOS DE PESQUISA: AVANÇOS E OPORTUNIDADES, 1., 2014, Campinas. Anais... Jaguariúna: Embrapa Meio Ambiente, 2014. RE028. 4 p.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 153. | | PENTEADO, A. L.; PACKER, A. P. C.; CHAIM, A.; BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; TERAO, D.; PORTO, D. D.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALEGARIO, F. F.; JESUS, K. R. E. de; ABREU, L. S. de; WADT, L. G. R.; OLIVEIRA, P. de; BARIZON, R. R. M. Contaminação do meio rural e da produção. In: KIILL, L. H. P.; KATO, H. C. G. de A.; CALEGARIO, F. F. (Ed.). Saúde e bem-estar: contribuições da Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2018. E-book. (Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 3). ODS 3.| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| 154. | | PENTEADO, A. L.; PACKER, A. P.; CHAIM, A.; BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; TERAO, D.; PORTO, D. D.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALEGARIO, F. F.; JESUS, K. R. E. de; ABREU, L. S. de; WADT, L. G. R.; OLIVEIRA, P. de; BARIZON, R. R. M. Contaminação do meio rural e da produção. In: KIILL, L. H. P.; KATO, H. C. G. de A.; CALEGARIO, F. F. (Ed.). Saúde e bem-estar: contribuições da Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2018. E-book. (Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável, 3). Cap. 4. p. 55-71| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente. |
| |
| 155. | | PENTEADO, A. L.; PACKER, A. P.; CHAIM, A.; BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; TERAO, D.; PORTO, D. D.; RODRIGUES, G. S.; CALEGARIO, F. F.; JESUS, K. R. E. de; ABREU, L. S. de; WADT, L. G. R.; OLIVEIRA, P. de; BARIZON, R. R. M. Contamination of rural environment and production. In: KIILL, L. H. P.; KATO, H. C. de A.; CALEGARIO, F. F. (Ed.). Good health and well-being: contributions of Embrapa. Brasília, DF: Embrapa, 2020. cap. 4, p. 37-46. (Sustainable Development Goals, 3).| Biblioteca(s): Embrapa Meio Ambiente; Embrapa Semiárido. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 155 | |
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental; Embrapa Territorial. |
|
Data corrente: |
10/03/2009 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
10/05/2024 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Resumo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
FERREIRA, J. N.; BRIENZA JUNIOR, S.; BATISTELLA, M.; ABREU, L. S. de; CELESTINO FILHO, P.; MATTOS, L. M. de; XAUD, M. R.; SILVA, M. R. da; BUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.; PINTO, E. de P.; MOUTINHO, P.; STACHETTI, G. |
|
Afiliação: |
JOICE NUNES FERREIRA, CPATU; SILVIO BRIENZA JUNIOR, CPATU; MATEUS BATISTELLA, CNPM; LUCIMAR SANTIAGO DE ABREU, CNPMA; PEDRO CELESTINO FILHO, CPATU; LUCIANO MANSOR DE MATTOS, CNPMA; MARISTELA RAMALHO XAUD, CPAF-RR; MARCOS R. DA SILVA, IPAM; CLAUDIO CESAR DE A BUSCHINELLI, CNPMA; ERIKA DE PAULA PINTO, IPAM; PAULO MOUTINHO, IPAM; GERALDO STACHETTI, IPAM. |
|
Título: |
Agroambiente network: ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2008 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: ACES: A CONFERENCE ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2 USING SCIENCE FOR DECISION MAKING IN DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, Naples, FL. Abstract book... Gainesville: University of Florida, 2008. |
|
Páginas: |
p. 46. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
Family farms are by far the most numerous component of the agricultural sector in the Brazilian Amazon. However socially vital for the development of the region, these small landholdings? agricultural and cattle ranching activities frequently overdraw and degrade natural resources, threatening important ecosystem services. Predominant agricultural practices have been marked by shifting cultivation, with intense use of fire and low productivity, causing high rate of destruction of natural forests. These current production patterns have not been able to alleviate poverty in many local communities, calling for changes in land use planning and agricultural management strategies toward more sustainable practices. Agroambiente is a research network from Embrapa and collaborators committed to investigate alternative agricultural practices for the maintenance of ecosystems services in the Brazilian Amazon. The network was firstly created to offer scientific support to a Government Program for ecosystem services compensation to family farmers (Proambiente Program), but has been expanding its scope to integrate social and environmental scientists focusing their studies mainly on: factors influencing provision of environmental services; methods for assessing ecosystem health status; management practices with lower impact on the environment; land use changes and market-based mechanisms for poverty alleviation through ecosystem services. Current research activities and their respective methodologies are: 1) Links between social perspectives and agricultural management decisions, carried out by interviews with land owners; 2) Search and validation of innovative production systems applied by farmers assessing inputs and productivity rates in different management conditions; 3) Construction of indices for assessment of ecosystem health in rural establishments through the development of an evaluation system (Ecocert- Proambiente); 4) Management alternatives for fire risk and accidental burnings abatement; 5) Evaluation of land use/land cover dynamics based on Landsat TM images and land use histories by interviews with the farmers; 6) Evaluation of carbon sequestration potential by estimating carbon stocks in different compartments of secondary forests; and 6) Appraisal of available market-based mechanisms for carbon schemes. Some rural communities have already been involved in sustainable agriculture practices such as agroforestry systems and fair trade (e.g. south western Brazilian Amazon). Production systems adopting no-till and no-fire may have initially lower productivity than traditional systems, but some viable management alternatives have been found. The Ecocert-Proambiente system was developed and validated with 62 indicators that covered social, economic, environmental and property management aspects. Avoided deforestation and maintenance of secondary forests were more feasible alternatives in terms of cost-benefit than the CDM negotiations from the establishment of