| |
|
|
|
Registro Completo |
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
|
Data corrente: |
14/10/2010 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
30/06/2023 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
|
Autoria: |
PEDROSO, A. de F.; NUSSIO, L. G.; RODRIGUES, A. de A.; SANTOS, F. A. P; MOURÃO, G. B.; BARIONI JUNIOR, W. |
|
Afiliação: |
ANDRE DE FARIA PEDROSO, CPPSE; LUIZ GUSTAVO NUSSIO, ESALQ/USP; ARMANDO DE ANDRADE RODRIGUES, PESQUISADOR APOSENTADO DO CPPSE; FLÁVIO ALGUSTO PORTELA SANTOS, ESALQ/PIRACICABA; GERSON BARRETO MOURÃO, ESALQ/PIRACICABA; WALDOMIRO BARIONI JUNIOR, CPPSE. |
|
Título: |
Performance of dairy cows fed rations produced with sugarcane silages treated with additives or fresh sugarcane |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2010 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 39, n. 9, p. 1889-1893, 2010 |
|
Idioma: |
Português |
|
Conteúdo: |
An experiment was performed aiming at evaluating the performance of dairy cows fed sugarcane silages treated with additives compared to cows fed fresh forage. Twenty-four Holstein cows were grouped in blocks of three cows, according to parity order and milk production level, in multiple 3 × 3 Latin Square design to evaluate three types of ration (63% roughage and 37% concentrate in dry matter - DM): ration with silage treated with urea (5.0 g/kg of fresh forage - FF) + sodium benzoate (0.5 g/kg FF); ration with silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri (5 × 104 cfu/g FF); ration with fresh sugarcane. Each evaluation period consisted of two weeks for adaptation and one week for data collection. Cows fed rations with silages treated with urea + benzoate and L. buchneri showed lower DM intake (18.5 vs 21.4 kg/day) and lower milk production (17.4 vs 18.6 kg/day) in comparison to those fed fresh forage ration. Fat content was higher in the milk of cows fed silage inoculated with L. buchneri compared to cows in the fresh forage group resulting in similar 3.5% fat corrected milk (FCM) among cows in both groups. Cows fed ration with silage treated with urea + benzoate presented intermediate fat content in milk but inferior FCM production compared to animals fed fresh sugarcane. Feed efficiency (kg FCM/kg DMI) was higher for cows fed ration produced with the inoculated silage (0.95), intermediate for cows that received silage treated with the combination of chemical additives (0.91) and lower for cows fed the ration with fresh sugarcane (0.83). MenosAn experiment was performed aiming at evaluating the performance of dairy cows fed sugarcane silages treated with additives compared to cows fed fresh forage. Twenty-four Holstein cows were grouped in blocks of three cows, according to parity order and milk production level, in multiple 3 × 3 Latin Square design to evaluate three types of ration (63% roughage and 37% concentrate in dry matter - DM): ration with silage treated with urea (5.0 g/kg of fresh forage - FF) + sodium benzoate (0.5 g/kg FF); ration with silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri (5 × 104 cfu/g FF); ration with fresh sugarcane. Each evaluation period consisted of two weeks for adaptation and one week for data collection. Cows fed rations with silages treated with urea + benzoate and L. buchneri showed lower DM intake (18.5 vs 21.4 kg/day) and lower milk production (17.4 vs 18.6 kg/day) in comparison to those fed fresh forage ration. Fat content was higher in the milk of cows fed silage inoculated with L. buchneri compared to cows in the fresh forage group resulting in similar 3.5% fat corrected milk (FCM) among cows in both groups. Cows fed ration with silage treated with urea + benzoate presented intermediate fat content in milk but inferior FCM production compared to animals fed fresh sugarcane. Feed efficiency (kg FCM/kg DMI) was higher for cows fed ration produced with the inoculated silage (0.95), intermediate for cows that received silage treated with the combination of chemical additives (0.... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
Feed efficiency. |
|
Thesaurus Nal: |
milk composition; milk production; sodium benzoate; urea. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
L Ciência Animal e Produtos de Origem Animal |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/23607/1/9269.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02307naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1864164
005 2023-06-30
008 2010 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aPEDROSO, A. de F.
245 $aPerformance of dairy cows fed rations produced with sugarcane silages treated with additives or fresh sugarcane$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2010
520 $aAn experiment was performed aiming at evaluating the performance of dairy cows fed sugarcane silages treated with additives compared to cows fed fresh forage. Twenty-four Holstein cows were grouped in blocks of three cows, according to parity order and milk production level, in multiple 3 × 3 Latin Square design to evaluate three types of ration (63% roughage and 37% concentrate in dry matter - DM): ration with silage treated with urea (5.0 g/kg of fresh forage - FF) + sodium benzoate (0.5 g/kg FF); ration with silage inoculated with Lactobacillus buchneri (5 × 104 cfu/g FF); ration with fresh sugarcane. Each evaluation period consisted of two weeks for adaptation and one week for data collection. Cows fed rations with silages treated with urea + benzoate and L. buchneri showed lower DM intake (18.5 vs 21.4 kg/day) and lower milk production (17.4 vs 18.6 kg/day) in comparison to those fed fresh forage ration. Fat content was higher in the milk of cows fed silage inoculated with L. buchneri compared to cows in the fresh forage group resulting in similar 3.5% fat corrected milk (FCM) among cows in both groups. Cows fed ration with silage treated with urea + benzoate presented intermediate fat content in milk but inferior FCM production compared to animals fed fresh sugarcane. Feed efficiency (kg FCM/kg DMI) was higher for cows fed ration produced with the inoculated silage (0.95), intermediate for cows that received silage treated with the combination of chemical additives (0.91) and lower for cows fed the ration with fresh sugarcane (0.83).
650 $amilk composition
650 $amilk production
650 $asodium benzoate
650 $aurea
653 $aFeed efficiency
700 1 $aNUSSIO, L. G.
700 1 $aRODRIGUES, A. de A.
700 1 $aSANTOS, F. A. P
700 1 $aMOURÃO, G. B.
700 1 $aBARIONI JUNIOR, W.
773 $tRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia$gv. 39, n. 9, p. 1889-1893, 2010
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
|
Registro Completo
|
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves. |
|
Data corrente: |
16/04/2015 |
|
Data da última atualização: |
05/08/2019 |
|
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Anais de Congresso |
|
Autoria: |
ROBIN, P.; AMAND, G.; AUBERT, C.; BABELA, N.; BRACHET, A.; BECKMANS, D.; BURTON, C.; CANART, B.; CELLIER, P.; DOLLÉ, J. B.; DONG, H. M.; DURIF, M.; EHRLACHER, A.; EREN ÖZCAN, S.; ESPAGNOL, S.; GAUTIER, S.; GUINGAND, N.; GUINZIOU, F.; HARTUNG, E.; HASSOUANA, M.; LANDRAIN, P.; LEE, I. B.; LELEU, C.; LI, Y. S.; LIAO, X. D.; LOUBET, B.; LOYON, L.; LUTH; NICKS, B.; OLIVEIRA, P. A. V. de; PONCHANT, P.; POWERS, W.; RAMONET, Y.; SOMMER, S. G.; THIARD, J.; WANG, K. Y.; XIN, H.; YOUSSEF, A. |
|
Afiliação: |
1INRA, UMR SAS, Rannes, France.; ITAVI, Poulfrangan, France.; ITAVI, Poulfrangan, France.; 1 INRA, UMR SAS, Rannes, France.; IDELE, Arras, France.; M3-BIORES, K. U. Leuven, Belgium.; IRSTEA, Rennes, France.; Univ. Liège, Belgium.; 1 INRA, UMR SAS, Rannes, France.; M3-BIORES, K. U. Leuven, Belgium.; CAS, Beijing, P.R. China.; INERIS, Paris, France.; ITAVI, Poulfrangan, France.; M3-BIORES, K. U. Leuven, Belgium.; IFIP, Le Rheu, France.; INERIS, Paris, France.; IFIP, Le Rheu, France.; IRSTEA, Rennes, France.; Univ Kiel, Germany.; 1 INRA, UMR SAS, Rannes, France.; CRAB, Rennes, France.; Univ. Seoul, South Korea.; 1 INRA, UMR SAS, Rannes, France.; Univ. Jiao Tong, Shanghai, P.R. China.; SCAU, Guandong, P.R. China.; 1 INRA, UMR SAS, Rannes, France.; IRSTEA, Rennes, France.; 1 INRA, UMR SAS, Rannes, France.; Univ. Liège , Belgium.; PAULO ARMANDO VICTORIA DE OLIVEIRA, CNPSA; ITAVI, Poulfrangan, France.; Univ. Liège , Belgium.; Univ. Michigan, U.S.A.; Univ. South Denmark, Denmark.; 1 INRA, UMR SAS, Rannes, France.; Zhejiang University, P.R. China.; Iowa State Univ., U.S.A.; M3-BIORES, K. U. Leuven, Belgium. |