agroforestry systems. Considering this scenario, estimatives in secondary forests of Pará state indicated aboveground biomass varying from 22 to 247 Mg ha-1. Altogether, these results are important to guide public policies in Brazil towards environmental conservation and social benefits in the Amazon. MenosFamily farms are by far the most numerous component of the agricultural sector in the Brazilian Amazon. However socially vital for the development of the region, these small landholdings? agricultural and cattle ranching activities frequently overdraw and degrade natural resources, threatening important ecosystem services. Predominant agricultural practices have been marked by shifting cultivation, with intense use of fire and low productivity, causing high rate of destruction of natural forests. These current production patterns have not been able to alleviate poverty in many local communities, calling for changes in land use planning and agricultural management strategies toward more sustainable practices. Agroambiente is a research network from Embrapa and collaborators committed to investigate alternative agricultural practices for the maintenance of ecosystems services in the Brazilian Amazon. The network was firstly created to offer scientific support to a Government Program for ecosystem services compensation to family farmers (Proambiente Program), but has been expanding its scope to integrate social and environmental scientists focusing their studies mainly on: factors influencing provision of environmental services; methods for assessing ecosystem health status; management practices with lower impact on the environment; land use changes and market-based mechanisms for poverty alleviation through ecosystem services. Current research activities and their respective m... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Agroambiente; Sistemas dinâmicos. |
|
Thesagro: |
Agricultura; Tomada de Decisão. |
|
Thesaurus NAL: |
Amazonia. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/107275/1/2317.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 04342nam a2200313 a 4500
001 2067073
005 2024-05-10
008 2008 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aFERREIRA, J. N.
245 $aAgroambiente network$becosystem services in agricultural landscapes in the Brazilian Amazon.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: ACES: A CONFERENCE ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2 USING SCIENCE FOR DECISION MAKING IN DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, Naples, FL. Abstract book... Gainesville: University of Florida$c2008
300 $ap. 46.
520 $aFamily farms are by far the most numerous component of the agricultural sector in the Brazilian Amazon. However socially vital for the development of the region, these small landholdings? agricultural and cattle ranching activities frequently overdraw and degrade natural resources, threatening important ecosystem services. Predominant agricultural practices have been marked by shifting cultivation, with intense use of fire and low productivity, causing high rate of destruction of natural forests. These current production patterns have not been able to alleviate poverty in many local communities, calling for changes in land use planning and agricultural management strategies toward more sustainable practices. Agroambiente is a research network from Embrapa and collaborators committed to investigate alternative agricultural practices for the maintenance of ecosystems services in the Brazilian Amazon. The network was firstly created to offer scientific support to a Government Program for ecosystem services compensation to family farmers (Proambiente Program), but has been expanding its scope to integrate social and environmental scientists focusing their studies mainly on: factors influencing provision of environmental services; methods for assessing ecosystem health status; management practices with lower impact on the environment; land use changes and market-based mechanisms for poverty alleviation through ecosystem services. Current research activities and their respective methodologies are: 1) Links between social perspectives and agricultural management decisions, carried out by interviews with land owners; 2) Search and validation of innovative production systems applied by farmers assessing inputs and productivity rates in different management conditions; 3) Construction of indices for assessment of ecosystem health in rural establishments through the development of an evaluation system (Ecocert- Proambiente); 4) Management alternatives for fire risk and accidental burnings abatement; 5) Evaluation of land use/land cover dynamics based on Landsat TM images and land use histories by interviews with the farmers; 6) Evaluation of carbon sequestration potential by estimating carbon stocks in different compartments of secondary forests; and 6) Appraisal of available market-based mechanisms for carbon schemes. Some rural communities have already been involved in sustainable agriculture practices such as agroforestry systems and fair trade (e.g. south western Brazilian Amazon). Production systems adopting no-till and no-fire may have initially lower productivity than traditional systems, but some viable management alternatives have been found. The Ecocert-Proambiente system was developed and validated with 62 indicators that covered social, economic, environmental and property management aspects. Avoided deforestation and maintenance of secondary forests were more feasible alternatives in terms of cost-benefit than the CDM negotiations from the establishment of agroforestry systems. Considering this scenario, estimatives in secondary forests of Pará state indicated aboveground biomass varying from 22 to 247 Mg ha-1. Altogether, these results are important to guide public policies in Brazil towards environmental conservation and social benefits in the Amazon.
650 $aAmazonia
650 $aAgricultura
650 $aTomada de Decisão
653 $aAgroambiente
653 $aSistemas dinâmicos
700 1 $aBRIENZA JUNIOR, S.
700 1 $aBATISTELLA, M.
700 1 $aABREU, L. S. de
700 1 $aCELESTINO FILHO, P.
700 1 $aMATTOS, L. M. de
700 1 $aXAUD, M. R.
700 1 $aSILVA, M. R. da
700 1 $aBUSCHINELLI, C. C. de A.
700 1 $aPINTO, E. de P.
700 1 $aMOUTINHO, P.
700 1 $aSTACHETTI, G.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Amazônia Oriental (CPATU) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