|
Título: |
Reference procedures for the measurement of gaseous emissions from livestock houses and stores of animal manure. |
|
Ano de publicação: |
2013 |
|
Fonte/Imprenta: |
In: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMISSIONS OF GAS AND DUST FROM LIVESTOCK, 2012, Saint-Malo. [Proceedings?]. Saint-Brieuc: INRA; Le Rheu: IFIP-Institut du Porc, 2013. EMILI 2012. |
|
Idioma: |
Inglês |
|
Notas: |
Edited by Mélynda Hassouna and Nadine Guingand. |
|
Conteúdo: |
In the ten years before the EMILI 2012 symposium, gaseous losses from animal farms became increasingly important in the m edia. The paradox of this tendency was the great number of publications, scientific or not, even though the emissions of most animal farms had never been measured. Therefor e, the development of reference tools to measure greenhouse gas and ammonia emissio ns was important. Such tools allow recognition and remuneration of the best pract ices and equipment. Accordingly, ADEME funded an international project associating several research and development organizations involved with the animal production chain. The project proposed an initial set of 18 procedures to measure ammonia and greenho use gas emissions from animal houses and manure stores. These were adapted to the diversity of animal farms found throughout the world. Some methods were compared duri ng a ?building? and a ?liquid manure? experiment. Results showed a high difference among methods (ca. 80%), much higher than the estimated uncertainty. Associat ing independent emission measurements, together with a mass balance of the system, is necessary for the reliability of further results. However, previously published references lack uncertainty estimates of measurements that conform to GUM 2008. In the coming years, this is one of the major concerns for measuring emission factor s. Uncertainty estimates should depend on the measurand (temporal: hourly, per batch, yearly; spatial: animal, house, national) and include the uncertainties associated with system representativity and temporal interpolation. MenosIn the ten years before the EMILI 2012 symposium, gaseous losses from animal farms became increasingly important in the m edia. The paradox of this tendency was the great number of publications, scientific or not, even though the emissions of most animal farms had never been measured. Therefor e, the development of reference tools to measure greenhouse gas and ammonia emissio ns was important. Such tools allow recognition and remuneration of the best pract ices and equipment. Accordingly, ADEME funded an international project associating several research and development organizations involved with the animal production chain. The project proposed an initial set of 18 procedures to measure ammonia and greenho use gas emissions from animal houses and manure stores. These were adapted to the diversity of animal farms found throughout the world. Some methods were compared duri ng a ?building? and a ?liquid manure? experiment. Results showed a high difference among methods (ca. 80%), much higher than the estimated uncertainty. Associat ing independent emission measurements, together with a mass balance of the system, is necessary for the reliability of further results. However, previously published references lack uncertainty estimates of measurements that conform to GUM 2008. In the coming years, this is one of the major concerns for measuring emission factor s. Uncertainty estimates should depend on the measurand (temporal: hourly, per batch, yearly; spatial: animal, house, nat... Mostrar Tudo |
|
Palavras-Chave: |
EMILI 2012. |
|
Categoria do assunto: |
-- |
|
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/122431/1/final7486.pdf
|
|
Marc: |
LEADER 03244nam a2200577 a 4500
001 2013667
005 2019-08-05
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aROBIN, P.
245 $aReference procedures for the measurement of gaseous emissions from livestock houses and stores of animal manure.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON EMISSIONS OF GAS AND DUST FROM LIVESTOCK, 2012, Saint-Malo. [Proceedings?]. Saint-Brieuc: INRA; Le Rheu: IFIP-Institut du Porc, 2013. EMILI 2012.$c2012
500 $aEdited by Mélynda Hassouna and Nadine Guingand.
520 $aIn the ten years before the EMILI 2012 symposium, gaseous losses from animal farms became increasingly important in the m edia. The paradox of this tendency was the great number of publications, scientific or not, even though the emissions of most animal farms had never been measured. Therefor e, the development of reference tools to measure greenhouse gas and ammonia emissio ns was important. Such tools allow recognition and remuneration of the best pract ices and equipment. Accordingly, ADEME funded an international project associating several research and development organizations involved with the animal production chain. The project proposed an initial set of 18 procedures to measure ammonia and greenho use gas emissions from animal houses and manure stores. These were adapted to the diversity of animal farms found throughout the world. Some methods were compared duri ng a ?building? and a ?liquid manure? experiment. Results showed a high difference among methods (ca. 80%), much higher than the estimated uncertainty. Associat ing independent emission measurements, together with a mass balance of the system, is necessary for the reliability of further results. However, previously published references lack uncertainty estimates of measurements that conform to GUM 2008. In the coming years, this is one of the major concerns for measuring emission factor s. Uncertainty estimates should depend on the measurand (temporal: hourly, per batch, yearly; spatial: animal, house, national) and include the uncertainties associated with system representativity and temporal interpolation.
653 $aEMILI 2012
700 1 $aAMAND, G.
700 1 $aAUBERT, C.
700 1 $aBABELA, N.
700 1 $aBRACHET, A.
700 1 $aBECKMANS, D.
700 1 $aBURTON, C.
700 1 $aCANART, B.
700 1 $aCELLIER, P.
700 1 $aDOLLÉ, J. B.
700 1 $aDONG, H. M.
700 1 $aDURIF, M.
700 1 $aEHRLACHER, A.
700 1 $aEREN ÖZCAN, S.
700 1 $aESPAGNOL, S.
700 1 $aGAUTIER, S.
700 1 $aGUINGAND, N.
700 1 $aGUINZIOU, F.
700 1 $aHARTUNG, E.
700 1 $aHASSOUANA, M.
700 1 $aLANDRAIN, P.
700 1 $aLEE, I. B.
700 1 $aLELEU, C.
700 1 $aLI, Y. S.
700 1 $aLIAO, X. D.
700 1 $aLOUBET, B.
700 1 $aLOYON, L.
700 1 $aLUTH
700 1 $aNICKS, B.
700 1 $aOLIVEIRA, P. A. V. de
700 1 $aPONCHANT, P.
700 1 $aPOWERS, W.
700 1 $aRAMONET, Y.
700 1 $aSOMMER, S. G.
700 1 $aTHIARD, J.
700 1 $aWANG, K. Y.
700 1 $aXIN, H.
700 1 $aYOUSSEF, A.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original: |
Embrapa Suínos e Aves (CNPSA) |
|
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
| Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|
